What is the Strait of Hormuz — and why one-fifth of global oil is at risk as Iran threatens closure
TEHRAN, June 23 — Iran's top security body must make the final decision on whether to close the Strait of Hormuz, Iranian TV said yesterday, after parliament reportedly backed the measure in response to US strikes on several of Tehran's nuclear sites.
Iran has in the past threatened to close the strait but has never followed through on the move, which would restrict trade and impact global oil prices.
Below are details about the strait:
A map showing the Strait of Hormuz is seen in this illustration taken June 22, 2025. — Reuters pic
What is the Strait of Hormuz?
The strait lies between Oman and Iran and links the Gulf north of it with the Gulf of Oman to the south and the Arabian Sea beyond.
It is 21 miles (33km) wide at its narrowest point, with the shipping lane just 2 miles (3km) wide in either direction.
Oil tankers pass through the Strait of Hormuz, December 21, 2018. — Reuters pic
Why does it matter?
About a fifth of the world's total oil consumption passes through the strait. Between the start of 2022 and last month, somewhere between 17.8 million and 20.8 million barrels of crude, condensate and fuels flowed through the strait daily, data from analytics firm Vortexa showed.
Opec members Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Iraq export most of their crude via the strait, mainly to Asia. The UAE and Saudi Arabia have sought to find other routes to bypass the strait.
About 2.6 million barrels per day (bpd) of unused capacity from existing UAE and Saudi pipelines could be available to bypass Hormuz, the US Energy Information Administration said in June last year.
Qatar, among the world's biggest liquefied natural gas exporters, sends almost all of its LNG through the strait.
The US Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, is tasked with protecting commercial shipping in the area.
History of tensions
In 1973, Arab producers led by Saudi Arabia slapped an oil embargo on Western supporters of Israel in its war with Egypt.
While Western countries were the main buyers of crude produced by the Arab countries at the time, nowadays Asia is the main buyer of Opec's crude.
The US more than doubled its oil liquids production in the last two decades and has turned from the world's biggest oil importer into one of the top exporters.
During the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq War, the two sides sought to disrupt each other's exports in what was called the Tanker War.
In July 1988, a US warship shot down an Iranian airliner, killing all 290 aboard, in what Washington said was an accident and Tehran said was a deliberate attack.
In January 2012, Iran threatened to block the strait in retaliation for US and European sanctions. In May 2019, four vessels — including two Saudi oil tankers — were attacked off the UAE coast, outside the Strait of Hormuz.
Three vessels, two in 2023 and one in 2024, were seized by Iran near or in the Strait of Hormuz. Some of the seizures followed US seizures of tankers related to Iran. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Will Iran give US a 'political grenade'?
THE United States' strikes on Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday raised two major questions: how effective were they and what will Iran do next? US President Donald Trump said the air raids "totally obliterated" the main nuclear sites, calling them a "spectacular military success". So far, Teheran has given little away about its response, although Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the US had "crossed a very big red line". The US targeted Iran's three main nuclear sites, including Fordow, a uranium enrichment facility buried 90m underground. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said the strikes "devastated the Iranian nuclear programme". The extent of the damage has not been confirmed, but there is speculation nuclear material had already been moved away. Heloise Fayet, a nuclear expert at the Institut Francais des Relations Internationales, said satellite images showing activity around Fordow "suggests enriched uranium stock may therefore have been transferred to sites not monitored by the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)". "We previously had knowledge, albeit imperfect, of the programme thanks to the agency's inspections; now no inspections are possible," she said. "As for Iran's technical expertise, it cannot be destroyed, knowing that thousands of people have participated in Iran's nuclear programme." Andreas Krieg, a senior lecturer at King's College London, called the US action a "high-risk operation that delivers unpredictable outcomes", given the facility was deep underground. "Trump has been using OSINT (open-source intelligence) accounts to say Fordow is gone while the Iranians claim there is only surface-level destruction." Ali Vaez, Iran project director for the International Crisis Group, said destroying Fordow "won't necessarily end Iran's nuclear programme". "Teheran has produced hundreds of advanced centrifuges in the past few years that are stored in unknown locations," he said. According to Krieg, Iran will seek a "calibrated response — loud enough to resonate, but measured enough to contain". Michael A. Horowitz, a geopolitics and security analyst, said its options included attacking US assets, closing the Strait of Hormuz — a vital conduit for the world oil trade — or even attacking energy facilities in the Gulf, which hosts several US military bases. "None of those are good options that achieve anything — this is mostly about saving face," he posted on X. "The risks, on the other hand, are great." However, Horowitz said there were other ways to respond, including a limited retaliation against the US before returning to strikes against Israel and finally negotiating a settlement. The Iranian government now realised its very existence was at stake, said Renad Mansour, senior research fellow at the Chatham House think tank, casting it back to the days of the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war. "It's survival mode," he said, predicting "more violence" in the short term with the prospect of a "managed de-escalation" and eventual negotiations. Hamidreza Azizi, visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, said Iran might allow Trump a "symbolic win" and retaliate against Israeli targets instead. "This keeps Washington out of the war while intensifying pressure on Tel Aviv. The risk of drawing the US further in would now rest on Trump's next move," he posted on X. "If Trump continues to strike Iran without new provocation, it looks more like going to war on Israel's behalf. That's politically costly, given domestic opposition to war with Iran." Meanwhile, Iran could deny knowledge of what happened to its enriched uranium, avoiding IAEA inspections, and later leave the Nuclear Non-Profiferation Treaty. "Trump may have scored a tactical win but if Iran plays this smart, they hand him a political grenade, all while shifting the nuclear game into murkier, more dangerous territory," wrote Hamidreza.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Japan rice price falls below US$27 per 5kg for the first time since March
TOKYO (Bernama-Kyodo): The average price of rice in Japan fell below 4,000 yen (US$27) per five kilograms (kg) for the first time in around three and a half months to 3,920 yen, the government said on Monday, with increased distribution of stockpiles likely helping to drive down prices. According to Kyodo News Agency, during the seven days through June 15, the average price of rice sold at supermarkets across the nation fell by 256 yen per five kg from the previous week, dropping to the 3,000 yen range for the first time since the week ended March 2, according to the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Farm Minister Shinjiro Koizumi told reporters that the drop was due in part to the release of additional rice reserves, stating that "a clear message from the government is proving effective." The market share of blended rice, including reserve rice, rose six percentage points to 50 per cent. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has vowed to bring the average retail price of five kg of rice down to the 3,000 yen range by the end of June. Last year, a household consumed 60.20 kg of rice, according to government consumer spending data. Even after the latest fall, the average price of rice remains nearly double that of a year earlier. Japan's core consumer prices in May rose 3.7 per cent from a year earlier, marking the biggest increase in more than two years, with rice prices setting a fresh record for the eighth consecutive month with a 101.7 per cent jump due to a supply shortage. On Monday, meanwhile, measures were put into place prohibiting the reselling of rice bought at retail stores to ensure that consumers have access to rice at stable prices. Under the ban, those who sell rice at a higher price than they paid face up to one year in prison or a fine of up to 1 million yen (US$6,767), or both. -- BERNAMA-KYODO
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Premier urges China's Jiangsu to embrace ‘higher development expectations'
As Beijing looks to shore up China's economic growth amid mounting challenges, Premier Li Qiang has called on Jiangsu province, a key manufacturing hub on the country's east coast, to step up its efforts in technology, trade and consumption. During a three-day visit to the province from Monday, Li emphasised the importance of embracing innovative development, stimulating effective demand, fostering entrepreneurship, and deepening reform and opening up to support China's sustained economic growth. 'Jiangsu has a solid economic foundation and strong capabilities, but it also faces higher development expectations,' Li said, calling on the province's officials and residents to stay focused on economic growth and shoulder greater responsibility in meeting the challenges facing the broader economy, Xinhua reported on Wednesday. In the first quarter of this year, Jiangsu's gross domestic product rose 5.9 per cent year on year to 3.31 trillion yuan (US$460.5 billion), closely trailing top-ranked Guangdong's 3.35 trillion yuan, which was up 4.1 per cent. One of China's most advanced manufacturing provinces, Jiangsu has been tasked by Beijing with playing a leading role in stabilising growth amid sluggish domestic demand and growing external pressure from increased US tariffs. At a factory that makes machinery, Li highlighted the need to accelerate the adoption of artificial intelligence and clean energy technologies to upgrade traditional industries and keep pace with global manufacturing trends. At a home appliance manufacturer involved in a government-backed consumer goods trade-in scheme, Li encouraged the development of more high-quality, customised products to unlock consumer potential. 'China has a vast and growing market, and we welcome businesses from around the world to invest and operate here,' Li said, pledging more policy support and services to ensure a favourable environment for foreign companies. While inspecting the Jiangsu-Central Asia Centre, a regional service platform for the Belt and Road Initiative trade development strategy, the premier called for better use of China-Europe freight trains and cross-border e-commerce to deepen trade ties with Central Asia. Wrapping up his trip at the construction site for the 11.5 billion yuan Nanjing North Station project – which will be the provincial capital's largest railway station when it is completed – Li urged more use of advanced materials and technologies and better industrial planning to maximise its long-term impact. His remarks echoed comments made by President Xi Jinping in March during a meeting with deputies from Jiangsu at the annual meeting of China's top legislature. Xi urged the province to take on a leading role in innovation, regional cooperation and the pursuit of common prosperity. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
