
Why this stock market makes so many of us want to scream
Most investors have felt FOMO, fear of missing out. Nowadays, many are feeling the opposite.
In April, turmoil over President Trump's tariffs drove U.S. stocks down 12% in four days. Some investors bailed out, worried Trump's policies would overturn decades of agreements that helped global trade thrive.
Others had gotten out even earlier, either in advance of the second Trump presidency or because they thought back-to-back double-digit annual gains, like those U.S. stocks earned in 2023 and 2024, weren't sustainable.
Now, markets have erased April's losses after Trump backtracked on several tariffs and a court decision Wednesday cast doubt over his trade-war plan. That hasw many people wondering if they should be more fully invested.
Their paralyzing dilemma: They aren't sure when or how to do that.
'I don't have FOMO," says Michael McCowin, an investor in Madison, Wis. 'I have FOGI: fear of getting in."
In his individual retirement account, where he does most of his investing, McCowin got out of stocks by early last year, as the S&P 500's return of 26.3% in 2023 was followed by nearly an 11% gain in just the first quarter of 2024.
Feeling FOGI can make you feel like an old fogey even if you're nowhere near McCowin's age of 86. McCowin is a former chief investment officer at Wisconsin's pension board, which manages the retirement assets of public employees in the state.
So he isn't a naive or impulsive investor. But, he says, his FOGI is a strong 'gut feel."
What, specifically, is McCowin afraid of? 'Getting in too early," he says, before the market hits bottom.
'I probably went too far by going all to cash," he adds. 'I do believe we're on the cusp of what could be a very significant downturn, and if that happens I'll be prepared for it. And if it doesn't, I'm collecting 4% to 4.5% [on cash] and that's more than enough for me."
McCowin emphasizes that he would never advise his grandchildren to do what he did, as they have decades of wage-earning ahead of them to help cushion market crashes. And I don't think his moves are advisable for most people. But his FOGI does remind us that investors often forget to ask: What am I afraid of?
A shift like McCowin's is 'not about mitigating risk, it's about mitigating regret," says Meir Statman, a finance professor at Santa Clara University who studies the psychology of investing.
'The fear of getting back in is the fear of feeling really stupid," says Statman. If the market goes up before you get back in, 'you'll have to buy stocks back at a higher price and say, 'God, why did I ever sell?'" If it goes down after you get back in, you'll kick yourself over that, too.
Let's put the market's recent moves in longer-term perspective.
Since the end of World War II, the S&P 500 has lost between 5% and 10% 63 times, and it has dropped between 10% and 20% 25 times, according to Sam Stovall of CFRA, an investment-research firm. It's gone down at least 20% 14 times; three of those were epic losses of 40% or more.
In the worst declines of at least 40%, the downdrafts lasted an average of 23 months, and stocks took an average of 58 months—just under five years—to gain back their losses in full. (These figures don't include the reinvestment of dividends, which would have shortened the recovery times.)
One advantage of April's turbulence is that it's so fresh in your mind, it's hard to kid yourself about what you believed a few weeks ago.
Hindsight bias, the human tendency to believe that our past predictions were much more accurate than they turned out to be, fools investors all the time.
This time, though, you can probably admit it: Those first few days, as Trump slapped huge tariffs on the rest of the world and markets reeled, you leaped to the conclusion that the global economy had been irreversibly disrupted. Like most investors, you probably underestimated how resilient and adaptable people, companies, markets and governments are.
The other advantage of the market's April stumble was that it happened so fast. In four epic weeks, stocks plunged, then bounced back. For all the S&P 500's heaving around, it's up 1% in 2025.
So you can't feel the fear of getting in if you never had time to get out.
That's a blessing, because market timing is much harder than it seems. As John Montgomery, founder of Bridgeway Capital Management in Houston, points out, getting out of stocks before a crash is only a fraction of what you need to do as a successful market timer.
You have to be right about your economic forecast, when it will begin to take hold and when it will end. You also have to be correct about when and how the stock market, interest rates and other variables will respond.
'You have at least four opportunities to get it wrong," says Montgomery, and 'if you're off by only a couple of months, that can destroy any chances of making money."
If, like McCowin, you did get out, then the best way to overcome your FOGI is by taking baby steps. Set up an automatic investment plan to transfer a fixed amount of money from your bank or other cash holdings into a stock fund or brokerage account. Spread these transfers out in equal monthly increments over at least a year.
That should reduce your fears of buying back all your stocks at a higher price than you sold them for, or of buying too much right before a crash. What's more, you reduce the risk of being tempted to think you know exactly when to get back in.
Write to Jason Zweig at intelligentinvestor@wsj.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Treasury secretary Bessent seen in race to succeed US Fed's Powell
A growing chorus of advisers inside and outside the Trump administration are pushing another name to serve as the next chair of the Federal Reserve: Treasury secretary Scott Bessent. US President Donald Trump said Friday he would name a successor "very soon" to replace Jerome Powell, whose term as Fed chair ends in May 2026. The small list of candidates under consideration has included Kevin Warsh, a former Fed official whom Trump interviewed for the Treasury secretary role in Nov, according to people familiar with the matter. But Bessent - who is leading Trump's effort to kickstart the US economy with sweeping changes to trade, taxes and regulation - is also now one of the contenders for the job, said the people, who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. Formal interviews for the position have not begun, two of the people said. "I have the best job in Washington," Bessent said in response to a request for comment. "The President will decide who's best for the economy and the American people." A senior administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, disputed the reporting without providing further specifics. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, US appeals court rules
A federal appeals court has allowed President Trump's tariffs to remain in effect while it reviews a lower court decision that blocked them. The court will consider whether Trump exceeded his authority by imposing the tariffs under an emergency economic powers act. The tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A federal appeals court allowed President Donald Trump 's most sweeping tariffs to remain in effect on Tuesday while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them on grounds that Trump had exceeded his authority by imposing decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. means Trump may continue to enforce, for now, his "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on Canada, China and appeals court has yet to rule on whether the tariffs are permissible under an emergency economic powers act that Trump cited to justify them, but it allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the appeals play Federal Circuit said the litigation raised issues of "exceptional importance" warranting the court to take the rare step of having the 11-member court hear the appeal, rather than have it go before a three-judge panel first. It scheduled arguments for July tariffs, used by Trump as negotiating leverage with U.S. trading partners, and their on-again, off-again nature have shocked markets and whipsawed companies of all sizes as they seek to manage supply chains, production, staffing and ruling has no impact on other tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that the U.S. Constitution gave Congress, not the president, the power to levy taxes and tariffs, and that the president had exceeded his authority by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies. The Trump administration quickly appealed the ruling, and the Federal Circuit in Washington put the lower court decision on hold the next day while it considered whether to impose a longer-term ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 12 U.S. states. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA. The 1977 law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the U.S. or freeze their is the first U.S. president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said that the tariffs imposed in February on Canada, China and Mexico were to fight illegal fentanyl trafficking at U.S. borders, denied by the three countries, and that the across-the-board tariffs on all U.S. trading partners imposed in April were a response to the U.S. trade deficit The states and small businesses had argued the tariffs were not a legal or appropriate way to address those matters, and the small businesses argued that the decades-long U.S. practice of buying more goods than it exports does not qualify as an emergency that would trigger IEEPA. At least five other court cases have challenged the tariffs justified under the emergency economic powers act, including other small businesses and the state of California. One of those cases, in federal court in Washington, D.C., also resulted in an initial ruling against the tariffs, and no court has yet backed the unlimited emergency tariff authority Trump has claimed.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Australian shares hit record peak as US-China revive trade truce
June 11 - Australian shares rose to a record high on Wednesday, supported by banks and miners, as an agreement between U.S. and Chinese officials on a framework to revive their trade truce reinforced hopes of easing global economic tensions. The S&P/ASX 200 index was up 0.4% at 8,623.40 points, as of 0044 GMT, after climbing 0.8% to a record close on Tuesday. U.S. and Chinese officials agreed on a framework to put their trade truce back on track and resolve China's export restrictions on rare-earth minerals and magnets at the conclusion of two days of intense negotiations in London. An U.S.-China settlement would pacify investors around the world, calming jitters surrounding a potential escalation of trade wars between the world's two largest economies. Heavily dependent on export to China, Australian miners rose 0.7%, defying weaker iron ore prices driven by expectations of rising supply. Mining giants BHP, Rio Tinto and Fortescue climbed 2.2%, 1% and 2.4%, respectively. Financials were up 0.4% with the "big four" banks rising between 0.3% and 0.5%. Energy stocks advanced nearly 2% to their highest point in more than three months, buoyed by stronger oil prices amid optimism that a U.S.-China trade deal could support global economic growth and boost oil demand. Among corporate news, property services business John Lyng Group surged more than 18% after it announced a buyout offer from Australian fund manager Pacific Equity Partners for an undisclosed value. Meanwhile, shares of Qantas remained largely unchanged after the airline announced the decision to close its Singapore-based budget carrier, Jetstar Asia. New Zealand's benchmark S&P/NZX 50 index rose 0.7% to 12,647.44 points. Fletcher Building surged nearly 10% after the construction materials maker said it has received interest from parties for its businesses, including the construction division. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.