logo
Loungers-owner Fortress plots stay at Malmaison hotels

Loungers-owner Fortress plots stay at Malmaison hotels

Sky News5 days ago
The owner of the Loungers bar chain and Poundstretcher, the discount retailer, is weighing a takeover of two of Britain's best-known hotel chains.
Sky News has learnt that Fortress Investment Group is among the parties considering offers for Malmaison and Hotel du Vin, which sit under the same ownership structure.
Cushman & Wakefield (C&W), the commercial property agent, is handling the auction.
The group trades from 37 hotels in 27 UK cities, with the portfolio split almost equally between the two brands.
The chains have been through a succession of owners over the last 20 years, including the private equity firm KSL Capital Partners.
They are now owned by Singapore-based Frasers Hospitality Group, which reportedly paid more than £360m to acquire the group in 2015.
A number of other bidders are also said to be participating in the auction, although the current valuation attached to the business was unclear.
Fortress has been on a buying spree in Britain in recent years, snapping up assets including Majestic Wine.
Earlier this year, the investment firm bought Loungers for about £350m, while it also explored a takeover of the supermarket chain Wm Morrison in 2021 before being beaten to a deal by buyout giant Clayton Dubilier & Rice.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU-US deal avoids damaging trade war, says Irish premier
EU-US deal avoids damaging trade war, says Irish premier

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

EU-US deal avoids damaging trade war, says Irish premier

The Irish premier has welcomed a new trade agreement between the US and EU as having 'avoided a damaging trade war'. Taoiseach Micheal Martin also said there is 'much to be negotiated' following what he termed a 'framework agreement'. Speaking to the media in Dublin on Monday, Mr Martin said it 'opens up the prospect of more significant strategic collaboration between the US and Europe on quite a number of issues'. 'It also avoids further escalation, or indeed a trade conflict, which would be very, very damaging to the economies of the United States and of the European Union,' he said. 'It's important to say that Europe never sought tariffs, or never sought to impose tariffs, and fundamentally, we are against tariffs: we believe in an open trading economy.' Mr Martin said it is a very different situation than before April 1. 'New realities are in play and so at a broader level, the stability and predictability that this agreement brings is important for businesses, is important for consumers and indeed patients when it comes to the manufacturing and distribution of medicines,' he said. 'In essence, we have avoided a trade conflict here which would have been ruinous, which would have been very damaging to our economy, and to jobs in particular. 'The challenge now for Europe is to work on its own inefficiencies, to reduce barriers within the single market, to press ahead more ambitiously and more proactively on trade diversification and trade deals with other countries that would facilitate that market diversification that is required. 'Meanwhile, there is much to be negotiated in the aftermath of this framework agreement.' Asked about mixed reactions to the deal in Europe, Mr Martin said: 'Nobody is welcoming tariffs with open arms. 'I think we've been consistent in saying that we don't agree with tariffs, that we prefer if there weren't tariffs, but we have to deal with realities. 'I understand people criticising, but given the balance and the options here… in my view, I would appreciate the work of the (European) Commission in this regard, and the avoidance of a trade war is preferable, in my view, and that's the key issue.'

What to know about the Royal Mail changes effective from now
What to know about the Royal Mail changes effective from now

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

What to know about the Royal Mail changes effective from now

Major changes to Royal Mail 's delivery services have commenced, allowing second-class letters to be delivered on alternate weekdays and no longer on Saturdays. Delivery targets for both first and second-class post have been relaxed, though Ofcom has introduced a new enforceable backstop to ensure 99% of mail arrives within two days of the target. Regulator Ofcom states these reforms are crucial for Royal Mail's survival, aiming to cut annual costs by £250 million to £425 million due to declining letter volumes. The changes follow Royal Mail's £348 million loss in 2023-24 and recent fines for poor performance, with a review into stamp prices also planned. While criticised by consumer and business groups, the overhaul comes after Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky's EP Group completed its £3.6 billion takeover of Royal Mail owner IDS.

Loophole that lets you gift without worrying about inheritance tax
Loophole that lets you gift without worrying about inheritance tax

Daily Mail​

time2 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Loophole that lets you gift without worrying about inheritance tax

I am one of the people that will be adversely affected by Rachel Reeves' unwarranted raid on unused pension pots. Currently, this change will mean an additional inheritance tax charge of about £270,000 for me, if I died. I have been looking at the gifting rules and the sums you can give away are measly, £3,000 each year, or unlimited £250 gifts but only one per person. Harvey Dorset, of This is Money, replies: Recent changes mean that considerably more people are in line to incur inheritance tax bills on their estates in the years to come. Pensions are set to fall into the inheritance tax net from 2027, meaning that many will find their estate is worth well above the inheritance tax allowance. Inheritance tax receipts recently increased to £8.2billion from April 2024 to March 2025, more than £800million higher than the same period a year before. One of the main ways to go about reducing a potential IHT bill is to make the most of gifting allowances to lower the value of your estate. However, the current gifting allowances have been in place since the mid 1980s, with a maximum total annual inheritance tax-free gift limit of £3,000. This has made it all the harder to meaningfully reduce the size of an estate by using this allowance. The rules state: 'On top of the £3,000 annual allowance, the rules stipulate that you can give as many £250 gifts to whomever you like, but this won't be immediately exempt if the recipient received the annual gifting allowance or part of it.' This is where your novel solution comes in. If you can find 400 willing participants – something I dare say you might have trouble with – why can't you give them each £250 to then gift to your two daughters? Unfortunately, as David Denton, tax expert at Quilter Cheviot, discusses below, you might not have found the genius solution that you might think. Luckily though, there are other options that might be available to help you pass your wealth to your two daughters. David Denton, tax expert at Quilter Cheviot, replies: As the tax burden hits a recent high and rumours swirl of more tax rises to come, it is understandable that consumers may wish to find ways to reduce their tax bill. However, the tax authorities are rightly switched on to the potential for abuse of the system and people finding what they think to be new and novel ways to avoid tax. Some may be legitimate but for the vast majority they are likely to cause more problems than it is worth. The UK introduced the 'General Anti–Abuse Rule' (GAAR) in 2013 and this is designed to target those taxpayers who avoid paying tax in ways that are not in the spirit of the rules, despite some aspects being potentially legal. Abusive arrangements can include as a series of pre–ordained steps, where HMRC would look at the overall effect of the series or combination of transactions in order to identify the real purpose. The GAAR applies to a number of personal taxes, including inheritance tax, so if enough tax was at risk, it could come into effect here given there is a pre–planned element and involves a number of people. Instead you should be looking at how they can use the rules to still make substantial gifts. For example, should you expect to live for another seven years then it may be worth making a gift above the £3,000 limit as a potentially exempt transfer. After seven years of being gifted these assets will no longer be taken into account on death and be free from inheritance tax. There are other possibilities for exempt gifts, such as marriage gifts, which can be up to £5000, according to the relationship between the donor and recipient. Finally there is also the option of making gifts out of surplus income, where the gift is part of your normal expenditure and leaves you able to maintain your usual standard of living. These gifts can come from salary, dividends, pension income or rental income, so it does give you some options that are very much within the rules of the UK tax system.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store