"Delhi high court has asked Sports Ministry to...": AIPA president Arvind on granting of NSF status to Indian Pickleball Association
AIPA strongly opposed the Sports Ministry's decision to grant National Sports Federation (NSF) status to the Indian Pickleball Association (IPA), as communicated in a letter dated April 25, as per the AIPA press release.
AIPA believed this action appeared to have been influenced by undue lobbying and misleading representations made by the newly formed entity. Granting NSF status to an organisation formed in November 2024 -- bypassing AIPA's 18 years of contribution.
While talking to the ANI Arvind Prabhoo President AIPA said,' We challenged it in the court and the honourable court has directed the Ministry of Youth and Sports to furnish under an affidavit the justification for giving relaxation you know they have offered relaxation to this Indian Pickleball Association so the court has asked justification of that. And that is what we are hearing on the 19th, that is coming Monday.'
AIPA last Sunday wrote a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, highlighting the ongoing injustice regarding the sport of Pickleball and its recognition being overlooked for the last 18 years by the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports (MYAS).
'We have sent it, we are requesting an opinion from the Honorable PM, PMO to look into this matter because according to us it draws injustice for us and all India Pickleball Association, and we are requesting them to intervene in this matter and get to the bottom of this,' Arvind Prabhoo said.
Established in 2007, the All India Pickleball Association (AIPA) is the oldest and most widely represented governing body for pickleball in India, with active federations in 24 states. AIPA has played a pivotal role in the structured growth of the sport for nearly two decades and is also a founding member of both the International Pickleball Federation (IPF) and the Asian Pickleball Federation (APF), with official affiliations granted in 2015 and 2020, respectively, as per a press release from AIPA.
AIPA pointed out that the recognition granted to IPA by the Sports Ministry has been made after relaxing key eligibility conditions outlined in the National Sports Development Code of India, 2011, including:
--- Requirement of a minimum three-year existence: As per Para 3.3 of Annexure-II of the Sports Code 2011, a sports federation must be in existence and functioning for at least three years before it can be considered for recognition as an NSF. The IPA was incorporated in November 2024 and has therefore not met this minimum eligibility.
--- Requirement of state-level representation: The Sports Code mandates that a State/UT unit of a federation must be affiliated with at least 50% of the district-level associations in that region to be considered valid. There is no verifiable evidence that IPA or its state units meet this criterion.AIPA remains committed to the values of fair play, sportsmanship, and clean sports governance and calls upon the Ministry to immediately review and rectify the decision in the larger interest of Pickleball and the Indian sporting community. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
4 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Tiranga Yatra' fills Chandni Chowk with patriotic fervour
The historic lanes of Chandni Chowk were awash with patriotic colours on Monday, ahead of Independence Day. The Virat Tiranga Yatra, led by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Praveen Khandelwal, brought together traders, residents, and BJP workers in a vibrant celebration. BJP leaders and workers during a 'Tiranga Yatra' at Chandni Chowk in New Delhi on Monday. (PTI) Starting from Red Fort's ramparts, and culminating at Fatehpuri, the celebration drew participation from women, youth, workers, and the local trading community and turned the bustling market area into a sea of tricolours. Shopfronts, rooftops, and street corners along the route were decorated with the national flag and the yatra was accompanied by bands, drums, shehnais, and trumpets. Local market associations and RWAs lined the route, showering flowers on the participants. Slogans such as 'Har Gali – Har Mohalla, Har Dil Mein Tiranga Laharaye' and 'Tiranga Aan Bharat Ki – Tiranga Shaan Bharat Ki' echoed throughout, underscoring the unity and pride of the gathering. Khandelwal described the yatra as 'a reflection of deep respect and unwavering commitment to our national flag.' He linked the event to the 'Bharatiya Samaan – Hamara Swabhiman' campaign under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, calling it a decisive step towards promoting indigenous products and self-reliance. 'Prime Minister Narendra Modi is recognised globally not only for his bold decisions but also for implementing them effectively. Today, the world acknowledges India's growing power, leadership, and capabilities,' Khandelwal said. He added that traders nationwide are joining the campaign, playing a key role in strengthening the economy and reviving India's manufacturing prowess. The initiative, he stressed, represents not just economic progress but also 'the resurgence of India's glory, pride, and self-reliance.'
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Trump Slaps Tariffs, India Hits Back: From McDonald, Coca-Cola To iPhones, A Nationalist Boycott Storm Brews
New Delhi: A wave of calls to ditch American brands is sweeping across parts of India. From McDonald's and Coca-Cola to Amazon and Apple, household names from the United States are finding themselves at the centre of a boycott campaign, Reuters reported. The push comes as business leaders and supporters of Prime Minister Narendra Modi rally against Washington's steep new trade duties. India's vast consumer base has long been fertile ground for U.S. companies. McDonald's outlets are dotted across the country. Coke and Pepsi dominate beverage shelves in both small-town stores and urban supermarkets. Apple store openings attract long queues. Starbucks offers discounted treats to crowds of loyal customers. WhatsApp, which is owned by Meta, has more users in India than anywhere else in the world. Domino's runs more outlets here than in any other country. Now, anger is simmering after former U.S. President Donald Trump slapped a 50% tariff on Indian goods. The decision has unsettled exporters and sparked tension between New Delhi and Washington. While there is no clear sign of sales declines, the rhetoric against American imports is getting louder, both online and on the streets. Manish Chowdhary, co-founder of Wow Skin Science, posted a video on LinkedIn urging shoppers to back Indian farmers and startups. He called for 'Made in India' to become a global obsession and cited South Korea's global reputation for food and beauty products. 'We have lined up for products from thousands of miles away. We have proudly spent on brands that we do not own, while our own makers fight for attention in their own country,' he said, as cited by the news agency. Rahm Shastry, CEO of DriveU, a service that provides drivers on call, added his voice on LinkedIn. 'India should have its own home-grown Twitter/Google/YouTube/WhatsApp/FB like China has,' he wrote. Indian companies already challenge foreign brands at home, particularly in retail and food. Still going global has remained an uphill climb. In technology, though, Indian IT firms such as TCS and Infosys serve clients across continents. Speaking in Bengaluru on Sunday, Prime Minister Modi called for greater self-reliance. 'Indian technology companies make products for the world but now is the time for us to give more priority to India's needs,' he said, without naming any firm. Even as boycotts gathered steam, Tesla opened its second showroom in the country on Monday in New Delhi. The launch drew both Indian commerce ministry officials and U.S. embassy representatives. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) affiliate Swadeshi Jagran Manch staged rallies nationwide on Sunday. The group urged shoppers to switch to Indian alternatives and circulated a WhatsApp list of domestic brands, from soaps to cold drinks. 'People are now looking at Indian products. It will take some time to fructify. This is a call for nationalism and patriotism,' said group's Co-Convenor Ashwani Mahajan. On social media, the group's 'Boycott foreign food chains' graphics display logos of McDonald's and other international restaurants. In Lucknow, 37-year-old Rajat Gupta sat at a McDonald's on Monday, sipping a cup of coffee worth Rs 49. He brushed off the protests. 'Tariffs are a matter of diplomacy and my McPuff, coffee should not be dragged into it,' the report has quoted him as saying.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Nationalism as spectacle
The recent inauguration of the Chenab railway bridge by Prime Minister Narendra Modi is emblematic of India's new politics of imagery. Hailed as the world's highest rail arch, the bridge leaps across a chasm in Jammu and Kashmir, its elegance rendered into nationalist spectacle. The plan to display it on the Independence Day invitation card signals that infrastructural grandeur is the foremost motif of the republic — and the citizen is invited not to traverse or question but to behold and admire it. A society wracked by inequity and developmental deficits celebrates nationhood in the form of engineered titans: the world's tallest statue, the longest railway bridge, the widest expressway. These achievements are feted in lavish state ceremonies, nationalist rhetoric, and media blitzes designed to inspire awe. But how does grandeur rather than inclusion become the idiom of national pride? Symbols of exclusion India's fondness for gigantism is not accidental. The very size of the project is its message. When the Statue of Unity rose from the banks of the Narmada, it wasn't just a work of art or a tribute to a statesman: it was a declaration writ large in stone and steel of a Hindu-first narrative, with Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel recast as a symbol of unity against imagined internal foes. The mythos that envelopes such projects smothers questions of distributive justice. Who benefits when governments spend astronomical sums on such initiatives? Whose aspirations do they serve and silence? Every engineering marvel draws on a carefully curated past. In India, the current government's embrace of large-scale building projects is paralleled by its project to rewrite history. The ambition is not just to fill skylines but to repopulate the national imagination with icons drawn solely from a few mythologies. The making of nation states often involves tearing down colonial-era symbols, recasting historical figures, and erecting new ones that embody the prevailing ideology. But what is striking about contemporary India is the scale and ferocity with which these projects have been pursued, and the drive to anchor national belonging in visual monumental forms. The Kashi Vishwanath Corridor is more than a series of temples and walkways, for example: it's a literal and figurative reclamation, in a city perceived to be the civilisational heart of the Hindu polity. Here, engineering prowess is being marshalled to announce who belongs and who doesn't. Of course, nation-building has always produced spectacle. The Eiffel Tower, the Hoover Dam, and the Great Wall have all served to bind citizens to an idea greater than themselves. But in India's nationalism, the spectacle operates with a particular logic: it's a sign of progress but also asserts dominance. The Statue of Unity gleams while local Adivasi communities, displaced from their ancestral lands, watch with little say in the project that now overshadows them. Expressways, while useful, are undertaken with a gusto that often mocks the villages flanking them awaiting clean water and toilets. The new India is not a place where the peripheries are uplifted to the centre but where a singular vision radiates outwards, flattening multitudes in its path. Engineering in particular lends itself seamlessly to this ideological programme because of the language of precision that engineering projects embody. Concrete, steel, and glass can be measured, weighed, and installed. Their timelines, costs, and visual impact can be displayed as evidence of political will and executive competence. In an era in which governance is increasingly judged on optics rather than outcomes, every new temple or monument becomes testament to the regime's 'can do' spirit. This is not empowerment. Even when prosperity is in the offing, the benefits of such projects rarely flow equitably. Mega-dams inundate villages; stadiums rise while informal settlements are razed; and metro lines are built with scant regard for labour conditions or environmental consequences. Government efforts to bore tunnels through the Himalayan frontier — the world's youngest, arguably most fragile mountains — are presented as triumphs of ingenuity and grit, shrinking distances and fortifying borders. Yet the scenes of excavation mask the scarring of ecologically fragile mountainsides, the uprooting of Indigenous communities, and the haste of it all that mocks environmental and social consent. There is little room here for participatory democracy. These impulses are most apparent in the erasure of marginal communities and alternative histories from the landscape of the new nation. Large engineering projects have become instruments of progress and of recalibration, of crafting a physical and symbolic order that must be admired and obeyed. Legal processes are twisted to fast-track construction. Public consultations are perfunctory and often organised long after decisions have been made. This is the grammar of the prevailing nationalism — a style that grants primacy to order, magnitude, and uniformity and disdains the messy business of democracy. Serving communities India's earliest engineering masterworks — stepwells, ancient irrigation systems, and the Mughal gardens — served communities, not just sovereigns. Identity and inclusion need not be strangers to national achievement. Success can also be measured in the lives touched, the voices heard, and the spaces opened to everyone. Yet India's nationalism seems to fear such a reckoning, and no wonder: no monument can command loyalty in perpetuity if those on whom it is built remain strangers to its promise.
