Superannuation 'mistake' slugs Aussies of thousands of dollars: 'Drain those funds'
Thousands of Rest Super members have unknowingly been paying insurance premiums for months due to a system error. It's the latest bungle to hit the $4.1 trillion superannuation sector, which is currently under heavy scrutiny from regulators.
Rest Super has written to around 2,500 members who have been wrongly paying insurance premiums since June last year. These were members who had either opted out of having insurance cover or previously had their insurance cancelled.
A Rest Super spokesperson told Yahoo Finance the error impacted a small number of uninsured members and said the error was 'addressed quickly' once identified.
RELATED
Major superannuation change for Aussies as $4.1 trillion industry comes under scrutiny: 'Long overdue'
AustralianSuper under major scrutiny as $4.1 trillion industry faces big changes
Aussie mum's $1,500 warning after getting 'stupidly high' bill: 'Question everything'
'Rest wrote to the impacted members to inform them of this mistake, and advised them how to cancel the insurance and have any premiums refunded,' the spokesperson said.
'Rest's approach is to honour any insurance coverage provided in error for a number of reasons, including in case any claims arise.'
Under the law, super funds will cancel insurance on inactive super accounts that haven't received contributions for at least 16 months.
Rest Super has its own rules around cancellation and may cancel it for accounts that have been inactive for 13 continuous months.Rest Super said it had alerted less than 2,500 of the impacted customers about the error.
'We made a mistake with your instance, but it's fixed now,' Rest told customers in a letter sent last month.
'Under the Rest Super insurance policy, whenever a member loses their insurance cover, we offer members 28 days from the date of cancellation to contribute to have the insurance cover reinstated.'
Due to a 'system error', the super fund said it received a contribution to certain member's accounts outside the 28-day period and restarted their insurance in error.
'This has resulted in you paying for insurance that shouldn't have been added to your account,' the letter said.
Impacted members are then advised they will keep paying the added fees and retain their insurance cover unless they opt out.
'If you no longer want the insurance cover we've reinstated, we can cancel it and refund the premiums. You need to let us know within 35 days of the date of this letter if you want us to do this,' the fund wrote.
The letter has been shared online, with one unhappy member claiming they had purposefully opted out of insurance only to be slugged with the added premiums.
The member argued it wasn't right to put the onus back on members to 'opt out' of insurance cover.
'They are not going to refund the charges and will keep charging for a policy you don't know you have (and therefore won't claim against) unless you contact them within 35 days,' they wrote.
Another Aussie called the decision to offer refunds as an opt in, rather than an opt out, 'a bit shady'.
'It should be refunded. Even if it is an old dormant account, it doesn't give an insurance company the right to drain those funds by 'providing' a service that no one knows about or even asked for,' one said.
Others argued it was beneficial that members could retain insurance cover that they might not otherwise be eligible for.
The superannuation industry is currently facing scrutiny from regulators.
Cbus is currently being sued by ASIC over allegations it failed to process more than 10,000 claims for death and disability payments in a timely manner.
The corporate watchdog is also reportedly investigating AustralianSuper for taking too long to pay out death benefits.
AustralianSuper, which is the country's largest super fund, announced in December that it would repay $4.2 million to deceased customer's loved ones as compensation for not resolving claims within the fund's four-month target.
The government has announced it will legislate new mandatory service standards for super funds. The standards will initially focus on improving slow payment of death benefits and other insurance claims, along with improving communication with members.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dollar slides on easing trade tensions, Fed expectations
By Rae Wee SINGAPORE (Reuters) -The dollar slid on Thursday on further signs that U.S. President Donald Trump may adopt a softer stance in tariff negotiations and heightened expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts. Trump said on Wednesday he would be willing to extend a July 8 deadline for completing trade talks with countries before higher U.S. tariffs are imposed. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested earlier that the Trump administration may offer extensions from a July trade deal deadline for countries negotiating in good faith. The remarks renewed dollar weakness, lifting the euro to a seven-week high. It last bought $1.1525. The greenback lost 0.43% against the yen and 0.34% against the Swiss franc to last trade at 143.98 and 0.81725, respectively. Against a basket of currencies, the dollar fell to its weakest since April 22 at 98.327. "It's hard to tell whether there is a masterplan behind this, but common sense would suggest that President Trump is trying to create a level of urgency in terms of trade negotiations," said Rodrigo Catril, senior currency strategist at National Australia Bank. "I think the market, in terms of the size of the moves, is becoming a little bit more sanguine about what this all means... the market is also very wary that the picture could change quite dramatically in a week's time or two weeks' time." Elsewhere, sterling was up 0.38% to $1.3588. The Australian dollar ticked up 0.05% to $0.6506, while the New Zealand dollar rose 0.1% to $0.6033. On Wednesday, data showed U.S. consumer prices rose less than expected in May, leading traders to ramp up bets of a Fed cut as early as September and keeping pressure on the dollar. Thursday's producer price index data will be the next test for markets. The offshore yuan was last a touch stronger at 7.1953 per dollar, helped slightly by news that a fragile truce in the U.S.-China trade war was restored as both sides reached a deal following talks in London this week. "Full details have not been published, and it remains unclear if the talks brought the two largest economies closer to productive cooperation," said Mantas Vanagas, senior economist at Westpac. EURO STRENGTH The euro was clinging to strong gains on Thursday, having jumped against most other currencies in the previous session. Against the yen, the common currency last stood at 165.88 having risen to its firmest since October at 166.42 on Thursday. It was up 0.13% against the Aussie, extending a 0.9% gain from Thursday, and had also touched a one-month high of 84.88 pence overnight. While there was no immediate trigger behind the moves, analysts say the euro has over the past week drawn support from hawkish European Central Bank (ECB) rhetoric. Last week, the ECB cut interest rates as expected but hinted at a pause in its year-long easing cycle after inflation finally returned to its 2% target. "Expectations of fewer previously expected ECB rate cuts have lent some support to the euro," said Carol Kong, a currency strategist at Commonwealth Bank of Australia. That contrasts with the likely resumption of a Fed easing cycle later this year, and as Trump has repeatedly called for U.S. rates to be lowered. Trump said last week that a decision on the next Fed chief will be coming soon, adding that a good Fed chair would lower interest rates. The euro has risen nearly 11% for the year thus far, helped in part by a weaker dollar and as investors pour money into European markets in a move away from the U.S. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Aussie job warning ahead of 'huge' shift: 'Can't even imagine yet'
Australians are being warned the opportunities of artificial intelligence are 'immense' but there is no denying it will cost some jobs. It comes as the head of one of the world's biggest AI labs predicts the technology could eliminate half of all entry-level, white-collar jobs within the next five years. Niusha Shafiabady, associate professor in computational intelligence at Australian Catholic University, told Yahoo Finance the jobs of the future would be different from the types of jobs that we have now. But she said this was something we'd experienced 'throughout the history of human life'. 'I think it's important for the kids to understand that we will have much fewer entry-level jobs and new roles will emerge. We should start thinking about our careers smartly from now on and plan our career properly,' she said. RELATED Millions of Aussies warned as Hungry Jack's replaces drive-thru workers with AI Centrelink cash boost coming from July 1 for millions of Aussies Aussie teen's job paying $300 per hour without a uni degree Australia's productivity commissioner Danielle Wood said the forecast that half of entry-level white-collar jobs would be wiped out was 'pretty extraordinary' and 'out of whack with other reasonable projections' she had seen. But she said there were some elements of jobs that would be overtaken by AI. 'Often it is the more routine elements but that is freeing people up to do the uniquely human parts of jobs,' Wood told ABC's 7.30 program. 'Am I going to sit here and say, 'No jobs are going to go?' No, clearly not. There will be some impacts.' Anthropic chief executive officer Dario Amodei recently warned politicians and businesses were not prepared for the spike in unemployment rates that AI could bring. 'AI is starting to get better than humans at almost all intellectual tasks, and we're going to collectively, as a society, grapple with it,' he told CNN's Anderson Cooper. 'AI is going to get better at what everyone does, including what I do, including what other CEOs do.' Unions will be pushing to regulate AI in the workplace at the upcoming productivity summit. It wants the government to enforce a 'digital just transition' for workers impacted by AI, similar to measures for coal and gas-fired power jobs impacted by the shift to renewables. They will also be pushing to gain a greater share of productivity benefits through higher pay. The World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report has estimated 92 million jobs will be lost in this decade, with 170 million new jobs created. This would leave a net worth of 78 million by 2030. Bloomberg found AI could replace more than 50 per cent of the tasks performed by market research analysts and sales representatives, compared to 9 and 21 per cent for their managerial counterparts. Wood said AI offered a 'huge amount of opportunity' and there would be jobs created that 'we can't even imagine yet'. 'I think probably the major impact on labour markets we'd expect in the next decade is more people working with AI to take some bits of their job but free them up,' she said. 'From an economy-wide perspective as well, the opportunities are immense. When we look at productivity gains, gains in our living standards have come from over the long run, it is largely those new technologies.' Shafiabady said we would need specialists in automation, those with skills to work with and analyse data, along with more cybersecurity experts. 'The closer we are to making strategic decisions in the organisation and critical thinking skills, the safer our job will be,' she in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tariff impacts on consumer prices so far: Chart of the Day
Yahoo Finance host Julie Hyman joins Asking for a Trend with Josh Lipton on today's Chart of the Day to explain how tariffs have impacted specific consumer price categories so far, despite overall inflation showing signs of cooling. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend here. Well, indeed those tariffs do not seem to be having an upward effect on headline inflation yet. And those are two important caveats because there are certain categories where we are seeing upward pressure on prices. It's just not averaging out to the overall number, which we saw just rise a tenth of 1% month over month, and 2.4% year over year. That's the headline number. So there were categories where we were seeing increases. Appliances, for example, rose more than 4%. Then there were some random collection of things, and here, peanut butter, bananas saw increases because of tariffs, at least in part. You saw canned fruits and vegetables on the same front. Roasted coffee, we have definitely seen that raw coffee prices, commodity coffee prices have been going up, toys going up to some extent here. But then there were also a number of categories where we saw decline. In cars, for example, there was a small decline, jewelry and watches, smartphones, gasoline, as we know, and airline fares, for sure, because we've seen a drop in demand for air travel, particularly international, and that has had a bit caused a bit of pressure here. But when we try to dig into why we are not seeing more of these categories see these types of increases, economists come up with a couple of reasons why. And for example, we talked to Ryan Wang of HSBC earlier in the day, and he said, you know, it's probably easier right now, because consumers have absorbed so many cost increases already, that businesses can pass on some cost increases to other businesses. It's tougher to do when it comes to consumers. He theorized that perhaps if there are shortages eventually in some goods, then you could see more upward pressure, or more broad upward pressure on goods prices. Um, he says on the flip side, however, if at the same time the labor market is cooling, then consumers won't be as able to absorb those price increases. So, some of these dynamics are some of the reasons why. Another reason why could be that ahead of the tariff imposition, we saw, of course, a huge surge in imports. A lot of companies trying to get ahead of the tariffs, and so they might not yet be raising prices because they are star they are still working off that inventory. So, pretty split here between the increase the number of categories increasing and decreasing, and again, a lot of different potential reasons why we could still see the tariffs make their way into more categories as time goes on, Josh. All right. Thank you, Julie. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data