Āpōpō Welcomes ‘Built To Last' Report As Mandate To Strengthen Aotearoa's Infrastructure Asset Management System
The report's emphasis on sustainability, stewardship, equity, and system reform aligns directly with Āpōpō's purpose: to enhance the capability of asset management professionals for Aotearoa New Zealand through education, accreditation, guidance, and thought leadership.
Supporting a Future-Ready Workforce
Āpōpō strongly endorses all seven recommendations made in the report - particularly Recommendation 4: Increase Asset Management Workforce Capability. With 99% of infrastructure already in place (Te Waihanga 2024), and future investment expected to prioritise maintenance and renewal, effective asset management is more critical than ever. Skilled knowledgeable professionals are needed now and in the future to take responsibility for delivering that effective asset management. New Zealand does not have sufficient capability in asset management to ensure we are realising all the economic, environmental, social and cultural value from our past current and future investments in infrastructure.
"Meeting these challenges requires more than money - it requires a shift to long-term, integrated thinking to deliver the competency and capacity in asset management that we require," says Murray Pugh, Āpōpō Chief Executive. "Asset management must be recognised as an essential discipline that safeguards intergenerational wellbeing, and this must be supported by formal education and certification pathways to ensure credible practitioners are added to the profession."
Āpōpō is already leading this shift. Through nationally recognised learning pathways, credentials, and technical guidance, the organisation is upskilling professionals across central and local government, the private sector, and community organisations. Its Professional Practice Accreditation Scheme - aligned with the Global Certification Scheme (GCS) of the World Partners in Asset Management – (WPiAM), offers recognition for practitioners at two levels: Asset Management Associate (AMA) and Asset Management Chartered Professional (AMCP).
Underpinned by Āpōpō's Competency Framework, which integrates international standards (GFMAM) and ISO, the Pou Herenga model of culturally grounded practice, this scheme is building a skilled, knowledgeable, and ethical asset management workforce for the future.
Strengthening Organisations and System Leadership
Āpōpō is preparing an Organisational Accreditation programme to help lift asset management maturity at a system level. The initiative will recognise public and private infrastructure asset owning organisations for demonstrating excellence in asset governance, planning, continuous improvement, stakeholder engagement, and value realisation.
Additionally, Āpōpō co-convenes with Te Waihanga – New Zealand Infrastructure Commission, the Central Government Asset Management Community of Practice. This collaboration provides a platform for asset owning agencies to share challenges and coordinate efforts for better outcomes.
Embedding Long-Termism and Te ao Māori Values
The HCF and WSP report highlights the tension between short-term political cycles and the long-term nature of infrastructure decisions. Āpōpō advocates for systems thinking, where infrastructure planning and asset management are grounded in wellbeing, resilience, and intergenerational equity.
Āpōpō's work draws on global frameworks and adapts them to Aotearoa's unique context. Te ao Māori principles are woven throughout guidance and professional standards (such as the next generation authoritative Āpōpō Guide and the Infrastructure Valuation and Depreciation Guidelines), reinforcing stewardship and interconnectedness for delivering value that benefits all communities.
The 2024 Āpōpō Supreme Award for Asset Management Excellence went to Nelson City Council for its Kaupapa Māori Asset Management Framework - an iwi-led, values-driven approach that exemplifies the future of asset management in Aotearoa. Built to Last recognises this project as a national exemplar.
Professionalising the System
Āpōpō calls on central government to take immediate action to support the professionalisation of the sector:
Recognise Āpōpō's accreditation schemes within the public sector capability framework.
Invest in professional development and an education-to-employment talent pipeline.
Support organisational accreditation to lift asset management maturity and embed continuous improvement.
Partner with professional bodies to co-develop national guidance, build communities of practice, and align with public value.
Building a Resilient Future
Built to Last affirms what asset management professionals have long known: our infrastructure future depends on people, capability, and culture.
'We thank the Helen Clark Foundation and WSP for their leadership in advancing this critical conversation,' says Murray Pugh. 'The time to act is now - together, we can support competent and capable asset management professionals to deliver enduring public value from our infrastructure assets.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
05-08-2025
- The Spinoff
NZOA has saved reality TV and soaps – what about all the shows left to die?
NZ on Air is confronting a very uncomfortable question: what to save, and what to leave behind. Funding announcements from NZ on Air are not typically newsworthy in and of themselves. The agency functions as a local version of the BBC, but instead of existing as a non-commercial umbrella brand, it funds a variety of media which runs across a wide range of largely commercial mediums and platforms. Funded work often consists of a mix of returning shows and new projects, which are either predictable (another season of Q+A, or a fresh David Lomas project) or largely unknown (another murder in rural New Zealand, cast tbc). The most recent round was strikingly different, making news in a way which reveals challenges to the agency's model, and shows just how bad the choices are for NZ on Air now. Three very familiar shows collectively received more than $5m in funding. They are Shortland Street, Celebrity Treasure Island and The Traitors NZ. All are broad in their appeal and comparatively popular. Yet none would have been considered good candidates for funding until very recently. That's because NZ on Air was set up to address a market failure. Due to our small population, some forms of 'programming reflecting New Zealand identity and culture' (according to its legislation) are not commercially viable. The legislation makes specific reference to 'drama and documentary', with everything else somewhat in the eye of the beholder. For decades that meant scripted shows (such as comedy and drama) were NZ on Air's core business, while most other formats (from current affairs to breakfast TV) were commercially funded, due to TV networks being able to sell enough ads to make them on their own terms. That didn't mean it lacked value, just that it didn't need the support. News is the canonical example of a commercially funded genre – TVNZ's 6pm bulletin remains among the highest-rated shows on television, despite costing a bomb to make. Reality TV wasn't even a genre when NZ on Air was founded, and the agency has tended to be fairly circumspect in its funding of it over the years, only getting involved when, as with Match Fit, or Popstars, it fulfilled another worthy goal. Shortland Street, our only true soap, was briefly funded as a kind of TV startup, but cranked along under its own steam for decades afterwards. This was helpful because reality TV and soaps are considered less intellectually nutritious by the kind of people who care about the culture we fund. The end of that era This has not been an uncontested idea. Critics, including those at The Spinoff, and the makers of reality TV have long felt that NZ on Air was too prescriptive in its definition of 'reflecting New Zealand identity and culture'. They believe that reality TV and soaps are popular, show a diverse range of New Zealanders and bring voices, vernacular and perspectives to our screens, just as scripted comedy and drama do. This past week, they won the argument. Shortland Street has returned for a second funded season, after last year accessing two different strands of public funding to stay on air. More striking was the return of The Traitors NZ and Celebrity Treasure Island, two shows which had previously been commercially funded. Celebrity Treasure Island is a revival of an '00s-era format, and has drawn praise for its use of Te Reo Māori and addressing 'complex issues like ageism, sexism and queer politics, all on primetime mainstream television', according to my colleague Tara Ward. The Traitors NZ is a hit local version of a smash international format, with a diverse cast and a strong strain of New Zealand-specific humour. In addition to the cultural arguments, there's also a broader systems-level case for their funding. The shows have consistently rated strongly, particularly with the kind of middle-aged audiences which have abandoned linear television over the past decade. The thinking goes that by keeping these tentpole shows on our screens, you also help keep our networks and production companies viable. The path not taken Despite the solid arguments in favour, there remains a case against, too. To contemplate it, you only need to cast your mind back to a little over a year ago. It was a bonfire of the journalists. We lost longform current affairs stalwart Sunday, the venerable consumer rights show Fair Go, the magazine-style 7pm staple The Project and, most wrenchingly, the whole Newshub operation, all in the space of a few harrowing months. The death of those shows was attributed to the awful financial equation facing TV networks. That despite all rating very strongly, at least by comparison to the rest of the schedule, none could justify the investment required to keep them running. It was a shocking, visceral event, one which made New Zealand a cautionary tale across the Tasman – the country you need to look hard at to figure out how to avoid its fate. Now, a year on, and NZ on Air has been persuaded by the arguments of TVNZ and Three, that these reality TV and soap formats are too important to be allowed to die. To be clear, none of Shortland Street, Celebrity Treasure Island or The Traitors NZ is fully funded. The budgets aren't public, but production industry sources suggest the agency's investment would cover no more than 50% of the associated costs, and perhaps considerably less. Still, the risk of moral hazard is clear. The networks and production companies have established that no show is beyond help, and as audiences decline, there is a manifest case for continually topping up the public funding component of budgets. The implication is that paradoxically, as they get less popular and ad revenue declines, they should receive more help. None of which is to say these decisions are wrong in isolation. But looking at the slate of what we publicly fund now, we seem a long way from home. Pulpy true crime documentaries, reality TV shows with large chunks devoted to selling McDonalds, regularly re-named shows built around the interests of a single comedian. Still, what else can we do? Linear TV audience decline is a global phenomenon, and no public or private broadcaster has successfully ported their audiences across to digital at the same scale as they once had, let alone been able to defend the same advertising revenues. NZ on Air faces bad choices everywhere as it seeks to fulfil its mission and defend its model. It may not have even been given the chance to save the news. But as we slip gently into a new era, where everything which can be argued can be funded, it's important to remember the shows we didn't save too. And ask whether the foundational mission of NZ on Air is better served by what we kept, or what we threw away.
1News
27-07-2025
- 1News
'Call me Mr Cash Man': MP seeks protection for hard currency
Self-proclaimed cash advocate and MP Jamie Arbuckle believes his proposed law protecting hard currency transactions is about more than accessibility — it's also about privacy and preventing "Big Brother" surveillance. The New Zealand First MP's members' legislation, the Cash Transactions Protection Bill, would require vendors to accept cash up to the value of $500, with no limits on the amount of cash that must be accepted for essential items like fuel and food. 'There's a real concern across New Zealand that we're becoming a cashless society, and we've got a lot of people who depend on cash,' the MP told Q+A. He said that particularly applied to people living in rural areas, the elderly who are more comfortable using cash than digital systems, and those on low incomes. A self-professed fan of using cash, Arbuckle said, 'cash is king, and you can call me Mr Cash Man if you like.' ADVERTISEMENT 'I've got to tell you right now, I don't like walking into a shop and not being able to pay cash for a coffee.' Composite image by Vania Chandrawidjaja (Source: iStock/1News) But he said in an increasingly digital world, there was a more serious point to be made about the ability to make anonymous payments. 'People are telling me they want to have the ability to use cash, it's a freedom of choice issue.' 'It's really the only true way of having privacy in a transaction. You don't get that with electronic payments. There's always the concern that Big Brother or someone is able to look at where you've been, what you've purchased, so the majority of people have been very positive about protecting cash use.' A Reserve Bank survey released in June 2025 found that — while electronic and debit card use was by far the most common method of making payments — a significant minority of the country continued to use cash regularly. Around 46% of respondents said they used cash 'to pay for everyday things', down slightly from 48% which an equivalent survey found in June 2023. ADVERTISEMENT The survey also found a majority had used cash at least once in the seven days preceding the survey being taken, with approximately 33% of respondents saying they hadn't used cash in the last week, and a further 3.6% saying they would never use cash. Further research undertaken last year by the Reserve Bank found Kiwis value being able to use physical cash. Director of money and cash Ian Woolford said, '84% of respondents were worried about losing access to banknotes and coins, and want assurance that cash will still be issued by the Reserve Bank and not reduced or replaced by digital cash.' 'We'll keep issuing cash for as long as New Zealanders want to use it," he said in December. "We're doing a lot of work to redesign the cash system, including helping retailers through community cash services trials next year in several rural communities lacking over-the-counter bank or ATM services.' Some businesses have moved to being cash-free, but Arbuckle said in his view, it couldn't be an opt-in and opt-out system. 'The majority of businesses hold cash, so we're only talking about a small amount of businesses that would have to change. ADVERTISEMENT "Cash is legal tender, and you should be able to purchase with cash.' He said if the bill is pulled out of the member's bill biscuit tin, he'd welcome feedback from businesses that might be affected during the select committee process. Q+A with Jack Tame is made with the support of New Zealand On Air
Otago Daily Times
26-07-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Tourist season extending
Wānaka's shoulder season is shrinking, as visitor numbers hold steady 12 months a year, according to visitor data. The region's rapid tourism growth is undeniable and, in addition to its growth, Wānaka is experiencing a gradual shift in its peak days too. Many outside the region regard the town as a winter destination, but operators say summer has risen in popularity and visitors are now making the most of off-peak seasons as well. Destination Queenstown chief executive Matt Woods said Wānaka had been seeing steady tourism from about mid-June through till mid-April, making the shoulder season next to non-existent. Last year and this year, the twilight zone was between December and March, during which there were about 94,000 to 140,000 commercial guest stays. The rest of last year had stable numbers ranging from about 53,000 to 70,000 guests per month, except for May and June with just over 35,000 guests each. Hospitality businesses in Wānaka have felt the impact of this shift. Te Wānaka Lodge co-owner Mandy Enoka said in the 17 years she had been in the industry, summer was a busy season, but it had grown over the years. "We've had a really busy market. I think summer has extended slowly," she said. " ... So we're now busy from November through until, like, the first of May." Before Covid-19, the summer season would run from mid-December to mid-March, she estimated. As the very peak of the summer season was at Christmas and New Year, some visitors were pushing their check-in dates in order to skip the high prices, Ms Enoka said. However, the winter season was not experiencing the same visitor increase that the summer was. While occupancy rates for the lodge used to be roughly 85% during the July school holidays, they were now sitting at 60%, and one of the most significant contributors was the late snowfall, she said. "I think they're not necessarily wanting to commit to travelling to Wānaka when potentially the snow isn't as good." Archway Motels and Chalets manager Mark Hamilton also said the summer had been a busy time, particularly with events such as Warbirds over Wānaka and Wheels at Wānaka. The high number of visitors made Mr Hamilton feel the town could not handle the tourism industry it had been bolstering. "Summer is definitely crazy. I mean, Wānaka has always been popular and now we have the R&A concert in the valley, which adds to the nightmare. "It's like, Wānaka's really struggling, capacity-wise, which pushes your prices up, of course ... The shoulder season really hasn't eventuated," he said. The winter saw fewer visitors who stayed longer, whereas the summer had more people coming for shorter periods. Deputy mayor Quentin Smith said the growing peak seasons had become something to seriously consider when looking at future development. "It's really hard to manage the infrastructure for the peaks, depending on who's riding, electricity, sewage, all of the above," he said. Building more infrastructure was only one part of the solution. The focus also had to be on regenerative tourism, where sustainability was encouraged. Mr Woods shared a similar opinion, pointing out that high visitor numbers needed to be considered hand in hand with resident population growth. The demand projection from the Queenstown Lakes District Council, released in May of this year, showed the projected resident population in 2025 was 54,440, with visitor numbers on peak days averaging 68,050 people. Looking ahead to 2035, the resident population was projected to hit 69,405 in the district and visitors on peak day to be 86,756. Mr Woods said the growth in resident and visitor numbers meant it was necessary to look at adding more infrastructure that could be used by all those living in or visiting the district. It was also important to look at the regenerative tourism strategy in the destination management plan, which aimed to make tourism sustainable for everyone in the region, he said.
