&w=3840&q=100)
Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan will never be restored: Amit Shah
Home Minister Amit Shah has said that India will never revive the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan and will instead redirect river water currently flowing to Pakistan for use within India.
In an interview with The Times of India, Shah said, 'No, it will never be restored.' He added, 'We will take water that was flowing to Pakistan to Rajasthan by constructing a canal. Pakistan will be starved of water that it has been getting unjustifiably.' Earlier, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had also asserted that "blood and water cannot flow together".
The Indus Waters Treaty, signed in 1960, governs the distribution of water from the Indus river system between India and Pakistan. It ensures Pakistan's access to water for around 80 per cent of its agricultural land through three rivers that originate in India.
India had suspended its participation in the treaty after 26 civilians were killed in a terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam. Despite a halt of military operations agreed upon by both nuclear-armed nations last month following one of their worst military escalations in recent years, the treaty remains on hold.
India plans major water diversion
India has already begun preparations to make full use of its share of the Indus waters. A feasibility study is currently underway for a 113-kilometre canal project that would divert excess water from Jammu & Kashmir to the Indian states of Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan. This canal will connect the Chenab river with the Ravi-Beas-Sutlej river system.
The objective is to better utilise India's share of both the eastern (Ravi, Beas, Sutlej) and western (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab) rivers, which would otherwise flow into Pakistan.
Pakistan considers legal action
India's actions have cast doubt on the possibility of any immediate negotiations on the treaty. In May, Reuters reported that India is preparing to draw significantly more water from rivers that flow into Pakistan, as part of a retaliatory strategy.
While Pakistan's foreign ministry has not responded to these recent developments, it has previously stated that the treaty does not allow unilateral withdrawal by either side. Blocking water flow to Pakistan, it warned, would be viewed as 'an act of war'.
Islamabad is also exploring legal options under international law to challenge India's suspension of the treaty.
Talks offer rejected by India
Earlier on Friday, Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif reiterated his willingness to engage with India on all unresolved matters, including Jammu and Kashmir, the Indus Waters Treaty, trade, and counter-terrorism.
India, however, has taken a firm stance, stating it will only engage in talks with Pakistan on the return of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and terrorism-related concerns.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Shah's take on English is his personal view: EPS
Coimbatore: AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K Palaniswami on Saturday said Union home minister Amit Shah's remark that a time would come when English speakers would feel embarrassed was his personal view. "Everyone has their own opinion. What he said was his personal view. He had, at the same time, emphasised on the importance of the mother tongue. Shah pointed out that some people are giving more importance to English than to their native language." Speaking to the media at the city airport, EPS said the public anger against the DMK was growing and that an anti-people govt was governing Tamil Nadu. "To divert attention from this, they are spreading 'derogatory' cartoons. The people would deliver appropriate punishment in the 2026 assembly elections." When asked about International Yoga Day , he said, "Yoga is essential for physical health and the Prime Minister is promoting it, for which he deserves congratulations."


Hindustan Times
32 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why US moved B-2 Spirit stealth bombers to Guam and how far is it from Iran?
The United States moved its B-2 bombers to Guam on Saturday, Reuters reported, citing two sources. This comes as tensions between Israel and Iran rose over the past week, with President Donald Trump weighing whether Washington should take part in Tel Aviv's strikes against Tehran. The White House has not confirmed why the bombers were deployed and if it is connected to the conflict in the Middle East. US moved B-2 Stealth Bombers to Guam on Saturday (AFP) The B-2 is equipped to carry the US's 30,000-pound GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, which is designed to destroy targets deep underground. Washington has hinted that this weapon could be used to strike Iran's nuclear capability. One official told Reuters that no further orders had been given yet to move the bombers beyond Guam. Reports suggested that the move reduces sortie times compared to flights from Missouri, enhancing readiness for potential strikes. Read More: Nuclear watchdog warns of 'serious catastrophe' if Israel targets Iran's Bushehr reactor Guam's distance from Iran minimizes exposure to Iranian retaliation, unlike Middle Eastern bases, per However, some experts, according to NBC News, said that it was precautionary, noting no strike orders and ongoing diplomacy efforts by European leaders. Distance from Iran to Guam The approximate distance from Guam to Iran is 7,500 kilometers (4,660 miles). The B-2's unrefueled range of 9,000–10,000 kilometers allows it to reach Iran from Guam, though mid-air refueling, supported by KC-46 Pegasus tankers. Israel said on Saturday it had killed a veteran Iranian commander during attacks by both sides in the more than week-long air war, while Tehran said it would not negotiate over its nuclear program while under threat. Read More: 'Grossi will pay after...': Khamenei aide's blood-chilling threat to IAEA chief Israel says Iran was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons, while Iran says its atomic program is only for peaceful purposes. Trump has said he would take up to two weeks to decide whether the United States should enter the conflict on Israel's side, enough time "to see whether or not people come to their senses," he said. (With inputs from Reuters)


India Today
36 minutes ago
- India Today
US moves B-2 stealth bombers to Guam amid escalating Israel-Iran conflict: Report
The United States is moving B-2 bombers to the Pacific island of Guam, two US officials told Reuters on Saturday, as President Donald Trump weighs whether the United States should take part in Israel's strikes against was unclear whether the bomber deployment is tied to Middle East B-2 can be equipped to carry America's 30,000-pound GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, designed to destroy targets deep underground. That is the weapon that experts say could be used to strike Iran's nuclear program, including The officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, declined to disclose any further details. One official said no forward orders had been given yet to move the bombers beyond Guam. They did not say how many B-2 bombers are being Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for and officials are closely watching to see whether the B-2 bombers will move forward to a US-British military base on the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia. Experts say that Diego Garcia is in an ideal position to operate in the Middle United States had B-2 bombers on Diego Garcia up until last month, when they were replaced with B-52 said on Saturday it had killed a veteran Iranian commander during attacks by both sides in the more than week-long air war, while Tehran said it would not negotiate over its nuclear program while under says Iran was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons, while Iran says its atomic program is only for peaceful has said he would take up to two weeks to decide whether the United States should enter the conflict on Israel's side, enough time "to see whether or not people come to their senses," he was first to report this week the movement of a large number of tanker aircraft to Europe and other military assets to the Middle East, including the deployment of more fighter aircraft carrier in the Indo-Pacific is also heading to the Middle InMust Watch