Taiwan's July export orders rise for 6th month, warns on global trade risks
Export orders rose 15.2% in July on the year to $57.64 billion, the economic affairs ministry said on Wednesday, broadly in line with analysts' expectations for a 15% increase.
Orders for goods from Taiwan, home of the world's largest contract chipmaker TSMC (2330.TW), opens new tab and other tech companies, are considered a bellwether of global technology demand.
Trade-reliant Taiwan's export performance this year could be affected as U.S. President Donald Trump said he would impose a tariffs of 20% on its goods.
Taiwan's government has said the 20% tariff is "temporary" as it continues to negotiate with the U.S. for more favourable rates.
"Uncertainty over trade policy and geopolitical risks will affect global trade performance," the ministry said in a statement.
But orders momentum will be supported as new applications such as AI and high-performance computing continue to expand, while the second half is typically the high season ahead of year-end holidays in Western markets, it said.
For August, the ministry said it expected export orders to rise between 10.5% and 14.5% from a year ago.
Taiwan's orders in July for telecoms products were up 15.5% on the year, while those for electronic products climbed 24.8%.
Overall orders from China were up 3.6%, slowing from a gain of 15% in June.
Orders from the United States climbed 25.4%, off a rise of 34.8% the month before.
Orders from Europe inched up 7.3%, and those from Japan rose 12.8%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump's huge civil fraud penalty thrown out by New York appeals court
NEW YORK, Aug 21 (Reuters) - A New York state appeals court on Thursday threw out an approximately half-billion-dollar penalty that Donald Trump had been ordered to pay after a judge found the U.S. president fraudulently overstated the value of his properties and other assets to bolster his family business. The decision by a five-judge panel of the Appellate Division in Manhattan represented a defeat for New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office brought the civil fraud lawsuit against Trump in 2022. James' case had been among Trump's biggest legal losses in a slew of lawsuits against him in recent years. Lawyers for Trump did not immediately respond to requests for comment. James' office did not immediately respond to similar requests. The appeals court was splintered. Two judges found Trump was properly held liable, and James "vindicated a public interest" by pursuing her fraud case, but the penalty was an excessive fine that violated the U.S. Constitution. Two other judges also found James had authority to sue, but a new trial was necessary because the trial judge should not have held Trump liable for fraud at the outset. The fifth judge said the case against Trump should have been dismissed. Trump was appealing a judgment entered by Justice Arthur Engoron in a state court in Manhattan, following a three-month nonjury trial. Engoron found Trump had inflated his wealth over several years before first becoming president in 2017, to dupe lenders and insurers into providing better terms to the Trump Organization. Trump has denied wrongdoing. His lawyers argued that the penalty was too high and that James had overreached. In February 2024, the judge ordered Trump to pay $454.2 million in penalties plus interest, which has continued to accrue. Trump was personally liable for nearly 98% of the judgment, with his eldest sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, and former Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg responsible for the remainder. Referring to Trump and other Trump Organization figures, Engoron said their "complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological." Engoron also banned Trump and the Trump Organization from applying for loans from banks registered in the state for three years, and effectively barred Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump from running the business for two years. The appeals court put these restrictions on hold during the appeals process, while letting a court-appointed monitor for the Trump Organization continue her work.
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Weaponizing US economic might will weaken it
NEW YORK, Aug 21 (Reuters Breakingviews) - American trade warriors may be keen to claim early victory. Tariff revenue has surged, opens new tab 131% year-over-year to reach $127 billion by July. The trade deficit shrank in June to its smallest margin since late 2023. On Thursday, Washington and Brussels clarified new terms on everything from duties on cars, opens new tab and pharmaceuticals to major purchase pledges, opens new tab. The gambit is that the might of U.S. consumption is too tantalizing for governments and corporations abroad to ignore. Levies, investment promises, and an edge for homegrown industry are the fruits of this leverage. The fiscal reality of President Donald Trump's hard-nosed approach, though, will sap Uncle Sam's strength. The United States is an economic colossus, accounting for roughly 30% of global consumption, an estimate derived from Bureau of Economic Analysis, opens new tab and World Bank, opens new tab data. A yawning trade deficit in goods – about $86 billion in June – is the flipside, an enormous opportunity for exporters worldwide. Tariffs and bespoke, country-by-country investment deals effectively weaponize this dynamic: pay your way, or lose access. An oddball patchwork of duties and pledges, like the European Union's declared intention to buy $750 billion of U.S. energy products and $40 billion of artificial intelligence chips, is the tenuous result. The administration claims $5.1 trillion in total promised inflows, says PolitiFact, with heavy caveats, opens new tab. To boot, it is attacking regulations that are bugbears of corporate America, extracting a promise of 'flexibilities' from Europe on its planned tax on carbon-intensive imports and nudging Canada to drop a digital services fee. This aggressive strategy comes at a price. The average effective tariff rate stands at a level last seen in 1933, opens new tab, while the total customs-duty take could reach 2.6% of gross domestic product, according to Yale's budget lab, opens new tab. This is, effectively, a tax that will dampen consumption, raising prices and trimming near-term growth, Yale reckons. For now, U.S. corporations seem fine. The blended net profit margin of S&P 500 Index constituents reached, opens new tab 12.8% in the second quarter, topping the five-year average, according to FactSet. But seven industries, including energy and real estate, posted year-over-year declines. Consumer spending is already softening, flat, opens new tab year-over-year on an inflation-adjusted basis in June, per BEA data. That may restrain attempts to pass on rising costs, even as the Institute of Supply Management's manufacturing price index notched among its highest readings, opens new tab of the past three years in July. When consumers are too stretched for companies to raise prices without losing sales, earnings will suffer. It's no accident that open trade has undergirded Uncle Sam's economic strength. A turn away from it could even backfire: European business activity hit, opens new tab a 14-month high in July as firms hedge against U.S. uncertainty. Tariffs might yet prove a tax on the engine of American exceptionalism. Follow Sebastian Pellejero on LinkedIn, opens new tab.
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Majority of college students say they will be affected by Trump's new tax bill: ‘Honestly, I'm cooked'
With Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' set to alter how families and students finance higher education starting in July 2026, a new survey suggests the majority of college students expect to be affected by the bill. A US News & World Report surveyed nearly 1,200 college students, with most responders saying the changes will affect them. When asked about the law's broader effects, 61% of students said they would personally feel its impact, while 20% said they would not and 19% responded 'I don't know.' About a third (32%) of students anticipate being affected by the removal of repayment options such as the Save Plan, a 2023 income-driven repayment plan for student debt implemented by former president Joe Biden. Trump's bill sets new caps on borrowing and reduces the repayment plan options available for federal student loan borrowers who take out loans beginning in the summer of next year. It also eliminates Grad Plus loans for graduate and professional students after that date. Awareness of the scope of the incoming changes varies among those surveyed. Just 20% of students say they fully grasp the upcoming policy shift, while 19% admit they don't understand it at all. Another 39% say they understand somewhat, and 22% are unsure how the new rules will apply to them. A slight majority of students (51%) oppose all of the bill's student loan changes. Even when asked about individual provisions, support remains weak, with only around one in five approving of borrowing caps or the elimination of certain income-driven repayment plans. For many, the new rules are causing them to reconsider their educational path. According to the survey, 35% are thinking about cutting back on their studies, 32% about changing degrees, 31% about completing school abroad, and 26% about enlisting in the military for financial support. First-generation students are even more likely to consider reducing their schooling (45%) or changing majors (44%), an outcome possibly also related to Trump's rescinding of longstanding protections against immigration raids on school campuses, as data shows 47% of first-generation students in the US are also first-generation immigrants. Some students shared their thoughts directly: 'I'm thinking about not finishing law school,' one said. Another explained: 'I wanted to go to medical school, but now I won't.' One summed it up simply: 'Honestly, I'm cooked.' Graduate and professional students are expected to feel the greatest impact, given the new borrowing limits and the loss of Grad Plus loans. Currently, students in programs such as law or medicine can borrow up to $138,500 over the course of their education, including undergraduate borrowing. Other graduate students have borrowing limits between $81,000 and $107,500, depending on what they took out as undergrads. The new legislation will cap borrowing for master's and academic doctoral degree programs at $20,500 per year and $100,000 in total. Professional practice doctoral degrees, such as medicine and law, will have higher limits of $50,000 per year and $200,000 in total. Although these new limits are technically higher than current caps, students needing more than that amount will find their options have shrunk. Currently, Grad Plus loans allow graduate students to borrow up to the full cost of attendance. While they carry higher interest rates than direct loans, they offer important benefits compared to private loans, such as fixed rates and access to income-driven repayment plans.
