
Bangladesh's telehealth centres were lifesavers. Now they're on life support
Mahbubur Rahman is used to the rhythms and interruptions of running a telemedicine center on the northern fringe of the Sunderbans, the world's largest mangrove forest.
At the government-funded hospital in Dacope, Bangladesh, the internet sometimes cuts out for days. Or the power goes out, like it did one recent morning in May, with more than a dozen patients waiting.
Rahman, a 36-year-old administrator, technician, and all-around troubleshooter at Dacope's telehealth clinic told them to hold on.
No one complained. Rahman is widely respected, and they knew he didn't have to be there. He hasn't been paid since January. Bangladesh's health sector has been beset by crisis since a new government came to power last August. It was further worsened when the US Agency for International Development, which gave around $88 million yearly to Bangladesh's health programmes between 2021 and 2023, halted funding in January.
The health ministry has so far not funded the telehealth programme, which treated more than 8,000 patients a month during its peak years after the Covid-19 pandemic. Rahman has struggled to keep the Dacope clinic running.
'I find a deep sense of joy in serving. Even though I'm not able to provide the same quality of care as before, I can't bear the thought of the centre closing completely,' he told Rest of World.
' But we have no food on our plates. We can't show this hardship to anyone,' he said.
Telemedicine, which includes virtual consultations and other remote health care technologies, surged in popularity worldwide during Covid-19 as millions went online to visit doctors. It was the future of health care, experts said, especially in poorer regions, but it is often hampered by poor infrastructure, lack of funding, and digital illiteracy.
In Bangladesh, too, the modestly named 'telemedicine service' got a boost during the pandemic, Israt Jahan Kakon, who heads the telemedicine programme at the Directorate General of Health Services, told Rest of World. By 2024, there were 234 such centers across the country, and they treated more than 100,000 patients last year. It was Bangladesh's longest-running telehealth programme.
The centres, located within subdistrict hospitals, had a computer and LED screen for video conferencing, a backup battery, a 2 Mbps internet connection, and an assortment of smart devices for remote monitoring, including a stethoscope, an ECG machine, and a spirometer.
But with the funding crisis, only about 35 centres have survived, kept on life support by unpaid staff who occasionally open the clinics, leading to uncertainty about the future of this programme in Bangladesh. Rural residents who used the centres earlier told Rest of World they are no longer receiving sufficient care.
'Without strong policy backing or well-thought-out planning, telemedicine has yet to reach its full potential in Bangladesh. It's an idea with promise, but it needs much more support to become truly effective and accessible,' MH Choudhury Lelin, a doctor and public health expert who was not involved in the programme, said.
Bangladesh's government spent just 0.7% of its gross domestic product on health care last year, among the lowest in the world but similar to other lower-income nations, such as Pakistan and Nigeria.
Virtual care makes sense for the nation, where 68% of the population lived outside cities in 2022. Millions of working-class people find traveling to the capital Dhaka or other cities too expensive, especially for chronic conditions that require regular checkups.
Bangladesh also suffers from a severe shortage of doctors, with only five available to treat every 10,000 people – much lower than the global average of 17. The scarcity is even worse in rural areas.
'Hospitals are often far from rural villages. Normally, patients are referred to [city] hospitals when a specialist is needed, but through this telemedicine system, they could access specialist care without leaving their [area],' Kakon said.
The Dacope clinic is set in the busy town on a low-lying riverine island in the Ganges delta. The water here is so saline that many residents develop skin infections due to constant salt exposure.
But Dacope does not have a dermatologist. In fact, the town has only one specialist – an orthopedist – and 10 vacancies, according to Sudip Kumar Bala, Dacope's health officer.
The telehealth center, launched in 2011, provided some relief. Local doctors would refer patients to the clinic, where a medical officer would connect them to a dermatologist in a distant city. The doctors would decide on a course of treatment together, either prescribing medicines or referring to a hospital. Skin disorders are easier than other conditions to diagnose using only photos, without other diagnostic tests.
Rahman, then 21 and a second-year university student of philosophy, was hired to run it. Fifteen years on, he is well-known and respected by villagers, army officials and administrators alike. He liaises between patients and physicians, gently asking people to put up with the constant delays caused by recurring tech failures. He also does basic nursing tasks such as measuring blood pressure, taking photographs of affected areas, and organising the material for the physician.
One morning, while waiting for the power to be restored, physician Selim Reza praised the center. 'For just 10 taka [8 cents], patients can speak directly to a senior doctor while sitting in their local health center,' he told Rest of World. 'For many, it feels like a dream.'
As Rahman switched on the battery backup, the LED screen blinked to display a dermatologist in the nearby city of Barishal. Reza presented the case of Sagar Chandra Mondal, a middle-aged farmer and tutor who had a persistent, generalised itch.
The dermatologist suggested medicines, which Reza prescribed.
Mondal said the treatment was a 'blessing.'
'Getting specialist care without having to travel far is very important for us. We are working-class people,' he told Rest of World.
Then, the battery drained and the power went out.
Reza said the internet, too, is slow and unreliable, sometimes making it difficult to diagnose. 'Sometimes, it is really hard to understand the voice and see the photo due to slow internet speed,' he told Rest of World.
Rahman unlocked a cupboard in a corner and pulled out the internet-connected diagnostic medical devices, including a stethoscope and a microscope the clinic received a decade ago. But the government never provided the software to run them, so they are kept in storage, he said.
The clinic, like most of rural Bangladesh, has a 2 Mbps internet connection provided by Bangladesh Telecommunications Company Limited, the nation's largest telecom provider, which maintains a 38,000-kilometre fiber-optic network. But the cables are vulnerable to the delta's ferocious storms, leading to regular power and internet outages. And there is only one repair technician for the entire district, where 2.6 million people live.
'We don't have enough manpower,' MD Jubaer Ahmed, an assistant manager at the telecom company, told Rest of World.
The internet is among the biggest barriers to telemedicine in Bangladesh, BM Mainul Hossain, director of the Institute of Information Technology at the University of Dhaka, told Rest of World.
'Because of internet speed issues, telemedicine services are inconvenient for many, so they are a little reluctant [to use it],' he said. 'Since patients are seen from a distance, it is important that the internet not be inconvenient for both the patient and the doctor. Otherwise, there is a risk of misdiagnosis.'
Satellite internet provided by Starlink has recently launched in Bangladesh, but it costs at least twice the price of the cable connection.
Despite its bare bones setup, the center treated as many as 300 patients every month at its peak, Rahman said, confirming, 'So many patients depend on it, and they would truly suffer without it.'
Shah Ali Akbar Ashrafi, director of management information systems in the health department, said the ministry has not committed to restoring the telehealth service.
'We have written several letters, but no decision has been made at the relevant levels of the government yet. As a result, we still do not know its future,' Ashrafi told Rest of World.
A three-hour drive by road from Dacope leads to a telehealth clinic at Bagerhat, which has fared poorly compared to its neighbor. Cobwebs hung from the ceiling, and a layer of dust covered the furniture and equipment. The internet has been cut.
Pranto Mondal, 25, the administrator who ran the center, told Rest of World he stopped getting paid last August and quit in February.
'I kept going for nearly six months, hoping things would get better. But, honestly, how long can someone keep pushing through like this?' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Hepatitis: Adults Can Also Get Vaccinated If They Missed The Jab In Childhood
Nagpur: As the world observes World Hepatitis Day on July 28, liver disease specialists in Nagpur are urging citizens to act before it's too late — highlighting that Hepatitis B vaccination is not just for children. Adults who missed their shots earlier in life can — and should — get vaccinated now, say doctors. Dr Piyush Marudwar, consultant gastroenterologist and liver transplant physician, said that even today, millions of adults remain unaware that the Hepatitis B vaccine is safe, effective, and easily available at any age. "Hepatitis may be silent, but our response must be loud. Awareness, timely screening, and vaccination are our strongest tools in defeating this global health challenge," said Dr Marudwar. Adding a local perspective, Dr Amol Samarth, gastroenterologist and hepatologist at Super Specialty Hospital, Nagpur, said that hepatitis remains an underdiagnosed but serious threat in Vidarbha, especially because of late testing. "In Nagpur, we are seeing a growing number of patients diagnosed with Hepatitis B and C during evaluations for other illnesses. Unfortunately, many reach us when liver damage has already progressed. Routine screening and adult vaccination are the most effective ways to prevent this," said Dr Samarth. He added that public hospitals like Super Specialty Hospital offer affordable screening and consultation facilities, and that both Hepatitis B vaccination and antiviral treatment are widely accessible in Nagpur now. This year's theme, 'Hepatitis Can't Wait', underscores the urgency of acting early. Doctors warn that the post-Covid disruption in routine health check-ups has led to delays in hepatitis detection and follow-up care. "Hepatitis is one of the leading causes of end-stage liver disease and the need for liver transplantation in India," said Dr Rahul Saxena, secretary of ZTCC Nagpur and a prominent liver transplant surgeon. "Nagpur is gradually becoming a liver transplant-ready city with better awareness and infrastructure. But to reduce the burden, we must focus on prevention," he said. "Hepatitis B has a safe and effective vaccine, and Hepatitis C is now curable with oral medications. Still, many patients present late due to lack of awareness or stigma," Dr Saxena added. All specialists emphasised that testing for hepatitis should be as common as checking for diabetes or blood pressure, especially for high-risk groups such as healthcare workers, pregnant women, dialysis patients, and those who've had blood transfusions.

The Wire
8 hours ago
- The Wire
Recovery, the Unfinished Business of the Pandemic
The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic far outlasted the health emergency. Long after infection curves flattened and emergency declarations were lifted, countries across the globe continued to wrestle with a deep economic, social and health-related fallout. In India, over 23 crore people were pushed into poverty during the pandemic years, with rural and informal sector workers bearing the brunt, and the economic spillover continues to be seen in the form of increased government debt, rising inflation, a stagnating hospitality industry and other things, even after half a decade has passed since the onset of COVID. In the health sector, the disruption to routine immunisation services led to measles outbreaks in numerous Sub-Saharan countries, while a UNICEF report warned that about 23 million children missed out on essential vaccines in 2020 alone. Mental health outcomes also deteriorated sharply. Data from the WHO shows that there was a 25% global increase in anxiety and depression in the first year of the pandemic. These aftershocks demonstrate that recovery is not a passive return to normalcy – it is a protracted and complex phase that demands sustained attention, governance and resource mobilisation. The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered worldwide efforts to mitigate the scale and impact of future health emergencies, including amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR); the creation of the Pandemic Fund and the WHO Pandemic Intelligence Hub; and the ACT-Accelerator, COVAX and One Health initiatives. The latest – and most talked-about – in this series of efforts is the WHO Pandemic Agreement, which was adopted on May 20, 2025 after three years of negotiations and discussions. It will become a legally binding international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response once it is signed by 60 countries. After India's vote in favour of the resolution to adopt the agreement, making it an official state party to the agreement, the prime minister has talked about its importance for vulnerable populations in the Global South that disproportionately bear the effects of health challenges. In order to successfully achieve this goal, the agreement needs to accomplish two things – chart out obligations targeted towards vulnerable populations, and highlight the specific ways in which pandemics' disproportionate impact on the Global South can be mitigated. While the agreement does lay the ground for equity in both aspects, it falls short of outlining implementable measures to achieve these goals meaningfully without hindering sovereign decisions. Notably, the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) annex, a critical component tied to equity and access, still has another year to be worked out, further delaying clarity on how benefit-sharing commitments will be operationalised. Commendably, the agreement talks about the need to provide affordable health and other social support services to 'persons in vulnerable situations'. It also calls for the mitigation of the socioeconomic impacts of pandemics on such persons. However, it misses an opportunity to guide state parties on when and how this should be done at the domestic and trans-national levels, especially at the time of recovery. Integrating recovery into the pandemic agreement Article 3 of the agreement, titled 'Preparedness, health system resilience and recovery', gestures toward the importance of post-pandemic strategies. However, recovery is buried within broader health system resilience goals and mentioned only in passing. It refers vaguely to 'developing post-pandemic health system recovery strategies' without outlining how, when or by whom such strategies must be developed, implemented or monitored. This diluted treatment effectively renders recovery a discretionary task, rather than an obligation. There is no requirement for countries to assess the long-term impacts of pandemics on vulnerable populations, nor is there any architecture for coordinating recovery efforts, allocating responsibilities or ensuring accountability. In the light of this gap, recovery must be established as a clear, foundational pillar within the pandemic agreement – not a vague aspiration buried under resilience. It is important to acknowledge at the onset that international treaties cannot impose rigid mandates on sovereign states. However, by creating shared expectations and enabling frameworks, they can support states in fulfilling recovery goals without infringing on national autonomy. Rather than prescribe uniform recovery models, the agreement can promote adaptable, equity-based cooperation that complements domestic efforts while ensuring accountability and consistency across borders. The agreement should require states to develop standalone national recovery frameworks tailored to their contexts, with explicit mandates for implementation, periodic review and transparent reporting. Recovery should be understood broadly – not just as restoring health systems but as encompassing social, economic and mental health dimensions affected by pandemics. A comprehensive recovery approach must prioritise impact assessments focused on marginalised and vulnerable populations – including gender minorities, workers in the informal sector, migrants, senior citizens, homeless populations, persons with disabilities and ethnic minorities – who disproportionately suffer during crises. These assessments should directly inform targeted economic and social policies, such as livelihood restoration, social protection adjustments and reintegration support, to prevent widening inequalities in the post-crisis phase. Further, recovery goals must be multi-dimensional and should account for the wide-ranging impact of pandemics across different key areas. Accordingly, the agreement should embed principles for access to justice and redressal mechanisms for harms suffered during pandemics, the restoration of disrupted education systems, safeguards for the continuity of essential public and welfare services, mechanisms for the review of governmental decisions and actions during the state of exception, and the rebuilding of public trust through transparent and participatory governance. The absence of these dimensions risks a recovery that is piecemeal and opaque, weakening institutional integrity and leaving societies more vulnerable to future crises. International cooperation in recovery efforts In order to achieve the aim of equity, especially across the Global North-Global South divide, the international community must direct its attention to recovery efforts across national borders. The agreement must institutionalise mechanisms for international coordination and solidarity during the recovery phase, facilitating sharing of expertise, resources and data across countries to reduce regional vulnerabilities and promote equitable resilience. The bodies set up under the agreement do not account for this adequately, in terms of function or finances. The mechanisms set up under the agreement, such as PABS, deal with important functions like pathogen and data sharing, and pharmaceutical supply and distribution. There are no such systems established for recovery. The Coordinating Financial Mechanism previously established under the IHR has been envisaged as the mechanism to promote sustainable financing for the implementation of the pandemic agreement as well. Its mandate under the pandemic agreement is to 'support strengthening and expanding capacities for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, and contribute to the prompt availability of surge financing response necessary as of day zero, particularly in developing country Parties.' This conspicuously and concerningly misses recovery as a crucial stage of assessing impacts and developing strategies for rebuilding, which is especially crucial for low and middle-income countries in the Global South, including India. The cultural impact of international documents Understandably, international agreements cannot impose specific obligations in the same way that domestic laws can. Given the legally binding nature of the pandemic agreement, it should also refrain from interfering with sovereign and context-specific decisions adopted at the national and sub-national levels. At the same time, beyond policy prescriptions, international treaties play a critical role in shaping legal cultures and empowering civil society to demand justice and reform. By embedding preparedness, resilience-building and recovery within the pandemic agreement, the global community will be able to create a shared vocabulary and normative framework that activists, policymakers and courts can invoke domestically to advance equity and resilience. India's past experience has illustrated this dynamic vividly. The Vishakha Guidelines on workplace sexual harassment, which transformed protections for women, were grounded in India's commitments under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Similarly, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has influenced landmark judicial decisions and legislative reforms enhancing disability rights and access to welfare in India. What can be done to prioritise recovery? While laying out the rules or procedure and terms of reference, the Intergovernmental Working Group empowered under the agreement must lay down specific provisions on recovery, including indicative domestic guidance, mechanisms for international cooperation and sustainable financing or recovery that recognises marginalisation and prioritises equity. Embedding principles that prioritise domestic and international efforts will shift recovery from a discretionary afterthought to a binding commitment that demands accountability without prescribing inflexible solutions. It provides states with a flexible but clear mandate to build inclusive, adaptive recovery architectures that address the deep, lasting fallout of pandemics. Shreyashi Ray is a senior resident fellow with the health team at the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy. Anchal Bhatheja is a research fellow at the centre.


Indian Express
9 hours ago
- Indian Express
GMCH-32: Newly constructed block to be inaugurated on Aug 8, to decongest gynaecology dept
The newly constructed 283-bed Emergency-cum-Trauma Block at GMCH-32 is all set to be inaugurated on August 8, to coincide with the 11th convocation, promising to reduce overload on the existing emergency units in the city, improve patient care and ensure better utilisation of resources. In the hospital's history, the A Block, where 24-hour emergency services are provided to patients, was the first to become functional, and since 1996, there has been no renovation of this block. 'With the new state-of-the-art trauma block ready for patients, the first step will be to renovate the area, with the engineering and fire safety departments already in action to ensure the latest facilities, amenities and safety. Once this is complete, we will start the process of decongesting our gynaecology department, which also comprises the labour room, and witnesses patients from across the region, including the large migrant population that we have. We will be utilising this space for the expansion of the department, and also add more beds to ease rush. We are making efforts to provide more speciality and super-speciality services. The process of space creation is a dynamic one,' said Prof A K Attri, Director-Principal, GMCH-32. The gynaecology department of the hospital has 100 beds, with 10 beds added way back in 2017. The number of patients in the gynaecology department is very high, and despite the increase in beds, there are not enough beds for pregnant women. More than 5,000 women deliver in GMCH every year, and when the number of cases is higher, two women have to be adjusted on one bed, with the occupancy rate almost 200 per cent. The hospital receives delivery cases from Chandigarh, Punjab, Haryana, Himachal, Uttarakhand, UP, and despite the shortage of beds, the effort is to provide treatment. As per doctors, the gynaecology department of GMCH-32 has the highest number of deliveries, followed by GMSH-16 and then PGI. Both PGI and GMCH-32 will have exclusive Mother and Child Centres, with work on the project of GMCH-32 having started in 2018, but was delayed due to COVID and has now restarted. With a budget of about Rs 73 crore, the centre, which will be open in about two years, will have two basements and four floors and have a facility of 251 beds, with the latest facilities and services under one roof. Dr Attri said it will decrease infant and mother mortality rate. PGI's Advanced Mother and Child Care Centre, where work is in full swing and may be inaugurated at the end of this year, will be equipped with the latest technologies and offer world-class facilities in both maternal and neonatal care. A human milk bank, advanced infertility treatment, robotic surgery, critical care obstetrics, high-risk maternity unit, foetal medicine unit, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, prenatal diagnosis, and reproductive endocrinology unit will be part of the centre. Here, there will be a modern developmentally supportive and family-centred level IV NICU designed as per current International NICU design specifications, a family-centred Kangaroo Mother Care ward, and a comprehensive high-risk follow-up programme. A long-needed facility, the Advanced Paediatric Centre at GMSH-16 was inaugurated last year. The 32-bedded facility offers state-of-the-art specialised care, featuring a 12-bedded hybrid ICU unit comprising ventilator beds and high-dependency unit beds. The centre includes 20 oxygen-supported beds and features ECG, echocardiography, and ultrasonography, all under one roof, so that parents don't have to go anywhere for these tests and their children receive the best care. There are 24-hour services like blood transfusion, sample collection, nebulisation etc, for critical patients, and this advanced centre has eased the burden on PGI.