Yinam Cohen: Northwestern's approach to fighting antisemitism creates an artificial balance
Last year, Northwestern stood out as one of the few universities in the country where an agreement was reached with the anti-Israel, and in many cases, antisemitic encampments on campus. I harshly criticized this agreement, driven personally by Northwestern President Michael Schill, as did leading Jewish and civic organizations. This agreement also led to the resignation of the very committee that Schill had previously established to address antisemitism at NU.
Over the past months, I have been in contact with Northwestern's leadership to discuss how the university can enhance its efforts to address harassment, intimidation, exclusion and discrimination against Jewish, Israeli and pro-Israeli students. These individuals suffered bias and hostility, not just from their peers, but also from faculty members.
This past December, I was encouraged to learn that Northwestern added new components to its anti-bias training to address rising antisemitism. However, I was also somewhat surprised by the way the university framed it. The email sent by Northwestern stated that the new components would address 'antisemitic, anti-Muslim, anti-Arab, and anti-Palestinian biases.'
I am fully committed to fighting all forms of bias, including anti-Muslim and anti-Arab sentiments and their derivatives. However, facts matter. According to FBI data and city of Chicago reports from the past two years, Jews have been one of the most targeted groups for hate crimes in the country. In Chicago, Jews were the most targeted group for hate crimes.
While it is clearly essential to address all forms of bias, Northwestern's approach creates an artificial balance between combating Jew hatred and addressing 'anti-Muslim, anti-Arab, and anti-Palestinian biases.' This misguided move appears to be driven, once again, by a desire to appease the anti-Israel sentiment among some members of the campus community. Combating antisemitism should not come at the cost of distorting reality or creating false equivalences. You cannot fight bias by creating further biases. This approach is not data-driven or fact-based — it undermines the integrity of the fight against all forms of discrimination.
Northwestern is one of the world's leading research institutions and a source of pride for the city of Chicago and the state of Illinois. I deeply appreciate the partnerships it has established with Israel's top academic and research institutions — collaborations that drive innovation, advance groundbreaking research and create real-world solutions to global challenges. These partnerships benefit not only Americans and Israelis but also contribute to scientific and technological advancements that improve lives worldwide. Strengthening these ties will further enhance opportunities for cutting-edge discoveries, knowledge exchange and a shared commitment to academic excellence.
However, there is still much more to be done in uprooting the inherent anti-Israeli — and in some cases, anti-Jewish — biases across the campus, particularly among some of its faculty members and students.
Northwestern must take meaningful action to ensure the safety and well-being of all its students, regardless of their backgrounds. The fight against bias and discrimination must be rooted in genuine commitment, not empty statements. It is time for the university to lead by example, setting a standard for others to follow in creating a truly inclusive and respectful environment for all.
Northwestern should be making headlines for its groundbreaking academic accomplishments — not for its failure to confront Jew hatred head-on. It must show the same boldness in tackling antisemitism that it shows in pursuing academic excellence. Hesitation and half-measures will only embolden those who seek to marginalize Jews on campus.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
16 minutes ago
Serbian protesters are back on the streets as clashes with government loyalists escalate
BELGRADE, Serbia -- Thousands of anti-government protesters returned to the streets in Serbia on Thursday after two days of clashes with loyalists of autocratic President Aleksandar Vucic and riot police that left dozens injured or detained. Police fired tear gas in at least two cities and numerous other incidents were reported throughout the country. In the northern city of Novi Sad, where the anti-Vucic revolt in Serbia started more than nine months ago, groups of young protesters shouted, 'He is finished,' as they demolished the offices of the president's ruling Serbian Progressive Party. The demonstrators broke windows on the party's downtown office and carried away some documents and pieces of furniture from inside. The police or Vucic's supporters, who have guarded the office for months, where nowhere to be seen. In Belgrade, the Serbian capital, and in Novi Sad, police in the evening fired multiple rounds of tear gas to disperse the protesters who then moved to other locations in smaller groups. Protesters in a downtown Belgrade area at one point scrambled in panic, some tumbling to the ground as they tried to run away. Videos on social media showed riot police beating up some protesters and a footage showed an opposition politician, his head bandaged. Vucic told pro-government Informer television that 'the state will win' as he announced a crackdown on anti-government protesters, accusing them of inciting violence and of being 'enemies of their own country.' He reiterated earlier claims that the protests have been organized from abroad, offering no evidence. The unrest throughout Serbia this week marked a serious escalation in largely peaceful demonstrations led by Serbia's university students that have shaken Vucic's firm grip on power in the Balkan country. Rival groups on Wednesday hurled rock and bottles at each other amid clouds of smoke and chaos. An army security officer at the SNS party offices at one point fired his gun in the air, saying later he felt his life had been in danger. Interior Minister Ivica Dacic on Thursday said there were gatherings at some 90 locations in the country the previous evening. The Serbian president has faced accusations of stifling democratic freedoms and of allowing organized crime and corruption to flourish in the country that is a candidate for European Union membership. He denies those allegations. The EU's Commissioner for Enlargement Marta Kos said the reports of violence were 'deeply concerning.' 'Advancing on the EU path requires citizens can express their views freely and journalists can report without intimidation or attacks,' Kos added on the social media platform X. Police officers on Wednesday formed a cordon around a makeshift camp of Vucic's loyalists outside the presidency building downtown. Dacic, the interior minister, accused the protesters of attacking governing party loyalists. He said 'those who broke the law will be identified and sanctioned.' University students posted on X to accuse the authorities of trying to 'provoke a civil war with the clashes' at demonstrations. The rallies so far passed for the most part without incident even while drawing hundreds of thousands of people. Occasional violence in the past months mostly involved incidents between protesters and the police, rather than between rival groups. 'Police were guarding the regime loyalists who were throwing rocks and firing flares at the protesters," a post by the informal group, Students in Blockade, said. The account is run by students from across Serbia who have been protesting the government since late last year. Demonstrations started in November after a renovated train station canopy crashed in Novi Sad, killing 16 people and triggering accusations of corruption in state-run infrastructure projects. The protesters are demanding that Vucic call an early parliamentary election, which he has refused to do. Serbia is formally seeking EU membership, but Vucic has maintained strong ties with Russia and China.
an hour ago
Judge strikes down Trump administration guidance against diversity programs
WASHINGTON -- A federal judge on Thursday struck down two Trump administration actions aimed at eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion programs at the nation's schools and universities. In her ruling, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher in Maryland found that the Education Department violated the law when it threatened to cut federal funding from educational institutions that continued with DEI initiatives. The guidance has been on hold since April when three federal judges blocked various portions of the Education Department's anti-DEI measures. The ruling Thursday followed a motion for summary judgment from the American Federation of Teachers and the American Sociological Association, which challenged the government's actions in a February lawsuit. The case centers on two Education Department memos ordering schools and universities to end all 'race-based decision-making' or face penalties up to a total loss of federal funding. It's part of a campaign to end practices the Trump administration frames as discrimination against white and Asian American students. The new ruling orders the department to scrap the guidance because it runs afoul of procedural requirements, though Gallagher wrote that she took no view on whether the policies were 'good or bad, prudent or foolish, fair or unfair.' Gallagher, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, rejected the government's argument that the memos simply served to remind schools that discrimination is illegal. 'It initiated a sea change in how the Department of Education regulates educational practices and classroom conduct, causing millions of educators to reasonably fear that their lawful, and even beneficial, speech might cause them or their schools to be punished,' Gallagher wrote. Democracy Forward, a legal advocacy firm representing the plaintiffs, called it an important victory over the administration's attack on DEI. 'Threatening teachers and sowing chaos in schools throughout America is part of the administration's war on education, and today the people won,' said Skye Perryman, the group's president and CEO. A statement from the Education Department on Thursday said it was disappointed in the ruling but that 'judicial action enjoining or setting aside this guidance has not stopped our ability to enforce Title VI protections for students at an unprecedented level.' The conflict started with a Feb. 14 memo declaring that any consideration of race in admissions, financial aid, hiring or other aspects of academic and student life would be considered a violation of federal civil rights law. The memo dramatically expanded the government's interpretation of a 2023 Supreme Court decision barring colleges from considering race in admissions decisions. The government argued the ruling applied not only to admissions but across all of education, forbidding 'race-based preferences' of any kind. 'Educational institutions have toxically indoctrinated students with the false premise that the United States is built upon 'systemic and structural racism' and advanced discriminatory policies and practices,' wrote Craig Trainor, the acting assistant secretary of the department's Office for Civil Rights. A further memo in April asked state education agencies to certify they were not using 'illegal DEI practices.' Violators risked losing federal money and being prosecuted under the False Claims Act, it said. In total, the guidance amounted to a full-scale reframing of the government's approach to civil rights in education. It took aim at policies that were created to address longstanding racial disparities, saying those practices were their own form of discrimination. The memos drew a wave of backlash from states and education groups that called it illegal government censorship. In its lawsuit, the American Federation of Teachers said the government was imposing 'unclear and highly subjective' limits on schools across the country. It said teachers and professors had to 'choose between chilling their constitutionally protected speech and association or risk losing federal funds and being subject to prosecution.' standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
News24
3 hours ago
- News24
Trump supports journalists going into ‘dangerous' Gaza amid ‘numerous deaths and injuries'
US President Donald Trump supports journalists going into Gaza. Israel does not allow journalists without a military escort. At least 17 people were killed in Gaza on Thursday. US President Donald Trump said on Thursday he would like to see journalists gain access to Gaza to see humanitarian efforts. Israel has not allowed foreign reporters to enter Gaza since the start of its war in October 2023, unless they are under Israeli military escort. 'I'd like to see that happen. Sure,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'I would be very fine with journalists going. And it's a very dangerous position to be in, as you know, if you're a journalist, but I would like to see it.' AFP reported that Gaza's civil defence agency said at least 17 people were killed on Thursday in Israeli strikes as the military intensified its bombardment of Gaza City. READ | Israel minister announces West Bank settlement 'burying the idea of a Palestinian state' The dead included six civilians who had been waiting for humanitarian aid, said civil defence spokesperson Mahmud Bassal. 'The Israeli occupation forces are intensifying their raids in the Zeitun area' of Gaza City, he said. The Israeli military has yet to comment. 'For the fourth consecutive day, the area has been subject to a military operation, resulting in numerous deaths and injuries,' said Bassal. 'Since dawn today, we have received 28 calls from families and residents of this neighbourhood, some of whose children have been killed.' Many people cannot leave these areas due to artillery fire. Mahmud Bassal Maram Kashko, a resident of Zeitun, said the strikes had increased over the past four days. 'My nephew, his wife and their children were killed in a bombardment,' he told AFP. An AFP videographer said their bodies were taken to Al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza City and buried shortly afterwards at the Sayyid Hashim cemetery. On Wednesday, the head of the Israeli military said he had approved a new plan for operations in the Gaza Strip aimed at freeing all hostages and defeating Hamas. The military intends to take control of Gaza City and neighbouring refugee camps, some of the most densely populated areas in the Palestinian territory, which has been devastated by more than 22 months of war. Over the past three days, Zeitun has been the target of repeated air strikes, according to multiple sources, including the military. Adding to the dire humanitarian situation, Gaza has been experiencing a spell of extreme heat, which is particularly difficult for displaced residents living in tents and makeshift shelters. 'The heat is unbearable. We live in a nylon tent - it's like an oven. We cannot stay inside during the day, there is no ventilation,' said Umm Khaled Abu Jazar, 40, displaced in the Al-Mawasi camp. 'My children have developed skin rashes. Even the water we drink is hot from the sun. There is nothing to cool us down. The heat only adds to our daily suffering,' the mother of five told AFP.
