
China's official media welcome US tariff deal, others sceptical
BEIJING/HONG KONG (Reuters): A tariff deal between the United States and China on Monday (May 12) was greeted with scepticism on Chinese social media, while official commentary welcomed the news.
Speaking after talks with Chinese officials in Geneva, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the two sides had agreed a 90-day pause and tariffs would be reduced by over 100 percentage points to a 10% baseline rate.
"I'm just afraid that Trump might change his mind at any time, after all he is not normal," one user called Qijie wrote on China's social media platform Weibo.
"Those Americans, especially that fool Trump, are simply not trustworthy! Beware of their fickleness," said another user called Wu.
Both posts generated thousands of likes.
Since taking office in January, US President Donald Trump has increased tariffs paid by US importers for goods from China to 145%, in addition to those he imposed on many Chinese goods during his first term and the duties the Biden administration levied.
China responded with export curbs on some rare earth elements, vital for US manufacturers of weapons and electronic consumer goods, and by raising tariffs on US goods to 125%.
Behind closed doors, Chinese officials had grown alarmed about the economic impact of tariffs and the risk of isolation as China's trading partners started negotiating deals with Washington, according to three officials familiar with Beijing's thinking.
As Chinese state media praised the deal, a commentary by public broadcaster CCTV said the meeting between China and the United States in Geneva was "balanced and beneficial to both sides".
"The atmosphere of the talks was candid, in-depth and constructive and substantial progress was made and important consensus was reached," it said on Tencent's Wechat social media platform.
Chinese commentator Hu Xijin, a former editor of state newspaper Global Times, said on his Wechat account the joint statement from China and the United States was historic.
China and the United States "can handle major disputes in an equal and mutually respectful manner," he said, adding the result was "also a victory for international trade rules and due order". – Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
US forces still in ‘defensive posture' in Mideast: White House
WASHINGTON: The White House insisted Monday evening that US forces remained in a 'defensive' posture in the Middle East, despite a military buildup over the Israel-Iran war and a shock warning from President Donald Trump to evacuate Tehran. Trump's brief warning on social media, without further details, raised speculation that the United States may be readying to join Israel in attacking Iran. Those suspicions rose further after it was announced that Trump would be leaving a G7 summit in Canada and returning to the White House a day early over the mounting Middle East conflict. But White House and Pentagon officials reiterated that US forces in the region remained in a 'defensive' posture. White House spokesperson Alex Pfeiffer, replying to a post on social media that claimed the United States was attacking in Iran, said: 'This is not true.' 'American forces are maintaining their defensive posture, and that has not changed,' he said. Pentagon Chief Pete Hegseth similarly told Fox News in a televised interview that 'we are postured defensively in the region, to be strong, in pursuit of a peace deal, and we certainly hope that's what happens here.' Earlier in the day, Hegseth had announced that he had 'directed the deployment of additional capabilities' over the weekend to the Middle East. 'Protecting US forces is our top priority and these deployments are intended to enhance our defensive posture in the region,' he wrote on X. His post on social media came after the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz was tracked leaving Southeast Asia on Monday, and amid reports that dozens of US military aircraft were heading across the Atlantic. A US defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed that Hegseth had ordered the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group to the Middle East, saying it was 'to sustain our defensive posture and safeguard American personnel.' The movement of one of the world's largest warships came on day four of the escalating air war between Israel and Iran, with no end in sight despite international calls for de-escalation.


New Straits Times
25 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Petronas expects ENI upstream joint venture to be set up in 1-2 years
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian state energy company Petronas said on Tuesday it expects to take one to two years to set up a planned joint venture with Italian energy group Eni on upstream assets in Indonesia and Malaysia. The companies announced a joint venture framework, moving forward with a pact signed in February that they said can deliver up to 500,000 barrels per day of oil equivalent (boe), combining about 3 billion boe of reserves with an additional 10 billion boe of potential exploration upside. "Asia has huge, huge potential," Eni CEO Claudio Descalzi told Reuters on the sidelines of the Energy Asia conference in Kuala Lumpur. "The cooperation between countries, to find synergies and exchange energies and put together resources and competencies, is essential. And that is a very strong example, Indonesia and Malaysia together," Descalzi said. The asset combination focuses on Indonesia's Kutai Basin, where Eni's portfolio includes developments in the Northern and Gendalo-Gandang hubs, which hold substantial gas reserves. "The whole idea of having this as a combination is to have an independent entity created in order to be self-financed," Mohd Jukris Abdul Wahab, executive vice-president and CEO - upstream at Petronas, said at the conference. Petronas has said it was looking to include oil and gas projects in Indonesia's Kutai Basin in the planned joint venture, proposing to swap interests for its assets in Malaysia and Indonesia with Eni's blocks there. However, Petronas said it would exclude Indonesian assets recently awarded to the company, such as the Binaiya and Serpang blocks. The companies said they aimed to finalise their agreement by this year-end, with completion thereafter subject to regulatory approvals.


The Sun
25 minutes ago
- The Sun
US forces still in ‘defensive posture' in Mideast
WASHINGTON: The White House insisted Monday evening that US forces remained in a 'defensive' posture in the Middle East, despite a military buildup over the Israel-Iran war and a shock warning from President Donald Trump to evacuate Tehran. Trump's brief warning on social media, without further details, raised speculation that the United States may be readying to join Israel in attacking Iran. Those suspicions rose further after it was announced that Trump would be leaving a G7 summit in Canada and returning to the White House a day early over the mounting Middle East conflict. But White House and Pentagon officials reiterated that US forces in the region remained in a 'defensive' posture. White House spokesperson Alex Pfeiffer, replying to a post on social media that claimed the United States was attacking in Iran, said: 'This is not true.' 'American forces are maintaining their defensive posture, and that has not changed,' he said. Pentagon Chief Pete Hegseth similarly told Fox News in a televised interview that 'we are postured defensively in the region, to be strong, in pursuit of a peace deal, and we certainly hope that's what happens here.' Earlier in the day, Hegseth had announced that he had 'directed the deployment of additional capabilities' over the weekend to the Middle East. 'Protecting US forces is our top priority and these deployments are intended to enhance our defensive posture in the region,' he wrote on X. His post on social media came after the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz was tracked leaving Southeast Asia on Monday, and amid reports that dozens of US military aircraft were heading across the Atlantic. A US defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed that Hegseth had ordered the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group to the Middle East, saying it was 'to sustain our defensive posture and safeguard American personnel.' The movement of one of the world's largest warships came on day four of the escalating air war between Israel and Iran, with no end in sight despite international calls for de-escalation.