logo
Pierre Poilievre's record on Indigenous rights concerns advocates

Pierre Poilievre's record on Indigenous rights concerns advocates

Yahoo07-04-2025

In an election ad, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks to a bust of John A. Macdonald about the importance of developing national projects like the Canadian Pacific Railway.
"What do you think, prime minister? Could you get the railway built today?" Poilievre asks the bust.
It's only the most recent way Poilievre has expressed his admiration for Canada's first prime minister — the man who got the railway built, but did it by displacing Indigenous Peoples using starvation and detention, and who also was a key proponent of the residential school system.
Métis lawyer Bruce McIvor, a partner at First Peoples Law, says it's a worrying admiration.
"Poilievre dreams of being a 21st century John A. MacDonald, and we can see that in what he's said so far," he said.
Poilievre has referenced Macdonald in multiple campaign speeches this election. Over the years, he has also made social media posts celebrating Macdonald's birthday, talked about the need for more statues of the former PM and, in 2012, dressed up in period clothing to announce the renaming of an Ottawa building after Macdonald.
In the two-and-a-half years since he became leader of the Conservative Party, Poilievre's pitch to Indigenous voters has focused on resource development and economic reconciliation but some Indigenous advocates say they are concerned about his record on issues like residential schools and Indigenous rights.
Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre poses with a bust of Sir John A. Macdonald after announcing the former Bank of Montreal building would be renamed in honour of Canada's first prime minister during a ceremony in Ottawa, Ont., Wednesday January 11, 2012. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)
Residential school apology
The same day in 2008 that Stephen Harper made a historic apology to former students of the residential school system, Poilievre told an Ottawa talk radio show survivors did not need more compensation but instead required a better work ethic.
"Along with this apology comes another $4 billion in compensation for those who partook in the residential schools over those years. Now, some of us are starting to ask, are we really getting value for all of this money," he said.
"My view is that we need to engender the values of hard work, independence, and self-reliance."
The next day, he was called on in Parliament to make his own apology, which he did.
Voted against UNDRIP bill
During a 2021 debate over the bill to make Canadian laws consistent with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Poilievre said, "I am very proud to say that I oppose this bill." He said that free, prior and informed consent — a phrase that appears repeatedly in UNDRIP — "would mean a veto" for any First Nation that opposed a resource development project.
He ultimately voted against the bill.
When Poilievre addressed the Assembly of First Nations for the first time in person last summer, Judy Wilson, former chief of the Neskonlith Indian Band and former executive member of the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs, was one of Poilievre's critics.
In addition to her concerns about his lack of support for UNDRIP, Wilson pointed out that Poilievre did not address missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls, treaty rights or climate change in his speech.
She said she remains concerned about his position on UNDRIP and free, prior and informed consent on issues affecting Indigenous Peoples, their lands and their communities.
The issue of consent and consultation arose again when Poilievre visited the Arctic in February. On the trip he announced plans to create a new military base in Nunavut if a Conservative government is elected, but Premier P.J. Akeeagok said Poilievre had failed to consult with Northerners before the announcement.
Election promises
A caption for the Facebook ad featuring Poilievre talking to the bust of Macdonald said that Conservatives would "honour the legacy of Sir John A. Macdonald & unite our country with a Canada First National Energy Corridor."
The energy corridor will be "pre-approved right away for pipelines, rail lines, power lines and other resource infrastructure," Poilievre says in the ad.
Métis lawyer and historian Bruce McIvor says talk of pre-approval for infrastructure projects 'is very concerning.' (Submitted by Bruce McIvor)
McIvor said he's worried about that.
"The government can't come forward with proposals that have been pre-determined," he said, pointing to the duty to consult Indigenous Peoples affirmed by the Supreme Court.
"So to hear the leader of the Conservatives say that they intend to greenlight projects before they've gone through consultation with Indigenous people is very concerning."
Along the same lines, Poilievre has said he would grant permits for mining projects in Ontario's Ring of Fire within six months of being elected.
Those rapid approvals, along with "pre-approving" energy corridor projects "is completely contrary to fundamental principles of constitutional law," McIvor said.
CBC Indigenous sent a list of questions to the Conservative campaign about Poilievre's record and his current policies.
A Conservative campaign spokesperson provided a statement which did not directly answer any of CBC Indigenous's questions, but said that Poilievre has prioritized speaking with Indigenous leaders and community members to inform his campaign's policies.
The energy corridor was one of two policies highlighted by the spokesperson.
The other policy was the First Nations resource charge, which was developed by the bi-partisan First Nations Tax Commission, and would allow First Nations to opt-in to the chance to directly tax resource development projects on their lands.
Ch'íyáqtel (Tzeachten) Chief Derek (Weli'leq) Epp, who works with the First Nations Tax Commission, said the commission presented the policy to multiple parties.
"With the Conservatives endorsing this, yes, it sends an important signal that Canada is committed to Indigenous economic justice," he said.
While the Conservatives have been the only ones to adopt it outright, Epp said he's seen parts of it in Liberal policies as well.
"It's great that the Conservative government is championing this, but this isn't new," Epp said, adding that the idea has been around for well over a decade.
When Conservatives announced the proposed policy in 2023, one critic called it "a great idea for the 1990s."
Concerns about resource charge
John Desjarlais, executive director of the Indigenous Resource Network, a non-partisan organization that promotes economic development, said he is pleased by the approach of the resource charge, especially as it respects First Nations autonomy.
However, he said there are some concerns about how the policy will be applied.
"I think there's worry that [the relationship between community and industry] will be lost and they'll lose their ability to negotiate and develop the things that matter to them," said Desjarlais, who is Cree-Métis.
Since the policy was first announced, it has been unclear if it would allow nations to tax projects on their traditional territories or only on reserve lands.
Epp said the resource tax should apply to traditional territories, calling that "integral to the proposal."
Desjarlais said if it only applied to reserves, "We'd certainly be less excited or less interested because its application would be far less impactful."
While he looks forward to streamlining some of the bureaucratic processes and speeding up project timelines, Desjarlais said the policy presents concerns about the potential for governments to discharge their responsibilities on consultation.
Epp said he doesn't have any concerns about the government abdicating its obligations to First Nations.
"There still is the right to UNDRIP," he said.
Desjarlais said he is encouraged to see "less government, less paternalism, less siphoning of the resources that can come directly to communities," from the Conservative adoption of the resource tax policy.
However, he said, during a campaign it's hard to tell what is real and what is rhetoric.
"Will those promises be honoured? Generally, I think that's our concern," Desjarlais said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How is council tax calculated and how much could it go up?
How is council tax calculated and how much could it go up?

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How is council tax calculated and how much could it go up?

The government expects council tax in England to rise by the maximum amount every year until 2029, according to a leading economic think tank. The IFS says a "big chunk" of the funding for local authorities which was set out in the government's Spending Review assumes bills will rise by just under 5% in April 2026, 2027 and 2028. Most councils in England put council tax up by the maximum amount in April 2025, and average bills also rose in Wales and Scotland. Council tax is a compulsory charge on properties in England, Scotland and Wales. It is set by local authorities to raise money for providing services to residents, including: rubbish collection street lighting libraries police and fire services youth clubs parks and recreation facilities care services Typically, anyone who is over 18 and owns or rents a home has to pay council tax. However, there are some exemptions and discounts. Someone living alone, for example, is entitled to a 25% reduction, and properties occupied only by students are completely exempt. Some discounts are available if you - or someone you live with - has a disability. Northern Ireland uses a domestic rates system instead of council tax. Councils with responsibility for social care can increase bills every year by 4.99% without having to hold a referendum or get approval from central government. Smaller councils without social care duties can increase bills by up to 2.99%. Documents about police funding released as part of the government's Spending Review assume councils in England will put bills up by the maximum amount every year during the period covered by the calculations. IFS director Paul Johnson said that this would mean bills were set to rise "at their fastest rate over any Parliament since 2001-05". Chancellor Rachel Reeves said there had been no change to the cap rules, which were introduced by the previous Conservative government. "It is a cap, councils don't have to increase council tax by 5%," she told BBC Breakfast. But the Local Government Association said council budgets were under "severe financial pressure", and services may have to be cut even if bills do rise by the maximum. Council tax expected to rise by 5% a year Seven ways the Spending Review will affect you Of the 384 councils in England subject to the referendum rules, 294 (77%) put bills up by the maximum amount. Another 56 (15%) were close to the limit. Eight authorities (2%) either made no change or reduced bills. The government let six areas introduce bigger rises to help deal with funding pressures. Bradford Council increased bills by 10% while they rose by 9% in Windsor and Maidenhead, and in Newham. Birmingham, Somerset and Trafford put bills up by 7.5%. A number of other councils were not allowed to put up bills by more than the standard maximum, including Hampshire, which had asked for a 15% uplift. It means the average Band D council tax bill in England for 2025-26 is £2,280, which is an increase of £109 or 5% on the 2024-25 figure of £2,171. Council tax rates in Scotland had been frozen or had limited increases since 2007, but went up in April. Bills rose by an average of 9.6% in April, with increases of at least 10% in 13 areas. It means the average Band D council tax bill in Scotland for 2025-26 is £1,543, up from £1,418 in 2024-25. The country's 32 councils had warned that they faced a potential shortfall of £392m in 2025-26, which could rise to £780m the following year. The Scottish government said it was giving councils an extra £1bn in 2025-26 to help limit increases. Why are Scottish councils so short of cash when tax is going up? Council tax rates in Wales increased by an average of 7.2% in April. It means the average Band D council tax bill in Wales for 2025-26 is £2,170, up from £2,024 in 2025-25. Wales' 22 local authorities had been given £253m in December to help reduce increases, but council leaders said more was needed. How much you pay depends on your property's council tax band. Broadly speaking, the more expensive the property, the higher the band. In England and Scotland, bands are based on the price the property would have sold for in 1991. Wales uses 2003 prices and Northern Ireland 2005 prices. You can check your home's band in: England and Wales Scotland Northern Ireland Council tax bills also include additional charges. These are used to fund the cost of care homes and other adult social care services. Another is set by local police and fire authorities to help fund their work. Some cities with mayors, such as London and Manchester, can also add a separate charges for other services. About half of local authority funding comes from council tax, according to the Institute for Government (IFG). Councils in England can also raise money by charging for services including parking, swimming pools and planning applications. Most of the rest comes from a combination of business rates and central government grants. Labour had promised £2bn of central government funding for English councils in the year from April 2025, an extra £700m on top of the £1.3bn announced in October's Budget. But £515m of that was earmarked to pay for higher National Insurance (NI) contributions from April. The local government settlement in the Spending Review provides an additional £3.3bn for local authorities in 2028-29 compared with 2023-24. The Spending Review also revealed revealed the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government would see a 1.4% cut in its day-to-day budget. But the government said councils' "core spending power" would still go up, if they increased council tax by the maximum amount. Separately the government is consulting on directing more money to deprived councils in England from 2026. Councils cannot technically go bankrupt, but if they cannot balance their budget for the financial year, they can issue what is called a section 114 notice. This means they cannot commit to most new spending, and residents could see reduced services, such as fewer bin collections or cuts to libraries. Before 2018, only two councils had issued a section 114. Twelve have been issued since. Birmingham City Council went bust in 2023, with a £760m black hole. It followed Woking Council, Thurrock and Croydon (for the third time). A number of local authorities in England have not issued section 114 notices but are receiving so-called "exceptional financial support", to help manage their budgets. Middlesbrough Council was one of 19 authorities allowed to borrow money to fund day-to-day spending in 2024-25. Why do councils go bust and what happens when they do?

Badenoch urges business leaders to ‘get on the pitch' and support Tories
Badenoch urges business leaders to ‘get on the pitch' and support Tories

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Badenoch urges business leaders to ‘get on the pitch' and support Tories

Businesses need to 'get on the pitch' to speak up against policies they think are damaging their prospects, Kemi Badenoch has said. The Conservative leader also appealed to business leaders to support her party, suggesting there was no credible alternative which would represent their interests. Speaking at the FTSE 250+ conference in central London, Mrs Badenoch said: 'My message to business is: I'm on your side, but I need you to be on mine too.' The Tory leader's appearance at the gathering came as the latest gross domestic product (GDP) figures showed the UK economy shrank more than expected, the day after the Government unveiled spending plans prioritising health and defence over the next few years. Speaking to an audience of business and investment chiefs, Mrs Badenoch hit out at Labour's tax rises, including the inheritance tax on family farms and national insurance employer contributions. She added: 'You need to support policies that back enterprise, and you need to challenge those who want more state control. 'Don't just wait for other politicians to do it. 'You need to get on the pitch too.' The Tory leader claimed the UK has 'forgot that business is a good in and of itself, and it pays for everything. It is the source of our prosperity'. Mrs Badenoch added: 'The challenge all of us in this room have now is that many people don't believe this anymore.' People instead believe 'business hoards wealth' and is 'greedy and needs to be taxed more', she said. Mrs Badenoch continued: 'This is a crisis. 'And the question before us is simple: Who has credible solutions? 'And I know many of you will be asking, 'Why should we trust the Conservative Party?' 'And I say because no-one is making the argument for business … except me and my party.' At PMQs I talked about Labour creating an economic spiral. A reminder we have 4 more years of this… — Kemi Badenoch (@KemiBadenoch) June 12, 2025 Labour offers only 'managed decline', she said, before taking aim at Nigel Farage's Reform UK party. Mrs Badenoch appealed to the audience, signalling voters cannot 'allow Farage, with no experience of legislating – he's never in Parliament, let alone government – to just come in'. She added: 'Can you imagine 360 random people suddenly taking over government saying they are going to fix everything? 'We were there for 14 years, sweating and labouring, it was unbelievably difficult. 'How many of you would allow your businesses to be run by people who have never been in that business and say 'Come on in, I'm sure you can fix it'? 'That's what he's offering, it's not real. 'It is a scam, and it's my job to expose that scam.' A Reform UK spokesman said: 'Kemi admits they had 14 years and yet all they achieved was sky high taxes, low growth and open borders. 'The only scam is her telling the British public that the Tories have changed. 'It's the same people and the same old failed ideas. 'Quite simply, the Tory party is irrelevant.'

Labour MPs push front bench for ‘crackdown' on ‘dodgy' vape and barber shops
Labour MPs push front bench for ‘crackdown' on ‘dodgy' vape and barber shops

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Labour MPs push front bench for ‘crackdown' on ‘dodgy' vape and barber shops

Labour MPs have called for a 'crackdown' on 'dodgy' vape, barber and souvenir shops, which a minister warned 'undermine the legitimate' firms on Britain's high streets. Melanie Onn said she 'really must press' the Government for long-term action to tackle these shops, which MPs heard had links to tax evasion and money laundering, and Joe Powell said well-known London streets such as Portobello Road and Notting Hill Gate are 'blighted'. Business and trade minister Gareth Thomas told MPs that the National Economic Crime Centre (NECC) had visited almost 400 premises during a three-week operation in March, freezing several bank accounts. Mr Powell, the MP for Kensington and Bayswater, told the Commons: 'Small businesses across my constituency on our high streets from Earls Court Road to Queensway, Notting Hill Gate and Portobello Road are fed up of being blighted by candy shops, low-grade souvenir shops, Harry Potter shops and, yes, even barber shops, with accusations of VAT and business rates evasion, and even links to money laundering and serious organised crime.' He urged Mr Thomas to say 'what steps' the Government is taking 'to crack down on these operations and create a legitimate level playing field for our small businesses'. The minister replied: 'We've been working with colleagues in the Home Office and the National Crime Agency (NCA) to take action to crackdown on illegitimate businesses that threaten to undermine the legitimate ones that are on all of our high streets. 'In March, the NECC co-ordinated a three-week crackdown against barber shops and other cash-intensive businesses where there were concerns, visiting almost 400 premises, securing freezing orders over a series of bank accounts totalling more than £1 million.' In response, Ms Onn said: 'I really do need to press him because my constituents in Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes are equally as fed up as (Mr Powell) of seeing high streets dominated by dodgy vape shops, unlicensed barbers.' She said 'some of them are legitimate' but asked: 'Is he working closely with the Home Office to try and tackle this blight because I think we probably need a national strategy, not a three-week operation?' Mr Thomas said he recognised 'a concern up and down the country' and added the NCA and Home Office 'are seeking to take action against illegitimate business'. He said a Government commitment to bolster police forces with 13,000 extra officers and special constables, backed by an uplift to forces' 'spending power' of 2.3% per year unveiled in Wednesday's spending review, 'will help'. In a viral video, Conservative shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick claimed 'weird Turkish barber shops' were 'chipping away at society', along with fare evasion, when he caught passengers allegedly 'bumping' London Underground ticket barriers on camera. 'The state needs to reassert itself and go after lawbreakers,' he said. Sadiq Khan is driving a proud city into the ground. Lawbreaking is out of control. He's not acting. So, I did.👇 — Robert Jenrick (@RobertJenrick) May 29, 2025 Conservative MP Graham Stuart said that if a book which Labour MP for Central Ayrshire Alan Gemmell is writing were a 'political thriller about fighting for small business', then he was 'sure it features five heroes on the front bench opposite, doing everything they can to promote small business'. Ministers laughed and pointed at Tory MPs when Mr Stuart added: 'Readers will ask 'who is the villain of the piece?'' The Beverley and Holderness MP suggested the villain would be Rachel Reeves, 'the Chancellor of the Exchequer who is doing everything possible to undermine business – 276,000 people having lost work since the autumn statement'. He asked: 'When will the ministers, the heroes of this story, fight against the Chancellor who's getting so much so wrong?' Mr Thomas said: 'It's a little while since I've been called a hero by (Mr Stuart) but I'm glad that I've finally had some recognition from him in that regard. 'I don't think the Chancellor of the Exchequer is a villain at all. 'Indeed, I think the spending review that she announced yesterday will help to unlock investment in our high streets and in our small businesses up and down the country – the record investment in research and development, the record investment in infrastructure, and the additional capacity to the British Business Bank will help to unlock billions of pounds of new investment and many more job opportunities across the country.' Labour former minister Liam Byrne later called for 'a plan to cut industrial energy costs now'. The Commons Business and Trade Committee chairman said: 'As our committee pointed out on Friday, the success of the industrial strategy will depend on a plan to cut industrial energy costs now. 'When the industrial strategy is published, will the Secretary of State reassure us that there will be a plan to ensure that UK energy prices are internationally competitive?' Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds replied: 'The very significant increase in industrial energy prices under the terms of the last government are a significant issue for our competitiveness, and yes, that is something we're seeking to address.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store