logo
Church's $100k fine shows importance of due diligence for Pacific communities, leaders say

Church's $100k fine shows importance of due diligence for Pacific communities, leaders say

RNZ News09-07-2025
Photo:
Auckland Council
A six-figure fine imposed on a Māngere church for illegal construction should serve as a reminder to all Pacific churches of the importance of conducting necessary checks before starting any project, community leaders say.
They emphasise the need for other Pacific congregations to ask questions, verify credentials, and seek proper advice to safeguard the contributions of their members.
Their comments follow the Auckland District Court's ruling that the Sāmoan Congregational Christian Church of New Zealand Māngere Trust and its representative, Sean Palala, were guilty of 15 breaches of the Building Act and Resource Management Act due to unlawful construction and use of a church and community centre on McKenzie Road in Māngere.
The Trust was fined more than $80,000 and ordered to pay an additional $25,300 to Auckland Council for costs. Palala also received a $7000 fine and was sentenced to 400 hours of community service.
The court heard that the church continued to use the building for gatherings despite receiving notices of its hazardous condition and orders to stop using the complex.
Pacific community leader Alf Filipaina says the church trust paid the price because it relied on someone who claimed to understand council processes but was uninformed about them.
The Manukau ward councillor says other churches can avoid making the same mistake by consulting with other congregations, verifying credentials and asking the right questions.
"They ended up contracting someone who indicated he knew the processes for building and resource consents, and he did not," he said.
"Having that talanoa first is so important. Talk to other churches. Who did you use? How did you do it? Always double check, triple check.".
The Māngere church boarded up after the Auckland District Court ruling, highlighting the consequences of ignoring stop-use orders.
Photo:
Auckland Council
Filipaina cites two recent projects as examples of how Pacific churches can successfully navigate these processes when they engage with the right people.
He says the Sāmoan Consulate complex, Maota Fale o Sāmoa, and the new LDS (Mormon) temple in Manukau both succeeded because they used certified planners who guided them throughout every step of the process.
He adds that investing in professional help upfront is more cost-effective than facing hefty fines later. Filipaina recently spent over $5300 on a building consent for renovations to his own home.
"When you have someone who truly knows the process -resource consents, building consents, inspections - it goes smoothly. That is the difference.
"That is money upfront, but that is nothing compared to the $100,000 they are paying now. Sometimes paying early saves your people later."
Apulu Reece Autagavaia, chair of the Ōtara Papatoetoe Local Board, says many small churches mistakenly believe they can handle complex consent processes on their own, but it is wiser to hire professionals to assist with these procedures.
He suggests that Pacific families engage younger generations, who are more adept at navigating the system, and use community or business networks to find trustworthy assistance.
"I encourage our communities to do the due diligence and get the experts in to provide professional advice. It might cost a bit, but it is worth it because then you have safeguards when things do go wrong.
"There are plenty of churches out there starting out. Do it the right way, get professional advice. If you do not know where to start, Pacific business organisations can help, or even your bank," Apulu said.
Tauanu'u Nick Bakulich, chair of the Māngere Ōtāhuhu Local Board, says good intentions are not enough when families contribute money in good faith.
"This situation shows how important it is to involve experts in building projects who can give qualified advice on regulatory matters," he said.
The Māngere property has since been sold, meaning the building is no longer owned by the church. Filipaina says this makes the lesson even clearer for other congregations.
"Our people gave to build that church. Now it is gone and they are paying fines on top of that. That is why you check first and do it the right way, so you do not lose what you worked so hard for."
An earlier image showing the church under construction on McKenzie Road, Māngere - a project that proceeded without proper building consents.
Photo:
Auckland Council
Auckland Council's David Pawson says ignoring court orders and using unsafe buildings would not be tolerated.
"Compliance with building and resource consent laws is essential for the safety of our communities," Pawson said.
Filipaina says the key takeaway is protecting the sacrifices of church members who contribute with goodwill and expect an orderly process.
"Our people give with their hearts. They deserve to know their sacrifice will not be wasted. We have seen it work when it is done right. Do the checks, protect what you build and protect your people."
Pacific leaders advise that any church planning a new building or renovation should consult with other churches that have successfully navigated the process.
Filipaina stresses the importance of hiring a qualified planner or consent expert and thoroughly verifying their credentials carefully. "It's money well spent."
Other recommendations include budgeting for proper compliance costs upfront and requesting a pre-application meeting with the council to address any uncertainties. '
Use trusted Pacific business networks for support.
The Sāmoan Congregational Christian Church of New Zealand Māngere Trust and Sean Palala could not be reached for comment.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minnie Deans, 130 years later
Minnie Deans, 130 years later

RNZ News

time6 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Minnie Deans, 130 years later

130 years ago today, Minnie Dean became the first (and only) woman to be executed for murder in New Zealand. Found guilty by the Supreme Court in Invercargill in 1895 for the murder of one-year-old Dorothy Carter, Dean was hanged just two months later. But what does New Zealand think now? Was Minnie Dean really guilty? Did she deserve the fate she got? Emile Donovan consults the experts: he is joined by Grant Morris, a legal historian at Victoria University of Wellington, to explore these questions and more. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

Gordon Hieatt strangled his girlfriend and lived with her body for a month, now he's getting parole
Gordon Hieatt strangled his girlfriend and lived with her body for a month, now he's getting parole

RNZ News

time7 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Gordon Hieatt strangled his girlfriend and lived with her body for a month, now he's getting parole

Gordon Hieatt. Photo: Open Justice/NZME/Natalie Slade Warning: This story contains distressing content which some people may find upsetting. A man who strangled his girlfriend to death and lived in the same flat as her decaying corpse for nearly a month is to be released from jail. Gordon Hieatt murdered his girlfriend, Nuttidar Vaikaew, at her flat in the Auckland suburb of Western Springs in 2009. He lived with her corpse for close to a month before police found her in a bed at the back of the flat. A fan had been pointed at her body in an attempt to disguise the smell. Hieatt appeared before the New Zealand Parole Board for the first time in 2020 after becoming eligible for early release. Today he was told he will be released on October 7. The former computer programmer had been hoping to get back up to speed with advances in the industry before starting to apply for jobs, but concerns were raised about his well-being with suggestions he stick to menial tasks following his release. He had earlier made it clear to the board he hoped to become a computer programmer again, despite saying his obsession with his work was the "root" of his offending. During today's hearing, he said he had been involved in a software project which he thought would turn into a business. "I do get focused, it can be problematic if I am working on my own." He also said he had concerns about stressors, finances and "not being successful". Family members said they had reconnected with Hieatt during his incarceration, one had concerns about the impact of the internet on his mental health, suggesting it would be beneficial for Hieatt to be involved in menial tasks, not in information technology (IT) upon his release. "We want to temper expectations of earning responsibilities." Panel convenor Annabel Markham told Hieatt she struggled to see the connection with what he did to Vaikaew. She asked Hieatt what had led him to that "extreme level of violence". He paused for a bit before saying he felt he was under attack at the time. "The pressure just built up." Markham said she still thought there was rage, anger, jealousy and resentment. Hieatt told the board he had done work to address his emotions and how to deal with them. According to Justice John Priestley's sentencing notes from 2011, Hieatt and Vaikaew, who was a sex worker, had got into an argument about how much rent he was to pay and him having to leave the flat when she had clients around. Hieatt, who had been in an on-again, off-again relationship with Vaikaew for several years, admitted during the trial he had strangled her, but said he didn't intend to kill her. She attempted to escape at one point during the argument, which had become physical, only for Hieatt to seize her and pin her down on her bed, where he attempted to gag her with masking tape. Hieatt told one report writer he believed Vaikaew had goaded him into killing her, and thought she made the plan when he wouldn't pay her rental bills. The judge ordered him to serve a minimum of 11 years before he could be eligible for parole. Today he said, that while having the skills to deal with his emotions, it was in that instance that it had got to the point where he "painted himself into a corner". Hieatt had told the court that after her death he washed her body with a cloth, wiping blood from her mouth, nose and eyes before spending the night in bed with her body. It was Vaikaew's landlord, Ray Goffin, who called the police after realising something was wrong when he came around to collect the rent, reporting piles of flies in the flat. Today the board told Hieatt there appeared to be a pattern of behaviour with prostitutes prior to the murder. Hieatt said two of his six girlfriends had been prostitutes. When asked if he had a problem with Vaikaew's work, he said no, but that "it was just her character". "I should have known better. I'm not supposed to speak ill of the dead, but that's how she was." Markham reminded Hieatt he had committed the "ultimate abuse". "I allowed it to go on rather than dealing with it in a constructive way," he said of the relationship with Vaikaew. The board heard Hieatt had undertaken a release-to-work programme which was proceeding well. He was living in shared accommodation and the release-to-work programme would continue after his release. He was asked what he would do once a spell of supported accommodation came to an end following his release. Hieatt said he would probably opt to share accommodation with others to keep costs down. Probation said there would be a liaison to assist Hieatt with accommodation options and support with other government agencies. Corrections reported he had been compliant and had a good work ethic. Hieatt will appear for a monitoring hearing in February 2026. * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .

The Panel with Deborah Hart and Andie McCombs Part 1
The Panel with Deborah Hart and Andie McCombs Part 1

RNZ News

time10 hours ago

  • RNZ News

The Panel with Deborah Hart and Andie McCombs Part 1

Photo: Neil Silverwood Tonight, on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Deborah Hart and Andie McCombs. First, a controversial West Coast mine has been declined for the fast track process. Is the legislation working as it should? Then, 90 police officers from outside of Northland will work in the region on a temporary roster as the local frontline struggles with a spate of crime. The Far North Mayor joins the panel.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store