
When the Going Was Good by Graydon Carter review – all the fun of the Fair
He is an odd character – ebullient, apparently confident, he confesses in this memoir that he is always anxious. But he believes that an anxious editor is a good editor, and he really loves being an editor. Born in 1949, and growing up in Canada, where life revolved around skiing and hockey, he dreamed of living in New York, editing a big magazine, marrying and having a happy family. He achieved it all eventually, but it took a while. Although he never enrolled as a student, he got a job editing a magazine at the University of Ottawa called the Canadian Review, which attained a circulation of 50,000 but no profits. So then he landed a job as a floating writer at Time magazine in New York. As he says, Time is 'now a digital husk' but it was then one of the most successful magazines in the world, selling 4 million copies a week, with salaries and expenses to match. All meals were on expenses and in five years, he says, he never switched on his oven. But after five years he was reassigned to Time's sister magazine, Life, which 'had become a zombie monthly, close to dead'.
Desperately bored, he decided to start a satirical monthly called Spy, which would be a cross between Private Eye and Mad magazine. Its launch issue in the autumn of 1986 carried a list of the Ten Most Embarrassing New Yorkers – one of whom was 'the short-fingered vulgarian Donald Trump'. Graydon first came across Trump when he wrote a disobliging profile of him for GQ magazine and mentioned in passing that he had abnormally small hands. Trump was mad enough to send him a tear-sheet of old photos circling the hands – 'See, not so short!' – but Graydon responded with 'actually quite short', so Trump has been a Graydon-hater ever since, and still sends him abusive tweets.
One of Graydon's wizard wheezes at Spy was to send extremely small cheques to extremely rich people to see who would bother to bank them. The first cheques were for $1.11 and half the recipients succumbed. So then Spy sent cheques for $0.64, and 13 people, including Rupert Murdoch, banked them. The next cheques were for $0.13 and only two people banked them. One was Adnan Khashoggi, a notorious arms dealer; the other was Donald Trump.
Spy was a success and Graydon then moved to the New York Observer, where he caught the eye of Si Newhouse, owner of Condé Nast. The rumour at the time (though not confirmed in this memoir) was that Si was thinking of making him editor of the New Yorker. But when Tina Brown, then editor of Vanity Fair, got wind of this, she demanded that Si give her the New Yorker, so Graydon got Vanity Fair instead.
At first he was not an obvious fit. At Spy he'd been breezily contemptuous of celebs, but now he desperately needed them because newsstand sales depended on having a star on the cover. Luckily, he had Annie Leibovitz as a draw – everyone wanted to be photographed by her – so he was happy to ignore the fact that the lunch bill for one of her shoots was more than the entire editorial budget for an issue of Spy.
At Condé Nast, he found that 'there was no budget at all – that is to say the budget had no ceiling'. Everything was on expenses – meals, flights, taxis, flowers. For the two years I was under contract, I got used to receiving huge bouquets of flowers any time I delivered an article and sometimes when I didn't. Once I was flown to New York and put up at the Royalton for three nights just to attend a party. Mind you, parties and dinners were always three-line whip with Graydon. I remember once telling him that I couldn't attend a dinner for Lord Snowdon because I had to be up early to interview Michael Caine. He said 'but it's only an interview' and I didn't like to say 'but that's what you pay me for'.
How good an editor was he? Judging from the amount of space he devotes to it, he seems to think that his greatest achievement was setting up the Vanity Fair Oscars party. He grabbed the opportunity when Swifty Lazar – the super-agent who used to tun the big after-party for the awards – died in 1993 and quickly made it the hot ticket, but actually it led to some very boring magazines. He claims that his greatest scoops on Vanity Fair were exposing the name of Deep Throat (the source of Woodward and Bernstein's Watergate revelations) and then covering Caitlyn Jenner's gender transition. These were hardly world-shattering, but of course it is very difficult for a monthly magazine to get scoops at all. What made Vanity Fair a must-read were two great writers – first, Dominick Dunne and then Christopher Hitchens. Dunne's coverage of the OJ Simpson trial and all the surrounding gossip was outstanding. But Graydon is notably sour about Dunne, who 'developed an imperious, overbearing manner', and in any case, it was Brown who had hired him, and Graydon has nothing good to say about Brown. He is much keener on Hitchens, who was 'better company than just about anyone' – he remembers taking him to the ultra-Waspy Everglades Club and Hitchens asking for the kosher menu.
In 2016, Anna Wintour told Graydon that she was now editorial director of Condé Nast and planned to make some changes. For Graydon it meant losing half his staff, and all his autonomy. He took a few months to think about it and even, most surprisingly, consulted a shrink, but in the end he decided to walk. He planned to retire to the south of France and smell the roses. But after two months he was starting a new online magazine called Air Mail. It is now in its sixth year and weathered the pandemic well, though its finances are always tight.
Graydon, at 75, has now been an editor for half a century. He says that 'some mornings I just wish I had properly retired, moved to Florida, become a Republican, and worked on my golf game. But then I lie down, let the moment pass, and get on with the life I have chosen and the life I love.' Thank you, Graydon.
When the Going Was Good: An Editor's Adventures During the Last Golden Age of Magazines by Graydon Carter is published by Grove Press (£20). To support the Guardian and Observer order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
MAGA ‘South Park' actor responds to show's brutal take on Trump administration
MAGA South Park actor Janeshia Adams-Ginyard has responded to the show's brutal takedown of President Trump. 'They go after everybody, everybody is up for grabs on South Park,' Adams-Ginyard told TMZ as they interviewed her between flights at Los Angeles International Airport. The actor, who is not shy about her support for the president, said that 'South Park has an amazing way of mirroring what is actually happening in the world right now, like we are having issues with our immigration –let's not lie,' In the latest season, the Comedy Central show has skewered the Trump administration by portraying the president cozying up to Satan, butchering Kristi Noem for admitting to shooting her puppy, and criticizing Immigration and Customs Enforcement, aka ICE. Adams-Ginyard, who voiced the Black female version of Eric Cartman in the 2023 series special Joining the Panderverse, also expressed her contempt for California Governor Gavin Newsom and called for the TV show to lambast him in an episode. 'Let's be honest with the fact that America needs to make some changes with how things are being ran, and I'm in California – I need to have [Gov. Gavin] Newsom go. Come on y'all, Trey [Parker] and Matt [Stone], get on Gavin's a*** right now because he's horrible. He trash.' Despite her outward support for the president, she doubled down on her stance, saying, 'I don't think it was crossing the line.' Adams-Ginyard went on to praise Trump for 'having a sense of humor,' adding that he had every right to say what he wanted. 'They've been going after everybody. Red or blue – it don't even matter.' The stuntwoman also shared her thoughts on right and left-wing people more generally, saying that 'a lot of conservatives have a sense of humor,' adding that 'it's the liberals that don't.' She also told TMZ she agreed with the axing of The Late Show With Stephen Colbert, and said, 'I need a couple other shows to go, he was the first one 'bye bye.'' 'I need Whoopi [Goldberg] to go, I need Sunny Hostin, all of them. They can go too.' The star said that the decisions were most definitely financial: 'Everything comes down to dollars.' As the interview came to a close, she struck out at Newsom again accusing him of 'hiding billions of dollars that he had for the homeless,' delaying the build of a high speed railway, and saying 'I need him to flat out say, he burned them peoples houses down,' on the topic of the devastating California wildfires at the start of this year. The next South Park episode is set to air on August 20 on Comedy Central and on August 21 on Paramount+.

The National
6 hours ago
- The National
I created artwork for Edinburgh Summerhall – then they censored it
The weird apologia over Kate Forbes being "permitted" to express her point of view (whether one agrees with her or not) signals a seismic shift under the new regime of Summerhall Arts. If their stated objective is 'to provide a nurturing safe space for artistic experimentation' they certainly left me out in the cold. READ MORE: Edinburgh Fringe venue under fire for censoring artist's work As an artist/activist my work is known for its humanitarian stance, politically charged and purposefully provocative, engaging with subjects that are often complex and intractable. My protest walls were first commissioned in 2017 by Robert McDowell, the visionary creative force and founder of Summerhall who invited me to create giant pastel murals in one of its main thoroughfares originally as part of the Fringe Festival. It became, at his insistence, a permanent fixture. Initially inspired by Carole Cadwalladr's ground breaking investigative journalism focussing on her Observer piece "The Great British Brexit Robbery – How our democracy was Hijacked", I undertook my own research into big data and how it was being used to fine tune and influence political campaigns in favour of far-right populist movements Using imagery of screaming masks, representing protesting masses with words, slogans and names, the protest walls addressed the world's rude awakening to the surprise electoral success of both Trump and Brexit. One section dedicated to Trump I titled 'Pink Pussy Protest', a reference to his vulgar boast, adjacent to a separate section on Brexit. Jumping ahead Fast forward to 2025 in a world that has grown distinctly dark under the second coming of an emboldened Trump. By mutual consent the new regime at Summerhall Arts agreed that the protest walls were more apposite than ever and that I should alter and update them accordingly in time for the Fringe festival. For sure I took a risk emblazoning a Nazi swastika symbol set within a red stop sign motif. Yes its shocking, its disgusting, grotesque – its a terrifying reminder that Nazism in no matter what shape or guise must never be tolerated and yet perversely the word Nazi is becoming all too pervasive. It surfaces in daily news items, it's bandied about on social media platforms, it's being held on placards by protesters on streets across the globe, not in celebration, but instead in a bleak reference that Nazism is becoming a terrifying reality. While I was working on updating the mural, Sam Gough suddenly appeared, finger outstretched towards the offending symbol, and commanded 'You can't have that'. 'Why?' I asked incredulously. His response was reasonable. "Because it still hurts and offends people," he said. My intention was not to hurt but to make an impact, for this overloaded symbol of unadulterated evil to act as a warning of where we are heading, to stir our consciousness and wake us up. I agreed I would 'tone it down', but without further discussion I did not agree to remove it. I assumed that something that was clearly so important would be discussed further, and seen in context. But he didn't give me that opportunity. Completed on the Saturday night, somehow over Sunday the walls had caused offence to both staff and public. Clearly there was no 'safe room' in place for members of staff on this occasion, so a member of staff apparently felt obliged to take a sponge to eradicate not only the offending symbol but oddly other anti-Nazi references as well. A photo shows several parts of the art having been scrubbed out (Image: Jane Frere) Why I'm speaking up An artist's work on display in a public venue should be sacrosanct. What gallery would touch a work without discussion and consent from its creator? Not just censorship, it felt like my work had been vandalised. Both walls were a work in progress, but without the impact of what I now call the 'N' word, I still wanted to ensure maximum impact through words and references taken across all media reflecting the world we are facing. Over the following weeks multiple emails to the Summerhall Arts team followed. No matter what ideas or vocabularies I forwarded none were approved of. READ MORE: Police Scotland respond to viral 'plasticine' T-shirt detention video Paradoxically when I first saw the redacted blank spaces it sparked an idea, what if all the placards went dark? Perhaps there are no words for this dystopic reality of Musk's DOGE, Netanyahu's genocidal invoking of the Amalek, TikTok images of soldiers revelling in satanic revenge, Putin's war, the rise of empowered Neo-Nazism, migration detention centres guarded by hungry alligators, not to mention sci-fi fears of hostile super AI dominating homo sapiens – all against an apocalyptic backdrop of catastrophic climate and nature breakdown. Ultimately redacted words leaving a blank space reflect something that is affecting everyone – we are all losing our freedom of speech, we are all little by little being silenced. Jane Frere is a Scottish artist, living in the Highlands. She has been involved in the Edinburgh arts scene for more than 30 years. Her most recent exhibited work, a collaborative creation of a banner bearing the names of victims in Gaza was hung in the Palestine Museum US show alongside the Venice Biennale last year.


The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
How TikTok changed pop music; a wealth tax explained; and the best way to slice an onion
Hello and welcome to the latest late edition of The Crunch! In this week's newsletter we have charts on the most mathematically sound way to slice an onion, which countries Trump's new tariffs are going to target, how the airline industry is struggling to get sustainable fuel projects off the ground, how TikTok has changed the length of pop songs, whether a wealth tax could work in the UK and the record rise in uncertainty. The demise of men reading books has, once again, been greatly exaggerated. A recent article about Australians' reading habits claimed 'Australians, especially men, are reading less than ever before' and 'the data showed females, on average, were reading more than males across all age groups'. Another ran with the headline 'Young men have stopped reading books – and these are the reasons why', which also said 'the percentage of men who would pick up any book at all is very small'. Nick took a deep dive into the surprisingly chaotic world of reading statistics and tracked down some hitherto unpublished survey data to show that reading has declined, regardless of gender: The data also shows that a significant proportion of males are still reading books, though they're doing so less frequently than they used to. 1. How TikTok has changed pop music We loved this piece from the BBC's Mark Savage and Jess Carr, which looked at the duration of songs in the UK top 40 over time: The data shows a marked shift towards shorter tracks in the years after the release of TikTok. The article also goes into how song structure can change when the song is shorter overall and how more recently, there's been a shift back to longer songs. 2. Where Trump's new tariffs will fall The New York Times graphics team has this simple but effective map showing how countries around the world will be affected by new tariffs imposed by the Trump administration: You can also toggle the map to show a cartogram where the counties are sized by import values! 3. How the airline industry is struggling to get sustainable fuel off the ground Reuters has produced an excellent investigation and visual feature looking at how the airline industry is struggling with sustainable jet fuel programs: Reuters reports that of the 165 sustainable fuel projects announced over the past 12 years, only 36 have materialised. 4. Could a wealth tax work in the UK? The UK, like Australia, is grappling with the prospect of how to change their tax system. This visual feature from our UK colleagues lays out how much money a wealth tax could raise and how it might work: Sign up to The Crunch Our data journalists showcase the most important charts and dataviz from the Guardian and around the web, free every fortnight after newsletter promotion Depending on how a wealth tax is designed, it could raise significantly more revenue than a freeze on income tax thresholds. 4. We live in interesting times In news that will surprised no one, global uncertainty has reached record highs: We came across this chart while reading Nicki Hutley's opinion piece about how we should focus less on interest rates in Australia. According to the economists who devised the index it is 'computed by counting the percent of the word uncertain (or its variant) in the Economist Intelligence Unit country reports'. A higher number means higher uncertainty, and the index is apparently associated with 'greater economic policy uncertainty (EPU), stock market volatility, risk and lower GDP growth'. Summer holidays in Paris How your phone gets the weather How much of Gaza is left standing? European cartographers' inaccurate maps of Australia have plenty to teach us Texas redistricting: how new Republican maps will hurt Democrats What is the most mathematically optimal way to cut an onion? It's an interesting geometry problem, which is laid out in amazing detail here by Andrew Aquino and colleagues in The Pudding: The level of detail and design flourishes here (the onion font!!!) are amazing. Make sure you hit the explode button. Enjoying The Crunch? If you like what you see and think you might know someone else who would enjoy it, please forward this email or send them a link to the sign up page. If you have a chart tip or technical issue viewing this newsletter, please reply to this email. If you are a Guardian supporter and need assistance with regards to contributions and/or digital subscriptions, please email