How to watch Nevada Wolf Pack vs. Fresno State Bulldogs: Live stream info, TV channel, game time
How to watch Nevada Wolf Pack vs. Fresno State Bulldogs: Live stream info, TV channel, game time | MWC Tournament
The No. 7 seed Nevada Wolf Pack (16-15, 8-12 MWC) face off against the No. 10 seed Fresno State Bulldogs (6-25, 2-18 MWC) in the MWC Tournament Wednesday at Thomas & Mack Center, tipping off at 4:30 p.m. ET on MW Network. Tune in as both teams look to take one step closer to earning an automatic place in the NCAA Tournament bracket.
As college basketball matchups continue, get ready for the contest with everything you need to know before Wednesday's game.
Check out: USA TODAY Sports Coaches Poll
Nevada vs. Fresno State: How to watch on TV or live stream
Game day: Wednesday, March 12, 2025
Wednesday, March 12, 2025 Game time: 4:30 p.m. ET
4:30 p.m. ET Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada Arena: Thomas & Mack Center
Thomas & Mack Center TV Channel: MW Network
MW Network Live Stream: Fubo (Watch Now! - Regional restrictions may apply)
Watch college basketball on Fubo!
Wolf Pack vs. Bulldogs odds and spread
Spread Favorite: Wolf Pack (-13.5)
Wolf Pack (-13.5) Moneyline: Nevada (-1064), Fresno State (+677)
Nevada (-1064), Fresno State (+677) Total: 137.5 points
College basketball odds courtesy of BetMGM Sportsbook. Odds updated Wednesday at 9:33 a.m. ET. For a full list of sports betting odds, access USA TODAY Sports Betting Scores Odds Hub.
Watch college basketball on Fubo!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox Sports
31 minutes ago
- Fox Sports
2025 Gold Cup stadiums, locations and host cities
The 2025 CONCACAF Gold Cup gets underway this week with matches set to run from June 14 to July 6. Sixteen national teams will compete in the biennial tournament, which crowns the best men's team in North America, Central America and the Caribbean. Below is the full list of stadiums selected to host matches, listed by city, along with previous Gold Cup appearances: Where is the 2025 Gold Cup? Who is the host? The 2025 Gold Cup will be staged across 14 stadiums in 11 metropolitan areas in the United States and Canada. 2025 Gold Cup Stadiums AT&T Stadium – Arlington, TX (2009, 2011, 2013, 2017, 2021, 2023) Q2 Stadium – Austin, TX (2021) Dignity Health Sports Park – Carson, CA (2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2015) NRG Stadium – Houston, TX (2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2019, 2021, 2023) Shell Energy Stadium – Houston, TX (2013, 2015, 2017, 2019, 2021, 2023) SoFi Stadium – Inglewood, CA (2023) Allegiant Stadium – Las Vegas, NV (2021, 2023) U.S. Bank Stadium – Minneapolis, MN (first-time host) State Farm Stadium – Phoenix, AZ (2009, 2015, 2017, 2019, 2021, 2023) Snapdragon Stadium – San Diego, CA (2023) PayPal Park – San Jose, CA (first-time host) Levi's Stadium – Santa Clara, CA (2017, 2023) CITYPARK – St. Louis, MO (2023) BC Place – Vancouver, Canada (first-time host) Where does the USMNT play? The USMNT will have three group stage games in Group D. Check out the schedule below (all times Eastern): Sunday, June 15: USA vs. Trinidad and Tobago (6 p.m. ET) at PayPal Park in San Jose, CA Thursday, June 19: USA vs. Saudi Arabia (9:15 p.m. ET) at Q2 Stadium in Austin, TX Sunday, June 22: USA vs. Haiti (7 p.m. ET) AT&T Stadium in Arlington, TX Where is the 2025 Gold Cup Final? The quarterfinals will be held June 28 at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, AZ and June 29 at U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Semifinals will be held on July 2 at both Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara, CA and CITYPARK in St. Louis, MO. The Final will be held on July 6 at NRG Stadium in Houston, TX. This year's edition marks the first time the Gold Cup will be played in both the U.S. and Canada, with Vancouver's BC Place serving as a first-time host venue. recommended Get more from Gold Cup Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more in this topic
Fox News
32 minutes ago
- Fox News
Simone Biles doesn't realize what she's admitting about trans women in her posts, Riley Gaines says
Riley Gaines pointed out a discrepancy in Simone Biles' personal attack on her as she called for the possibility of a third category for transgender athletes to compete in. Gaines broke down the social media post aimed at her from Biles in a recent episode of OutKick's "Gaines for Girls" podcast. The former NCAA All-American swimmer specifically talked about the Olympic gymnast, imploring her to create a "new avenue where trans feel safe in sports" and offering the idea of a "transgender category in all sports." "I don't think she realizes in that one sentence she's admitting that these people who say 'they are transgender women' are really just men," Gaines said. "She's admitting that by saying we should have a third category. I hope she realizes that. "Secondly, this has been done several times now. FINA (now known as World Aquatics), which is the international governing body of swimming, they were very quick to do this. Following the national championships, they did create a third category, even at the international, really high-level meets – to which they said we welcome all who are non-binary, gender non-conforming, those who identify as transgender, this is a category for you." World Aquatics developed the open category for transgender athletes who were barred from competing against the gender they identify as. Lia Thomas challenged the organization's rule change and lost in the Court of Arbitration for Sport last year. Additionally, World Aquatics was forced to scrap its open category race in the 2023 Berlin Swimming World Cup due to lack of interest. "This compromise that you're trying to make, don't come to me with it," Gaines said. "You should go to the other side and see how they feel about this compromise, because it's a compromise that they are not willing to make." Thomas won an NCAA championship in 2022. Nearly three years later, the NCAA changed its gender-participation policy in an attempt to align with President Donald Trump's "No Men in Women's Sports" executive order. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
3 Important Tax Considerations Following The House Versus NCAA Ruling
Following a lengthy legal battle, the AP reports that Judge Claudia Wilken has approved a deal between the NCAA and lawyers representing NCAA athletes. While the deal is nuanced, the key takeaway from this deal is that schools can now begin paying athletes directly. This change represents a significant departure from the NCAA's longstanding tradition of its athletes being student-athletes, hence remaining amateur (and unpaid) during their time in college. Although this coming year will be the first time that college athletes will begin to get paid directly by their schools, athletes receiving millions of dollars has become a mainstay in recent years. This ruling will allow schools to pay a total of $20.5 million in total to their student-athletes in the initial year. While these significant cash flows for the athletes can be very beneficial, they also carry tremendous tax burdens that the athletes may or may not be prepared to accept. In this article, I highlight three important tax considerations that college athletes should consider as we head into a new era of collegiate athletics compensation. Section 61(a) of the Internal Revenue Code tackles this topic. It states, 'Gross income means all income from whatever source derived.' This line item means that as athletes receive money from schools, NIL collectives, or sponsorships, they will be required to remit taxes on those funds received. As many deals are worth millions of dollars, it is important to highlight the ramifications of receiving these funds. For instance, consider Duke standout forward Cooper Flagg, whose Fox Sports reports received $28 million in compensation during his one year as a college basketball star. This amount of income firmly puts him into the top tax bracket at the federal level, meaning that all income over $626,350 will be taxed at a 37% tax rate. This means that without any other deductions, Flagg would owe over $10 million in federal income taxes. Furthermore, Flagg will have considerable state income tax liabilities due to the tax levied in his domiciled state of North Carolina as well as will have to pay the self-employment taxes (15.3%). What can also be problematic is that all compensation is subject to taxation, including in-kind compensation. According to Opendorse, athletes need to be aware of compensation beyond just the cash payments they receive. For instance, if an athlete has a partnership with a local car dealership and, as part of that partnership, they get a free car lease, the fair market value of that car lease that the athlete is not paying is a form of compensation. Similar rules apply to athletic gear, meals and entertainment, travel expenses, and other forms of in-kind compensation. What potentially gets lost in the equation is that these athletes do not have an employer who takes taxes out of their paycheck, as do most taxpayers. Instead, they must make quarterly payments to the taxing authority for their portion of the taxes owed. Thus, if an athlete receives a $1 million check, the athlete must put aside a significant portion (potentially more than half of it) of those funds to pay their taxes. This withholding will become even more important as athletes begin derive even more compensation directly from their schools. A critical wrinkle in the taxation of sports-related income is the jock tax. According to H&R Block, the jock tax is an extra layer of taxation levied on athletes when they play in a different taxing jurisdiction. This tax is levied on the athlete's salary. However, some jurisdictions will include bonuses that were achieved if the conditions of receiving those bonuses were met while performing in that other jurisdiction. The jock tax has led to numerous headlines in the media. According to Kiplinger, the jock tax led to a back-and-forth tax battle between California and Illinois over Michael Jordan's income during the 1991 NBA Finals. Their article also highlights how players like Stephen Curry and Nikola Jokic routinely pay over $1 million in jock tax on an annual basis. The precise formula for calculating the jock tax is messy and varies substantially based on where the athlete plays. For a college athlete now being compensated by their school, they will need to determine the portion of their income earned while playing at universities and tournaments in different states and ensure that they comply with the tax laws in those states. Even after an athlete pays federal income taxes and jock taxes, they will then need to pay their state income taxes. The state income tax rate can fluctuate drastically, as high as 13.3% in California and as low as 0% in several states, including Texas, Florida, and Washington. Thus, an athlete may want to consider their state tax liability when selecting their school. As I reported in Forbes, an athlete like Arch Manning decided between playing at Alabama, LSU, and Texas. While there were clearly many factors in play, Manning chose to play at Texas (0% state income tax rate) over the other schools in states that impose a state income tax, saving him hundreds of thousands of dollars per year. This nuance has led to states like Alabama and North Carolina to consider exempting NIL from state income taxes. In fact, as I reported in Forbes, Arkansas has gone the entire way and passed a law exempting this income from state taxation. Interestingly, many of these proposed and passed laws were directed at NIL income without considering the possibility that these athletes might eventually get paid directly by their schools. Thus, the House v. NCAA ruling has tremendous impacts on state income taxation considerations for these athletes, and the athletes will need to carefully consider and monitor their income to ensure that they comply with state tax laws.
