Progress On The SH1 Belfast To Pegasus Motorway And Woodend Bypass Project
Hon James Meager
Minister for the South Island
Associate Minister of Transport
Work is moving at pace on the State Highway 1 (SH1) Belfast to Pegasus Motorway and Woodend Bypass project, with geotech work beginning this week, Transport Minister Chris Bishop and Minister for the South Island and Associate Transport Minister James Meager say.
'The Government is committed to supporting the fast-growing Waimakariri District. This much needed transport infrastructure will boost economic growth, reduce congestion, improve safety and access to housing growth areas. SH1 approaching Woodend currently carries around 21,500 vehicles per day, of which nine percent is freight. The traffic volume is expected to reach 28,000 vehicles per day by 2048. There have been 280 crashes on SH1 through Woodend between 2014 and 2023, with three fatalities and 25 serious injuries,' Mr Bishop says.
'The NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) Board endorsed the investment case for the Belfast to Pegasus Motorway and Woodend Bypass Road of National Significance in November 2024, which proposes:
Widening the southern section of the existing SH1 from two to four lanes.
A new four-lane motorway bypass in the northern section.
A grade separated interchange at the Williams Street intersection with SH1.
Replace the Pegasus roundabout with an overbridge and signalised intersection.
Kaiapoi Bridge seismic strengthening and widening.
Construction of new bridges over the Cam River and overbridges at Woodend Beach Road and Gladstone Road.
Tolling to support the construction and maintenance of the road.
'In addition to endorsing the investment case in November last year, the NZTA Board also approved $68.1 million in initial funding to complete detailed design work and advance an early works package, as well as around $37 million for property acquisition. Further funding to begin and complete main construction will be considered by the NZTA Board in due course.
'Delivering this project has substantial benefits, including a three-minute travel time saving along the state highway, and up to 10 minutes at peak. It is also expected to reduce traffic through Woodend from 21,000 vehicles per day to 8,000, and a reduction in deaths and serious injuries from 5.6 to 1.25 per year.
'The investment case endorsed by the NZTA Board sets an investment envelope between $800 million and $1 billion to design, consent, and construct the project.
'The Government Policy Statement on Land Transport 2024 (GPS) requires NZTA to consider tolling for all new RoNS. The investment case confirms tolling is possible and the revenue will support the construction and maintenance of the road. The Government will consider this recommendation and announce next steps of the process in due course.'
'NZTA is continuing to move at pace on the project with the detailed design contract awarded to Aurecon and Tonkin + Taylor in March this year. Getting geotech works underway is an essential part of the design phase of the project and will involve drilling around 70 boreholes up to 35 metres deep and digging pits at individual sites within the construction area,' Mr Meager says.
'The geotechnical investigations will look at ground conditions, including soil and rock types, groundwater depths and the strength of soil and rock. This work will take around two months to complete.
'Once geotechnical data is available, NZTA will confirm the scope and design of an early works package and prepare and lodge consent applications. The early works package will likely begin in early 2026, while main construction is likely to begin later in 2026. The project is expected to take four years to complete.
'SH1 is a nationally strategic freight route and provides critical access to Christchurch City, Christchurch International Airport, Lyttelton Port, and the major health, education, commercial and industrial services in the Canterbury region. Delivering the Belfast to Pegasus Motorway and Woodend Bypass Road of National Significance will significantly improve reliability of the corridor and ensure people and freight can get where they need to go, quickly and safely.
'I want to thank local Waimakariri MP Matt Doocey, Banks Peninsula MP Vanessa Weenink, Kaikoura MP Stuart Smith and Mayor Dan Gordon who have been a staunch advocates of this project, as well as wider Canterbury MPs Hamish Campbell and Nicola Grigg. I know we're all looking forward to seeing more progress in the months and years ahead as we move into construction as soon as possible.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
5 hours ago
- 1News
Govt to rewrite liability provisions in building consents reform
New changes to speed up a "sluggish" consenting system means councils will no longer be left "footing the bill" for major building defects, the Building Minister says. The "joint and several liability" framework for managing building defects will be scrapped in what ministers call the biggest reform to the consenting system in "decades". Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk officially revealed two "major" changes alongside Prime Minister Christopher Luxon at today's post-Cabinet media conference. Penk said the overhaul would "ease the cost burden on ratepayers for defective building work" and be the most significant since the Building Act came into force in 2004. As part of the changes, he said the Government was taking aim at "stalling" productivity in the building sector through cutting red tape and enabling more cost efficiencies. ADVERTISEMENT Row of designed and furnished townhouses next to a road in Auckland. (Source: "[The] sluggish consenting system is delaying projects and driving up costs, making the average standalone house here 50% more expensive to build than in Australia. "We must eliminate system blockages to speed up the delivery of new homes and infrastructure," the Building and Construction Minister said. What's happening with building defects and consents? Introducing a bill to Parliament early next year, the Government intends to replace the existing "joint and several liability" framework with "proportionate liability," where "each party will only be responsible for the share of work they carried out." "It's time to put the responsibility where it belongs," Penk said, saying the change would "ease the cost burden on ratepayers for defective building work." "Right now, councils are hesitant to sign off on building consents and inspections because they could be held liable for all defects, leaving ratepayers to foot the bill. ADVERTISEMENT Window ledge crack (file image). (Source: "This often happens when one of the parties responsible cannot pay for repairs, for example, if a business goes bust. "Currently, building owners can claim full compensation from any responsible party — and it's often councils, with the deepest pockets and no option to walk away, that end up paying out. "The risk-aversion this creates [from council building consent authorities] leads to frustrating delays and extra cost for builders and homeowners." Penk said this wouldn't mean councils were entirely off the hook as they will still "carry the same share of responsibility they do now for tasks like processing consent applications, carrying out inspections, and issuing code compliance certificates." Govt 'exploring' protections for building owners Penk asserted that building owners would "be protected if things go wrong," and that the Government was "exploring options such as requiring professional indemnity insurance and home warranties, similar to arrangements in Australia." ADVERTISEMENT The Government gave examples of home warranties that already exist here, like the Certified Builders' Halo Guarantee and the Master Builders' 10-Year Guarantee. It said the new regime was similar to what some Australian states had used since the 1990s. Chris Penk (Source: 1News) Penk also announced today that it would allow councils to voluntarily consolidate their building consent authority functions with each other. "It is ridiculous that builders, designers and homeowners must navigate 66 different interpretations of the Building Code, because of the number of council building consent authorities across the country," Penk said. "Builders can be rejected on paperwork that would be accepted by a neighbouring authority simply because each building consent authority applies the rules differently. "Many councils have asked for this and I expect they will seize the opportunity to consolidate, share resources like building inspectors and IT systems, and pass the savings on to ratepayers." Today's changes are part of a broader reform programme for building and consents, which the Government argues will make it easier and more affordable to build. ADVERTISEMENT Building Consent Approvals is promising faster approvals for 'low-risk' house-building projects. (Source: 1News) Earlier this month, Penk announced homeowners would soon be able to build small structures like garden sheds, sleepouts and garages closer to their property boundaries without requiring building consent. Cabinet agreed to remove the minimum distance required between single-storey buildings under 10sqm and a property boundary or other residential building, and reduce it to one metre for buildings between 10 and 30 square metres. Other recent changes included exempting "granny flats" from consenting rules, allowing trusted building companies to build without consents, and enabling approved plumbers and drainlayers to self-certify their own work. 'Positive step': Industry reacts to shake-up Master Builders chief executive Ankit Sharma said the reforms represented a "positive step" towards a more consistent, efficient and balanced system. "Builders have long faced duplication, delays, and inconsistent decisions across more than 60 different building consent authorities. The proposal to consolidate building consent authorities and introduce common data standards has the potential to reduce compliance costs, improve consistency across regions, and speed up approvals. These are practical solutions that, if implemented well, could drive meaningful productivity gains for the sector." ADVERTISEMENT Addressing liability settings was just as important, he said. "The current joint-and-several system has meant councils carry a disproportionate share of risk, which has made them overly cautious and slowed down consenting. Moving to proportionate liability has the potential to create a fairer and more balanced system, provided it is paired with strong consumer protections such as home warranties and appropriate practitioner insurance." The group representing councils, Local Government New Zealand, also welcomed the changes. President Sam Broughton said the Government's proposals would help speed up building consenting on new homes. "We strongly believe it will have an instant and positive impact on housing growth; councils will be in a better position to consent more efficiently, with less legal risk borne by local government — and therefore less risk for ratepayers."
NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Watch: Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Minister Chris Penk announce construction changes
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon will front a post-Cabinet press conference with Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk to discuss sweeping changes to the Building Act. The Government signalled in late 2024 it was investigating options for major reform to make it easier and cheaper to build. Penk confirmed to
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Road-user charges can pay for more than just road maintenance - NZ could lead the way
By Simon Kingham* of Road user charges would see a shift away from petrol tax, which is currently about 77 cents per litre. File photo. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly The government heralded its plan to move New Zealand's entire vehicle fleet to road-user charges as a fairer method of funding road maintenance. For owners of electric and diesel vehicles, this is nothing new. They already pay road-user charges based on the distance travelled. But for petrol vehicles, it is a shift away from fuel excise duty, or petrol tax, which is currently about 77 cents per litre of fuel. As it is linked to the price of petrol, more fuel-efficient petrol vehicles pay relatively less than gas guzzlers for every kilometre travelled. Much of the policy detail is yet to be worked out, but if all of the country's vehicles paid road-user charges, this would provide opportunities to do more than raise revenue for road building and maintenance. New Zealand would become the first country to charge all vehicles a distance-based fee and, used in creative ways, this could save money and deliver better societal outcomes, such as safer roads and lower pollution. Fuel excise duty is currently collected at source, when refined fuel either leaves the refinery or is imported. Some other costs are included, such as a fee for New Zealand's Emissions Trading Scheme , currently about 13 cents per litre . These are simple to collect, have low compliance costs and are essentially unavoidable. Road-user charges are a distance-based payment. Licenses are pre-purchased in increments of 1000 kilometres and various rates apply depending on vehicle weight and axle configuration. Heavier electric vehicles (more than 3.5 tonnes) are currently exempt until June 2027. This system has higher compliance and administration costs than fuel excise duty. It also has a greater risk of evasion, because to some extent, it relies on vehicle owners' honesty. With all vehicles moving to road-user charges, everyone will pay for every kilometre they travel on the roads, with increased rates for heavier vehicles (currently anything above 3.5 tonnes). The plan is that this will be administered electronically through some device in or on the vehicle. This already happens with many freight vehicles. In most freight vehicles, the technology includes GPS and allows freight companies to monitor the performance of their vehicles and drivers. But rolling out electronic road-user charges across the whole vehicle fleet creates interesting opportunities beyond just raising revenue. The move to a distance-based scheme could discourage some people from selecting more fuel-efficient vehicles because a road-use system does not encourage that. This could lead to increased greenhouse gas and other emissions. However, rather than using a uniform road-user charge based solely on vehicle weight and distance travelled, rates could vary based on a range of criteria, including emissions, and pay for other traffic-related costs to society and the environment. For instance, about 300 people die each year in road crashes, and thousands more are injured. This costs NZ$9-10 billion annually. To help pay, New Zealand could collect higher road-user charge rates for vehicles more likely to cause crashes, based on safety ratings . Traffic-related air pollution causes more than 2000 deaths per year , costing New Zealand about $10 billion . Road-user charges could be used to pay for this by charging a higher rate for vehicles that emit more pollution. The same could be done for noise pollution. And if the electronic road-user charge device is GPS-enabled, vehicles travelling near the most vulnerable citizens - such as near schools during pick-up and drop-off - could be charged more. This may deter some people from dropping children off right outside the school gate, which in turn could have the added benefit of making walking and cycling feel safer due to less traffic, attracting more people to use active transport and helping create neighbourhood greenways . But why stop there? New Zealand could use electronic road-user charges to encourage all sorts of other behaviours. For example, lower rates might encourage vehicles to use highways and main roads instead of cutting through quiet residential streets. Road-user charges could be used to set a congestion price, manage on- and off-street parking and monitor speed limits without the need for any additional technology, saving on setting up separate congestion and parking pricing schemes and speed cameras. Some will argue this is an invasion of privacy . But as Minister of Transport Chris Bishop indicated, the privacy commissioner will oversee it. If New Zealand becomes the first country to charge all vehicles for the use of roads, this an opportunity to lead in innovation. * Simon Kingham is a Professor of Human Geography at the University of Canterbury - This story originally appeared on The Conversation.
