From Burkina to Belgium, fighting women's corner from benches of hard-right
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
As it turned out, she sits as a Belgian lawmaker in the ranks of the hard-right in the European Parliament, and says that suits her just fine.
The 44-year-old says she feels at home among the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) -- one of three groups in the assembly's far-right bloc, whose influence has grown steadily since elections last year.
As one of three EU lawmakers from the Flemish nationalist N-VA party, she rubs shoulders in the ECR with around 20 other outfits including Giorgia Meloni's post-fascist Brothers of Italy, and Poland's PiS.
She also crossed paths with Meloni at the inauguration of Donald Trump -- where they were both handpicked, as likeminded European politicians, to welcome the US leader back to office.
Despite divergences with some ECR members on "ethical" issues, Kanko pushes back at criticism of her decision to join the N-VA, a staunchly conservative party with a tough line on immigration.
"The idea that a black woman cannot also be right-wing is outrageous," she told AFP.
"I want the right to think and I take that right to think, I don't ask permission."
Fighting for women's emancipation has been a cornerstone of her life in politics, she says.
Born in Godyr, Burkina Faso, in 1980, Kanko was subjected to female genital mutilation at the age of five -- like three quarters of women in the country.
She shared her trauma from the experience in a 2013 book, the first of four she has written about gender equality.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
"If my mother had had means of her own, I am convinced I would not have been circumcised," she said.
"Today I am a very independent woman -- and no one would dare mutilate my daughter. That has to be the goal."
- EU being 'trampled' -
A "top of the class" high-school student in Burkina Faso -- in her own words -- Kanko left to study in the Netherlands in 2001.
From there she would move to Belgium -- where speaking both Dutch and French proved a boon to her career, in the private sector then as a municipal official in a district of Brussels.
Fast-forward to 2018, and Kanko decided to jump ship, leaving the centre-right MR party for the N-VA -- the political home of Belgium's current prime minister, Bart De Wever.
"I feel unstoppable, free and proud to be a new Flemish woman," she explained on the party's website at the time.
Kanko describes herself as pro-business, as a sovereigntist -- attached to the role of national governments within the EU -- and as a fervent Atlanticist.
That's how she explains her decision to attend the swearing-in of a US president who has made clear his disdain for the
-- which he says was founded to "screw" the United States.
"The United States is a partner we cannot do without," she said. "We have to form a bloc to defend Western values in the world."
But Kanko also warns that "unless we believe in our own power, our own priority and strategies, Donald Trump will walk all over us."
As it stands -- with a transatlantic trade war brewing and US security support in question -- she considers "the European Union today is being trampled underfoot -- and not just by the United States."
"It's trampled on by countries in the Middle East too, trampled on by China, trampled on by Russia, trampled on by radicals living on our own territories," argued Kanko -- who was raised in a Muslim culture but did not adopt the faith, and sees Islamic extremism as a threat.
In the EU parliament, Kanko has focused on security and border control -- and has sought to spotlight a report sounding the alarm about the Muslim Brotherhood as a threat to secularism and women's rights in France and beyond.
Kanko wants to see the organisation investigated at European level.
"We need to wake up," she told fellow lawmakers in parliament recently, accusing the brotherhood of "indoctrinating children" and "treating women as inferior."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
New Bill to boost construction equipment industry on the cards: Gadkari
New Delhi: The Union government is working on a new Bill to support India's construction equipment (CE) industry, Roads and Highway Minister Nitin Gadkari said on Thursday. The move aims to reduce the imports, particularly from China, and enhance the sector's competitiveness through targeted policy measures. 'We will frame rules and regulations for it. Our Bill will be released in the next session. Once it is approved, the standards will be set. You will not have to face the problems you are facing today. The standards will be set. Once the Bill is approved, all your worries will be solved,' the minister said. He was speaking at the annual session of the Indian Construction Equipment Manufacturers' Association (ICEMA), the apex industry body representing over 150 members, including 95 per cent of the country's OEMs and component manufacturers. India's construction equipment industry , valued at approximately $9 billion, has been facing the heat in recent years from Chinese imports. According to experts, the share of Chinese imports has risen to approximately 25 per cent in segments like excavators. Last year, major domestic players like Tata Hitachi also flagged concerns over the surge in cheaper imports from China. Speaking on efforts to decarbonise the sector, Gadkari said the government is considering a 10 per cent machinery advance for OEMs shifting to flex engines and clean fuels, along with zero per cent interest loans for equipment buyers using alternative fuel technologies. Industry growth Gadkari acknowledged that last year's slowdown in the industry was due to the cancellation of the Bharatmala project , but added that it should not affect progress this year. 'That problem has been solved. We have awarded ₹2 lakh crore so far. Now we will award another ₹5 lakh crore taking the total to ₹7 lakh crore by year-end.' 'We aim to award road projects worth ₹10 lakh crore every year,' he added. Retail sales of construction equipment (CE) grew marginally to 24,568 units during April-July 2025, up from 24,240 units in the same period last year, according to data from the Federation of Automobile Dealers Associations (FADA). The minister urged the CE industry to invest in high-capacity machinery for tunneling and pre-cast construction, 'We are building tunnels worth ₹3 lakh crore, but machinery availability remains a bottleneck. European nations have advanced tunnel boring equipment, we need to adapt such machines for Indian conditions. Pre-cast is now mandatory in many projects, requiring specialised machinery. I urge your industry to step up in these areas.' Giving reference to a recent study, he noted that the country's logistics costs have declined from 16 per cent due to enhancements in road infrastructure. He added that the government is working to reduce this further to 9 per cent by December. Skill training Gadkari also advised industry players to provide training and develop skillsets among equipment operators. 'It is very important to give skill training to these people. You should have a three-month course at the regional level on how to operate it, especially in areas where you have strong sales. Come to me, I will give you approval from the Indian government,' he said. Unlike road vehicles, the operation of heavy construction machines currently does not require any formal licensing or regulatory mandate.
News18
26 minutes ago
- News18
Talking Swadeshi, Farmer Protection: Modi Signals To Trump That India Is No Pushover
Modi leads a country of 1.4 billion people, of which 110-146.5 million are farmers contributing 20 per cent to the GDP. 'For us, the interest of our farmers is our top priority. India will never compromise on the interests of farmers, fishermen and dairy farmers. I know personally, I will have to pay a heavy price for it, but I am ready for it." Prime Minister Narendra Modi's address at the MS Swaminathan Centenary International Conference in New Delhi is a strong message being sent to US President Donald Trump who has used tariffs to try and cower India into submission. What the US President has not realised is that unlike America's European allies or Japan, India is no pushover. It will not be bullied into opening critical Indian sectors for foreign goods. Modi leads a country of 1.4 billion people, of which 110-146.5 million are farmers contributing 20 per cent to the GDP. What Did Modi Say? Modi's address at the Dr Swaminathan centenary was not a cogitatio solum on Trump and Tariffs. On August 2, on his home turf of Varanasi, the Prime Minister had also made a pitch for India's retailers to sell Swadeshi, a rare departure from his usual calls for Make in India, Atmanirbhar Bharat and vocal for local. By invoking the idea of 'Swadeshi', Modi was signalling that he was willing to take the path of Gandhi. It was a calibrated message for not just consumers and traders, but also policy pundits that India would not hesitate to draw firm lines when it comes to industrial and trade policies. Modi's responses to Trump elevate him into a class of his own. There are not many who can personally stand up to the 'classroom bully' diplomacy that the Trump administration seems to have a penchant for. India had started the pushback right since the first 25 per cent tariffs were announced. MEA released a statement that obliterated the claims and justifications used by Trump on a key ally like India. Rebuked, and later scorned by India's absolute refusal to kow-tow, Trump has doubled down by pushing more tariffs. But his ability to instill fear is overrated now. Bully For You, Trump! Other countries have also started taking a page out PM Modi's book on strong messaging. A major friend of India, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, has also delivered a public rebuke of Trump by saying that no matter what, he will not pick up the phone and call the US President to negotiate on tariffs. Brazil has also been slapped with 50 per cent tariffs. India and Brazil complete the consortium of BRICS that has the potential to take on the US, and change the geopolitical, global trade dynamics completely. What happens onward from this moment will be a lesson for all states looking to defy the US President. If it puts its mind to it, BRICS can upend the hegemony of the dollar completely. After everything, Trump certainly did something that no US President had done before, alienated almost all US allies and banded together its adversaries. India was one of the very first nations to come to the table on trade negotiations with the US after Trump had announced a baseline 10 per cent tariff with a grace period for world leaders to negotiate better trading terms. Despite the negotiations, despite India's proactiveness, Trump's belligerent decision to impose tariffs is nothing short of neo-imperialism. Why Swadeshi? Why Farmer? Modi's defiant message to Trump, revolving around Swadeshi and Farmer protection, is backed with economic realities which demonstrate India's ability to withstand and counter US trade pressures. For over a decade, growth, scale and self reliance has become part of India's growth story. However, under threat of global protectionism, and a fragmenting world order, Modi is making a pivot, repositioning India's economic sovereignty as both policy and cultural commitment. 'Every new item entering our homes, must be swadeshi." When Modi called for 'Swadeshi' in Varanasi, it was an appeal of a different kind. Unlike Atmanirbhar or Make in India, the word Swadeshi carries the moral weight of India's freedom movement and the rejection of foreign dependence. It's clear that New Delhi is in no mood to concede to any pressure, and will continue to chart the path on self-reliance trajectory. When Modi followed up with an appeal to the country's retailers to pledge to sell only swadeshi goods, it also was a clear message that he is willing to use the weight of India's huge consumer market, as a defensive shield. Swadeshi also underlines that India, which is in the middle of trade negotiations with the EU and GCC, is also willing to move away from the trade relationship with the US if need be. The call for Swadeshi is backed by $967.3 Billion in actual negotiating tools. India has $623.8 billion in alternative trade partners to redirect trade flows, $200 billion in government procurement which can favour domestic companies instead of US companies. The government also has $93.5 billion in GDP contribution from the agricultural sector value of production, and $50 billion in import controls which could be deployed. Another key reason for the Swadeshi push is also to plug strategic vulnerabilities. This is not the first time Trump has imposed tariffs on Indian goods. In his first term, he slapped 25 per cent tariffs on steel and 10 per cent on aluminum from India, and then revoked India's Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) status, affecting $5.6 billion in Indian exports. India retaliated at the time, by raising tariffs on 28 US products, which had a sobering effect on US policymakers as exporters lobbied for tariff relief and eventual rollback. But this game of chicken cannot be played every time a US President just deigns to make an example out of India. And this is where the call for Swadeshi comes into effect. The call to stand up for farmers, even if it comes at a personal cost, as Modi stated, also comes from the will to protect India's agriculture and food security. Modi knows that to bow to Trump on farm imports is nothing short of suicide. Under Modi government, India has become the world's number one producer of milk, pulses, and jute. Last year, India recorded its highest-ever foodgrain production. So keeping agriculture protected is critical to India's food security. No foreign power can be allowed to wipe out India's self-dependence and hold us hostage. India's agricultural production still pales in comparison to the scale and industrial capacity of US agriculture. The average farm size in India is just 0.74 hectares compared to 187 hectares in the US. This means allowing US agricultural imports without fewer restrictions would spell doom for Indian farmers. Returns on agricultural products in India are already razor thin. Exposure to cut-throat competition from the Americans could trigger farm failures, debt defaults, and rural unemployment that can destabilise rural India. There is an he argument that US goods cannot match the price point of domestic food production in India. But a simple look at almonds shows us this is untrue. US almonds have largely replaced Kashmiri almonds. Kashmiri almonds now account for less than 3 per cent of the market, whereas US almonds secured market dominance due to aggressive marketing and more efficient logistics. Therefore the message from the PM, at Dr Swaminathan centenary conference, is that the welfare of farmers remains the utmost priority for his government. And that India is determined to move forward to the next frontier in food security. The recent FTA with the UK was a prime example of how India puts farmers first. Key products like cheese were kept off the scope primarily to protect the interests of dairy farmers. The Modi government has been at the forefront of direct support for small-scale farmers, whether it be through the PM-Kisan scheme, crop insurance or cheaper, quality seeds and fertilisers. The creation of 10,000 Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) has strengthened the collective power of small farmers too. Why India Is Not Afraid Yes, there is a trade imbalances with the US, and it benefits India currently. However, the $45.8 Billion trade surplus means it's the US which needs Indian goods more. Trade deficit has grown 5.9 per cent YoY, which showcases America's increasing dependence on Indian exports. This essentially means Trump's tariffs essentially are economic self harm. Any escalation, such as the one going on right now, hurts America's access to critical Indian products like pharmaceuticals. Indian companies supply 40 per cent of America's generic drug market. Their prices in the US will go up. India, on the other hand, is now an indispensable link in the global healthcare supply chain. It exports pharmaceuticals to over 200 countries. It can easily find new markets. The net loser will be the US. While the US accounts for 18.3 per cent of India's exports ($87.3 billion), alternative markets offer a combined value of $623.8 billion, which is nearly 6.5 times the US market size. Trade with GCC countries has already reached $161.8 billion. India supplies 50 per cent of Africa's generic drug needs and maintains growing trade relationships across the continent. India's trade with the EU reached $135.3 billion in 2023-24, with India maintaining a $16.55 billion surplus. Despite a trade deficit with ASEAN countries, bilateral trade reached $121 billion in 2023-24, growing 5.2 per cent in the April-October 2024 period. Lowering trade barriers with ASEAN would allow Indian manufacturers to access cheaper raw materials while expanding market access for finished goods which can essentially replace the US market in size and capacity. Trump's Tariffs can also blow away lucrative defence deals for the US. There are already murmurs about India rethinking the P8 aircraft deal. The US is keen on bigger deals like a proposed sale of F-35 jets, co-production of Javelin missiles and Stryker combat vehicles. All of these could be soon in jeopardy. Combined with India's focus on 'swadeshi' and the Make In India pitch with partners like France, Israel and Russia, this could mean the loss of a big defence market for American hardware. top videos View all Trump's classroom bully diplomacy would have worked when America held overwhelming economic leverage. But not in today's multipolar world where the US is no longer the only dominant player. In his own way, the PM is telling Trump, 'Go on, levy your fines, your sanctions and your tariffs, India will not budge." About the Author Sohil Sinha Sohil Sinha is a Sub Editor at News18. He writes on foreign affairs, geopolitics along with domestic policy and infrastructure projects. tags : donald trump India-US trade deal Narendra Modi view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 08, 2025, 08:50 IST News opinion Talking Swadeshi, Farmer Protection: Modi Signals To Trump That India Is No Pushover Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Which countries are biggest buyers of Russian oil, and why is India still in stronger position despite 50% US tariffs?
Which countries are biggest buyers of Russian oil, and why is India still in stronger position despite 50% US tariffs? U.S. President Donald Trump has announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on goods imported from India, starting August 27. This is in addition to the existing 25 per cent tariff and is a response to India continuing to buy oil from Russia. The move has sparked global debate over trade policies, especially among countries that still import large amounts of energy from Russia. Asia becomes Russia's main oil buyer after EU pullback There was a time when the European Union (EU) was the biggest buyer of Russian oil. But after the EU placed sanctions on Russia, Asian countries like China, India, and Turkey stepped in and now lead in buying Russian energy. Asia has now become Russia's largest oil market. At present: China imports about USD 219.5 billion worth of energy (oil, gas, and coal) from Russia. India buys energy products worth around USD 133.4 billion. Turkey imports nearly USD 90.3 billion in energy from Russia. Some European countries, like Hungary, still buy small amounts of Russian oil through pipelines, but most have reduced their purchases due to sanctions. Russia's oil revenue still strong despite sanctions Even with sanctions from the U.S. and Europe, Russia continues to earn big from its oil exports. According to the Kyiv School of Economics, Russia made around USD 12.6 billion just from oil sales in June. For the entire year of 2025, it is expected to earn up to USD 153 billion from oil exports. Why is India in a better position? Even though President Trump has imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, India is still in a better position compared to China. Under Trump's new trade policy, Chinese imports are facing a much higher 30 per cent tariff, while imports from Vietnam are being taxed at only 20 per cent. This means Indian and Vietnamese products will continue to compete in the U.S. market, but India still has an edge over China. Recently, Fitch Ratings updated its 'Effective Tariff Rate (ETR) Monitor,' a tool that tracks how tariffs affect trade. According to the latest update: The average effective tariff rate in the U.S. has risen to 17 per cent, up from 15 per cent last year. Among all major U.S. trading partners, China's ETR is now the highest at 41.4 per cent, a big jump from its earlier rate of 10.7 per cent. India's ETR stands at just over 21 per cent, which shows that India is still in a relatively better spot compared to China. The Effective Tariff Rate (ETR) helps measure the real impact of tariffs on a country's trade and economic strategies. Liao Yu, a lecturer at Renmin University in China, says that during his second term, Trump has become more aggressive with his 'Make America Great Again' agenda. According to Liao, many supporters of this policy believe free trade has hurt the U.S., and they mainly blame China for it. In the future, China might face even tougher tariff battles. However, since Trump's 'America First' approach is also weakening old U.S. alliances, it could open up some new strategic opportunities for China.
