logo

Chennai-based Lalithaa Jewellery Mart files DRHP for Rs 1,700 crore IPO to fuel southern expansion

Economic Times3 hours ago

Lalithaa Jewellery Mart, a Chennai-headquartered jewellery retailer offering gold, silver, and diamond jewellery designed for southern Indian markets, has filed its Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP) with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to raise Rs 1,700 crore through an initial public offering (IPO).
ADVERTISEMENT The proposed Rs 1,700 crore IPO comprises a fresh issue of up to Rs 1,200 crore and an offer-for-sale (OFS) of Rs 500 crore by promoter M. Kiran Kumar Jain. The company also plans a reservation for eligible employees with a bidding discount and may undertake a pre-IPO placement of up to 20% of the fresh issue size, which would proportionally reduce the fresh issue.
Proceeds from the fresh issue will be primarily deployed towards capital expenditure for setting up new stores in India, amounting to Rs 1,014.50 crore, with the balance allocated for general corporate purposes, the company said in its filing. The issue will follow the book-building process, allocating no more than 50% of the net offer to qualified institutional buyers (QIBs), and reserving at least 15% and 35% for non-institutional investors and retail individual investors, respectively.
The company proposes to list its shares on the National Stock Exchange of India and BSE Ltd.
Founded in 1985, Lalithaa Jewellery Mart opened its first store in Chennai's T. Nagar, a hub for silk and jewellery retail. The company operates 56 stores across southern India's Tier I, II, and III cities, including 22 in Andhra Pradesh, 20 in Tamil Nadu, seven in Karnataka, six in Telangana, and one in Puducherry, spanning a total operational area of 6,09,408 sq. ft. As of December 31, 2024, 47 of these stores each cover more than 5,000 sq. ft. According to a CRISIL report cited in the DRHP, Lalithaa Jewellery Mart recorded the highest operating revenue per store among key organised jewellery players in India between fiscal years 2022 and 2024. It is also ranked the second fastest growing regional jewellery player based on operating revenue growth during the same period, posting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 43.62%.
ADVERTISEMENT The company's jewellery schemes, 'Dhana Vandhanam' and 'Free-yo-Flexi,' have attracted repeat customers, with 420,261 active enrolments as of December 31, 2024.
Lalithaa Jewellery Mart runs two manufacturing units in Tamil Nadu, one at Thirumudivakkam, Chennai, and another at Maraimalai, Kanchipuram, the latter through its wholly owned subsidiary Asita Manufacturing Private Limited. From December 2024, operations commenced at the Thirumudivakkam facility. The company employs a total of 563 Karigars across both manufacturing units.
ADVERTISEMENT The company also operates one of India's largest jewellery stores in Vijayawada, with a carpet area of 1,00,000 sq. ft., alongside large-format stores in Somajiguda (98,210 sq. ft.) and Vishakhapatnam (65,000 sq. ft.), making them among the largest jewellery retail outlets in the country, according to CRISIL.Financially, Lalithaa Jewellery Mart reported a 26.07% increase in restated consolidated revenue from Rs 13,316.80 crore in fiscal 2023 to Rs 16,788.05 crore in fiscal 2024, driven by the rise in store count from 47 to 53, higher gold rates, and increased gold sales. For the nine months ended December 31, 2024, the company posted revenue of Rs 12,594.67 crore and profit after tax of Rs 262.33 crore.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Indian gems and jewellery retail industry was valued at Rs 6.49 trillion in fiscal 2024 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 13–14% to reach Rs 12–12.2 trillion by fiscal 2029. South India remains the largest jewellery-consuming region, accounting for 38–43% of the country's overall jewellery demand.Anand Rathi Advisors and Equirus Capital are the book-running lead managers for the issue, while MUFG Intime India serves as registrar.
ADVERTISEMENT Also read | IPO calendar: 4 new issues, 1 listing lined up in a busy mid-June week
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Market Wrap: D-Street ends higher as RBI easing, U.S. jobs data fuel rally; Sensex adds 256 pts, Nifty above 25,100
Market Wrap: D-Street ends higher as RBI easing, U.S. jobs data fuel rally; Sensex adds 256 pts, Nifty above 25,100

Economic Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Market Wrap: D-Street ends higher as RBI easing, U.S. jobs data fuel rally; Sensex adds 256 pts, Nifty above 25,100

Synopsis Indian benchmark indices ended Monday's session in the green, with the banking index surging to a record high during the day, lifted by the Reserve Bank of India's surprise policy easing, upbeat U.S. jobs data, and progress in U.S.-India trade talks. Indian benchmark indices ended Monday's session in the green, with the banking index surging to a record high during the day, lifted by the Reserve Bank of India's surprise policy easing, upbeat U.S. jobs data, and progress in U.S.-India trade talks. ADVERTISEMENT The BSE Sensex jumped 256.22 points, or 0.31%, to 82,445.21, while the NSE Nifty rose 100.15 points, or 0.40%, to close at 25,103.20. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel) SensexRBI easingNiftyU.S. jobs databanking index Nikita Papers IPO opens on May 27, price band set at Rs 95-104 per share Nikita Papers IPO opens on May 27, price band set at Rs 95-104 per share Why gold prices could surpass $4,000: JP Morgan's bullish outlook explained Why gold prices could surpass $4,000: JP Morgan's bullish outlook explained Cyient shares fall over 9% after Q4 profit declines, core business underperforms Cyient shares fall over 9% after Q4 profit declines, core business underperforms L&T Technology Services shares slide 7% after Q4 profit dips L&T Technology Services shares slide 7% after Q4 profit dips Trump-Powell standoff puts U.S. Rate policy in crosshairs: Who will blink first? Trump-Powell standoff puts U.S. Rate policy in crosshairs: Who will blink first? SEBI warns of securities market frauds via YouTube, Facebook, X and more SEBI warns of securities market frauds via YouTube, Facebook, X and more API Trading for All: Pi42 CTO Satish Mishra on How Pi42 is Empowering Retail Traders API Trading for All: Pi42 CTO Satish Mishra on How Pi42 is Empowering Retail Traders Security, transparency, and innovation: What sets Pi42 apart in crypto trading Security, transparency, and innovation: What sets Pi42 apart in crypto trading Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Altcoins? How investors are structuring their crypto portfolios, Avinash Shekhar explains Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Altcoins? How investors are structuring their crypto portfolios, Avinash Shekhar explains The rise of Crypto Futures in India: Leverage, tax efficiency, and market maturity, Avinash Shekhar of Pi42 explains NEXT STORY Business News › Markets › Stocks › News › Market Wrap: D-Street ends higher as RBI easing, U.S. jobs data fuel rally; Sensex adds 256 pts, Nifty above 25,100

Why more equities won't save you from low withdrawal rates in retirement
Why more equities won't save you from low withdrawal rates in retirement

Mint

time17 minutes ago

  • Mint

Why more equities won't save you from low withdrawal rates in retirement

Retirees are often drawn to a tempting idea: since equities typically deliver higher returns over the long run, a retirement portfolio with more equities will produce better outcomes. Wouldn't it be nice to escape the meagre 3% withdrawal rate by investing more heavily in equities? Unfortunately, it's not so straightforward. Beyond a point, increasing equity allocation will reduce, not raise, the withdrawal rate. This is due to a crucial but underappreciated concept: sequence of return risk. In portfolios that experience regular withdrawals, not just the returns but the order in which they are earned matter, which can have dramatic consequences. Also Read: Relying on rental income in retirement? Take these steps to protect yourself. The table shows how two retirees (A and B) experience the same average returns but in different sequences. Despite identical withdrawals, A (who faces early losses) ends up with just ₹59, while B (who sees early gains) ends up with ₹71—this is sequence risk at work. In a portfolio with no withdrawals, only returns matter—not the order in which they occur. This is because multiplication is commutative: 1 × 1.1 × 0.9 × 1.2 is the same as 1 × 0.9 × 1.2 × 1.1. But when you introduce regular withdrawals, you are now subtracting from the portfolio every year. In mathematical terms, you are combining subtraction with multiplication, and the commutative property breaks down. The arithmetic changes and the sequence begin to matter. High sequence risk A retirement portfolio with heavy equity exposure is likely to face substantial volatility and heightened sequence risk. In the accumulation phase, volatility can be a friend—it brings down average cost through disciplined investing. But in the decumulation phase, volatility becomes a foe. A 20% drawdown early in retirement can cause lasting damage, especially if the retiree is simultaneously withdrawing funds to meet expenses. Unlike a young investor, the retiree cannot 'wait it out". Also Read: How to prepare for retirement in a world of increasing life expectancy This can be illustrated by conducting simulations on retirement portfolios with varying equity allocation. We conducted multiple such simulations to check how the optimal withdrawal rates vary for different asset allocations. The findings are unambiguous. Withdrawal rates initially rise with greater equity exposure, peaking at 20–40%, but then begin to fall. Portfolios with higher equity allocation produced meaningfully lower safe withdrawal rates. This is not a quirk of Indian market data or a one-off observation. William Bengen, the American financial planner who introduced the '4% rule" in 1994, found the same. In his landmark study of historical US data, Bengen was surprised to find that safe withdrawal rates declined when equity allocations increased. He even noted that the worst outcomes were not produced by conservative portfolios with low equity exposure but by aggressive portfolios with too much equity. This insight wasn't isolated. The Trinity Study, an influential academic analysis, came to similar conclusions when it tested various asset allocations and their impact on withdrawal rates using US market history. Closer to home, my 2024 co-authored study with Rajan Raju had a similar conclusion. Using Indian data, we found that withdrawal rates initially rise with equity allocation but then begin to decline beyond a certain point. Also Read: How to build a ₹5 crore retirement corpus with ₹1.5 lakh monthly salary Though equities offer higher long-term returns, more equity does not always mean more retirement income. This is a paradox we need to wrap our heads around. Retirees should construct a portfolio with a balanced allocation that reduces volatility. If you have been smirking at retirees with good fixed-income allocations in their retirement portfolio, well, the joke may be on you. Ravi Saraogi, CFA, Sebi-registered investment adviser. and co-founder, Samasthiti Advisors.

The poverty line has moved but have basic vulnerabilities in India eased?
The poverty line has moved but have basic vulnerabilities in India eased?

Mint

time17 minutes ago

  • Mint

The poverty line has moved but have basic vulnerabilities in India eased?

According to recent World Bank data, extreme poverty in India fell sharply from 27.1% in 2011–12 to just 5.3% in 2022–23, suggesting that 269 million people have been lifted out of poverty. While this achievement is nominally and statistically significant, the finding prompts a deeper and more structural methodological question: Are we counting fewer people as 'poor' in India, or are we failing to capture the full spectrum of vulnerabilities that persist among people in relative poverty which discussions based on 'poverty line' measurement miss in scope and reality? Historically, poverty measurement in India relied predominantly on income or consumption. This approach universally classifies individuals as poor or non-poor based solely on monetary criteria, offering a limited view of deprivation. In India, the Tendulkar Committee and later the Rangarajan Committee refined these poverty lines to reflect changing consumption patterns, but still focused primarily on income criteria. However, over the last two decades, the conceptualization of poverty, its measurement and assessment have all evolved significantly. Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | Poverty isn't widespread but prosperity needs to be Multidimensional frameworks, including the UNDP's Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), highlight that poverty encompasses deficits in education, health and living standards. Much of India's recent poverty discourse has centred on updated metrics, including the World Bank's shift from a poverty line of $2.15 to $3 per day and methodological refinements such as the adoption of thslum e 'modified mixed recall period' (MMRP) in consumption surveys. These changes, while noteworthy, underscore a deeper tension between statistical representation and lived deprivation. As critiques argue, estimates that rely on projected data, especially in the absence of post-pandemic ground surveys, risk portraying a linear trajectory of progress that may not fully account for access-based or structural vulnerabilities. A victory, but for whom?: While incomes have risen, they have not translated into improved well-being when access to essential public goods such as healthcare, education, transportation and digital infrastructure remains unequal. For multitudes, these access gaps persist, Uttar Pradesh (UP), Maharashtra, Bihar, West Bengal, and Madhya Pradesh, states that together made up 65% of India's extreme poor in 2011–12, account for two-thirds of India's overall reduction in extreme poverty. Yet, our Access Inequality Index Report 2025, which ranks Indian states based on access to essentials across five pillars—basic amenities, healthcare, education, socio-economic services and legal recourse—reveals a more uneven picture. While West Bengal and Maharashtra show relatively better rankings as 'achiever' and 'front-runner' states, respectively, UP and Bihar remain in the 'aspirant' category. This means that despite reductions in poverty as measured by consumption or income, the majority of households in these states continue to lack reliable access to vital public goods. For instance, only 19% of households in UP and 21.5% in Bihar have access to clean cooking fuel. Just 22.4% of households in Maharashtra and 33.7% in West Bengal have at least one member covered by a health insurance or finance scheme. Also Read: Himanshu: India needs official poverty data for effective policymaking States such as Kerala, Goa and Tamil Nadu consistently rank high in access to essential public services, with Goa leading overall and topping categories like basic amenities and healthcare. For example, 90% of households in Goa live in pucca houses, compared to 83.4% in Kerala and 87.9% in Tamil Nadu. Also, 91.9% of households in Goa have access to piped water supply within their dwelling or yard, while child immunization rates stand at 84.1% in Goa, 84.5% in Kerala and 85.7% in Tamil Nadu. In contrast, states such as Bihar, UP, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh lag far behind. These deprivations are critical to people's well-being and show that income thresholds alone are insufficient markers of progress. A household that marginally exceeds the poverty line but lacks clean water or reliable healthcare remains vulnerable. These forms of deprivation often remain invisible in conventional consumption data, yet they are pivotal in determining a household's ability to recover from shocks, invest in education or participate fully in economic life. Alternative readings: An analysis of household income data by Azim Premji University's State of Working India 2021 highlights the unequal economic impact of the covid pandemic. The lowest 10 percentiles saw a steep 27% decline in income, compared to 23% among the 40th-50th percentiles and 22% among the top 10 percentiles. Income losses were more pronounced in urban areas. And although the setbacks may appear modest, the absolute income reduction for low-income households has been profound. This financial distress coincided with a sharp increase in non-monetary deprivations. Also Read: India must redraw its poverty line to reflect economic progress The Hunger Watch survey reported in 2022 that 80% of respondents experienced some form of food insecurity, with 25% suffering severe distress (like skipped meals and hunger); 41% observed a decline in the nutritional quality of their diets, and 67% were unable to afford cooking gas in the month preceding the survey. A Pew Research Centre report in 2022 also estimated that about 75 million additional people in India fell into poverty due to the pandemic. The subsequent State of Working India 2023 study reaffirmed these patterns, documenting a 22% drop in cumulative household income from March to October 2020, with the poorest households disproportionately affected, driving a notable surge in poverty rates. While welfare programmes such as the PM Awas Yojana, Ujjwala Yojana, Jan Dhan Yojana and Ayushman Bharat have expanded coverage, and direct benefit transfers have improved matters, challenges persist. Access to resources does not always translate to adequacy; owning a gas cylinder does not guarantee regular refills. Many essential services remain underfunded, unevenly implemented or inaccessible, particularly in rural and remote areas. All this makes access inequality the emerging face of poverty in India. Ultimately, despite significant improvements in headline poverty metrics, a closer examination reveals a more complex reality. The persistence of access disparities, relative poverty and regional inequalities underscores the need for clarity on poverty today. We must pay attention to institutional capacity, political will and the equitable distribution of public goods. The authors are, respectively, dean and research analyst, O.P. Jindal Global University.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store