Iran will not compromise right to enrichment, says official
Iran will not abandon its right to uranium enrichment because of mounting frictions in the region, a senior Iranian official told Reuters on Thursday, adding that a 'friendly' regional country had alerted Tehran over a potential military strike.
The official said the tensions were intended to 'influence Tehran to change its position about its nuclear rights' during talks with the US on Sunday in Oman.
The sixth round of US-Iran nuclear talks will be held in Muscat, the Omani foreign minister said on Thursday, after US President Donald Trump reiterated that Tehran would not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.
Trump said on Wednesday that US personnel were being moved out of the Middle East because 'it could be a dangerous place'.
Iran's nuclear programme is spread over many locations. While the threat of Israeli air strikes has loomed for decades, only some of the sites have been built underground.
The US and the UN nuclear watchdog believe Iran had a co-ordinated, secret nuclear weapons programme that it halted in 2003. The Islamic Republic denies ever having had one or planning to have one.
Iran agreed to restrictions on its nuclear activities in exchange for relief from international sanctions under a 2015 deal with world powers. That pact fell apart after Trump — then serving his first term as president — pulled the US out of it in 2018 and Iran started abandoning the restrictions in the following year.
Iran has been expanding its uranium enrichment programme ever since the pact broke down, reducing the so-called 'breakout time' it would need to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a nuclear bomb to days or little more than a week from at least a year under the 2015 deal.
Actually making a bomb with that material would take longer. How long is less clear and the subject of debate.
Iran is now enriching uranium to up to 60% fissile purity, close to the 90% of weapons-grade, at two sites, and in theory it has enough material enriched to that level, if enriched further, for six bombs, according to a yardstick of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN watchdog.
WHERE ARE IRAN'S NUCLEAR FACILITIES?
NATANZ
A complex at the heart of Iran's enrichment programme on a plain abutting mountains outside the Shiite Muslim holy city of Qom, south of Tehran. Natanz houses facilities including two enrichment plants: the vast, underground Fuel Enrichment Plant (FEP) and the above-ground Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant (PFEP).
An exiled Iranian opposition group revealed in 2002 that Iran was secretly building Natanz, igniting a diplomatic standoff between the West and Iran over its nuclear intentions that continues today.
The FEP was built for enrichment on a commercial scale, able to house 50,000 centrifuges. About 16,000 centrifuges are installed there, roughly 13,000 of which are in operation, refining uranium to up to 5% purity.
Diplomats with knowledge of Natanz describe the FEP as being about three floors below ground. There has long been debate about how much damage Israeli air strikes could do to it.
Damage has been done to centrifuges at the FEP by other means, including an explosion and power cut in April 2021 that Iran said was an attack by Israel.
The above-ground PFEP houses only hundreds of centrifuges but Iran is enriching to up to 60% purity there.
FORDOW
On the opposite side of Qom, Fordow is an enrichment site dug into a mountain and therefore probably better protected from potential bombardment than the FEP.
The 2015 deal with major powers did not allow Iran to enrich at Fordow at all. It now has about 2,000 centrifuges operating there, most of them advanced IR-6 machines, of which up to 350 are enriching to up to 60%.
The US, Britain and France announced in 2009 that Iran had been secretly building Fordow for years and had failed to inform the IAEA. US President Barack Obama said then: 'The size and configuration of this facility is inconsistent with a peaceful programme.'
ISFAHAN
Iran has a large nuclear technology centre on the outskirts of Isfahan, its second largest city.
It includes the Fuel Plate Fabrication Plant (FPFP) and the uranium conversion facility (UCF) that can process uranium into the uranium hexafluoride that is fed into centrifuges.
Iran also stores enriched uranium at Isfahan, diplomats say.
There is equipment at Isfahan to make uranium metal, a process that is particularly proliferation-sensitive since it can be used to devise the core of a nuclear bomb.
The IAEA has said there are machines for making centrifuge parts at Isfahan, describing it in 2022 as a 'new location'.
KHONDAB
Iran has a partially built heavy-water research reactor originally called Arak and now Khondab. Heavy-water reactors pose a nuclear proliferation risk because they can easily produce plutonium which, like enriched uranium, can be used to make the core of an atom bomb.
Under the 2015 deal, construction was halted, the reactor's core was removed and filled with concrete to make it unusable. The reactor was to be redesigned 'to minimise the production of plutonium and not to produce weapon-grade plutonium in normal operation'. Iran has informed the IAEA that it plans to start operating the reactor in 2026.
TEHRAN RESEARCH CENTRE
Iran's nuclear research facilities in Tehran include a research reactor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Green Shoots: Those with ears must hear, with eyes must see, with heart must act
I've been trying to understand how international law works, and in particular international humanitarian law. This interest was prompted by the capture of the Madleen, a sailboat loaded with 12 doughty individuals from across the world and baby formula in the hold. They were trying to do what governments of the world have failed to do – deliver supplies to relieve the suffering of people in Gaza. The Madleen was intercepted in international waters, and the world watched as the Israeli state violated all the laws that safeguard our coexistence as nations and citizens of the world. The purpose of the United Nations as stated in their statutes is to maintain international peace and security; to develop friendly relations among nations; to cooperate in solving international problems and in promoting respect for human rights; and to be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations. Their Security Council has been trying to pass resolutions that would enable a ceasefire in Gaza, and the United States has vetoed these five times. And it isn't just the Trump administration – their lack of interest in stopping the carnage started under Joe Biden. The USA has imposed sanctions on four judges of the International Criminal Court (ICJ), an institution set up as an independent arbiter of disputes and custodian of international law. They did this because the ICJ dared investigate the illegal actions of Israel. Imagine if our government behaved like this when our judges make rulings against it? So Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru, Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou of Benin, and Beti Hohler of Slovenia will see their US-based property and assets blocked, and US-based entities are also forbidden from engaging in transactions with them. For me, though, the most egregious criminality that continues today is the denial by Israel of humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza. They instead are using aid as a weapon, deliberately starving ordinary men and women – and children – into submission. Christian leaders living in Jerusalem issued a desperate plea to the world last week. This is what they said: 'In addition to the close to 55,000 dead and over 120,000 wounded, starvation and famine are being experienced (the UN recently identified 10,000 new cases of malnutrition). Hospitals and other civilian facilities are almost completely shut down. More than two million Gazans and the remaining 24 live Israeli hostages are all at risk of their lives at every moment.' And then, in a calculated move driven by pure evil, the USA and Israel, having blocked international aid agencies from doing their work, instead establish the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The GHF distributes aid through what are called 'Secure Distribution Sites' that are fully controlled by the Israeli army. Even as starving Gazans make their way to these points, they come under attack by the very same army that is supposed to be ensuring the aid reaches them. Diabolical? It is clear that humanitarian aid is being used as a weapon of war to advance Israel's genocidal assault on the people of Gaza. Gazans are being given a choice: to submit to full Israeli control, or starve. I never did get any clarity on how international law works. But then, one doesn't need to be a law professor to know that we are entering very dangerous times when the community of nations allows a criminal state and its bully-boy protector to have carte blanche with the lives of so many. We who are not in Palestine do not have permission to be indifferent, though, or to throw our hands up in despair and hopelessness. We must heed the cry of the Jerusalem Voice for Justice in Palestine/Israel in their SOS of June 8: 'While the people of Gaza are the first victims of this cruel war, the rest of us are under another, more invisible psychological and spiritual bombardment—flooded with images and competing narratives, we are left feeling hopeless, paralyzed by despair and unable to help. Exhausted! Therefore, we call out to you. The international community must intervene. Although our voices do not seem to be heard by world leaders, we encourage all who have ears to hear and eyes to see, to take action.'

TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Trump says he may soon increase car tariffs to push more US production
US President Donald Trump on Thursday warned he may soon hike car tariffs, arguing that could prod carmakers to speed US investments. "I might go up with that tariff in the not too distant future," Trump said at a White House event. "The higher you go, the more likely it is they build a plant here." Carmakers have been pressing the White House to reduce the 25% tariffs Trump imposed on cars. The Detroit Three carmakers have criticised a deal that would cut tariffs on British car imports but not on Canada or Mexico production. Trump cited recent investment announcements, including GM saying this week it plans to invest $4bn (R71,882,393,200) in three US plants and move some SUV production from Mexico. He also noted a $21bn (R377,382,600,000) Hyundai investment announced in March, including a new US steel plant. "They wouldn't have invested 10c if we didn't have tariffs, including for manufacturing American steel, which is doing great," Trump said. Mexico said last month cars assembled in Mexico and exported to the US will face an average tariff of 15%, not 25%, because Washington is giving carmakers reductions for the value of US content. Carmakers are facing increasing cost pressures stemming from tariffs. In recent weeks, Ford Motor and Subaru of America have hiked prices on some models due to higher costs from Trump's tariffs. In May, Ford estimated tariffs would cost it about $1.5bn (R26,939,413,200) in adjusted earnings. GM said last month it had a tariff exposure of between $4bn (R71,882,393,200) and $5bn, including about $2bn (R35,942,920,000) on the more affordable vehicles GM imports from South Korea, where it makes entry-level Chevrolet and Buick models.


The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Israel strikes Iran: what we know
It said 200 jets were involved in the raids, striking about 100 targets. Rescue teams work outside a heavily damaged building, targeted by an Israeli strike in the Iranian capital Tehran on June 13, 2025. (Photo by AFP) Israel said Friday it had carried out strikes on Iran's nuclear and military sites, promising to continue its campaign and 'achieve much more'. Blasts were reported in Tehran and at a key uranium enrichment site. Here is what we know: What was hit? Israel's military said its jets carried out strikes on 'dozens of military targets, including nuclear targets in different areas of Iran'. It said 200 jets were involved in the raids, striking about 100 targets. Blasts were reported in the capital, where state television said fire and smoke were seen at a key site for Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in the city's east. Damage to residential buildings and civilian deaths were also reported. State television said Natanz, in Iran's central Isfahan province and home to a key nuclear site, had been hit 'several times', showing footage of heavy smoke billowing from the site. ALSO READ: SA stands in 'solidarity' with Iran after devastating explosion [VIDEO] The UN nuclear watchdog confirmed Natanz was among the sites targeted in the attacks and said it was in touch with Iranian authorities and its inspectors in the country 'regarding radiation levels'. Additional strikes were reported against three military sites in Iran's northwest. Iranian state media confirmed the deaths of Revolutionary Guards chief Hossein Salami and armed forces chief of staff Mohammad Bagheri in the attacks. It also reported that 50 people, including women and children, had been injured. Why now? Israel sees the cleric-run state in Tehran as an existential threat. It says it took out Iran's air defences in October last year in retaliation for a barrage of about 200 missiles from the Islamic Republic. Defence Minister Israel Katz described the Israeli action as a 'pre-emptive strike'. The army said intelligence showed Iran was approaching a 'point of no return' on its nuclear programme. The United States and other Western countries, along with Israel, have repeatedly accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon, which it has always denied. ALSO READ: South Africa responds to claims of cooperating with Iran on nuclear energy [VIDEO] Israel again called for global action after the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) accused Iran on Wednesday of non-compliance with its obligations. There had been indications a military strike was likely, with US media reporting an imminent Israeli attack that would not be coordinated with Washington. 'I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen,' US President Donald Trump told reporters on Thursday when asked if an Israeli attack loomed. A sixth round of talks over Tehran's nuclear programme had been scheduled between the United States and Iran on Sunday in Oman. Trump said after the strikes he was 'still hoping' for talks. Israel's strike on Iran: Who was involved? Israel relies on the United States for military and diplomatic support but carried out the strikes alone, top US diplomat Marco Rubio said. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' he said in a statement warning Tehran against targeting US interests. ALSO READ: Iran geared to cement its ties with SA Rubio said Israel had 'advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defence,' without offering support or criticism of the strikes. Trump meanwhile told Fox News that he had advance notice of the strikes, warning Tehran 'cannot have a nuclear bomb'. Tehran said Washington would be 'responsible for the consequences' of Israel's deadly attacks, saying they 'cannot have been carried out without the coordination and permission of the United States'. Iran: What reaction has there been? Oman, due to host nuclear talks this weekend, called the strikes a 'dangerous escalation' that threatened negotiations and regional stability. Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, condemned the 'blatant Israeli aggressions'. Netanyahu said the strikes had been 'very successful… and with God's help, we will achieve much more'. Air traffic was halted at Tehran's main international airport, and neighbouring Iraq closed its airspace entirely. Israel warned Iran could retaliate at any moment, declaring a state of emergency and also shutting its airspace. ALSO READ: SA joins other countries condemning Israel's attack on Iran In Washington, the White House said Trump would convene security chiefs after the strike, which was criticised by a senior Democrat. 'Israel's alarming decision to launch airstrikes on Iran is a reckless escalation that risks igniting regional violence,' said Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the US Senate Armed Services Committee. The strikes saw oil prices surge up to 12 percent, though Iran's oil ministry said there had been 'no damage' to refineries or depots.