logo
Waving Canadian flag on two-way street of trade

Waving Canadian flag on two-way street of trade

Opinion
I gave up my Friday night pizza dates with Tom Gore around the same time Donald Trump started his trade war with Canada.
It was a forced breakup, but I didn't mind. Tom was my favourite wine until it was pulled from liquor store shelves as part of the federal and provincial governments' response to the imposition of tariffs on U.S. imports from Canada.
There's been so much background noise in the aftermath that it's been hard to keep track. All I know is Tom and all his California cohorts are still in exile, and the alternatives I've found are such that I don't miss them.
Apparently, I'm not alone. Sales of U.S. wine to Canada are, by some accounts, down 94 per cent, and sales of Canadian alcoholic beverages are up, probably the most noticeable effect of our collective disenchantment with our largest trading partner.
An Angus Reid poll released in the early days of this muddled trading mess showed four out of five Canadians were buying more Canadian products in the face of the Trump's tariff tactics. Three out of five said they were actively boycotting products from the U.S.
However, these opinions were collected in February, around the same time it was still cool to boo the American anthem at hockey games.
Thankfully, we've moved on from that. It's likely Canada's aversion to anything American will also start to dissipate now that Trump's attention has shifted from making Canada the 51st state to other matters.
However, an Ipsos poll released this month shows the aversion to buying U.S.-made goods has gone global. Fewer than half of respondents from 29 countries say they are likely to buy something manufactured in the U.S. According to that poll, 63 per cent of Canadians say they are unlikely to buy anything American.
Food and beverages top the list of consumer goods where shoppers can vote with their dollars, thumbing their nose at Trump every time they stock up.
Considering all this, it comes as no surprise to anyone — except perhaps the U.S. administration — that the U.S. agricultural trade deficit is growing instead of shrinking as was promised when it turned to taxing imports, kicking out immigrant workers critical to its own food supply and detaining tourists to 'make America great again.'
Release of the USDA quarterly trade report earlier this month was reportedly delayed and stripped of its usual analysis after the original draft's authors cited tariffs and the 'buy Canadian' movement as reasons for reduced demand for U.S. agricultural goods. The redacted report forecasts a US$49.5 billion trade deficit for fiscal year 2025, an increase of US$500 million.
It's living proof it's never a good idea to trash-talk your best customers.
However, that's something we Canadians need to keep in mind as we explore how to navigate the tangled trade environment we face for the foreseeable future.
It's always a good idea to shop local when you can. Even if it costs a little more, supporting local suppliers and businesses circulates our hard-earned dollars in our communities, creating jobs and contributing to economic growth. Our farmers no doubt appreciate the moral and financial support.
Yet one of Canada's defining strengths as a nation is its status as a global supplier of food commodities. More than 50 per cent of what farmers here grow is exported either directly or indirectly.
The U.S. is still our largest trading partner. More than half of Canada's agri-food imports originate in the U.S., while 60 per cent of Canada's agri-food exports are U.S.-bound. The food industries in both countries count on that cross-border trade.
For that reason, the export-orientated sectors have steadfastly maintained support for rules-based trade and opposition to policy that unduly protects access to domestic markets. Trade must be a two-way street.
As Canada Day approaches, waving the flag and putting Canadian foods on the table is a meaningful expression of our national pride. Our collective individual actions do make a difference.
But does supporting local equate with boycotting someone else? It's a choice we all need to make.
Laura Rance is executive editor, production content lead for Glacier FarmMedia. She can be reached at lrance@farmmedia.com
Laura RanceColumnist
Laura Rance is editorial director at Farm Business Communications.
Read full biography
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More homeowners retiring with a mortgage
More homeowners retiring with a mortgage

Toronto Sun

time40 minutes ago

  • Toronto Sun

More homeowners retiring with a mortgage

Royal LePage president and CEO Phil Soper Reviews and recommendations are unbiased and products are independently selected. Postmedia may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page. Home price appreciation over the past 25 years described as a 'double-edged sword' for today's retirees This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Three in 10 Canadians who plan to retire this year or next will carry a mortgage on their primary residence into retirement, while 47 per cent of those nearing retirement don't plan to downsize within two years of ending full-time employment. Those findings of a recent Royal LePage survey conducted by Leger paint a picture that's starkly different from previous generations. For starters, the trend of carrying a mortgage into retirement appears to be growing, with just half as many senior households carrying mortgage debt compared to a decade ago. According to Statistics Canada, 14 per cent of households with income earners aged 65 and over had a mortgage in 2016, up substantially from eight per cent in 1999. Meanwhile, 45 per cent of survey respondents say their mortgage is currently paid off, while another six per cent say their mortgage will be paid off before retirement. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Royal LePage President and CEO Phil Soper describes home price appreciation over the past 25 years as a 'double-edged sword' for today's retirees. ' On one hand, it has delivered unprecedented financial gains,' he says. 'On the other, this generation is far more likely to have carried mortgage balances that would have been unimaginable to their parents or grandparents.' According to Royal LePage research, they're also more likely to have provided financial assistance to their children to help them buy a home. While previous generations may have viewed mortgage-free retirement as the 'only option,' today's retirees tend to be more 'open-minded,' Soper notes. 'Traditional employment income may have dried up, but many are still comfortably managing their expenses and servicing mortgage payments with income from investments, part-time work or a working spouse.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. That picture the survey paints is different from previous generations in other ways as well. For one, the average age of retirees in Canada has been increasing gradually, from 64.3 in 2020 to 65.3 in 2024. At the same time, Canadians are entering the housing market later, increasing the odds of future generations of retirees carrying a mortgage further into retirement. 'Compared to their grandparents, today's retirees are enjoying about fifty per cent more years after turning 65,' Soper says. 'They're working longer, staying active and in many ways, continuing the lives they led during their working years – just without the job. It's no surprise their attitudes toward home ownership have evolved with the times. With people buying their first homes later and working longer, it's increasingly common for Canadians to carry a mortgage well into retirement, often by choice rather than necessity.' Of those Royal LePage experts who say a majority of people nearing or entering retirement are downsizing, 43 per cent say that standard condominiums are the most popular property type among this cohort, followed by adult living communities that cater to those aged 55 and up (25 per cent) and detached properties (16 per cent). NHL Sunshine Girls Sunshine Girls Toronto Raptors Columnists

New laws against blocking access to places of worship, schools coming, Fraser says
New laws against blocking access to places of worship, schools coming, Fraser says

Toronto Sun

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Sun

New laws against blocking access to places of worship, schools coming, Fraser says

Published Jun 28, 2025 • 3 minute read Newly-appointed Minister of Justice Sean Fraser in his new office at the Justice building on Parliament Hill Wednesday. Photo by JULIE OLIVER / Postmedia OTTAWA — Justice Minister Sean Fraser says the Liberal government will press ahead with plans for new criminal provisions against blocking access to places or worship, schools and community centres. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The measures, promised during the recent federal election campaign, would also create a criminal offence of wilfully intimidating or threatening people attending events at these venues. The minister's statement comes as civil libertarians point to existing provisions intended to curb such behaviour and push back against the idea of new measures that could infringe on freedom of expression and assembly. Tensions have risen in Canadian communities over public protests, many prompted by the ongoing hostilities in the Middle East. Several Canadian municipalities have taken steps recently to mandate 'bubble zones' that restrict protest activity near such places as religious institutions, schools and child care centres. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'It's not lost on me that there will be different levels of government that try to address this challenge in different ways,' Fraser said, adding that the federal government has an opportunity _ where behaviour crosses a criminal threshold — to legislate in that space. 'We clearly have seen challenges when it comes to certain religious communities in Canada who are facing extraordinary discrimination — antisemitism, Islamophobia, and other forms of hate,' Fraser said in a recent interview. 'People need to know that in Canada they are free to pray to the God of their choice and to, at the same time, freely express themselves, but not to the point where you threaten the protected Charter rights of a religious minority.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. James Turk, director of the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University, said he questions the need for new provisions and suggests politicians are proposing penalties simply to appear to be doing something. He said existing laws against mischief, nuisance and interfering with religious celebrations can be used to deal with the kinds of behaviour the federal government wants to address. 'I haven't heard a single thing that isn't already illegal, so it's a waste of time. It adds confusion to the Criminal Code and it suggests that they're only engaged in performative activity,' Turk said. 'They want to be seen to be doing something about this pressure they're under.' Anais Bussieres McNicoll, director of the fundamental freedoms program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, also said she wonders about the scope of the proposed new federal provisions 'and if they are necessary or simply duplicative of existing criminal offences.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Bussieres McNicoll said it's important to remember that a protest might be disruptive but also protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms' guarantee of peaceful assembly. 'As a parent myself, I know that any protest can be sometimes scary for a child. We're talking about loud voices, huge crowds, emotions are running high,' she said. 'So I believe it's part of my role as a parent to teach my child about what living in a democracy means, why we need protests, why we need space in our society for strong language — including language that we disagree with — and to teach my child about what we can do if we personally disagree with speech that we hear.' Richard Robertson, director of research and advocacy at B'nai Brith Canada, said that while the organization welcomes the planned new federal provisions, additional federal measures are needed. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. B'nai Brith wants national 'vulnerable infrastructure legislation' that would prohibit protests within a certain distance of a place of worship or school, or perhaps during specific time periods, if they interfere with someone's ability to attend the institutions, Robertson said. 'That would remove the need for municipalities and provinces to adopt legislation, and it would send a clear message that across Canada, individuals do not have the right to prevent others from accessing their houses of worship and their community centres and cultural institutions.' — With files from Anja Karadeglija NHL Sunshine Girls Columnists Sunshine Girls Toronto Raptors

Under the finfluence
Under the finfluence

Winnipeg Free Press

timean hour ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Under the finfluence

Opinion Alyssa Davies knows when a social media post has struck a chord with her tens of thousands of followers: the DMs (direct messages) pour in. 'Every week, people pour their hearts out over what they're going through financially,' says the 34-year-old financial influencer (or finfluencer), who has been writing about money for a decade on her blog Mixed Up Money. Davies finds she blogs less these days and posts more on multiple social media platforms, including TikTok, though her wheelhouse is Instagram, where she posts short videos about personal experiences with life and money. Her first-person narrative about money challenges and successes are what draws followers. It's not a unique formula and the insights can be quite banal (like allowing yourself some treat spending occasionally, even when you're trying to stick to a budget). Yet the intimacy of these financial insights are why hundreds if not thousands of finfluencers are captivating potentially millions of Canadian consumers. A recent survey of 1,000 Canadians by Tangerine Bank — looking only at TikTok (or 'FinTok,' the hashtag for users seeking financial advice) — point to finfluencers' growing impact, finding nearly nine in 10 using the platform believe it improved their financial literacy. In following finfluencers, 61 per cent note their posts helped them build at least $500 more wealth. The report ('#FinTok: the good, bad and straight-up wrong') found while the experience is mostly good, nearly one in four report following bad advice — most often related to investing. Among those individuals, more than 40 per cent lost more than $500. The report also illustrates how a new generation of consumers and investors are getting financial advice much like they consume other goods and services — for better and for worse, says Lora Paglia, chief operating officer at Tangerine. 'People want everything at their fingertips … from food deliveries to financial advice,' he says. '(Yet) not all advice is created equal and everyone has a unique financial situation.' Cautions aside, social media platforms — from TikTok to YouTube to Reddit to Instagram — are catching on because young consumers, especially, can learn about an intimidating topic in an approachable way, he adds. Finfluencers put the 'personal' in personal finance, and regulators like the Ontario Securities Commission are trying to understand their full impact. It recently published a report called 'Social Media and Retail Investing: the Rise of Finfluencers,' surveying 655 investors. Among its findings are 91 per cent of respondents are active social media users. Notably, 35 per cent of those respondents state making financial decisions based on finfluencer content. That more than one-third of Canadian investors could be following advice from largely unregulated financial content providers is concerning, says Meera Paleja, head of research and behavioural insights at the OSC. 'Their level of knowledge can vary greatly.' Finfluencers range from social media-savvy licensed advisers to those with no professional background in finance at all. Theresa Ebden, vice-president of the investor office at the OSC, notes the latter group can further be distinguished into two sub-groups: those posting content about money and investing who aren't being paid to promote a product; and those who are paid by a third party to promote a financial product. The latter group is of most concern to regulators, she adds. What's more, the OSC has reason to be concerned, given the findings of the second part of its study. It involved experiments with investors to determine finfluencers' impact and found respondents exposed to finfluencers' advice were more than three times as likely to purchase an investment mentioned in posts than those who were not exposed. 'Just seeing an investment talked about on social media dramatically increases the chance people will purchase it,' Paleja says. In the real world, the OSC is seeing the potential impacts, receiving more complaints about finfluencers — though most involve cryptocurrency, Ebden says. In contrast, at FAIR Canada (Canadian Foundation for the Advancement of Investor Rights), complaints about finfluencers have yet to arise. That doesn't mean it isn't a concern, says Jean-Paul Bureaud, executive director of FAIR Canada. 'The research (including the Tangerine study) generally shows that investors following finfluencers may be losing small amounts … so maybe they don't feel it's worth reporting.' Yet he can see how it can be potentially problematic, given finfluencers' unique and growing appeal. 'People like feeling part of a community, having peer-to-peer interactions and learning from others who have been through the same challenges.' Like any other financial literacy resource, finfluencer content can be 'a double-edged sword,' with the dangerous edge being those paid to promote products that may not be in consumers' best interest, Bureaud adds. The OSC study, however, did find potential solutions to better protect consumers. 'The greatest impact in the experiment was inoculation,' says Paleja. Like vaccines introducing a harmless piece of a virus to an immune system to recognize and fight off the real virus in the future, inoculation for investors involves introducing 'a weakened form of the misinformation they might encounter' on social media, she explains. Davies, who is completing her master's degree in financial psychology, offers some inoculation of her own, noting content consumers should be skeptical of any advice encountered online and they need to further confirm its veracity elsewhere before applying it to their own lives. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. Indeed, most followers she engages with don't blindly follow finfluencers. Rather, they see them as an entry point to learning more about subject matter they find intimidating, giving them confidence to learn more so they can make better money decisions. 'It's not about giving people perfect advice,' Davies says. 'It's really about helping them feel less alone on their financial journey.' Joel Schlesinger is a Winnipeg-based freelance journalist joelschles@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store