logo
World's major courts take growing role in climate fight

World's major courts take growing role in climate fight

Time of India2 days ago
PARIS: The world's top court is poised to tell governments what their legal obligations are to tackle global warming, and possibly outline consequences for polluters that cause climate harm to vulnerable countries.
Wednesday's highly anticipated advisory opinion by the
International Court of Justice
comes in the wake of landmark international decisions that experts say together have the potential to significantly shape climate action.
How has
climate litigation
evolved?
Andrew Raine, deputy director of the
UN Environment Programme
's law division, said frustration over the pace of climate action had spurred people, organisations and countries to turn to the courts.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
"When political systems fall short, the law is increasingly seen as a tool for driving ambition and enforcing commitments that have been made," he told AFP.
These have been bolstered by increasingly precise and detailed climate science, including from the UN's IPCC climate expert panel.
Almost 3,000 climate cases have been filed up to the end of 2024, in nearly 60 countries, according to the Grantham Research Institute, using data compiled by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.
While not all have been successful -- and some have tried to slow climate progress -- there have been notable cases in recent years that have pushed states to do more.
Urgenda, an environmental organisation in the Netherlands, notched a win at the Dutch Supreme Court in 2019, with justices ordering the government to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by the end of the following year.
And in 2021, the German Constitutional Court found that the government's failure to sufficiently cut planet-heating pollution placed an unacceptable burden on future generations.
Raine said that litigation was increasingly crossing borders, with 24 cases brought before international or regional courts, tribunals or other bodies.
"This marks a turning point and it reflects the transboundary and shared nature of the climate crisis," he said.
Why have recent cases been deemed historic?
Two in particular have been hailed as watershed moments that will help shape how courts, governments and businesses understand and act on their climate responsibilities.
Last year, an advisory opinion by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea said carbon emissions can be considered a marine pollutant and that countries have a legal duty to take measures to reduce their effects on oceans.
The tribunal made clear that the work of defining countries' obligations is not limited to the Paris climate agreement or the UN body that runs climate change negotiations.
Major polluters have argued that the UN framework is sufficient and against courts taking climate decisions.
Another major advisory opinion was issued this month, with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights reaffirming the right to a healthy climate system and acknowledging the rights of nature.
But perhaps the court's most profound statement was to place protection against irreversible climate harms on the same level as international prohibitions on genocide and torture, said Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito, Professor of Law and Director of the Climate Law Accelerator at New York University.
The court said "massive and serious harm to the climate system through emissions, through deforestation and so on, is absolutely forbidden by international law," he said.
In his view this made it the strongest statement yet by any international court on states' duty to avoid causing severe ecological destruction.
All eyes are now on the ICJ.
What could be the impact?
Vanuatu, one of many low-lying islands threatened by sea level rise, has asked the ICJ to give its opinion on states' obligations to reduce emissions.
But the potentially more controversial request is what -- if any -- legal consequences there might be for major polluters who cause severe climate damages.
"These are questions of global justice," said Rodriguez-Garavito, potentially touching on contentious issues of "reparations for climate harms" to those least responsible for emissions.
While advisory opinions like the ICJ are not legally enforceable, Raine said they carry significant weight.
"They clarify how international law applies to the climate crisis, and that has ripple effects across national courts, legislative processes and public debates," he said.
"It doesn't force states to act, but it shows them where the law stands and where they should be headed."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Were Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump friends? After birthday card, now wedding photo haunts Potus
Were Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump friends? After birthday card, now wedding photo haunts Potus

First Post

time6 minutes ago

  • First Post

Were Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump friends? After birthday card, now wedding photo haunts Potus

Disgraced American financier Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump once had the same social circle. Now, new images from the US president's 1993 wedding to Marla Maples proves that they were not just acquaintances. These new visuals emerge just a week after a news report stated that the American leader had sent the financier a racy card for his 50th birthday read more Commuters walk past a bus stop near Nine Elms Station as activists put up a poster showing President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein near the US Embassy in London. AP Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced American financier who was accused of running a sex trafficking ring of underage girls, died in 2019. But his death has turned into a nightmare for US President Donald Trump, who has come under intense scrutiny for his ties with the convicted felon. Now, even as many Americans demand for more disclosures from the Epstein Files, CNN has uncovered archived video footage and photos about Trump's past relationship with Epstein. Notably, this comes at a very difficult time for the US president — just last week, the Wall Street Journal published a report in which it stated that Trump had sent a card to Epstein for his 50th birthday, featuring a sketch of a naked woman and a typed note that read, 'Happy Birthday, and may every day be another wonderful secret.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Epstein spotted at Trump's wedding In December 1993, Donald Trump, then a wealthy business tycoon, tied the knot with American singer and television personality Marla Maples. The two exchanged their 'I dos' at a grand function at New York's Plaza Hotel. Now, 30 years later, CNN has accessed archival images from the event which show Jeffrey Epstein in attendance. High-society photographer Dafydd Jones, who was present at the wedding and tasked with taking photos, told CNN that among the photos he took was one of Epstein entering the event. 'I wish now I took more of him with Trump,' he told the American media outlet. 'I had the job of photographing the Trump wedding, so I stood with the press and photographed him. The image you have is from the contact sheet — the negatives were lost.' NEW via CNN / @KFILE: Newly uncovered archived video footage and photos reveal fresh details about Donald Trump's past relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Photos from 1993 confirm for the first time that Epstein attended Trump's 1993 wedding to Marla Maples. In addition,… — MeidasTouch (@MeidasTouch) July 22, 2025 Another photo, this time from the LIFE's archives, shows Epstein smiling in the background — his head is just visible as other attendees take a group picture. CNN's Andrew Kaczynski, whose team uncovered the images, told OutFront of the new reporting, 'Although we know that Trump and Epstein were friends during this period, this is really the first time that it's actually been reported that Trump invited Epstein to his wedding.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When CNN asked the now US president about the wedding images, he replied: 'You've got to be kidding me,' adding that CNN was 'fake news' and then hung up. Later, White House Communications Director Steven Cheung said in a statement, 'These are nothing more than out-of-context frame grabs of innocuous videos and pictures of widely attended events to disgustingly infer something nefarious. 'The fact is that the President kicked him out of his club for being a creep. This is nothing more than a continuation of the fake news stories concocted by the Democrats and the liberal media.' Trump, Epstein and Victoria's Secret Adding to the heaping pile of evidence of their close friendship are visuals from a 1999 Victoria's Secret fashion show in New York. The video shows the US president and financier laughing and chatting ahead of the runway event. A person walks by an image of US President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, along with the words 'President Trump: Release All the Epstein Files', projected onto the US Department of Commerce headquarters in Washington, DC. AFP Trump's birthday wish to Epstein CNN's reporting follows a bombshell report last week from The Wall Street Journal describing a birthday card Trump was said to have sent Epstein for his 50th birthday. The US media outlet stated that Trump told Epstein in the card, 'May every day be another wonderful secret.' It also featured lines of typewritten text framed by a drawing of a naked woman, with Trump's name signed below the woman's waist. The president denied to the Journal that he wrote the letter or drew the picture. 'I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women,' he told the Journal. 'It's not my language. It's not my words.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Later, he also sued the publication, seeking at least $20 billion in compensation. Trump's legal team accused the Journal's parent company of engaging in 'glaring failures in journalistic ethics and standards of accurate reporting.' Many of his supporters such as far-right influencer Laura Loomer also called the letter 'totally fake.' She wrote on X: 'Everyone who actually knows President Trump knows he doesn't type letters. He writes notes in big black Sharpie.' Parties, private jets and a 'terrific guy' The images uncovered by CNN and the previous reporting by Wall Street Journal are just latest on the friendship that Trump and Epstein once shared. In fact, it is reported that the two first met around the time Trump bought Mar-a-Lago in 1985, when Epstein was also living in Palm Beach. Since then, the pair have been pictured together at various events and social dos. A display of their close ties was when Trump flew on Epstein's private jet at least seven times during the 1990s, according to flight logs presented in court and cited by US media. The US president has denied this, and in 2024 said he was 'never on Epstein's plane'. In a 2002, Trump even told New York Magazine that Epstein was a 'terrific guy'. 'He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD People holds signs calling for the release of files regarding late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. File image/AFP A falling out However, the friendship between Epstein and Trump wasn't to last. Speaking in July 2019, just days after Epstein was charged with sex trafficking, Trump was eager to clarify that there pair were no longer friends – and hadn't been for quite some time. 'I had a falling out with him,' said the US president. 'I haven't spoken to him in 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you.' But what caused a souring in their friendship? It was a property deal. In 2004, a Palm Beach property came up for grabs — an oceanfront mansion called Maison de l'Amitie, or the House of Friendship. The property was being sold as a result of its previous owner Abe Gosman's bankruptcy, and according to a Washington Post report, both Epstein and Trump were keen to get their hands on it. What ensued was an outright bidding war between the two men for the estate, which Trump eventually won. But it left a sour taste in Trump's mouth and the two went their separate ways. Trump even claimed that barred Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago estate, and the pair were never photographed together again. 'He's a real creep, I banned him," Trump is reported to have told his former aide, Sam Nunberg. Trump's Epstein Files saga continues Since coming to office, it seems that the Epstein files have become a noose around Trump's neck. Earlier this month, the US Justice Department claimed that there is no evidence that Epstein maintained a 'client list' that named or implicated others in alleged sex crimes. This has angered many of Trump's core followers, including Tucker Carlson and former 'First Buddy' Elon Musk. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Amid this ongoing controversy, the Justice Department announced that it is in touch with an attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, a long time associate of Epstein, to try to arrange a meeting with her in the coming days. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the plan on social media, saying that the department is seeking any information from Maxwell — who is serving time for sex trafficking — as part of its quest to uncover 'all credible evidence' in the Epstein case. With inputs from agencies

US Consulate celebrates National Day with a reception in Kolkata
US Consulate celebrates National Day with a reception in Kolkata

Time of India

time15 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US Consulate celebrates National Day with a reception in Kolkata

The U.S. Consulate in Kolkata hosted a grand reception on Friday evening to celebrate the 249th Independence Day of the United States. The event brought together diplomats, government officials, cultural figures, and prominent members of the city's civil society, marking a vibrant evening of camaraderie and cross-cultural exchange in presence of Manoj Pant, IAS chief secretary to the government of West Bengal. Held with all the ceremonial flair befitting the occasion, the gala underscored the enduring partnership between the United States and India. Reflecting on the journey of America for freedom and as a democracy, Charge D' Affaires Jorgan K Andrews said, 'There is no better place to celebrate America's birthday than here, the world's largest democracy.' 'This is my first time hosting America's national day here in Kolkata and it caps off an amazing and busy year since I arrived in August. Many of you have opened the doors to my team, me and my family and helped us to forge our allies. When we talk about diplomacy, we often think of governments working together and certainly that is true, but certainly what is also true is the real part, the real connections and the real strength comes from the people' - Kathy Giles-Diaz , US Consul General 'This day marks an inspiring journey of freedom and democracy that the US had undertaken since independence. It also gives us an opportunity to reflect on the profound and enduring relationship between the two nations. Our shared values of democracy, liberty and justice are found in the dynamic partnership that we cherish today. West Bengal holds a special place in this shared history being home to one of the oldest American Consulates in the world and the oldest in India established in 1794' -Manoj Pant, IAS, chief secretary to the government of West Bengal

China Bars Two US Citizens From Leaving: What Are Exit Bans And How Do They Work?
China Bars Two US Citizens From Leaving: What Are Exit Bans And How Do They Work?

News18

time16 minutes ago

  • News18

China Bars Two US Citizens From Leaving: What Are Exit Bans And How Do They Work?

Last Updated: China imposed exit bans on two Americans, a Wells Fargo executive and a US government employee. What are exit bans and how do they work? China imposed exit bans on two American citizens- a Wells Fargo executive and an employee of the US government- just weeks ahead of a key trade deadline between the two countries. China's Foreign Ministry confirmed that it had placed an exit ban on Mao Chenyue, a banker working for Wells Fargo, saying she was 'involved in a criminal case" and was required to cooperate with the investigation. Separately, the US State Department said that China blocked a Commerce Department employee- specifically from the United States Patent and Trademark Office- from leaving the country. The US Embassy in Beijing said that it had raised concerns about the use of 'arbitrary exit bans" with Chinese authorities, saying such actions damage bilateral relations. What Are Exit Bans Used For? Exit bans are legal tools that prevent individuals- both Chinese citizens and foreigners- from leaving the country. In many cases, authorities justify their use to keep suspects or witnesses in place during investigations, particularly if they are deemed a flight risk. China's exit bans are sometimes imposed for political reasons or as leverage in civil disputes, diplomatic stand-offs or even to pressure foreign governments, experts have warned. James Zimmerman, a Beijing-based lawyer and former chair of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, said, 'Most of the time, there is a legitimate legal basis for the exit bans. But there are indeed instances of misuse of the process by the government authorities, including for political reasons." Who Can Be Subject To Exit Bans? While suspects and witnesses in criminal cases are often the most obvious targets, China has extended exit bans to individuals who are not directly involved in legal proceedings. Foreigners with ties to investigations involving state-owned enterprises (SOEs) may also be barred from leaving. There are also high-profile examples of exit bans being used coercively. In 2018, two American citizens- Victor and Cynthia Liu- were prevented from leaving China for three years in what US officials described as an effort to pressure their father, a Chinese fugitive wanted for financial crimes, to return. How Has China Expanded Its Use Of Exit Bans? In recent years, China has passed or amended several laws that give authorities broader powers to impose exit bans, especially under the banner of national security. A major change came in 2023, when the country revised its counterespionage law to allow exit bans for anyone under investigation who might pose a national security risk after leaving the country- even if no charges have been filed. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store