Raleigh tries again to get bus rapid transit construction started
Why it matters: The city hopes bus rapid transit — and the dedicated bus lanes and stations it would bring — will be a key part of the way Raleighites get around the city as its population continues to soar.
But after ceremoniously breaking ground last year, no construction has started on the BRT line.
Driving the news: This week, the city put out the first of what it says will be three construction packages for companies to bid on.
This is the third time the city has put out bids, with the previous two rounds not receiving any bids the city deemed workable.
The first phase of the new bids would focus on a downtown section of the BRT line and then New Bern Avenue to Poole Road. Bids will be accepted until June 20.
State of play: It's a critical moment for Raleigh, as the last time the city put the project out to bid, it got no responses, lengthening timelines for when the city can finish a BRT line and potentially making it more expensive.
It will be the first project of its kind in North Carolina, though other U.S. cities such as Richmond have built systems. Raleigh has budgeted around $90 million for the New Bern Avenue leg of BRT.
That newness kept many contractors from bidding, the city previously said. There were also concerns about how fast the city hoped the project would be completed and competition from other roadwork across the region due to Hurricane Helene.
The new bid calls for a 30-month construction period for the first section of BRT.
What they're saying: Het Patel, transit planning supervisor for the city of Raleigh, said in a statement to Axios the city is optimistic that the changes to the project will result in an awarded contract.
The city has "had one-on-one conversations with more than 10 local and regional contractors to gather feedback that has been incorporated into this bid advertisement, which should make it more attractive," Patel said.
If they award a contract this time, Patel said, the goal is to get construction started this fall or winter.
Zoom in: Raleigh's first of four BRT lines will run 5.4 miles down New Bern Avenue between downtown and WakeMed and New Hope Road.
Buses will operate in their own lanes, have elevated platforms at 10 stations and get priority green lights.
The big picture: The BRT network will one day stretch in four directions from downtown, including a southern leg to downtown Garner, a western leg to downtown Cary and northern routes to North Hills and Triangle Town Center.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
36 minutes ago
- Axios
SEPTA faces final countdown to avoid service cuts
SEPTA has one week to fill its $213 million budget shortfall and avoid massive cutbacks — a reality the transit agency is facing without a once-reliable plan B. Why it matters: The impending service cuts will impact commuters and students returning to schools later this month, and they could interrupt the city's planning for big-ticket events in 2026. The big picture: Pennsylvania's divided government is weeks late in hammering out a budget deal. Amid the biggest sticking points: state transportation funding, including the money SEPTA needs to avert its doomsday service cuts. While Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro and the Democratic-controlled House have backed more SEPTA funding, the Republican–controlled Senate has balked at the proposal and called for more agency oversight. Threat level: SEPTA faces an Aug. 14 deadline to get state funding to shore up its budget gap, agency officials said Wednesday. Barring that, a 20% reduction in service across rail, buses and trolleys will begin Aug. 24. What they're saying: SEPTA general manager Scott Sauer said during a Wednesday news conference that the deadline is necessary to schedule service changes across the system, set staff assignments and prepare vehicles. "Time is of the essence," he said. Sauer warned that even if state funding arrives after Aug. 14, SEPTA will need at least 10 days to restore full service. Meanwhile, it appears unlikely that Shapiro can count on an alternate plan to fund SEPTA, as he did last year. Flashback: In 2024, after SEPTA failed to secure more funding in the state budget and faced service cuts, Shapiro directed the transfer of $153 million in federal highway funding to the agency in a maneuver known as " flexing." Shapiro didn't need state lawmakers to sign off on the transfer. But the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), then under former President Joe Biden, had to review and sign off on the transfer. The intrigue: Now without a fellow Democrat in the White House, Shapiro could face a chillier reception to such a request — especially considering Shapiro and President Trump have sparred in the past. SEPTA has not heard of flexing federal funding for the agency being an option so far, agency spokesperson Andrew Busch tells Axios. FHWA spokesperson Angela Gates declined to discuss hypothetical flexing requests. But Gates noted that the federal agency has approved four requests from the state this year for flexing federal funding, but declined to identify them. A spokesperson for Shapiro declined to comment. The spokesperson referred Axios to Shapiro's previous comments in which the governor said budget negotiations were making slow progress. The bottom line: It's likely state budget or bust for SEPTA.
Axios
8 hours ago
- Axios
Iowa DOGE mulls whether the state needs 99 counties
A government efficiency task force established by Gov. Kim Reynolds is meeting again Wednesday and may further examine the politically and culturally sensitive issue of whether Iowa needs all 99 counties. Why it matters: Iowa's county structure is deeply rooted in the state's identity. Yet some have fewer than 5,000 residents, raising questions about the viability of redundant local governments and infrastructure, including 100 courthouses across the state. Catch up quick: Reynolds issued an executive order creating Iowa DOGE Task Force in February, appointing an all-Republican committee to steer it. Its aim is to maximize taxpayer money, leverage emerging technology and refine workforce and job training programs. County consolidation was among the ideas floated in June when task force members agreed to do more research before making a final report in September. Flashback: Ideas for county consolidation have been on some lawmakers' minds for decades, including in 2004 when former state Sen. Matt McCoy (D-DSM) introduced legislation that would have created a legislative study committee to explore it. The measure never advanced. Yes, but: In February, McCoy — who is now the chairperson of the Polk County Board of Supervisors — told Axios that consolidation or increased collaboration among local governments is becoming necessary, especially given state-level efforts to cut property taxes. Reality check: Cutting the number of counties would require a constitutional amendment, potentially presenting a major political challenge. A more efficient option could be "a regionalism approach," which would expand existing cost-sharing and cooperative service models among counties rather than eliminating county lines, Andrea Woodard, executive director of the Iowa State Association of Counties, tells Axios. The big picture: While full-scale county mergers are rare, several states have pursued regional service delivery or structural consolidations to cut costs and boost efficiency. The intrigue: Iowa has already regionalized certain services, including mental health and substance abuse systems, and consolidated some state government agencies.
Axios
10 hours ago
- Axios
Behind the Curtain: What does AI owe YOU?
You could easily live without AI. But AI wouldn't exist without you. So does AI owe you for your small part in creating it? Why it matters: This question sits at the very heart of legal, economic, moral and societal debates unfolding before us today — and deep into the future. The answer will unlock everything from court verdicts to the fortunes of financial winners and losers years from now. The big picture: First, the facts. Large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI's ChatGPT or Anthropic's Claude were built by ingesting the totality of human information online — everything from news stories by Axios to social media postings by you. AI developers call this "training data" because they used the internet — and all its content — to train machines to think, reason and operate like the humans feeding the web. The goal: think better, faster and cheaper than us. Then, unleash these machines everywhere for everything. By 2025, content produced by billions of internet users helped shape the massive digital corpus that modern AI models were trained on — mostly through public, web-accessible data. Think any content — posts, blogs, forums, websites, Wikipedia edits, reviews, and videos. Some content owners — mass producers and individual creators — are suing AI companies for using their content without permission. The litigation — by media companies, music producers, book publishers — is often brought under copyright laws. AI makers defend their use of protected content by invoking long-contested "fair use" principles. Copyright owners have filed close to 50 lawsuits against AI companies in federal court, according to the Copyright Alliance, which represents creators. Some publishers, including News Corp and Axios, have struck deals with OpenAI for use of their content. The Supreme Court could ultimately decide — likely years from now — whether the owners of these LLMs violated federal law with their training tactics. "We're at the top of the first inning of understanding how the courts are going to define fair use as it applies to AI training," Keith Kupferschmid, president and CEO of the Copyright Alliance, tells us. He said cases involving images and music will be more difficult for AI companies to win, while cases involving text are more complex. But what about you? If you ever posted a comment on Reddit, or tweeted, or shared pictures on Instagram, or posted a rant on Facebook, you're a tiny part of the LLMs' brains. Your words were gobbled up to help train the machines, creating untold riches for tech companies and investors. But no one asked your permission or offered to compensate for that tiny part you played in making others rich. It's doubtful you'll get a penny for your time or mind now. President Trump, in his speech at last month's AI summit in Washington, made plain his opposition to companies doling out cash based on derivative use of the internet (unless it's blatant piracy). "[W]hen you read something and when it goes into this vast intelligence machine, we'll call it, you cannot expect to every time, every single time, say: 'Oh, let's pay this one that much,'" he said. "[W]e have to allow AI to use that pool of knowledge without going through the complexity of contract negotiations, of which there would be thousands for every time we use AI." His main point: It would give China an insurmountable edge if we tie ourselves in knots over who owes what to whom. But some AI leaders, most notably Anthropic's Dario Amodei, argue you should benefit — in the future. They believe if AI only enriches the big companies and investors, America will face a rebellion — and potentially sky-high unemployment. So instead of paying you now, which might hamstring the companies, they talk of spreading the wealth if AI truly creates trillions of dollars of wealth long-term. This could be as novel as a guaranteed minimum income (universal basic income, or UBI), funded by AI companies, or as ordinary as higher taxes on AI to fund social programs and government overall. Or it could be a private sector indirect benefit of higher growth, driving higher wages. Regardless, the AI companies will get a lot bigger and a lot richer — before you get a penny, if you ever do.
