
HCLTech CEO C Vijayakumar earns $10.85 mn in FY25; more than TCS, Infosys heads
The company's board has also approved an over 71 per cent increase in his current remuneration to USD 18.6 million (about ₹ 154 crore) for the next financial year, according to the company's annual report.
Vijayakumar's FY25 compensation places him ahead of his peers at India's top two IT firms.
For the same period, TCS CEO K Krithivasan's remuneration was ₹ 26.52 crore, while Infosys CEO Salil Parekh earned ₹ 80.62 crore. Vijayakumar's earnings also topped those of Wipro CEO Srinivas Pallia (USD 6.2 million or about ₹ 53.64 crore) and Tech Mahindra CEO Mohit Joshi ( ₹ 53.9 crore).
According to HCLTech's annual report, Vijayakumar's total remuneration in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, comprised a base salary of USD 1.96 million and a performance-linked bonus of USD 1.73 million.
The largest portion of his earnings came from long-term incentives, with exercised Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) valued at USD 6.96 million. An additional USD 0.20 million was provided in benefits and perquisites.
Vijayakumar, who took over as the CEO in 2016, is based in the US and draws his remuneration from HCL America Inc., the firm's wholly-owned US subsidiary.
"Under C. Vijayakumar's leadership, HCLTech's market capitalisation has increased from ₹ 1,15,000 crore on March 31, 2016, to ₹ 4,32,000 crore on March 31, 2025, reflecting a growth of 3.8 times since FY16. Over the same period, the market capitalisation of the other four leading Indian listed IT services firms among the top five has grown by approximately 2.5 times," the company said.
The company's board has approved a revised remuneration package for Vijayakumar, effective April 1, 2025. The proposed annual salary is set at USD 18.6 million, marking a 71 per cent increase from his FY25 earnings.
The proposed structure significantly increases both fixed and performance-linked components.
"The revised compensation acknowledges C Vijayakumar's successful and long-tenured leadership as CEO, recognising his significant contributions to the company's growth and sustained performance over the years," the report said.
HCL Technologies posted a 9.7 per cent drop to ₹ 3,843 crore in consolidated net profit for the June quarter, hurt by higher expenses and one-time impact of a client bankruptcy, but raised the lower end of revenue growth outlook for the full fiscal to 3-5 per cent (from 2-5 per cent earlier) on booking expectations in coming quarters.
Shares of HCLTech settled 0.98 per cent lower at ₹ 1,452.95 apiece on the BSE on Friday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
GCC GDP 2024: Real and nominal figures differ, but both show non-oil sectors make up over 70%
In 2024, non-oil sectors made up 77.9% of nominal GDP and 70.6% of real GDP across the GCC/ Image: FIle The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) economies showed steady growth in 2024, with rising contributions from non-oil sectors offsetting a decline in oil output. Real GDP rose 3.3% in the fourth quarter, backed by strong performance in manufacturing, trade, and construction. This marks a continuing shift away from oil dependence, reinforced by national reform programs and increased investment in non-hydrocarbon industries. Real GDP – Growth despite oil sector contraction In constant price terms, or real GDP, the total output of the six GCC countries rose by 3.3% in Q4 2024, reaching USD 456.3 billion, compared to USD 442.3 billion in Q4 2023. Quarter-on-quarter, the region's economy expanded by 1%, rising from USD 452.2 billion in Q3 2024. The bulk of this real GDP came from non-oil sectors, which made up 70.6% of total real GDP in Q4. In contrast, oil-related activities contributed the remaining 29.4%. Looking at the year as a whole, the overall real GDP across the GCC rose by 2.4%. However, this masks a notable divergence between sectors: Non-oil GDP increased by 3.7%, driven by robust growth in industry and services. Oil GDP declined by 0.9%, primarily due to voluntary production cuts under the OPEC+ framework. Country-wise, Qatar recorded the highest annual increase in real GDP at 4.5%, followed by the UAE at 3.6%, and Saudi Arabia at 2.8%. In Saudi Arabia, non-oil activities grew by 4.6%, while oil activities contracted by 4.5%, indicating a substantial shift in the country's economic composition. Nominal GDP – Growth tempered by market prices In nominal terms (i.e., unadjusted for inflation), the GCC's GDP rose by 1.5% year-on-year, reaching USD 587.8 billion by the end of Q4 2024, up from USD 579 billion in Q4 2023. Unlike real GDP, nominal GDP reflects current market prices, and can be influenced by inflation or deflation. While the overall increase was modest, the non-oil sector's contribution to nominal GDP was higher at 77.9%, showing a broader diversification trend in monetary terms. The remaining 22.1% came from oil activities, a significantly lower share compared to their contribution in real terms. This disparity suggests that while oil remains a large physical output driver, price pressures and production curbs have diminished its monetary weight in the economy. Sector contributions – Manufacturing and trade lead A closer breakdown of nominal GDP reveals the growing role of diverse non-oil industries: Manufacturing: 12.5% Wholesale and Retail Trade: 9.9% Construction: 8.3% Public Administration and Defence: 7.5% Finance and Insurance: 7% Real Estate Activities: 5.7% Other Non-Oil Activities: 27% These sectors have underpinned the GCC's non-oil expansion, with each contributing steadily to national and regional outputs. In Saudi Arabia specifically, the National Industrial Development and Logistics Program (NIDLP) contributed SAR 986 billion (USD 262.8 billion) to non-oil GDP, accounting for 39% of Saudi Arabia's non-oil economic output. Non-oil activities now represent 55% of Saudi Arabia's total GDP. This growth has been supported by government spending, which increased by 2.6% in Saudi Arabia during 2024, enabling momentum in infrastructure, services, and industry. Reform agendas and future outlook The GCC's shift from oil-dependency to broader economic resilience is no longer just policy ambition — it is increasingly reflected in macroeconomic data. Growth in 2024 was driven by sectors aligned with national strategic reforms: Saudi Vision 2030 UAE Economic Vision Qatar National Vision 2030 Oman Vision 2040 These plans emphasize tourism, logistics, manufacturing, finance, and digital infrastructure, backed by regulatory changes and significant public-private investment. The year's data confirms that these structural transformations are not only underway but are starting to deliver tangible economic diversification. Despite setbacks from oil market volatility, the region is expanding in real output, broadening its industrial base, and recalibrating its sources of long-term growth. Real vs. nominal GDP – Simplified To help readers understand the two metrics used: Real GDP adjusts for inflation, showing actual physical output growth or contraction. It's more useful for comparing economic performance over time. Nominal GDP is the economy's total value of goods and services using current prices, reflecting the monetary size of the economy but can be skewed by price changes. In the GCC's case, real GDP growth (3.3%) outpaced nominal GDP growth (1.5%), which suggests that while the region is producing more goods and services, price effects (like lower oil prices) dampened the apparent value increase.


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
US effective tariff on Indian goods jumped to 20.7% from 2.4% last year: Fitch Ratings
Synopsis Fitch Ratings reports a significant increase in US tariffs on Indian goods by 2025. This rise to 20.7% from 2.4% may hinder India's economic expansion. Goldman Sachs has already lowered India's growth forecasts. HDFC Bank also anticipates a GDP growth reduction. Moody's Ratings suggests potential challenges for India's manufacturing sector. However, India's economy is expected to remain resilient. Agencies New Delhi: The US effective tariff rate on Indian goods rose to 20.7% in 2025, up from 2.4% in 2024, due to the addition of an 18.3 percentage point increase this year, according to Fitch Ratings. The increase in tariffs poses some downside risk to India's economic growth. Overall, the US effective tariff rate is now 17%, around 8 percentage points lower than April 3 estimate, when higher reciprocal tariffs were originally announced, it said on Monday. "The US tariff rate of 17% reflects a 15% tariff rate on EU goods, including auto and auto parts, and higher tariffs for major trading partners Brazil, Taiwan, India and Switzerland," it added. Last week, US President Donald Trump announced 25% tariff on Indian goods, along with an unspecified additional penalty related to India's energy dealings with Russia. Goldman Sachs on Monday cut India's economic growth forecast to 6.5% for 2025 and 6.4% for 2026, due to US tariffs. "In our view, some of these tariffs are likely to be negotiated lower over time, and further downside risk to the growth trajectory mainly emanates from the uncertainty, " it to HDFC Bank, the tariff poses a downside risk of 20-25 bps to India's GDP growth. Christian de Guzman, senior vice president, Moody's Ratings, said, "Curtailed access to the largest economy globally diminishes prospects for India's ambitions to develop its manufacturing sector, particularly in higher value-added sectors such as electronics".He, however, added, "India's economy is expected to remain resilient as it is less trade-reliant than other large economies in the Asia-Pacific."


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Sona Comstar not informed who controls promoter family trust after Sunjay Kapur, CEO says
Next Story Ayaan Kartik , Nehal Chaliawala While the dispute rages between Priya Sachdev Kapur and Rani Kapur, who are the wife and the mother of Sunjay, the company assured investors that the discord has no bearing on its performance. Sunjay Kapur, the former chairman of Sona Comstar. Gift this article Mumbai: Automotive component maker Sona Comstar's top executive said on Monday that the company has not been informed of the beneficial owner of the promoter family trust following the passing away of company chairman Sunjay Kapur. Mumbai: Automotive component maker Sona Comstar's top executive said on Monday that the company has not been informed of the beneficial owner of the promoter family trust following the passing away of company chairman Sunjay Kapur. The trust–RK Family Trust–is at the centre of a succession and inheritance dispute within the promoter family. Sunjay Kapur's wife and mother–Priya Sachdev Kapur and Rani Kapur–are at odds over inheritance and control of the Trust's stake in Sona Comstar, which is worth almost ₹ 8,000 crore. RK Family Trust owns 65% of Aureus Investment Private Ltd, which in turn controls the 28% promoter stake in Sona Comstar (listed as Sona BLW Precision Forgings Ltd). In 2019, RK Family Trust had informed Sona Comstar, which was a privately held company at the time, that its sole beneficiary was Sunjay Kapur. Vivek Vikram Singh, the company's managing director and group CEO, said during an analyst call to discuss the company's June-quarter results that the discord was limited to the promoter family and it has no bearing on its performance. 'There is far more sensationalism around this than there is impact. Whoever controls the 28% doesn't have that much [impact]," Singh said. Aureus Investment, the promoter company, has the right to nominate just one director to Sona Comstar's board, Singh said on the call, adding that even that power was not absolute. The board may choose to reject the nomination. Even if the board approves it, public shareholders then have to ratify the nomination, he said. 'How the appointment of a single director on a board with six independent directors can have an impact on the running of the company is very bizarre to me," he said, blaming the media for putting a spotlight on the succession dispute. The Sona BLW Precision Forgings Ltd stock has lost almost 15% since the sudden passing away of its chairman on 12 June. It closed 1.26% higher on the BSE on Monday at ₹ 442.8 compared to a 1.54% gain in the S&P BSE Auto Index. After Kapur's demise, Aureus Investment nominated Priya as a non-executive director of Sona Comstar. Her appointment was accepted by the company's board and, later, by its shareholders at its annual general meeting on 25 July. Earlier, Priya was appointed as the managing director of Aureus within a week of Sunjay's passing away. Unhappy with Priya's appointment to the Aureus and Sona Comstar boards, Rani Kapur wrote to the latter company on 24 July, questioning the authority of those who approved the appointment of Priya. She also alleged that she was made to sign certain documents while she was grieving and that she has no knowledge of what she signed upon. 'I was approached multiple times and compelled to sign various documents without explanation or even having time to read and understand the same," she wrote in her letter. 'Despite being under immense mental and emotional distress, I was coerced into signing such documents behind locked doors and though I've requested repeatedly, the contents of such documents have never been revealed to me." Vaibhav Gaggar, the lawyer appointed by Rani Kapur, declined to comment on the structure of the company and who was the controlling trustee of RK Family Trust. "There is a lot to it. It will start unfolding. Ms Kapur has talked about some very suspicious things," he said. Company's Q1 performance Meanwhile, the rare earth magnet crisis and tariff war dented Sona Comstar's profit and revenue in the April-June quarter, but the outlook remains bullish. The company reported a consolidated profit of ₹ 125 crore for the quarter, 12% less year-on-year (y-o-y). Revenue was 5% lower y-o-y at ₹ 851 crore. The company's business was affected by several obstacles during the quarter, including China's sudden restriction on the export of rare earth elements, which are crucial to make motors for electric vehicles, a key product for Sona Comstar. Other headwinds included the US tariffs, with North America being the key market for the company. 'Q1 FY26 was a challenging quarter for us due to the convergence of multiple adverse factors, which are temporary, and some have started to resolve already," CEO Singh said in a media statement. The company ended the quarter with a few large order wins, he said, which helped its net order book reach an all-time high of ₹ 26,200 crore. The comparable figure at the end of the preceding quarter was ₹ 24,200 crore. Amongst the order wins was a ₹ 1,550 crore order from a North American automaker to supply differential assemblies–the company's largest order win in 30 months. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News , Corporate news , Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.