Ceasefire next week? Trump hopeful on Gaza deal; Israel-Hamas talks in motion
US President Donald Trump on Friday expressed hope that a ceasefire in Gaza could be reached soon, saying a deal involving Israel and Hamas might come as early as next week.
'We think within the next week, we're going to get a ceasefire,' Trump told reporters when asked about the possibility of ending the fighting in the war-ravaged Palestinian territory.
The current round of violence in the region resumed in March, when Israel declared a previously brokered ceasefire to be over and launched new attacks on Hamas. That earlier truce had been negotiated in the final days of former US President Joe Biden's term, with backing from Trump's incoming administration.
The conflict began when Hamas launched a deadly assault on Israel on October 7, 2023. Since then, Gaza has suffered widespread destruction and a severe humanitarian crisis.
Following the breakdown of the ceasefire, Israel also blocked the entry of food and other essential supplies into Gaza for more than two months, raising concerns over a looming famine.
In recent weeks, Israel resumed limited aid flow through the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a system supported by the United States and involving American security contractors working with Israeli troops at the edges of Gaza.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says
CNA
Read More
Undo
On Thursday, US announced $30 million in funding for the GHF programme. 'We're supplying, as you know, a lot of money and a lot of food to that area,' Trump said. 'We're involved because people are dying. And look at those crowds of people that have no food, no anything.'
However, the aid distribution effort has been surrounded by controversy. Witnesses and Gaza officials have reported several instances of Palestinians being killed while waiting near distribution centres.
Israeli newspaper Haaretz quoted unnamed soldiers who claimed their commanders had ordered them to fire on crowds near aid zones to disperse them, even when they posed no threat. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has denied the report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Minnesota shooting: Biden, Harris attend memorial service for slain Minnesota house speaker
Minnesota shooting: Former President Biden, VP Harris attend memorial service for slain Minnesota house speaker A solemn silence fell over the Basilica of Saint Mary on Saturday as more than 1,000 mourners including former US President Joe Biden , Kamala Harris and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, gathered to honor Melissa Hortman, the trailblazing former Minnesota house speaker. Hortman and her husband, Mark, were killed two weeks ago by a man impersonating a police officer in what federal prosecutors describe as a politically motivated attack. The shooting also left state Senator John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, seriously wounded. The couple's golden retriever, Gilbert, was also injured and later euthanized. Biden and Harris sat in the front row with Governor Tim Walz, who was Harris's 2024 running mate. 'Melissa Hortman will be remembered as the most consequential speaker in Minnesota history,' Walz said in his eulogy. 'I get to remember her as a close friend, a mentor, and the most talented legislator I have ever known.' Walz praised Hortman's ability to lead without dominating — a lawmaker known for her conviction, not combativeness. 'She knew how to get her way,' he said. 'But she never made anyone feel they'd been steamrolled. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo She didn't need someone else to lose for her to win.' The day before the service, more than 7,500 people filed through the Capitol rotunda in St. Paul, where the bodies of Hortman, her husband, and Gilbert lay in state — a rare honor in Minnesota. Biden also visited Hoffman at the hospital. First elected in 2004, Hortman rose to become a central architect of Minnesota's liberal policy agenda. As House speaker, she led a sweeping 2023 session that delivered free school meals, expanded abortion access, and strengthened protections for transgender rights. This year, with the House evenly split, she stepped aside as speaker under a power-sharing agreement but remained a key figure in budget negotiations. The service drew current and former lawmakers from both parties, underscoring the respect Hortman commanded across the aisle. The suspect, 57-year-old Vance Boelter of Green Isle, remains in custody following what officials called the largest manhunt in state history. He has not entered a plea and is due back in court Thursday. Prosecutors have not publicly discussed a motive but are pursuing federal charges that could carry the death penalty.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
35 minutes ago
- First Post
Beyond Trump's Iran strikes: Is America a compulsive warmonger? Debate rages on US military interventions
From its inception to at least 2022, the United States has carried out nearly 400 military interventions worldwide. It's possible that the roots of this behaviour go deeper than the ideology or personality of any particular president. read more Donald Trump's recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities have once again triggered a familiar and deeply polarised debate: is the United States compulsively drawn to war? The operation, billed as the largest B-2 stealth bomber deployment in history and involving over 125 aircraft and submarine-launched missiles, came despite Trump's repeated promises to keep America out of foreign entanglements. Critics say the action illustrates a long-standing pattern in US foreign policy– where rhetoric about restraint consistently gives way to the use of force. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But defenders of the strikes argue that Trump's hand was forced by the international obligations and security commitments that come with being a global superpower. An empire built on interventions From its inception to at least 2022, the United States has carried out nearly 400 military interventions worldwide– a number that has sharply accelerated in recent decades. According to a Congressional Research Service report, the US conducted 469 interventions between 1798 and 2022, with over 250 occurring after the Cold War ended in 1991. These have spanned nearly every region of the world, from Latin America to West Asia, and from Africa to the South Pacific. Instead of receding after the Cold War, military action only intensified. The post-9/11 period is now regarded as one of the most militarily aggressive eras in US history, characterised by not only the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, but also continuous drone strikes, special operations, and cyber offensives in countries like Yemen, Somalia, and Libya. Far from signalling a retreat, America's global military posture appears more entrenched than ever. The structure that compels war It's possible that the roots of this behaviour go deeper than the ideology or personality of any particular president. The US operates over 750 military bases in 80 countries and is treaty-bound to defend more than 50 nations, including through alliances such as Nato, ANZUS, and bilateral pacts with countries like Japan, South Korea, and the Philippines. This sprawling network of obligations and strategic interests creates what some experts describe as a structural bias toward intervention. In effect, the US is constantly at risk of being pulled into conflicts on terms dictated by others. Even Trump, whose 'America First' campaign promised to end 'endless wars,' escalated drone strikes during his first term, killed Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, and sent troops back to West Asia in moments of crisis. Addiction or obligation? To critics, this behaviour is not a coincidence but a pathology: a kind of compulsive warmongering disguised as leadership. They cite the uninterrupted line of US military campaigns from Korea and Vietnam to Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and now, again, Iran. Yet others argue that US military power remains the backbone of global security. As threats multiply from state and non-state actors, and as alliances such as Nato agree to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP, they insist that America's engagements abroad are less about aggression than deterrence. Either way, the question remains: Can the United States ever break its cycle of war, or is the machinery of global empire too deeply embedded to stop? As Trump's recent actions show, the pattern is likely to persist — whoever sits in the White House. With inputs from agencies
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites set up "cat-and-mouse" hunt for missing uranium
Live Events PICTURE BLURRED CHASING SHADOWS (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The U.S. and Israeli bombing of Iranian nuclear sites creates a conundrum for U.N. inspectors in Iran: how can you tell if enriched uranium stocks, some of them near weapons grade, were buried beneath the rubble or had been secretly hidden away?Following last weekend's attacks on three of Iran's top nuclear sites - at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan - President Donald Trump said the facilities had been "obliterated" by U.S. munitions, including bunker-busting bombs But the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency , which monitors Tehran's nuclear program, has said it's unclear exactly what damage was sustained at Fordow, a plant buried deep inside a mountain that produced the bulk of Iran's most highly enriched uranium. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said on Monday it was highly likely the sensitive centrifuges used to enrich uranium inside Fordow were badly damaged. It's far less clear whether Iran's 9 tonnes of enriched uranium - more than 400 kg of it enriched to close to weapons grade - were governments are scrambling to determine what's become of spoke to more than a dozen current and former officials involved in efforts to contain Iran's nuclear program who said the bombing may have provided the perfect cover for Iran to make its uranium stockpiles disappear and any IAEA investigation would likely be lengthy and Heinonen, previously the IAEA's top inspector from 2005 to 2010, said the search will probably involve complicated recovery of materials from damaged buildings as well as forensics and environmental sampling, which take a long time."There could be materials which are inaccessible, distributed under the rubble or lost during the bombing," said Heinonen, who dealt extensively with Iran while at the IAEA and now works at the Stimson Center think-tank in more than 400 kg of uranium enriched to up to 60% purity - a short step from the roughly 90% of weapons grade - are enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA a fraction of that left unaccounted for would be a grave concern for Western powers that believe Iran is at least keeping the option of nuclear weapons are indications Iran may have moved some of its enriched uranium before it could be chief Grossi said Iran informed him on June 13, the day of Israel's first attacks, that it was taking measures to protect its nuclear equipment and materials. While it did not elaborate, he said that suggests it was moved.A Western diplomat involved in the dossier, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the issue, said most of the enriched uranium at Fordow would appear to have been moved days in advance of the attacks, "almost as if they knew it was coming".Some experts have said a line of vehicles including trucks visible on satellite imagery outside Fordow before it was hit suggests enriched uranium there was moved elsewhere, though U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved has also dismissed such concerns. In an interview due to air on Sunday with Fox News Channel's "Sunday Morning Futures", he insisted the Iranians "didn't move anything.""It's very dangerous to do. It is very heavy - very, very heavy. It's a very hard thing to do," Trump said. "Plus we didn't give much notice because they didn't know we were coming until just, you know, then."The White House did not respond to a request for comment. The State Department referred Reuters to Trump's public remarks.A second Western diplomat said it would be a major challenge to verify the condition of the uranium stockpile, citing a long list of past disputes between the IAEA and Tehran, including Iran's failure to credibly explain uranium traces found at undeclared sites."It'll be a game of cat and mouse."Iran says it has fulfilled all its obligations towards the Israel launched its 12-day military campaign aimed at destroying Iran's nuclear and missile capabilities, the IAEA had regular access to Iran's enrichment sites and monitored what was inside them around the clock as part of the 191-nation Non-Proliferation Treaty aimed at preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, to which Iran is a rubble and ash blur the more, Iran has threatened to stop working with the IAEA. Furious at the non-proliferation regime's failure to protect it from strikes many countries see as unlawful, Iran's parliament voted on Wednesday to suspend says a resolution this month passed by the IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations paved the way for Israel's attacks, which began the next day, by providing an element of diplomatic cover. The IAEA denies has repeatedly denied that it has an active program to develop a nuclear bomb. And U.S. intelligence - dismissed by Trump before the airstrikes - had said there was no evidence Tehran was taking steps toward developing experts say there is no reason for enriching uranium to 60% for a civilian nuclear program, which can run on less than 5% a party to the NPT, Iran must account for its stock of enriched uranium. The IAEA then has to verify Iran's account by means including inspections, but its powers are limited - it inspects Iran's declared nuclear facilities but cannot carry out snap inspections at undeclared has an unknown number of extra centrifuges stored at locations the U.N. nuclear watchdog is unaware of, the IAEA has said, with which it might be able to set up a new or secret enrichment makes hunting down the material that can be enriched further, particularly that closest to bomb grade, all the more important."Iran's stockpile of 60% enriched uranium may not have been part of the 'mission' but it is a significant part of the proliferation risk - particularly if centrifuges are unaccounted for," Kelsey Davenport of the Washington-based Arms Control Association said on X on IAEA can and does receive intelligence from member states, which include the United States and Israel, but says it takes nothing at face value and independently verifies pummelled the sites housing the uranium, Israel and the U.S. are seen as the countries most likely to accuse Iran of hiding it or restarting enrichment, officials Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office did not respond to a request for comment for this story.U.N. inspectors' futile hunt for large caches of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, which preceded the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, showed the enormous difficulty of verifying foreign powers' assertions about hidden stockpiles of material when there is little tangible information to go in Iraq, inspectors could end up chasing shadows."If the Iranians come clean with the 400 kg of HEU (highly enriched uranium) then the problem is manageable, but if they don't then nobody will ever be sure what happened to it," a third Western diplomat IAEA, which answers to 180 member states, has said it cannot guarantee Iran's nuclear development is entirely peaceful, but has no credible indications of a coordinated weapons U.S. this week backed the IAEA's verification and monitoring work and urged Tehran to ensure its inspectors in the country are is a long journey from there to accounting for every gram of enriched uranium, the IAEA's above-ground plant at Natanz, the smaller of the two facilities enriching uranium up to 60 percent, was flattened in the strikes, the IAEA said, suggesting a small portion of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile may have been Iran's most deeply buried enrichment plant, which was producing the bulk of 60%-enriched uranium, was first seriously hit last weekend when the United States dropped its biggest conventional bombs on it. The damage to its underground halls is underground area in Isfahan where much of Iran's most highly enriched uranium was stored was also bombed, causing damage to the tunnel entrances leading to agency has not been able to carry out inspections since Israel's bombing campaign began, leaving the outside world with more questions than said on Wednesday the conditions at the bombed sites would make it difficult for IAEA inspectors to work there - suggesting it could take time. "There is rubble, there could be unexploded ordnance," he the former chief IAEA inspector, said it was vital the agency be transparent in real time about what its inspectors have been able to verify independently, including any uncertainties, and what remained unknown."Member states can then make their own risk assessments," he said.
