
Kashmir conflict: Pakistan calls for peace with India
Amid rising tensions over Kashmir, Pakistan's envoy to South Africa has called for dialogue while condemning India's recent air and drone strikes.
Pakistan Markazi Muslim League activists take part in a rally in Karachi this week marking the country's national day in commemoration of the Chagai-I and Chagai-II series of nuclear tests. Picture: Rizwan Tabassum / AFP
'We don't want war, we want peace with India, but we will always defend our sovereignty and our territorial integrity against any invasion,' says Pakistan's acting high commissioner to South Africa, Fahad Amjad.
He was reacting to the recent war between India and Pakistan over Indian-administered Kashmir.
Amjad was explaining Pakistan's position regarding what Islamabad called India's 'unprovoked and unjustified attacks' using coordinated missile, air and drone strikes on multiple locations inside Pakistan recently on 6 and 7 May.
Areas affected by the attack included Sialkot, Shakargarh, Muridke, Bahawalpur, Kotli and Muzaffarabad. The conflict began with alleged terrorist attacks on tourists on 22 April, killing 26 people.
But Amjad said India blamed the attack on Pakistan. The disputed territory is the subject of various UN Security Council (UNSC) Resolutions.
Long-standing dispute rooted in history and religion
The core issue stems from a long-standing territorial dispute between India and Pakistan, dating back to the 1947 partition of India.
Both countries claim the entire region, but control only parts of it, leading to conflict and ongoing tensions.
The issue is further complicated by the region's Muslim-majority population and the unresolved question of self-determination, which has been a major point of contention between India and Pakistan.
Since 2019, India has taken over the area as part of its union territory. But Amjad said India was not allowed to act unilaterally regarding the area and the final decision lay with the Kashmiri people through a plebiscite and via the UNSC.
ALSO READ: Six killed in school bus bombing in SW Pakistan
Water treaty dispute deepens mistrust
The 1960 Water Treaty between the two countries, which was brokered by the World Bank, often also fuelled the conflict.
India accused Pakistan of unilaterally suspending the treaty, which governs the use of water sources that flow between the two nations.
'We are dependent for our water needs on those rivers which come from India-controlled territories.
'We can't do it unilaterally because the treaty is guaranteed by the World Bank, and the treaty has a mechanism that, in case of a dispute, we can refer it to a third party, like arbitration, or the World Bank can decide about it.
'We will always follow the steps that we have in terms of the treaty,' Amjad said.
Civilian casualties and retaliation raise alarm
The situation was also exacerbated by the pro-government Indian media's narrative that 'we should crush Pakistan' and 'we should attack Pakistan', he said.
On 6-7 May, India hit between seven and eight targets in Pakistan. Between 20 and 22 people died in the attacks on the areas that India described as terrorist areas.
But according to Amjad, most of the victims were civilians, including children. Pakistan retaliated by shooting down some of the fighter jets that India used in the attacks. 'In our response we said we will not target any civilians but only the military installations.'
The confrontation between the two countries continued for two to three days. It subsided when various international players engaged with the leaders of both countries.
ALSO READ: India and Pakistan agree to ceasefire after days of attacks
A ceasefire brokered by the US was achieved. 'As the policy of our government, we want to continue the ceasefire. But the Jammu-Kashmir issue remained unresolved.'
Calls for South African mediation and global peace effort
During a seminar with civil society organisations in Sandton on Wednesday night some suggested that South Africa, which championed the Palestinian cause in the ongoing Middle East war, should be involved in attempts to resolve the Pakistan-India Kashmir dispute.
They claimed South Africa had to fulfil Nelson Mandela's wish that the conflict should be resolved peacefully.
An international solution is needed, including taking the issue to the International Court of Justice. Zohra Kathrada, a niece of the late ANC stalwart Ahmed Kathrada, said as a family, they always stood with countries that were occupied.
'We stand in solidarity with any occupied country,' Kathrada said. Salman Khan said the Indian occupation of Jammu-Kashmir was as important as the occupation of Palestine by Israel. Fatima Domingo, of the SA Kashmir Action Group, said Pakistan response to India's attacks was not aggression, but self-defence.
She condemned India for allegedly monopolising the water resources in the region. Speaking at the seminar, Amjad said Pakistan was ready for dialogue with India on all the issues, including Jammu-Kashmir.
'We want to live in peace'
'We also welcome any kind of mediation from a friendly country. We want to live in peace. We don't want war with any country.
'First, on this old issue, we will not attack. But if India attacks us, then we will have to respond. Second, we believe in the supremacy of international law, which we respect. We also expect that other countries should follow the policies, rules and regulations of international law,' Amjad said.
He expressed concern that India would do it again. 'If something is done to Pakistan, we will respond to it.
'We also request that our international partners talk with India so that sense prevails and there are no confrontations. We want to resolve all issues with India through dialogue and in a peaceful manner.'
ALSO READ: Pakistan tests missile weapons system amid India standoff
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Court orders reconsideration of asylum for persecuted gay man
The court ruled that home affairs had to reconsider granting asylum status to a Chad citizen after he was persecuted in his country for being gay. Image: File A Muslim man who was imprisoned in Chad on grounds of his sexual orientation and fled to South Africa after he was released as he fears persecution, turned to court after home affairs officials here refused to grant him refugee status. The man, only identified as MA, on Friday headed to the urgent court at the Western Cape High Court, where he obtained a lifeline. He asked that the decision by the Refugee Status Determination Officer, in refusing his refugee status, be overturned. Judge Gayaat da Silva-Salie ordered that his application for asylum status had to be heard afresh, by another officer. The judge remarked that the reasons given by the officer for refusing his application were nonsensical. MA fled to South Africa to join his lover, a doctor working here. He explained that homosexuality is criminalised in his country of origin. He was arrested in Chad in September 2022, after which he was convicted on charges of homosexual activities and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment. On appeal, his sentence was reduced to 12 months with the option of paying a fine. He was released from prison in February 2023 and entered South Africa in May 2023, by way of a visitor's visa. He applied for asylum on a few occasions and his most recent interview was in September last year. While the reasons for refusing him asylum status formed part of the court proceedings, the judge remarked that they were unintelligible, irrational and failed to consider the applicable law. The officer also failed to consider the circumstances in Chad, in particular their position on homosexuality. MA submitted in support of his application for asylum that he fled Chad after being imprisoned solely for being a homosexual man. He further stated that his safety and freedom remain threatened in Chad, where homosexuality is a criminal offence. He also indicated that his family had disowned him and that he faces persecution both from the State and society at large in his home country. Home affairs, on the other hand, said he has not yet exhausted the internal remedies available to him and argued that he could return to that country. The department reasoned that the judiciary in Chad is independent, and that although homosexuality is criminalised, some courts had released offenders. Judge Da Silva-Salie found the arguments by the department 'rather problematic". 'It accepts the factual basis of criminalisation of homosexuality, with consequent criminal convictions and punishments in the applicant's home country of Chad, whilst simultaneously rejecting the credibility of the applicant's claim of fear of future persecution,' she said. She added that no attempt was made to test or evaluate the applicant's claim that his prior arrest, imprisonment, and societal ostracisation due to his homosexuality posed a continued threat. The judge said if the applicant returned to Chad, his position can only be worse if he continued his lifestyle as he would be already a convicted person of homosexual offences. She referred to the reason forwarded for refusing asylum as 'a characteristic of a sequence of illogical babble".

IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Mark Burns, Trump's top pastor, challenges genocide claims against white farmers in South Africa
Described as US President Donald Trump's top pastor, Mark Burns, is visiting southern Africa and has already been convinced that there is no genocide against white Afrikaner farmers in South Africa. Image: Timothy Bernard / Independent Newspapers Televangelist Mark Burns, described by Time magazine as US President Donald Trump's top pastor, is convinced that widespread claims that there is genocide of white farmers under way in South Africa are absolutely untrue. Burns is visiting southern Africa, and his trip has already helped him debunk allegations of genocide against white Afrikaner farmers. The founder and chief executive of the NOW television network has been invited by the global network of Muslim leaders, Concordia Forum, and its founder and president, Muddassar Ahmed, for an interfaith dialogue to continue bridging the gap between the two faiths and others around the world to promote peace, prosperity, and unity. Their mission is to promote peaceful situations around the world where there are conflicts. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Burns said he sees the strong ties between the United States and South Africa, which he indicated was a beautiful thing that he will get to take back home. 'Thank God, there is no conflict here in South Africa. Your government is clearly a powerful, stable nation. The big elephant in the room – the meeting that took place in the Oval Office between President Cyril Ramaphosa and Trump,' he said. Burns, who described Trump as his 'dear friend of 12/13 years', said the question being asked is: 'Is there white genocide happening in South Africa?' He added: 'As a peace mission that I have, is white genocide taking place, are white farmers being targeted or having their land taken away forcibly in this country? I have been just blown away by having great access to white Afrikaner farmers and those that represent farmers from around your entire country.' Burns said he has met small and commercial farmers and was able to meet with white business manufacturing owners and hear from their perspectives what is actually happening in South Africa. 'Not to my shock again, you were able to hear their perspectives. From their point of view, being white Afrikaners, there is absolutely no genocide or white genocide in South Africa. They believe Trump was fed erroneous information for whatever reason they don't know,' Burns explained. He said in his understanding, the farmers he met were all shocked to discover that such a thing as white genocide was happening in South Africa. 'From that point of view, they pivoted that there absolutely is a crime issue, there is a high murder rate, and many of them spoke about worrying about their safety, not because they are white but because they don't feel as protected as they should be,' Burns stated. He said he was informed in the meetings that over 5,200 murders had occurred in the last reporting quarter and that only 12 of them were related to farmers. 'And out of those 12, only three of them were white. You clearly see that based on those statistics, and this was given to me by a farmer, a white farmer, and that to me speaks extreme volumes,' he said. Releasing the 2024/25 fourth quarter crime statistics a week ago, Police Minister Senzo Mchunu said there were 5,727 murders in the three months between January and March this year. He said six attacks on rural communities were recorded. 'In principle, we do not categorise people by race, but in the context of claims of genocide of white people, we need to unpack the killings in this category. The two farm owners who were murdered during the fourth quarter were African and not white. Further to that, the two farm employees and one farm manager were also African – it is the one farm dweller that was white,' added Mchunu. Turning to key matters of trade between the US and South Africa, Burns said: 'This is a nation that we need to continue to partner with, this is a nation that is one of our important partners on the continent of Africa and that we ought to continue to strengthen that relationship and to do whatever it takes to make sure that we have good trading deals with each other.' His message back in his country will be 'come to South Africa, invest in South Africa. We have so much that we are similar'. Burns said the purpose of that is to create jobs here in South Africa, to entice more American investors to invest in South Africa. He also acknowledged that the AGOA (Africa Growth and Opportunity Act) Forum, scheduled to be held in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, in July, would be difficult, especially after Trump imposed 31% tariffs on goods imported from South Africa in April. Burns warned South Africa against remaining a member of the BRICS bloc of countries, including Brazil, Russia, India, and China, as well as its newest members, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. 'BRICS is a challenge, though, that needs to be addressed, and if I were advising your President Ramaphosa to remove that 'S' from the title BRICS immediately,' he said. According to Burns, while BRICS was initially established to enable access to different markets, the country should declare to Vladimir Putin (the Russian president) that it will not be a party to the devaluation of the US dollar and introduce a separate currency. BRICS also includes Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Nigeria, Thailand, Uganda, and Uzbekistan as partner countries.

IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
BRICS+ Series: China's Belt & Road Initiative is Advancing Ethiopia's Infrastructure
Ethiopia's strategic partnership with China under the Belt and Road Initiative exemplifies a new development model for the Global South, as it aligns with BRICS' vision of infrastructure-led growth and cooperative partnerships. A new narrative is unfolding in the Horn of Africa and it is one that defies the legacies of colonialism and reclaims Africa's right to development on its own terms. With its dynamic economy and rich history, Ethiopia has become a key player in China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). As BRICS+ expands its footprint with the joining of Ethiopia in 2024, the alignment that is between BRICS development goals and Chinese infrastructure investments is both inspiring and critical. Reimagining Development Through BRICS The BRICS bloc has always championed alternative models of development. These models challenge the conditions and ideological strings of the institutions in the Global North and emphasise sovereignty, mutual respect and practical cooperation. The BRICS framework calls for infrastructure-led development, financial independence from traditionally dominant Western lenders such as the World Bank and the IMF and equitable partnerships. Ethiopia's collaboration with China, particularly within the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), exemplifies the BRICS vision of fostering physical and digital infrastructure, strengthening South-South cooperation, and promoting industrial growth across the Global South. The BRI, therefore, extends beyond a singular Chinese endeavor, embodying the core principles of the BRICS economic partnership. The Addis Ababa-Djibouti Railway: Steel Tracks to Sovereignty One of the most symbolic projects under the BRI of China is the Addis Ababa– Djibouti railway. Completed in 2016 with Chinese engineering and financing, the 750-kilometre electrified railway that connects landlocked Ethiopia to Djibouti's Port– the lifeline for over 95% of Ethiopia's exports and imports. This railway has significantly reduced the transport time from three days to less than 12 hours, improving trade efficiency, cutting costs and reshaping the architecture of logistics within the region. Despite "debt trap" criticisms of Chinese infrastructure investments, Ethiopia's experience with the Belt and Road Initiative offers a counter-narrative. The operational Addis Ababa–Djibouti Railway serves as a crucial element in Ethiopia's economic development. Instead of defaulting, Ethiopia successfully negotiated debt restructuring with China in 2023, demonstrating a cooperative and flexible partnership unlike the strict austerity measures often imposed by Western creditors. BRICS and Ethiopia: A Symbiotic Vision Ethiopia's 2024 entry into BRICS+ offers new opportunities for funding, technology exchange, and strategic partnerships. The New Development Bank (NDB), a BRICS initiative designed as an alternative to the World Bank, is now positioned to finance increased infrastructure development in East Africa. The NDB's lending approach is specifically designed for developing nations, prioritizing sustainability and local involvement—principles often overlooked by conventional financial institutions. For Ethiopia, this is a development model that is not only tailored to its unique challenges, but is also embedded in a bigger Global South coalition. The 10 year development plan of Ethiopia– centered on energy generation, industrial parks and digital transformation– emphasises BRICS' prioritisation of inclusive and high impact development. China financing Ethiopia's Industrial Parks in Adama and Hawassa, for example, has created thousands of jobs, especially for women, and it has also linked Ethiopia into global supply chains without the risk of compromising local control. Ethiopia as a BRICS Beacon in Africa Ethiopia's increasing symbolic and strategic importance within the expanding BRICS framework is evident. As one of Africa's most populous countries, a significant diplomatic center hosting the African Union, and a rising industrial force, Ethiopia's engagement with both the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and BRICS is a conscious decision. This reflects Ethiopia's strategic preference for infrastructure-driven development, South-South partnerships, and a multipolar world order, moving away from reliance on aid and traditional neoliberal approaches. Amidst global inequality, climate instability, and geopolitical changes, the Global South, exemplified by countries like Ethiopia, is moving beyond passively receiving development aid. It is actively shaping its own path, redefining progress, and building resilience. Platforms like BRICS and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) are facilitating this shift, marking a new era of agency for Africa.A Future Built on CollaborationThe Ethiopia-China-BRICS alliance offers a compelling alternative to traditional development models in 2025. It demonstrates that development is a locally driven, negotiated process rooted in the needs of the people, rather than a uniform approach dictated by Western powers. Ethiopia's experience with the Belt and Road Initiative, especially as more Global South nations join BRICS and align with it, demonstrates that infrastructure development can be a source of liberation and that South-led development, fostered through empowering partnerships, ultimately benefits the global community. Ethiopia's experience exemplifies a BRICS-supported development model for the Global South, suggesting a broader renaissance across these nations. Written By: *Dr Iqbal Survé Past chairman of the BRICS Business Council and co-chairman of the BRICS Media Forum and the BRNN *Sesona Mdlokovana Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group UAE & African Specialist **The Views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Independent Media or IOL. ** MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE ** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter for daily BRICS+ updates