
HHS promotes insurer pledge to scale back prior authorization
Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz took part in a roundtable discussion with insurers in which the payers pledged commitments to six key reforms to the prior authorization process.
Health care providers must obtain approval from an insurer before a specific service is covered, and they've criticized that process for being time-consuming and a drag on providing health care.
According to Oz, the roundtable included the CEOs of health insurance companies who cover about 75 percent of Americans. The CMS administrator said he would like fewer services to be subject to preauthorization.
Medicare Director Chris Klomp gave the example of colonoscopies or cataract surgeries as procedures that could be moved out of the prior authorization process.
Referencing the biblical passage that reads 'the meek will inherit the earth,' Oz said in a press briefing that health insurance companies and hospital systems have 'agreed to sheath their swords, to be meek for a while.'
Major health insurers including Cigna, UnitedHealthcare and Aetna said they would be simplifying the process and reducing the number of health care claims subject to prior authorization.
The voluntary commitments include standardizing the electronic prior authorization process; reducing the number of claims subject to prior authorization; ensuring continuity of care when patients change plans; enhancing communication and transparency when it comes to determinations; increasing the numbers of real time responses; and ensuring medical review of denied requests.
By cutting down on red tape, Oz said 'tens of billions of dollars of administrative waste' could be saved.
Kennedy acknowledged that similar commitments have been made by the health insurance industry in the past, but said this instance was different because of the number of insurers who have signed on to the voluntary agreement.
'The other difference is we have standards this time. We have, we have deliverables. We have specificity on those deliverables, we have metrics, and we have deadlines, and we have oversight,' said Kennedy.
Oz suggested another difference was a change in Americans' current consensus on prior authorization compared to the past.
'I mean, there's violence in the streets over these issues. This is not something that is a passively accepted reality anymore. Americans are upset about it,' said Oz. 'I think the major factor is the industry realizes that some of the things that are preauthorized just don't make any sense.'
'The health care system remains fragmented and burdened by outdated manual processes, resulting in frustration for patients and providers alike. Health plans are making voluntary commitments to deliver a more seamless patient experience and enable providers to focus on patient care, while also helping to modernize the system,' said Mike Tuffin, president and CEO of the health insurance trade association AHIP.
According to a 2024 survey by the American Medical Association, 91 percent of physicians said the prior authorization process can lead to negative clinical outcomes and 82 percent said it could lead to patients abandoning their course of treatment.
Acknowledging the voluntary nature of the commitments, Oz said, 'If the insurance industry cannot address the needs of preauthorization by themselves, there are government opportunities to get involved. They might not be as nimble, but they will be used if we're forced to use them.'
Actor Eric Dane, who recently disclosed his diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), appeared at the press conference to put his support behind the move. Dane famously played a physician on the show 'Grey's Anatomy.'
'I'm here today to speak briefly as a patient battling ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease. When that diagnosis hits and you find out that you're sick, your life becomes filled with great uncertainty,' said Dane. 'The worst thing that we can do is add even more uncertainty for patients and their loved ones with unnecessary prior authorization.'
Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) and Rep. Greg Murphy (R-N.C.) joined Kennedy and Oz at HHS headquarters. Both lawmakers have previously introduced legislation seeking to reform and streamline the prior authorization process under Medicare.
Marshall and Murphy, both physicians, touched on how the prior authorization process has negatively impacted their patients.
'I vividly remember a patient I once had scheduled for an infertility surgery. She'd taken time off work and arranged help at home, only to be told the morning of a procedure that her insurance company had added another step to the prior authorization process, abruptly canceling her surgery,' Marshall recounted. 'Now, whether you need a hip replacement or a heart catheterization, many patients feel their critical care has been delayed by an opaque and burdensome prior authorization process.'
The senator from Kansas said he was still committed to codifying preauthorization reforms despite the commitments made Monday.
Describing himself as a 'skeptic,' Murphy said he would be keeping an eye on insurers to make sure they're 'doing what they're saying they're going to do.' He touched on the role of artificial intelligence in today's prior authorization process.
'Artificial intelligence should help this tremendously, tremendously, and it should take out a lot of the variances that happen between doctors, hospitals, regions of the country, etc. But remember, artificial intelligence only is as good as what you put into it,' said Murphy.
Physicians have previously expressed concerns about the role of artificial intelligence in the preauthorization process, with some evidence suggesting AI-use results in higher rates of denials.
In March, Murphy joined with bipartisan House colleagues in reintroducing the Reducing Medically Unnecessary Delays in Care Act. Among other measures, the bill would bar Medicare administrative contractors from denying coverage of health care services solely because it does not meet an evidence-based standard and would require input from practicing physicians prior to establishing clinical criteria for preauthorization review.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

4 hours ago
Leading pediatrician group recommends COVID vaccine for infants, toddlers in contrast with RFK Jr.
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) said on Tuesday that children ages 6 months to 23 months should receive a COVID-19 vaccine, in contrast with federal health officials. The recommendations are part of the AAP's annual childhood immunization schedule, which includes guidance for COVID, flu and RSV vaccines for those aged 18 and younger. The AAP has been releasing its own recommendations since the 1930s, but in a rare occurrence, the recommendations differ from those put out by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The group also recommended Americans age 18 and under receive a COVID vaccine if they are at high risk of severe COVID, live in a long-term care facility or congregate setting, if they have never been vaccinated against COVID or if they live with someone at high risk for severe COVID. It comes after Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in late May that the CDC would no longer recommend the COVID vaccine for healthy children. The CDC, which is under Kennedy's purview, later updated the guidance to a " shared clinical decision making" model -- leaving the decision to vaccinate children to parents alongside advice from a doctor. The prior recommendations were that everyone aged 6 months and older get vaccinated against COVID with the most up-to-date shot. The contrasting vaccine recommendations highlight the growing rift between federal health officials and medical organizations on vaccine policy. "The academy has been making pediatric immunization recommendations since the 1930s, that has not changed," Dr. Susan J. Kressly, president of the AAP, told ABC News. "But what has changed is that this year, we're doing it in the environment of misinformation, which makes it more important than ever that we provide clear and confident guidance, because the majority of American families really depend on us for this guidance." Children between 6 months old and 23 months old are at the highest risk of severe COVID-19, and the vaccine can protect against serious illness, according to the AAP. "We know that this age group, that's the highest risk for severe disease," Kressly said. "And so we want to make sure that those children who are at highest risk and did not live through the pandemic -- they were not exposed to COVID viruses during the pandemic -- we want to make sure that they are protected as best as possible." Although medical organizations may differ in their vaccine recommendations, insurers often rely on the CDC's vaccine panel, known as the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), recommendations to determine what they will and won't cover. If certain vaccines aren't recommended by the ACIP, it may lead to parents or guardians facing out-of-pocket costs if their children receive the shot. It could also mean the shots aren't covered by the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program, a federally funded program that provides no-cost vaccines to eligible children. "We need to work with our like-minded policy makers who understand the importance of keeping VFC vaccines available in every community for those children who depend on them," Kressly said. "At the same time, there are children in this country whose vaccines are paid for through commercial insurance, and we are having continuing conversations with major payers to make sure that those can be vaccines are available as well. Vaccination is part of high-quality preventive care, and we are confident that we can work with the payers to make sure that translated into policy."


Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
‘Nothing Is OK' Says Bank of America on UnitedHealth Stock (UNH) Despite Warren Buffett's New Bet
UnitedHealth Group (UNH) stock has recently drawn strong interest from top investors and hedge fund managers, including Warren Buffett. Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B) disclosed a $1.57 billion investment in UnitedHealth, acquiring roughly 5 million shares, signaling confidence in its potential for a rebound. Following this, Bank of America Securities' Top analyst Kevin Fischbeck raised his price target to $325 from $290. However, he kept a Neutral rating on the stock, citing several near-term uncertainties. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Earnings Are Key, But Timing Matters Fischbeck noted that UNH has strong earnings potential, but meaningful stock growth will take time. The company's guidance of $16 per share for 2025, with growth to around $16.80–$17 in 2026, sets a realistic near-term expectation. For significant upside beyond this, UNH needs consistent results driven by operational strength rather than one-off gains. Fischbeck emphasized that steady earnings beats and modest increases will be key to rebuilding investor confidence. Medicare Advantage Stars Could Impact Profitability Another key uncertainty for UNH lies in its Medicare Advantage (MA) business. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will release the 2027 'stars' ratings in mid-October, showing what percentage of UNH's MA members qualify for a 5% quality bonus. These ratings are crucial because they directly influence profitability. Fischbeck said that if UNH's ratings fall, it could delay a return to normal profit margins and affect the stock's performance for another year. Analyst Points to Coding Adjustments as Major Risk Fischbeck pointed to a key risk for UNH in its Medicare Advantage business. The company's revenue could be affected if the government changes the rules for how it counts patient data, a process known as coding. Any new adjustment could reduce the revenue UNH earns from these plans and erase some of the gains the company expects in the next few years. Looking Ahead Despite these near-term risks, Fischbeck remains constructive on UNH's long-term prospects. He believes that patient investors who can focus on a multi-year horizon could benefit from the company's underlying strength, steady growth in health care demand, and potential upside in 2027. Is UNH a Good Buy Right Now? average UnitedHealth stock price target implies a 2.94% upside potential.


USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
Florida surgeon general says raw milk has health benefits. Experts say he's wrong
Florida law says it's illegal to sell raw milk for human consumption, but that's not stopping some of the state's top officials from supporting residents who want to drink it. Some have even made a complete 180, from promoting pasteurized milk to promoting consumer freedom within days. In an Aug. 12 post on X, Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo said Floridians "have the freedom to make informed health choices." Floridians have the freedom to make informed health choices. I support the decision to consume raw milk when sought for potential health benefits and protective factors. Be aware of your source and know the "I support the decision to consume raw milk when sought for potential health benefits and protective factors. Be aware of your source and know the risks," Ladapo wrote. Illness from raw milk can cause diarrhea, stomach cramping and vomiting, and severe complications can lead to paralysis, kidney failure, stroke, or even death, federal authorities say. Interest in raw milk has been growing in recent years. In June 2024, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he "only drinks raw milk." Raw milk doesn't cure ailments, experts say Raw milk devotees say it tastes better and is healthier, but according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the American Medical Association, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, raw milk does not contain any extra beneficial bacteria and will not cure or treat asthma, allergies or lactose intolerance. Florida Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson agreed with Ladapo in a statement given to the USA TODAY NETWORK – Florida on Aug. 12: 'State Surgeon General Ladapo and I share the same position on raw milk. People should make informed decisions." To be sure, it's a reversal to what his agency was saying a week ago. In a press release on Aug. 6, the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services encouraged Floridians to drink "only" pasteurized milk. "Florida Commissioner of Agriculture Wilton Simpson and the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) are encouraging Floridians to protect their health by only consuming pasteurized milk products," the press release says. 'Florida's pasteurized milk supply is safe, nutritious, and closely controlled from the farm to your local grocery store,' Simpson said in the release. 'There have been no reported illnesses from pasteurized milk products in Florida, so Floridians should continue to buy and enjoy nutritious and wholesome dairy products from Florida farmers.' As previously reported earlier this month, 21 people got sick and seven were hospitalized for bacterial infections, including E. coli, from drinking raw milk from Keely Farms Dairy in New Smyrna Beach. Raw milk: OK as pet food in Florida Raw milk can be sold as pet food in Florida, but it must be clearly labeled "not for human consumption." the Keely Farms' webpage did not mention pets. Six of the infected people were children under age 10, the Florida Department of Health said. The cases were all in Central and Northeast Florida. According to the CDC, improperly handled raw milk is responsible for nearly three times more hospitalizations than any other food-borne disease source. And so far in 2025, there have been seven recalls or outbreaks from raw milk in the United States. More from the Palm Beach Post: Opinion | Floridians can make America healthy again by not drinking raw milk Ana Goñi-Lessan, state watchdog reporter for the USA TODAY Network – Florida, can be reached at agonilessan@