logo
Australia confident U.S. will proceed with AUKUS submarine deal after review

Australia confident U.S. will proceed with AUKUS submarine deal after review

NBC Newsa day ago

SYDNEY — Australia 's defense minister said Thursday he was confident that the AUKUS submarine pact with the United States and Britain would proceed, and that his government would work closely with the U.S. while the Trump administration conducted a formal review.
Australia in 2023 committed to spend 368 billion Australian dollars ($239 billion) over three decades on AUKUS, the country's biggest ever defense project with the U.S. and Britain, to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines.
A Pentagon official said the administration was reviewing AUKUS to ensure it was 'aligned with the President's America First agenda' on the eve of expected talks between President Donald Trump and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.
In an Australian Broadcasting Corporation radio interview, Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles said AUKUS was in the strategic interests of all three countries and that the new review of the deal signed in 2021 when Joe Biden was the U.S. president was not a surprise.
'I am very confident this is going to happen,' he said of AUKUS, which would give Australia nuclear-powered submarines.
'This is a multi-decade plan. There will be governments that come and go and I think whenever we see a new government, a review of this kind is going to be something which will be undertaken,' Marles told the ABC.
Albanese is expected to meet Trump for the first time next week on the sidelines of the Group of 7 meeting in Canada, where the security allies will discuss a request from Washington for Australia to increase defense spending from 2% to 3.5% of gross domestic product.
Albanese has said defense spending would rise to 2.3% and has declined to commit to the U.S. target.
The opposition Liberal party on Thursday pressed Albanese to increase defense spending.
Under AUKUS, Australia was scheduled to make a $2 billion payment in 2025 to the U.S. to help boost its submarine shipyards and speed up lagging production rates of Virginia-class submarines to allow the sale of up to three U.S. submarines to Australia starting in 2032.
The first $500 million payment was made when Marles met with his U.S. counterpart, Pete Hegseth, in February.
The Pentagon's top policy adviser Elbridge Colby, who has previously expressed concern that the U.S. would lose submarines to Australia at a critical time for military deterrence against China, will be a key figure in the review, examining the production rate of Virginia-class submarines, Marles said.
'It is important that those production and sustainment rates are improved,' he added.
AUKUS would grow the U.S. and Australian defense industries and generate thousands of manufacturing jobs, Marles said in a statement.
John Lee, an Australian Indo-Pacific expert at Washington's conservative Hudson Institute think tank, said the Pentagon review was 'primarily an audit of American capability' and whether it can afford to sell up to five nuclear-powered submarines when it is not meeting its own production targets.
'Relatedly, the low Australian defense spending and ambiguity as to how it might contribute to a Taiwan contingency is also a factor,' Lee said.
John Hamre, president of the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a former senior Pentagon official, told a Lowy Institute seminar in Sydney on Thursday there is a perception in Washington that 'the Albanese government has been supportive of AUKUS but not really leaning in on AUKUS,' and that defense spending is part of this.
Under the multi-stage pact, four U.S.-commanded Virginia submarines will be hosted at a Western Australian navy base on the Indian Ocean starting in 2027, which a senior U.S. Navy commander told Congress in April gives the U.S. a 'straight shot to the South China Sea.'
Albanese wants to buy three Virginia submarines starting in 2032 to bring its submarine force under Australian command.
Britain and Australia will jointly build a new AUKUS-class submarine that is expected to come into service starting in 2040. Following a recent defense review, Britain said it would boost spending on its attack submarine fleet under AUKUS.
Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who struck the AUKUS deal with Biden, said Thursday that Australia should 'make the case again' for the treaty.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pentagon has a plan to seize Greenland ‘if necessary', US defence secretary says
Pentagon has a plan to seize Greenland ‘if necessary', US defence secretary says

The Independent

time32 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Pentagon has a plan to seize Greenland ‘if necessary', US defence secretary says

During a combative congressional hearing, US defence secretary Pete Hegseth faced intense questioning regarding Pentagon contingency plans, his use of Signal chats, and diversity within the military. Hegseth acknowledged the Pentagon has plans for various contingencies, including potential actions involving Greenland and Panama, but a Republican lawmaker intervened to clarify there were no plans to invade Greenland. Democratic representatives, including Rep. Salud Carbajal, criticised Hegseth's performance, with Carbajal calling him an "embarrassment" and "unfit to lead." Hegseth was pressed about his use of Signal chats to discuss military operations, specifically whether he shared classified information regarding strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen. Hegseth debated the role of women and transgender service members in the military, asserting that military standards should be high and equal, while also facing criticism for his stance on diversity programs.

US has contingency plans to invade Greenland and Panama, Hegseth reveals
US has contingency plans to invade Greenland and Panama, Hegseth reveals

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

US has contingency plans to invade Greenland and Panama, Hegseth reveals

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to acknowledge that the Pentagon has developed plans to take over Greenland and Panama by force if necessary. During a combative congressional hearing on Thursday, he refused to answer repeated questions about his use of Signal chats to discuss military operations. Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee repeatedly engaged in heated exchanges with Hegseth, with some of the toughest lines of questioning coming from military veterans. Many demanded yes or no answers, but he tried to avoid direct responses about his actions as Pentagon chief. In one exchange, Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., asked whether the Pentagon has developed plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary. Hegseth said: "Our job at the Defence Department is to have plans for any contingency." While it is not unusual for the Pentagon to draw up contingency plans for conflicts that have not arisen, his handling of the questions prompted a Republican lawmaker to intervene. 'It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?' said Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio. As Hegseth started to repeat his answer about contingency plans, Turner added emphatically, 'I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.' 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats,' Hegseth responded. Time and again, lawmakers pressed Hegseth to answer questions he has avoided for months, including during the two previous days of hearings on Capitol Hill. And frustration boiled over. "You're an embarrassment to this country. You're unfit to lead," Rep. Salud Carbajal snapped, the California Democrat's voice rising. 'You should just get the hell out.' GOP lawmakers on several occasions apologized to Hegseth for the Democrats' sharp remarks, saying he should not be subject to such 'flagrant disrespect.' Hegseth said he was 'happy to take the arrows' to make tough calls and do what's best. More questions emerge over Signal chats Hegseth's use of two Signal chats to discuss plans for US strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen with other US leaders as well as members of his family prompted dizzying exchanges with lawmakers. He was pressed multiple times over whether or not he shared classified information and if he should face accountability if he did. Hegseth argued that the classification markings of any information about those military operations could not be discussed with lawmakers. That became a quick trap, as Hegseth has asserted that nothing he posted — on strike times and munitions dropped in March — was classified. His questioner, Rep. Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat and Marine veteran, jumped on the disparity. 'You can very well disclose whether or not it was classified,' Moulton said. 'What's not classified is that it was an incredible, successful mission,' Hegseth responded. A Pentagon watchdog report on his Signal use is expected soon. Moulton asked Hegseth whether he would hold himself accountable if the inspector general finds that he placed classified information on Signal, a commercially available app. Hegseth would not directly say, only noting that he serves 'at the pleasure of the president.' Trump speech raises concerns about politics in the military Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who appeared along Hegseth, was questioned about Trump's speech at Fort Bragg this week and whether the military was becoming politicized. The Defense Department has a doctrine that prohibits troops from participating in political activity while in uniform. Members of the 82nd Airborne Division were directed to stand behind Trump at Fort Bragg, and they booed and cheered during his incendiary remarks, including condemnation of his predecessor, Joe Biden. There also was a pop-up MAGA merchandise stand selling souvenirs to troops in uniform. Caine repeatedly said US service members must be apolitical but that he was unaware of anything that happened at Fort Bragg. Hegseth is pressed about policies on female and transgender troops Hegseth got into a sharp debate about whether women and transgender service members should serve in the military or combat jobs. He said he has worked to remove diversity programs and political correctness from the military. He said he has not politicized the military but simply wants the most capable troops. Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., demanded to know if Hegseth believes that both men and women can pull a trigger, cause death, operate a drone or launch a missile. 'It depends on the context,' Hegseth said, adding that 'women carry equipment differently, a 155 round differently, a rucksack differently.' Hegseth, who has previously said women 'straight up' should not serve in combat, asserted that women have joined the military in record numbers under the Trump administration. He said the military 'standards should be high and equal.' He also was asked about three female service members — now being forced out as part of the Pentagon's move to ban transgender troops. Hegseth agreed that their accomplishments — which Houlahan read out — were to be celebrated, until he learned they were transgender. Republican lawmakers jumped to his defense, criticizing any Pentagon spending on gender transition surgery. Plans for 'action against Greenland and Panama' President Donald Trump has said multiple times that he wants to take control of the strategic, mineral-rich island nation of Greenland, long a US ally. Those remarks have been met with flat rejections from Greenland's leaders. 'Greenland is not for sale,' Jacob Isbosethsen, Greenland's representative to the U.S, said Thursday at a forum in Washington sponsored by the Arctic Institute. In an effort not to show the Pentagon's hand on its routine effort to have plans for everything, Hegseth danced around the direct question from Smith, leading to the confusion. 'Speaking on behalf of the American people, I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,' Smith said.

6 wild and unexpected Donald Trump moments as judge rules he acted illegally
6 wild and unexpected Donald Trump moments as judge rules he acted illegally

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

6 wild and unexpected Donald Trump moments as judge rules he acted illegally

The Trump administration was last night scrambling to come up with a position in response to Israel's pre-emptive strikes on Iran. The attack is likely to be problematic for Trump, who has been seeking a deal with Iran to prevent them working on a nuclear weapon. Whether it was part of the calculus that led to the strikes or not, it's likely Israel's action will scupper those talks for now. Trump plans to meet with top security officials in the Situation Room at the White House at around 4pm UK time. Which means it will have been 15 hours since the attack took place by the time the President is fully briefed on it. Where is he? Meanwhile, a judge has predictably ruled Trump overstepped by sending the National Guard to LA. And Pete Hegseth basically confirmed plans have been drawn up to invade Greenland. Everything is fine. Here's what you need to know. Late last night a federal judge ruled Trump had acted improperly in deploying the National Guard to try and quell largely peaceful protests in Los Angeles. Following a request from Governor Gavin Newsom, Judge Charles R Breyer agreed to block the deployment, ruling he had both exceeded the scope of his authority and violated the Tenth Amendment - which guarantees rights not reserved by the Federal Government revert to the States. "He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith," the judge wrote. He added: "We're talking about the president exercising his authority, and the president is of course limited in that authority. That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George." Oh yeah he went there. The White House immediately appealed, and was granted a stay of Judge Breyer's order until Tuesday. Trump's weird World War II riff took a bizarre additional swerve. "Russia fought with us in World War II," he said. "And everybody hates them. "And Germany and Japan, they're fine, someday somebody will explain a strange world." I'm not sure it's going to take all that much explaining to be honest, Mr President. Mike Turner, a Republican Congressman, tried to be helpful to Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, giving him an easy out on the question of whether the United States was planning to invade the sovereign territory of a NATO ally by force, in breach of all manner of international laws. "I just want to help you out," he said at a congressional committee hearing. "Because people will try to twist your words. You are not confirming in your testimony today that at the Pentagon there are plans for invading and taking by force Greenland, correct? That is not your testimony today..." Hegseth replied, and didn't grab hold of the lifeline he was being offered. "All my testimony is is that the Pentagon has plans for any number of contingencies," he said. Turner tried again: "It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force Because I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony." Hegseth replied: "We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats." That, readers, is not a no. Senator Alex Padilla, a Democrat from California, was forcibly removed from a press conference by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in his home state. Footage of the incident shows security pushing him out of the room, ordering him to put his hands up. And further video posted online show officers manhandling him to the floor and handcuffed in the corridor outside. (For UK readers, even in America it's almost unheard of for a sitting, elected Senator to be physically detained, and presumably arrested). Senator Padilla told onlookers he had "questions" for Noem - presumably related to the deployment of military personnel to his state. Noem later claimed he'd "lunged" toward the podium, that he didn't identify himself, and that nobody knew who he was. The first words he said to her, as captured on video, were: "I'm Senator Alex Padilla". As tension between the White House and Europe heats up, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is , select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our . It seems someone has finally got through to Trump, and explained that if he deports every undocumented person in the US, Americans will starve and Las Vegas will collapse into the desert. In a spectacular u-turn, one which will cause Stephen Miller real physical pain, Trump indicated he might make exceptions to his mass deportations for nice undocumented people who work in farms and hotels. "You go into a farm and you look at people -- they've been there for 20, 25, years, and they've worked great, and the owner of the farm loves them, and everything else and then you're supposed to throw them out," he said. "We're going to have an order on that pretty soon, I think," he added. "We can't do that to our farmers and leisure too, hotels." Trump said on his Truth Social site that the waiting list is open for his $5m 'Trump card'. The card, it's claimed, will grant the buyer legal permanent residency in the US. The gold-colored card prominently features a drawing of the president with a bald eagle in front of him and the Statue of Liberty behind. It reads "United States of America" across the top, "The Trump Card" on the right side in bolder letters with stars around it, and Trump's signature above the $5 million figure. Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn. Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox. And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store