India won the emerging market race again in FY25. Will it become a safe haven too?
India became the best emerging market economy in 2024-25 for the fourth consecutive year despite facing turbulence in the second half of the year due to weak exports, sliding stock market capitalization and depreciating rupee, showed the Mint's Emerging Markets Tracker.
While stock markets emerged as one of the weak links in the second half of the year, a quick rebound in equities from disruption caused by the tariffs announcements by US President Donald Trump has seemingly made India a safe haven.
'India would be seen as a safe haven in certain terms among EMs and Asian economies as its economy is domestic demand driven," said Gaura Sengupta, chief economist,
IDFC First Bank
. 'Our exposure to the tariff tension compared to other Asian countries is on the lower side."
Unlike previous years, India struggled to maintain its top position throughout the year, even falling to sixth rank in August and seventh in February—but a strong performance at the beginning of the year helped the country outpace its peers like China and the Philippines.
India maintained its first rank for the first four months, but the flight of foreign investors from September onward, particularly to China after its economic stimulus programme, brought India down. The optimism, however, seems to be returning to India as the country is better placed in terms of economic growth as well as potential hit from the US tariffs. The trade war between China and the US seems to have shifted confidence back to India from China.
Also Read |
In charts: Trump moves erode US status as a safe haven
India's strong lead over its EM peers weakened mainly due to turbulence in the external environment—stock market crash, currency depreciation and exports. When it comes to overall economic growth and manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index, India scored the highest (100) throughout the year. Its performance on inflation was also among the strongest. These scores are based on seven high-frequency indicators across nine emerging market economies. On each indicator, the best-performing economy gets a score of 100, the worst one gets zero, and the others get linearly interpolated relative scores.
However, there was clear evidence of decline in the second half of the year in stock market capitalization where the average score fell to 40.7 from 63.3 in the first half. The average score for exports also declined to 31.5 from 40. While the outlook for exports remains uncertain amid tariff-related disruptions and expectations of a global growth slowdown, stock markets are making a comeback. BSE Sensex has crossed the 80,000-mark in late April after having fallen from over 85,000 in late September 2024.
On the other hand, China, India's closest rival, maintained a good score due to its fairly strong economic growth. By maintaining its growth at 5%, meeting its target, the country proved that despite its problems, like lacklustre domestic demand and falling property prices, it can grow. Multiple fiscal stimuli in the second half of the year helped the country achieve a good score on stock market capitalization as well. However, uncertainty has gripped China, an export-dependent country, due to the full-blown trade war with the US.
There is no doubt over India's supremacy in GDP growth. Even as global uncertainties are expected to pull India's growth down in FY26, other
emerging market peers
will remain behind. As per the latest projections by the International Monetary Fund, India's GDP growth is seen at 6.2% in FY26. In comparison, China is expected to grow by 4% in 2025, and ASEAN-5—Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand—are expected to grow only 3.6%. On the inflation front, India is on the downward path and is expected to keep the year-on-year price rises close to the medium-term aim of 4.0% in FY26.
For India's growth outlook, how well the country is navigating the risks from the external environment to currency, stock markets, and exports will be decisive. The sharp depreciation in the rupee between October 2024 and February 2025 was likely due to a delayed easing of the central bank's control over the currency. Nevertheless, India maintains a massive foreign exchange reserve ($686 billion as of 18 April) to address volatility in the rupee. As for stock markets, India has already outpaced the emerging markets in recovery from disruption caused by Trump's tariffs, signalling the return of optimism to the country, even though its volatile nature could very well put India at a disadvantage, the way it did in FY25.
'The stock market reaction is a mix of both what will happen to the domestic economy and perhaps some amount of optimism around the India-US trade deal. But its near-term movements can be volatile," said Sakshi Gupta, principal economist at
HDFC Bank
. 'Looking at our overall growth projections for the coming year by various international agencies vis-à-vis our peers gives a hard and a more definitive sense of how our growth prospects are being viewed," Gupta added. Since India's growth prospects are bright compared to the EM peers, the performance of exports and stock markets holds the key to the country's position in this year's race.
Also Read:
Will lower tariffs lure back FPIs from other emerging markets?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Will visa delays and border fears keep international fans away from the Club World Cup in the US?
As the United States readies for the FIFA Club World Cup, concern over such things as international travel, fan safety and even economic uncertainty threaten to diminish enthusiasm for the tournament. The United States will see the arrival of 32 professional club teams from around the globe to 11 cities for the tournament. There's a $1 billion prize pool. The Club World Cup is considered in many ways to be a dress rehearsal for the big event, the 2026 World Cup to be hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico. But there seems to be little buzz for the Club World Cup at home or abroad. The expansion of the field from seven to 32 teams has diminished the exclusivity of the event, and ticket sales appear slow. At the same time, the tournament is being played amid reports of foreign tourists being detained and visa processing delays. Chaotic U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement activities and President Donald Trump's travel bans aren't exactly reassuring international fans, either. Trump's policies appear to have already impacted travelers. The National Travel and Tourism Office released data showing visitors to the U.S. from foreign countries fell 9.7% in March compared to the same month last year. The travel forecasting company Tourism Economics has predicted that international arrivals would decline 9.4% this year. The U.S. Travel Association, a nonprofit group that represents the travel industry, has urged the Trump administration to improve such things as visa processing and customs wait times ahead of a series of big sporting events on U.S. soil, including the Club World Cup beginning June 14, the Ryder Cup later this year, next summer's World Cup, and the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. Association President Geoff Freeman said, for example, that the wait in Colombia for a visa interview appointment is upwards of 18 months — already putting the 2026 World Cup out of reach for some travelers. He said his organization is working with the White House's World Cup Task Force to address issues. 'They recognize how important this event is: success is the only option. So we're eager to work with them to do whatever it is we need to do to ensure that we can welcome the millions of incremental visitors that we think are possible," Freeman said. "But these underlying issues of visa and customs, we've got to address.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking at a House Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing last month, suggested consular staff could be put on longer shifts and that artificial intelligence could be used to process visas. 'We want it to be a success. It's a priority for the president,' said Rubio. But the Trump administration may have added to the concerns for international visitors by issuing a ban on travelers from 12 countries, with restrictions on travel from nine more countries. Iran, one of the countries named, has qualified for the World Cup. The proclamation included an exemption for 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state.' It did not mention fans. There are signs current immigration policies were already impacting soccer fans and spurring worries over safety. A Latin American supporters group in Nashville stayed away from a recent Major League Soccer game because of ICE activity in the city. The city's Geodis Park is set to host three Club World Cup matches. Danny Navarro, who offers travel advice to followers on his social media platforms under the moniker TravelFutbolFan, said the World Cup Task Force announcement did not allay fears about travel, especially when Vice President JD Vance said, 'We want them to come. We want them to celebrate. We want them to watch the game. But when the time is up, they'll have to go home. Otherwise, they'll have to talk to Secretary Noem.' That insinuated fans visiting the United States for the World Cup could use it to stay in the country, which is nonsensical, Navarro maintained. For many countries, fans traveling to the World Cup — an expensive travel plan with hiked flight and hotel prices — are broadly viewed as higher-spending and lower-risk for host nation security planning. Navarro put the onus on FIFA. 'They must know that there is an anxiety among international travelers wanting to come in. They must know there's an anxiety among the U.S. fan base that is multicultural and wanting to go to all these places. Are they going to? Are they going to be harassed by ICE?' Navarro said. 'There is just a lot of uncertainty, I would say, too much uncertainty, that the fan base doesn't want to think about." It remains to be seen how outside factors will ultimately impact the Club World Cup, which is not the global spectacle or draw that the World Cup is. Ticket sales, which were based on a dynamic pricing model, appear to be slow, with lowered prices from earlier this year and a slew of recent promotions. For a match between Paris Saint-Germain and Botafogo at the Rose Bowl on June 19, there were wide swaths of available seats going for $33.45. FIFA created an incentive program that says fans who buy two or more tickets to the Club World Cup 'may' be guaranteed the right to purchase one ticket to the World Cup next summer. Navarro said economic uncertainty and fears of inflation may make fans hesitant to spend their money on the Club World Cup — when the more desirable World Cup is looming. In some host cities, there's little sign the Club World Cup is happening. A light rail station in Seattle had a lone sign advertising the event. The Seattle Sounders are among the teams playing in the tournament. Hans Hobson, executive director of the Tennessee State Soccer Association, suggested part of the problem is that, unlike the national teams that play in the World Cup, some of the club teams playing in Nashville are just not known to U.S. fans. 'It's not leagues that they watch. If it was the Premier League or the Bundesliga or something like that, then they'd go, 'Oh, I know players there. Let's go check it out,' Hobson said. There were tickets available to LAFC's match against Esperance Sportive de Tunisie in Nashville on June 20 for $24.45. FIFA President Gianni Infantino has traveled to several host cities to gin up enthusiasm. He has promised "the world will be welcomed.' But some say the United States isn't exactly rolling out the red carpet for visitors in the current climate. 'I could see trepidation for anyone looking to travel to the U.S. at this current political climate,' said Canadian national team coach Jesse Marsch. 'So it's a sad thing, I think, that we have to talk about visiting the U.S. in this way but I think everybody has to make decisions that are best for them and that fit best with what's going on in their life and their lifestyle.' Sports Writer Teresa Walker contributed to this report ___ soccer: /hub/soccer
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
The Reserve Bank's leap of faith: A big rate cut is very hard to justify
It's a study in contrasts. About a month to the day, the US Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged in a wait-and-watch response to the uncertainty about how President Donald Trump's tariffs will raise inflation and/or slow growth, the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) saw no merit in waiting for the fog to lift. It cut rates for the third time in a row and by a larger-than-expected 50 basis points to 5.5%. Not content with that, it went in for what many might term an 'overkill,' lowering the cash reserve ratio (CRR), or the amount of bank deposits impounded with RBI, by 100 basis points, which will over the course of this year release an additional ₹2.5 trillion of liquidity into a system already flush with funds. RBI's leap of faith in support of growth, when many would argue that growth is doing quite well by its own projections, is hard to justify. At a time when it is impossible to know for sure whether the price or growth effects of US tariffs will dominate, front-loading action could well be a two-edged sword. The belief (mistaken?) that lower interest rates and surplus liquidity alone will raise growth without reigniting inflation beats logic. And past experience too. Also Read: RBI's policy review: Why this time is truly different So, what has changed since the last meeting in April 2025 that could possibly justify the sea-change to a looser-than-expected (warranted?) monetary policy? The governor's argument is that growth needs support, hence the need to front-load action. Except that the data does not support that view. On the contrary, not only has growth done better than expected, with fourth-quarter (January-March 2025) growth at 7.4% better than RBI's December projection of 7.2%, but the growth projection for 2025-26 has also been left unchanged at 6.5%. The dilemma for the MPC was how it should frame policy when growth is faring better than expected and also inflation (which retail numbers for April suggest is under control). But there is a cloud hanging over both. Sure, the India Meteorological Department's prediction of a good monsoon suggests agriculture will do well. But summer months invariably see an uptick in food inflation. Moreover, it is the temporal and spatial distribution of the rains that affect food prices, not overall precipitation. We have already seen prices of onion and tomato—two of the treacherous TOP (tomato, onion and potato) sub-group that plays havoc with food inflation—edge up. Core inflation (excluding food and fuel) is also up at 4.2%, the highest since September 2023. Also Read: Ajit Ranade: RBI's increasing fiscal support deserves a closer look Meanwhile, the impediments to growth are mainly external—tariff induced—over which RBI has no control. In such a scenario, it might have been better had RBI borrowed one of the principal precepts of bioethics,Primum non nocere, a Latin phrase that means 'first do no harm.' This fundamental principle in healthcare (not out of place when covid is again among us) basically says: 'Given an existing problem, it may be better not to do something, or even to do nothing, than to risk causing more harm than good.' It reminds healthcare personnel to consider the possible harm any intervention might do. And is invoked when debating the use of an intervention that carries an obvious risk of harm but a less certain chance of benefit. Also Read: RBI's ₹2.7 trillion: Many benefits arise from one big beautiful surplus Remember, US gross domestic product (GDP) growth contracted 0.2% during the January-March quarter, even as our GDP grew 7.4%. Despite this hit to US growth and constant bluster from President Trump, who has made his displeasure with Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell known in no uncertain terms, the Fed opted to bide its time. Wisely so. Powell's statement after the last meeting of the rate-setting Federal Open Markets Committee sets out the logic very clearly. 'We may find ourselves in the challenging scenario in which our dual mandate goals are in tension. If that were to occur, we would consider how far the economy is from each goal and the potentially different time horizons over which those respective gaps would be anticipated to close." The MPC resolution does not offer any such reasoning. In the absence of a convincing argument, it is tempting to attribute Friday's policy-rate change to the panel's changed composition. The MPC's newly-inducted deputy governor in charge of monetary policy, unlike her career-central-banker predecessor, is perhaps not an inflation hawk. But then, that would go against the veryraison d'être of entrusting rate decision-making to a committee rather than an individual. Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | An inflation dip enlarges RBI's policy space 'Policy levers," said Governor Sanjay Malhotra, 'are needed to step up the growth momentum." The 'changed growth-inflation dynamic calls for not only continuing with the policy easing but also front-loading the rate cuts to support growth." A bit of a hard sell, given that we claim to be among the world's fastest-growing major economies, with 2025-26 growth projected at 6.5%. Sure, growth remains lower than our aspirations amid a challenging global environment and heightened uncertainty. But aspirations are not to be confused with potential. Wise central banks know the difference. As for uncertainty, in the words of former Fed chair Alan Greenspan, 'Uncertainty is not just a pervasive feature of the monetary policy landscape; it is the defining characteristic of that landscape." All the more reason then not to jump the gun, but to cross the river by feeling the stones. There is no great sanctity in timing rate decisions with MPC meetings. For central banks, the motto must always be, 'Better safe than sorry.' The author is a senior journalist and a former central banker.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump-Musk rift rattles Wall Street; Tesla share slide exposes market fragility; major indexes take a hit
The public feud between US President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk has turned into both a political and a Wall Street drama, raising investor concerns and exposing the vulnerability of stock markets to sharp moves in major companies. The clash, which played out mostly on social media, triggered a 14% drop in Tesla shares on Thursday, after Trump threatened to cut off government contracts to Musk's companies. Thursday's decline reduced Tesla's market value by approximately $150 billion, with its weight in the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 at 1.6% and 2.6%, respectively. Tesla shares recovered partially on Friday, increasing about 5% by mid-day, reaching a market value of around $970 billion. Microsoft and Nvidia, both valued above $3 trillion, maintained weights of 6.9% and 6.8% in the S&P 500 as of Thursday. Despite a slight recovery on Friday, Thursday's sharp fall weighed heavily on major US indexes, with Tesla alone accounting for nearly half the day's declines. The company's decline made up nearly half of the day's losses for both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq 100, which fell 0.5% and 0.8% respectively. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo The S&P 500 is widely seen as the key benchmark for the US stock market, while the tech-focused Nasdaq 100 underpins the popular Invesco QQQ ETF. "It's a widely held stock," said Robert Pavlik, senior portfolio manager at Dakota Wealth told Reuters. "When this big-name company that represents a sizable portion of the index sells off, it has an overall effect on the index, but it also has a psychological effect on investors," Pavlk added. The situation highlights long-standing concerns about index concentration in a small number of large-capitalisation stocks. The "Magnificent Seven", including Apple, Microsoft and Nvidia, collectively represented nearly one-third of the S&P 500's total weight as of Thursday's close. Though Tesla is the smallest among these tech and growth giants, it played a major role in driving index gains in 2023 and 2024. While 2025 started off uncertain, recent trends suggest signs of recovery. Tesla shares have dropped around 37% since mid-December, while the S&P 500 has fallen just 1% in the same period—reducing Tesla's overall influence on the index. Tesla is included in about 10% of the roughly 4,200 ETFs, giving it wide market exposure, according to Todd Sohn, ETF and technical strategist at Strategas. Some major funds affected include the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund, which fell 2.5% on Thursday, and the Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, which declined 2.6%. "It's very important to know holistically what is in all your ETFs, because a lot of them are overlapping," the analyst noted. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
