Australia adds YouTube to platforms covered by world-first ban on social media for teenagers
The reversal could trigger a legal challenge.
The ban, set to take effect in December, seeks to protect minors from harmful content and algorithm-driven exposure.
The latest decision came after the internet regulator asked the government last month to overturn the YouTube carve-out, citing a survey that found 37 per cent of minors reported harmful content on the site, the worst showing for a social media platform.
The prime minister said his government was standing with parents and prioritising child safety online. 'I am calling time on it,' Anthony Albanese said, stating that Australian children were being negatively affected by social media platforms.
'I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.'
While YouTube claims it's a video sharing platform, critics argue it functions similarly to banned apps like Instagram and TikTok.
'Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media,' a YouTube spokesperson said by email.
'We have written directly to the government, urging them to uphold the integrity of the legislative process and protect the age-appropriate experiences and safeguards we provide for young Australians.'
Other social media platforms had criticised the earlier decision to exempt YouTube from the ban, arguing that it functioned similarly to them by promoting user interaction and algorithm-based content. TikTok had described it as a 'sweetheart deal'.
Although YouTube will now be included in the ban for users under 16, parents and teachers can still show videos to minors.
The decision to include YouTube in the under-16 social media ban reflects growing concern over AI-driven misinformation and big tech's influence, according to cybersecurity expert Adam Marre.
'The Australian government's move to regulate YouTube is an important step in pushing back against the unchecked power of big tech and protecting kids,' he told Reuters.
Mr Albanese had earlier asserted that the policy would be made independently of any corporate threats. 'The minister will make these assessments,' he told ABC TV on Sunday, 'independent of any of these threats that're made by the social media companies. I say to them that social media has a social responsibility. There's no doubt that young people are being impacted adversely in their mental health by some of the engagement with social media and that is why the government has acted.'
The decision was set to heighten tensions with Alphabet, which previously threatened to withdraw services over regulatory disputes.
Federal communications minister Anika Wells vowed not to be swayed by legal threats as the Albanese government awaited a report on age-verification tools that could shape enforcement of the ban.
'I will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the well-being of Australian kids,' Ms Wells told the parliament on Wednesday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alcoa Explores Feasibility of Gallium Critical Mineral Production in Western Australia
PERTH, Australia, August 04, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Today, Alcoa of Australia Limited ("Alcoa"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alcoa Corporation (NYSE: AA; ASX AAI; "the Company"), announced a Joint Development Agreement ("JDA") with Japan Australia Gallium Associates Pty Ltd ("JAGA"), a joint venture between Sojitz Corporation (Sojitz) and Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security (JOGMEC), to explore the feasibility of a gallium project to be co-located at one of Alcoa's operating alumina refineries in Western Australia. Gallium is a highly sought-after mineral, supporting a wide range of important industries and efforts, including the technology sector, particularly semiconductors, as well as the defense industry. Australia and the United States have both recognized gallium as a critical mineral. Additionally, Japan has identified gallium as one of 35 minerals important to national security. Currently, gallium production is concentrated in China with market controls introduced in 2023 heightening global interest in alternative supply chains. Alcoa of Australia President Elsabe Muller said the JDA partners were assessing the potential for a co-located facility to expand global supply of gallium as an existing by-product of the alumina refining process in Western Australia. "This opportunity could deliver additional value from our established operations and further demonstrate how Alcoa's longstanding mineral processing capabilities can be significant in supporting state, national and global objectives in technology and national defense," said Ms. Muller. "We welcome the opportunity to work with the JAGA partners, including Sojitz, who has considerable connection with midstream gallium refiners and manufacturers and would be an offtake customer in the project." Sojitz Metals, Resources and Recycling Divisional Chief Operating Officer Osamu Matsuura said the project had the potential to introduce supply options for Japanese semiconductor production critical to global downstream processing and manufacturing. Subject to further commercial agreements and regulatory approvals, the JDA partners are targeting a final investment decision by the end of 2025 and to begin production in 2026. Alcoa's participation in the JDA is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. About Alcoa Corporation Alcoa Corporation (NYSE: AA, ASX: AAI) is a global industry leader in bauxite, alumina and aluminum products with a vision to build a legacy of excellence for future generations. With a values-based approach that encompasses integrity, operating excellence, care for people and courageous leadership, our purpose is to Turn Raw Potential into Real Progress. Since developing the process that made aluminum an affordable and vital part of modern life, our talented Alcoans have developed breakthrough innovations and best practices that have led to greater efficiency, safety, sustainability and stronger communities wherever we operate. Dissemination of Company Information Alcoa intends to make future announcements regarding company developments and financial performance through its website, as well as through press releases, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, conference calls, media broadcasts, and webcasts. Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains statements that relate to future events and expectations about the gallium joint development agreement and project, including but not limited to the feasibility and timing of investments and production, and as such constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include those containing such words as "aim," "ambition," "anticipates," "believes," "could," "develop," "endeavors," "estimates," "expects," "forecasts," "goal," "intends," "may," "outlook," "plans," "potential," "projects," "reach," "seeks," "sees," "should," "targets," "will," "working," "would," or other words of similar meaning. All statements by Alcoa that reflect expectations, assumptions or projections about the future, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Although Alcoa believes that the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that these expectations will be attained, and it is possible that actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks and uncertainties. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements is contained in Alcoa's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Alcoa disclaims any obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether in response to new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. View source version on Contacts Investor Contact:Yolande Media Contact:Sarah Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Superannuation warning as dire reason Aussies want to raid retirement funds revealed: ‘Worse off'
Millions of Australians say they would raid their superannuation accounts to help with current housing and cost-of-living pressures. There are limited reasons why Aussies can access their superannuation early and experts have warned it can have major impacts on your retirement. The average Australian superannuation balance is $172,834, according to the latest Australian Taxation Office (ATO) statistics from the 2022-23 income year. While 40 per cent of Aussies said they wouldn't touch their super if they had the option to access it early, new research by Finder found others would funnel it towards their current money problems. About 15 per cent said they would use their super to buy a home for themselves, while 10 per cent would put it towards easing cost-of-living pressures. Another 8 per cent of Aussies would use it to pay down their mortgage, while the same amount would spend it on a holiday. RELATED $5.7 billion superannuation warning for all Aussie workers after major ATO deadline Commonwealth Bank reveals LMI home loan changes for borrowers Centrelink update on little-known support for Aussies in crisis Finder superannuation literacy expert Pascale Helyar-Moray OAM told Yahoo Finance the research showed many Aussies still saw the value in preserving their super for retirement, despite being under pressure. 'A large portion of Australians clearly recognise that super is designed to fund life after work – not to solve short-term money problems,' she said. 'But the fact that one in 10 would use it to cover everyday expenses shows just how tough the cost-of-living crunch is right now.' A further 7 per cent said they would use their super to buy an investment property, 5 per cent would buy a home for their kids, 3 per cent would buy a new car and just 2 per cent would pay down credit card or personal loan can I access my super early? You can generally access your super when you retire and reach 60 years old, or when you reach 65 even if you haven't retired yet. There are limited circumstances when you can access your super early. These include compassionate grounds to pay for expenses like medical treatment, funeral expenses and preventing you from losing your home. Other reasons include terminal medical conditions, being unable to work due to incapacity, and severe financial hardship. The maximum amount that can be withdrawn for financial hardship is $10,000. More than $1 billion in compassionate superannuation withdrawals were actioned in the last year by at least 50,000 people. During the pandemic, Aussies could also withdraw up to $20,000 of their super as an emergency support measure. Some 3.05 million people dipped into their savings, totalling $37.8 billion. The Coalition previously proposed allowing Aussies to take up to $50,000, or 40 per cent, of their super to buy their first home ahead of the federal election. What are the risks? Helyar-Moray said dipping into your super early had major long-term financial consequences. 'Raiding your retirement savings might solve a problem in the short term, but it could leave you significantly worse off in the future,' she told Yahoo Finance. 'The Morrison government's pandemic-era scheme, which allowed financially strained Australians to withdraw from their super early, will have huge implications for those who withdrew from their retirement savings.' Super Members Council analysis found that a 30-year-old who withdrew the maximum $20,000 would have $93,600 less at retirement. Along with impacting your future retirement balance, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has noted that people need to be wary of how early access to super could impact your insurance coverage and certain social security benefits. Helyar-Moray urged Aussies to boost their balances if they could and to consider salary sacrificing. 'Even $50 a month over thirty years would make a substantial difference to how comfortable their lifestyle will be once they reach retirement,' she in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Putin widens effort to control Russia's internet
The idea, experts say, is to migrate more Russians from an open internet dominated by the products of Western tech giants to a censored online ecosystem, where Russians primarily use software under the gaze and influence of the state. The effort has advanced significantly amid wartime repression, but it is unclear how far it will go. 'The goal here is absolute control,' said Anastasiia Kruope, a researcher at Human Rights Watch who wrote a recent report on declining Russian internet freedoms. Advertisement The Kremlin wants to control not only the information available online but also where and how internet traffic flows, Kruope said, so the Russian internet can function in isolation and be switched on and off at will. Russia's technical capabilities for clamping down are improving, she added. 'They are not perfect,' Kruope said. 'They are not nearly at the level they would like them to be. But they are getting better, and this is the reason to start paying attention.' Advertisement Unlike China, where users have been restricted since the dawn of the internet, Russia long boasted one of the most open and freewheeling environments anywhere online. Operating with virtually no barriers, millions of Russians flocked to Western tech platforms, posted critical news, and freely expressed their thoughts on the web. The Kremlin began to see that freedom as a threat, particularly after the rise of opposition activist Alexei Navalny, who died in prison last year. His exposes of the Putin elite, initially publicized in Live Journal blog posts and later in popular YouTube videos, gave him millions of followers online and the power to mobilize mass protests on the street. Since the first decade of Putin's rule, Moscow had been articulating a vision for what it called a 'sovereign' internet that would sever Russia as much as possible from the rest of the online world and strip power from foreign tech firms, which didn't always give in to the Kremlin's demands. But Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 gave the government the opportunity to accelerate the plan. On the eve of the invasion, the state indirectly took over VK, the country's biggest social network, harnessing a platform with millions of existing users to popularize Russian alternatives to Western tech products. The son of Putin's powerful first deputy chief of staff, Sergei V. Kiriyenko, was tapped to run the company. Moscow banned Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter outright and took steps that caused TikTok to disable functions in Russia. Lawmakers passed Draconian laws stifling free expression in the streets and online. Last year, after building out a video-streaming service on VK, Russia began throttling YouTube, pushing users toward the domestic alternative, though with mixed success. Advertisement Now, with the introduction of MAX, authorities have signaled they may take aim at foreign messaging apps, in particular WhatsApp, which is owned by Meta and counts nearly 100 million monthly users in Russia. Telegram could be a target as well. Anton V. Gorelkin, deputy head of the information technology committee in Russia's lower house of parliament, said last month that WhatsApp should 'prepare to leave the Russian market.' He said Russians would replace the app with MAX. At an economic forum in June, Gorelkin also called Telegram, based in the United Arab Emirates and owned by Russian-born internet entrepreneur Pavel Durov, 'an entity that worries the state.' But he said previously that the app would not be banned. 'I am very afraid that other methods of communication are going to be blocked,' said Mikhail Klimarev, head of the Internet Protection Society, an exiled Russian digital-rights group. Beyond messaging, Telegram allows Russians access to content from exiled journalists, activists, and artists, who post in channels. At the same time, the Kremlin uses Telegram to distribute its own propaganda, giving the app a chance of survival. Klimarev said a Telegram blockage would devastate the Russian internet. 'Russia will turn into Mordor,' he said, referring to the dark realm ruled by evil in the writings of J.R.R. Tolkien. Through MAX, Russian officials are hoping to create their own version of China's WeChat, an app that remains indispensable for millions of Chinese despite being both censored and monitored. Apart from messaging and uploading posts, WeChat users can pay utility bills, book train tickets, make payments for goods and services, apply for marriage licenses, and in some places even file for divorce. Advertisement Moscow is following that model. A new law says government services must be offered through MAX. Officials across all levels of Russian government are being told to install the app. Already, local authorities have been testing the use of MAX by schools and signaling that teachers will be required to use it to communicate with students and parents. 'You need to bring it into the daily life of people to the extent that you cannot avoid this app anymore,' said Philipp Dietrich, an analyst at the German Council on Foreign Relations. 'The whole point of doing this is the same reason China is doing WeChat: the more information you can gather against your citizens, the better,' Dietrich added. This article originally appeared in
