Kilmar Abrego Garcia could be released from custody Wednesday
Kilmar Abrego Garcia, 29, was deported to a prison in El Salvador in March and was brought back to the U.S. to face charges of human smuggling following a Tennessee traffic stop. He's accused of conspiring to bring undocumented migrants to the U.S. from around 2016 to 2025.
The charges stem from a traffic stop by the Tennessee Highway Patrol in Putnam County in 2022. Body camera video shows officers discussing among themselves their suspicions of human smuggling before letting Abrego Garcia go free. He was not charged with any offense at the traffic stop before he was deported in March and returned on June 6.
Click here for previous coverage on Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
On Wednesday, prosecutors are expected to have a homeland security agent provide testimony about the traffic stop. The judge is expected to then rule on whether Abrego Garcia should be released while he awaits trial.
Immigration officials have said they would immediately detain him and begin deportation proceedings.
A federal judge in Maryland scolded the Trump administration Friday for its refusal to detail its deportation plans for Abrego Garcia, including where the government plans to send him and whether he'll get a chance to fight his expulsion.
The administration argues Abrego Garcia is a danger to the community and can be deported before his trial to a country other than El Salvador. An U.S. immigration official said Thursday Mexico and South Sudan could be willing to accept him.
Abrego Garcia has reportedly lived and worked in Maryland for more than a decade, working construction and raising a family. His American wife is suing the administration over his wrongful deportation in Maryland.
The hearing is expected to begin at 1 p.m.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Epstein scandal questions: Letters to the Editor — July 28, 2025
US District Court for the Southern District of New York/AFP via Getty Images The Issue: Ghislaine Maxwell talking to the DOJ amid a resurgence in interest in the Jeffrey Epstein case. Well, well, well: Ghislaine Maxwell, ice-cold procurer, sex-trafficker and co-conspirator with Jeffrey Epstein in a savage and sordid criminal enterprise is a resident in a rundown federal prison circled by razor wire ('DOJ big sit-down with Epstein madam Ghislaine,' July 25). That's appropriate. It's abhorrent to call Maxwell a socialite; she's a convicted felon. Advertisement Marc D. Greenwood Opelika, Ala. American presidents have been no stranger to scandal. Advertisement Thomas Jefferson dealt with allegations of a long-standing sexual relationship with one of his slaves, Sally Hemings. No less salacious was the Monica Lewinsky affair. Perhaps the most notorious was President Richard Nixon's participation in Watergate, which at its core was an attempt to illegally impact the outcome of an election. While these transgressions served to outrage the public, none involved the alleged molestation of dozens of underage girls, the current scandal impacting President Trump's second term. Although there is no evidence exposing the president's participation in Epstein's acts of degeneracy, one question remains on the minds of many Americans: Was Trump complicit in any way? Advertisement The truth may never be known, but one thing is certain — obfuscation and deflection are not its pathway. Jim Paladino Tampa, Fla. It appears that Maxwell is going to spill her guts in exchange for her freedom. Advertisement Makes sense, and she's definitely got the goods. But she will be living in fear for the rest of her life. Kreg Ramone Manhattan The step by Republican Speaker Mike Johnson to cease possible discussions about the Epstein files by shutting down the House of Representatives smells of desperation. Epstein died almost six years ago — by whatever means — and there is still no real action on releasing the files, despite Trump's assurances. The suggestion of allowing Trump more time to address the matter is farcical given how long it has been a lead item in most newspapers. The files are not going to be forgotten, and hopefully they won't be destroyed, so let them be seen. Let the truth be told. This applies to all countries and their governments. Dennis Fitzgerald Advertisement Melbourne, Australia Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! The Issue: French President Emmanuel Macron's decision to officially recognize Palestinian statehood. Regarding the pathetic country of France recognizing Palestine: Isn't this the same France that in 1942 rounded up thousands of Jewish citizens, among them almost 4,000 Jewish children, in a bicycle stadium and sent them to the Nazis for extermination ('Macron: France will recognize Palestinian state,' July 25)? Advertisement A total of at least 77,000 Jews were rounded up by the French police and sent to their horrible deaths. Why would we deal with France at all? I don't buy anything from the French and never will. Americans should boycott all of their cheap wine and anything else. Total isolation for this stupid, terrorist-loving country is a good solution. Or better yet, France should invite all the Palestinians there to make it their new homeland. Richard Smith Palmerton, Pa. Advertisement In fear of his ever-growing Muslim population, resulting from open borders, French President Emmanuel Macron will 'bend the knee' and recognize a Palestinian state at the antisemitic UN General Assembly in September. I wonder: Which portion of France will Maron cut out for his new Palestinian state ? Joe Alloy Yulee, Fla. Advertisement Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
CNN
7 hours ago
- CNN
Another whistleblower claims that top DOJ official suggested department could ignore court orders
Another whistleblower has made claims to the Justice Department's watchdog that Emil Bove — a top agency official who is now nominated for a judgeship — suggested others in the department could ignore court orders during a contentious legal battle in an immigration case. The whistleblower, a former DOJ attorney in the Office of Immigration Litigation, told CNN documents have been filed with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General that appear to align with another whistleblower's account that Bove tried to mislead federal judges during the administration's aggressive deportation effort this spring. 'I think it would be incredibly dangerous for someone like that to have a lifetime appointment as a federal appellate judge,' the whistleblower said. These disclosures were filed in May before Erez Reuveni, an immigration law specialist who worked on the case of the mistakenly deported immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia, made similar claims in a whistleblower letter in June. Once Reuveini went public, this whistleblower, who worked with Reuveni, decided to publicize on Friday that their own disclosure had been made to the DOJ inspector general ahead of Bove's Senate confirmation vote. CNN has not independently reviewed the documents submitted by this whistleblower. News of the latest disclosure comes days before Bove, a former personal lawyer to President Donald Trump, is set to receive a final Senate vote to be confirmed for a lifetime appointment to an appellate judgeship. 'I think he has demonstrated in several ways that he doesn't respect the authority of the federal courts and doesn't respect the role of the DOJ attorneys representing the United States before those courts,' this whistleblower told CNN. In a statement to CNN about this newly discovered disclosure, a DOJ spokesperson said Bove 'will make an excellent judge.' 'Emil Bove is a highly qualified judicial nominee who has done incredible work at the Department of Justice to help protect civil rights, dismantle Foreign Terrorist Organizations, and Make America Safe Again,' spokesperson Gates McGavick told CNN. 'He will make an excellent judge — the Department's loss will be the Third Circuit's gain.' While working as the president's personal attorney, Bove helped defend Trump in his federal criminal cases, both of which were dismissed after his reelection last fall, and in the New York hush-money case, in which Trump was found guilty of all 34 charges he faced. Bove has repeatedly rejected the claims of the first whistleblower, who alleged in a letter that Bove said in a March meeting 'that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f**k you'' if they stood in the way of Trump's deportation efforts. During a confirmation hearing, Bove said he had 'no recollection' of the claims leveraged in the letter. 'I don't think there's any validity to the suggestion that that whistleblower complaint filed … calls into question my qualifications to serve as a circuit judge,' Bove said to the committee. He also said: 'I have never advised a Department of Justice attorney to violate a court order.' Even amid the disclosures, Bove's nomination has moved through the Senate along partisan lines. Earlier this month, all 12 Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to move Bove's nomination forward, as Democratic Sen. Cory Booker railed against Republican Chair Chuck Grassley and every Democratic senator walked out. The latest whistleblower told CNN their decision to leave the Justice Department was solidified in March shortly after the Trump administration sent planes with migrants to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act, despite court orders to stop the hasty deportations. The whistleblower alleged Bove told attorneys to mislead the court. 'It was not a place where I could continue to work,' the whistleblower told CNN. The Senate Judiciary Committee received a letter in June asserting that this whistleblower had made a protected disclosure to the DOJ inspector general and asked the panel to contact the independent watchdog about the status of the investigation, according to a copy shared with CNN. Although the letter shared with Grassley and ranking Democratic member Dick Durbin does not name Bove specifically, it says 'our client provided evidence that established their reasonable belief that senior Department of Justice officials may have violated laws, rules or regulations-notably with respect to a March 2025 Temporary Restraining Order ('TRO') issued by the presiding judge in a matter before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.' The whistleblower said they are concerned that Senate Republicans aren't taking the time to dig into the claims. 'It appears Senate Republicans are not taking seriously Bove's nomination because they would rather rush to confirm him based on their loyalty to the president rather than take more time to investigate any potential allegations of wrongdoing' the whistleblower said. A spokesperson for Grassley told CNN the senator's office has contacted legal representatives for the whistleblower about their complaint, along with the DOJ inspector general's office. A spokesperson for Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee declined to comment. The DOJ inspector general's office did not respond to CNN's request for comment. CNN's Shania Shelton contributed to this report.
Epoch Times
14 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Senate Democrats Call for US-Led Investigation Into American's Death in the West Bank
A group of 29 Senate Democrats, led by Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), signed onto a letter on July 24, calling on the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of State to lead an independent investigation into the events surrounding the death of U.S. citizen Saifullah Musallet in the West Bank earlier this month. 'We write with grave concern regarding the brutal killing of a Palestinian-American, Saifullah Kamel Musallet, near the West Bank town of Sinjil, on July 11, 2025. The U.S. government must conduct a credible and independent investigation into his death and hold all perpetrators accountable,' reads the letter from the Senate Democrats.
