Tesla shares rebound as Musk–Trump row shows signs of cooling
Tesla shares clawed back from steep losses on Friday, as a war of words between CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump appeared to cool amid report that White House aides were scheduling a call to help broker peace.
Shares were up 5 per cent in premarket trading after Musk signalled on X he was open to easing tensions with Trump, agreeing with comments from hedge fund manager Bill Ackman calling for a detente.
The spat between the world's most powerful man and its richest erased more than $150 billion from Tesla's market value on Thursday, the company's biggest drop in one session.
Short-sellers, or investors betting against the stock, pocketed nearly $4 billion from the drop, the second-biggest single-day of profit on record, according to data from Ortex.
Tensions escalated after Musk stepped up criticism of Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill, which proposes largely ending the popular $7,500 EV tax incentive by the end of 2025.
In response, Trump suggested cuts to the government's contracts with Musk's companies, including rocket maker SpaceX.
"It might be a bit too hopeful to think their relationship will ever go back to what it once was, but if cooler heads prevail and the tension eases, that would definitely be a big improvement for Tesla," said Tesla shareholder Matthew Britzman, who is an analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown.
LOFTY STOCK VALUATION
An open clash with Trump could pose multiple hurdles for Tesla and the rest of Musk's sprawling business empire.
The U.S. Transportation Department regulates vehicle design standards and would have a big say in whether Tesla can mass-produce robotaxis without pedals and steering wheels.
Tesla stock is down 29.5 per cent this year after a 14 per cent drop on Thursday. Still, the shares trade at 120 times expected earnings, a lofty multiple compared to other automakers and even tech giants such as Nvidia.
The shares have been on a turbulent ride since last July when Musk backed Trump's White House bid. They surged initially as investors bet on less regulatory pressure for robotaxis, but tumbled due to soft sales and brand fallout from Musk's political stance.
Some analysts said the rift was likely to blow over as it would be detrimental to both the president and his biggest backer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump has options to punish Musk even if his federal contracts continue
The relationship between US President Donald Trump and Mr Elon Musk exploded into warfare on June 5. PHOTO: HAIYUN JIANG/NYTIMES WASHINGTON - After the relationship between President Donald Trump and Mr Elon Musk exploded into warfare on June 5, Mr Trump suggested that he might eliminate the tech titan's federal contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it,' Mr Trump posted on his social media platform. That's not as easy as Mr Trump implies. The Pentagon and Nasa remain intensely reliant on SpaceX, Mr Musk's rocket launch and space-based communications company, to get to orbit and move government data across the world. But there are options available to the president that could make Mr Musk's relationship with the federal government much more difficult than it has been so far in Mr Trump's second administration. Mr Trump's most accessible weapon to punish Mr Musk is the ability to instruct federal regulators to intensify oversight of his business operations, reversing a slowdown in regulatory actions that benefited Mr Musk's businesses after Mr Trump was elected. 'In an administration that has defined itself by reducing regulation and oversight, it would not be difficult to selectively ramp up oversight again,' said Mr Steven Schooner, a former White House contracts lawyer who is now a professor at George Washington University. With a decree, Mr Trump could suspend Mr Musk's security clearance, a step that the Trump administration has also taken against some of its Biden-era critics. That move would make it harder for Mr Musk to continue in his role as CEO of SpaceX, given its billions of dollars in Pentagon contracts. Pentagon investigators had been examining whether Mr Musk has violated federal security clearance requirements for disclosing contacts with foreign government leaders, The New York Times reported in 2024. The Trump administration could also slow down new contracts going to SpaceX in the years to come, perhaps by looking for ways to drive more work to its rivals, such as Mr Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin or the Boeing and Lockheed partnership called United Launch Alliance. But billions of dollars in financial commitments have been made to SpaceX for launches that will be spread out over the rest of Mr Trump's term to deliver astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station and even the moon, as well as to send military and spy satellites into orbit. Moreover, the services SpaceX provides are vital to some of Mr Trump's top agenda items, such as building a new space-based missile defence programme that the Pentagon is calling Golden Dome. That programme will require dozens of launches to orbit as well as space-based observation and data transmission systems to track and help intercept missile threats. SpaceX is by far the dominant global player in these launches. While Blue Origin and other companies like Rocket Lab and Relativity Space are building or have recently built their own new rockets, none has the kind of launch record and reliability that SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket has. Overall, the federal government has awarded nearly US$18 billion (S$23 billion) in contracts to SpaceX over the past decade, including US$3.8 billion just in the 2024 fiscal year, according to a tally by the Times. That makes SpaceX one of the largest federal contractors, with most of that money coming from Nasa and the Pentagon. Terminating SpaceX's contracts 'would end the US capability to launch astronauts to orbit for the foreseeable future,' said Ms Laura Seward Forczyk, founder of the space consulting firm Astralytical. It would also significantly delay the US effort to return humans to the moon, she said. Ms Bethany Stevens, Nasa's press secretary, hinted on Mr Musk's X social platform late on June 5 afternoon – as the verbal war between Mr Musk and Mr Trump continued to play out – that the deals with SpaceX are in fact not going to be cancelled anytime soon. 'Nasa will continue to execute upon the President's vision for the future of space,' Ms Stevens said, without mentioning Musk or SpaceX by name. 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the President's objectives in space are met.' But Mr Trump has more flexibility when it comes to the alphabet soup of federal agencies that regulate SpaceX as well as Tesla, Mr Musk's car company; X; the Boring Co., his underground drilling outfit; and Neuralink, his computer chip brain implant startup. The federal government, by most historical and ethical norms, is not supposed to be used as a retaliatory machine to punish political enemies. And that practice by Mr Trump would be abnormal and inappropriate, Schooner said. But the Trump administration, including the Justice Department, has shown itself willing to take up investigations that target Mr Trump's enemies or organisations that he dislikes, like Harvard University or even his former aides who have become critics, like Mr Chris Krebs, his former top cybersecurity official. Before Mr Trump was elected, at least 11 federal agencies had ongoing investigations or lawsuits targeting Mr Musk's companies. These included the Federal Aviation Administration's scrutiny of launch safety issues, the Environmental Protection Agency's inquiry into potential water pollution at SpaceX's Texas launch site and transportation regulators' questions about fatal accidents involving Tesla cars using autopilot. Several of those inquiries were put on hold. In other instances, fines that Mr Musk's companies had been assessed were being reconsidered, including one that the FAA announced in September for what it said were safety violations during launches in Florida. Mr Trump's top transportation official vowed at his confirmation hearing to 'review' that fine. As of last week, it had still not been paid, an agency official said. The Fish and Wildlife Service also has slowed down its oversight of SpaceX's Texas launch site, where the company for years has been accused of damaging adjacent state park and National Wildlife Refuge lands. That enforcement effort could be turned back on almost overnight if Mr Trump ordered it. But no other US company can currently do what Nasa needs. Boeing, the other company Nasa hired to take astronauts to orbit, has yet to complete fixes for its Starliner capsule after a test mission left two Nasa astronauts, Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, in orbit for nine months before they finally returned to Earth in a SpaceX Crew Dragon. Aerospace company Northrop Grumman also has a contract to take cargo to the space station with its Cygnus spacecraft, but the most recent Cygnus had to be scrapped after it was damaged during shipment to Florida for launch. Mr Musk appears to recognise this leverage he has over Nasa. He initially threatened on June 5, as the war of words with Mr Trump played out, to stop future flights to deliver astronauts to the space station, but he appeared to walk back that threat later in the day. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Singapore exploring 'worst-case scenario' solutions for its Harvard students: Vivian Balakrishnan
SINGAPORE: Singapore is trying to find solutions to deal with the "worst-case scenario" where Singaporean Harvard University students are not able to physically study in Boston, Minister for Foreign Affairs Vivian Balakrishnan said on Saturday (Jun 7). His ministry will continue to seek clarification on international student visas with the US State Department and Department of Homeland Security, he told reporters, though he made no promises that the matter would be resolved in time. Dr Balakrishnan on Saturday completed a four-day working visit to Washington DC. This was the first ministerial visit to the US since both countries elected new governments. Harvard's ability to enrol international students was thrown into turmoil last month after the US government said it would block the university from accepting foreign students, affecting study plans. Though all Singaporean students are set to be affected by the visa issue and possible delays in processing their applications, those studying at Harvard have the "greatest concern", and Singapore's ambassador to the US, Mr Lui Tuck Yew, has held a virtual townhall with them. "We are also trying to find solutions to deal with the worst-case scenario where they would not be able to physically study in Boston," Dr Balakrishnan said, adding that the ministry has some ideas about how to help the students deal with that "without impairing their academic and professional progress". Those who are not in the US yet and have not secured visas may need to have backup plans, he said. "But my main point is we will stay in touch, and we will continue to keep you informed." A court on Thursday ruled that the government cannot enforce US President Donald Trump's latest move to bar most new international students at Harvard from entering the country, following legal action by the university. Beyond Harvard, Reuters also reported last month that the US ordered its consular offices to stop scheduling new visa interviews for students and exchange visitors. "I am not in a position to give any guarantees that this will be resolved in time," said Dr Balakrishnan, when asked about contingencies being planned for Singaporean students. He noted that it is already June, and the academic year in the US usually begins in August. "We will have to watch this space, but rest assured that we will continue to do our best to try to at least get clarification, get certainty ... (and) thereafter, give our students specific advice," he said. Dr Balakrishnan said he hoped that there will be clarifications from US authorities in the next few days, but that these are domestic political issues. "The situation confronting our students is not confined to Singapore, but indeed to all international students," he said. "It is not directed at us. Nevertheless, you can become affected as collateral damage." He added that it is in the interest of both countries keep opportunities open to Singaporeans who want to study and even work in the US. "I hope we will be able to find suitable solutions for our students who want to pursue educational opportunities in the United States." "NO HURDLES" Dr Balakrishnan also said there were no challenges in interacting with his US counterparts during his trip. "There were no hurdles or impediments interacting with the Americans ... We got along in our own usual direct and constructive manner," he said, adding that there was no anxiety on that front. "The anxiety is that we have reached the end of a world order that has prevailed for 80 years, and we are now in a period of transition to a new world order." Singapore has benefited from open trade and free flow of investments and the multilateral rules-based order, he said. "That is clearly changing, and the time of greatest danger is the interregnum – the transition period from one world order to the next. That is why this is a time where we need to be alert, we need to keep our eyes and ears open, and we need to respond promptly and quickly to changes." It is also important to interact frequently, candidly, openly and constructively, especially with a superpower which is of "great strategic importance to us", he said. In response to a question on how tariff discussions are going, Dr Balakrishnan said it will take time because the US is looking for multiple rounds of negotiation with its trading partners. Based on conversations with senators and members of Congress from the two major US political parties, there is still a recognition that trade, investment, intellectual property protection, reliability and supply chain security are vital issues, he said. "Do not just look at the headline numbers of what the tariffs are, but rather think about the primary considerations and anxieties of policy makers across the whole world," he said. Negotiators from different countries have to exercise discretion and care in how they seek to preserve and protect their national interests.
AsiaOne
2 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Iran says US travel ban shows 'deep hostility' for Iranians, Muslims, World News
Iran on Saturday (June 7) blasted US President Donald Trump's travel ban on countries including the Islamic Republic, saying it showed "deep hostility" toward Iranians and Muslims. "The decision to ban the entry of Iranian nationals - merely due to their religion and nationality - not only indicates the deep hostility of American decision-makers towards the Iranian people and Muslims but also violates... international law," a senior foreign ministry official said in a ministry statement posted on the X social media platform. Trump's proclamation on Wednesday will bar citizens from 12 countries starting on Monday at 12.01am. The countries are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo Republic, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The ban, which Trump said was necessary to protect against "foreign terrorists", was reminiscent of a similar move he implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travellers from seven Muslim-majority nations. [[nid:718841]]
