
Unethical or inevitable? Artists question where to draw the line on AI-generated art
Lauren Thomander recently began selling a series of prints on her Etsy page inspired by the illustrated covers of The New Yorker magazine.
But when they were reposted on Halifax Noise, a popular Instagram feed with more than 80,000 followers, the response was mixed.
Some praised the work and eagerly followed the link to her shop to purchase a print, but others, including many illustrators themselves, were quick to criticize the idea.
"People are kind of saying that AI trains itself with other people's work, and that it's not my work anymore," she said. "I don't see it that way because it is my picture that you can see there."
In Thomander's view, using ChatGPT to make an illustration is no different than using software to edit photos.
"Whether you're maybe changing the background of a photo, removing somebody that's in the way of your subject, or even putting a filter over it, I feel like that's all kind of in the same boat as AI," she said.
'The process is totally unethical' says illustrator
Illustrator and printmaker Alex MacAskill strongly disagrees. The print may have originated from Thomander's picture, but she's a photographer and not an illustrator, he says.
"I think if you flip the situation on the other end and take illustrations you want to convert into photography, I can't help but feel that the person on the other end of the equation would feel similar to how illustrators feel in this particular situation," said MacAskill, who owns and operates Midnight Oil Print and Design House in Halifax.
He said Thomander could have realized her idea instead through collaborating with another artist.
"To replace that with AI … and to remove that person from the process is totally unethical," he said
Large-language models, like those used to build ChatGPT or Google's Gemini or Anthropic's Claude, are trained by mining large data sets that include the creative output of many thousands of artists and writers, often without their consent.
When you ask ChatGPT a question, for instance, it's using that data to answer the query, which is why it's able so quickly to translate Thomander's work into an illustration that wouldn't look out of place on the cover of The New Yorker.
Photography was once seen as threat
It's no secret that many previous innovations in the world of technology have been received skeptically in the art world.
It wasn't that long ago that photography was viewed as an existential threat to painting, says Ray Cronin, the curator for the Beaverbrook Gallery in Fredericton.
"When photography was introduced in the 19th century, people were convinced it was going to kill painting," Cronin said.
Even more recently, when Mary Pratt, a renowned Canadian artist who was known for making lifelike paintings of everyday objects, began painting from photographs in the late 1960s, there were some people who thought she wasn't playing by the rules
"Her parents thought she was cheating because she wasn't inventing the images herself," said Cronin, who wrote a book about Pratt's life and work.
Pratt would select an image from her collection of photos, maybe one she took herself. From there, she would project the image onto a blank canvas and trace the outline before starting to paint by hand.
It was all part of what Cronin says was her desire to "make the human eye look at the world the way the camera looks at the world."
"The skill to do that is immense," he said " It's not something that could just be fed into some kind of algorithm."
When Pratt died in 2018, this was unquestionably true. The matter has become more complicated in the age of readily available generative AI.
A simple prompt on ChatGPT asking to "create a painting with apples in the style of Mary Pratt" will churn out an image that might, to a less discerning viewer, look just like the real thing.
But this ignores a key quality of Pratt's work, Cronin said. Although photography played a role in the work, Pratt's paintings are special because they were made by a real person using real materials.
"Everybody knows the experience of seeing something, whether it's a photograph or a painting or a sculpture, that you can't just walk by. You have to actually look at it. And the longer you look at it, the more you see," he said.
Even still, Cronin is not ready to write off AI altogether.
"I think AI is a tool and tools are only as good as the people who use them. And they're only as interesting as what's made with them."
However, he hasn't found much art made with AI particularly interesting.
"I'd rather see somebody with their mistakes and failures and experiments … than the kind of perfection AI always seems to create," he said.
Imperfection makes art interesting, says Cronin
Art, in his view, isn't perfection. It's the absence of it. In Pratt's 1994 painting Glassy Apples, that much is clear.
The painting, based on a photograph she'd taken of a crystal bowl filled with apples that had been a wedding present, was made as her marriage to painter Christopher Pratt was falling apart.
"The thing she always pointed out about that work that was most important to her is that there's a chip in the rim of the crystal bowl," said Cronin.
When she took the photo in advance of the painting, she turned the bowl so that a chip was visible.
"She's showing that there's a crack in everything. It's breaking," he said. "That's not something you'd get from asking AI to make a bowl of apples in Mary Pratt's style."
Future unknown
For both MacAskill and Thomander, how AI will affect art in the future is an open question.
Beyond the ethical implications of using AI, MacAskill worries about what may happen if we lose sight of why art is valuable in the first place.
"I think to value the convenience of creating something over the humanity behind it is really just doing a disservice to all of us," he said.
But Thomander believes that as AI continues to develop as a technology, it will be prudent to get acquainted with how it works.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
The sidewalk fairy turning Montreal street cracks into art
News Duration 4:45 Laurence Petit, better known as the "Sidewalk Fairy," is bringing street art to the ground by paving over Montreal's sidewalk cracks with her mosaic art.


CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Musicians fight uphill battle as AI infiltrates streaming platforms, cutting into royalties
Social Sharing Musicians are calling for regulations and finding creative ways to fight back as AI "bands" climb the charts on streaming platforms, soaking up already meagre royalty payments. But as a major musicians' union works for legal change, a copyright expert says the law is failing to keep up with artificial intelligence. This comes as an act called The Velvet Sundown has hit 1.2 million monthly listeners on Spotify after stirring controversy over its use of AI, sparking conversations about the future of the music business. "It's obviously a challenge in the industry," Allistair Elliott, director of Canadians affairs for the American Federation of Musicians, which represents 70,000 professional musicians in the U.S. and Canada, told CBC News. "Same as everything else, the technology gets created and gets used before there's any guardrails or policies in place to protect musicians." Elliott said musicians should have to provide consent for their work to be used to train AI learning models, and they should be compensated if they do consent. He said he hopes to see the federal government step up with policies and legislation but acknowledges that a "careful balance" needs to be struck between the advancement of technology and the protection of creators. If that doesn't happen, Elliott said, he worries the technology could "eradicate" a generation of creative workers. "The frustration, I think, for creators is governments tend not to move very quickly," he said. While AI can't compete for the live music market — at least not yet — Elliott said there are a lot of musicians who only make recorded music, be it for television, movies or commercial jingles, whose livelihoods will be directly affected by AI. CBC News reached out to the Department of Canadian Heritage, but late Friday it said it wasn't yet ready to comment. WATCH | Musicians seek protection against unethical use of AI: More than 200 performers plead for protections against unethical AI 1 year ago Duration 2:02 'Pick a real guitar to play' Kristian Heironimus, a Florida-based musician who records and tours under the name Velvet Meadow, was miffed to see The Velvet Sundown amass such a huge following when it seemed elements of the name and imagery were eerily similar to his own. "It's definitely disheartening," he said in an interview. But instead of getting down about it, the multi-instrumentalist set to work tracking guitar, bass, drums and vocals on a fuzzy, garage-rock inspired "diss track" called The Velvet Sundown, released July 1. "Pick a real guitar to play, not damn mouse," Heironimus sings. "Cut your teeth just like me, and all the artists whose fingers bleed." Without using artificial intelligence, Heironimus is challenging The Velvet Sundown at its own game, effectively "memeing" the AI band and using its name to push his own song into the algorithm. "As artists, we just have to outperform [AI] the best we can," he said. "I think we're going to be in for kind of a new wave of sound, because I feel like there's going to be a lot of artists who will be chasing something truly unique to get away from that sphere of AI music as it takes over. I'm optimistic about it." On the heels of the Velvet Sundown controversy, India's Collective Media Network launched an AI-generated "spiritual" rock band called Trilok this week, along with videos explaining each of the AI-generated band members' personas, in the latest sign that AI music is going mainstream. And in France, streaming platform Deezer said in April that 18 per cent of its uploaded songs — about 20,000 a day — are fully generated by AI. Other major streaming platforms like Spotify and Apple don't track those numbers or label AI-generated music. WATCH | Nova Scotia artists on artificial intelligence: Nova Scotia artists draw line on artificial intelligence 5 days ago Duration 2:13 As Andrew Sampson reports, some call it unethical while others say it's inevitable. Artists unlikely to get fair deal: musician New York-based pop musician and vlogger Hadji Gaviota, who discussed the recent controversies in a video called Spotify's Fake AI Band Problem, said musicians have long known they can't rely on streaming services to make a living. But because Spotify's royalties are distributed based on a percentage of the company's overall revenue, the influx of AI acts means real musicians are now getting an even smaller slice of the pie. "You need to figure out how to make that money somewhere else," Gaviota said. "It's been clear, but it's only clearer now." The rising use of generative AI in creative industries has triggered a wave of lawsuits, with artists, authors and rights holders accusing AI firms of using copyrighted material without consent or compensation to train their models. AI music tools Suno and Udio are each facing legal action from Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music, which have accused the startups of mass copyright infringement for allegedly training AI systems on their recordings. Gaviota said he has little faith in record labels to fight for artists, noting they're seeking equity in Suno and Udio as part of their lawsuits. He said he's hopeful about developments in attribution technology, which aims to pick apart the songs used to train AI models in order to credit and compensate artists, though he expects any compensation would likely amount to "fractions of pennies." "Artists getting a fair deal is usually like the last part of anything," Gaviota said. "I wouldn't put my eggs in that basket." AI regulation talk 'going in circles' Mira Sundara Rajan, a visiting professor at the University of California, Davis, law school and former Canada research chair in intellectual property law at the University of British Columbia, said talks about regulating AI have been "going in circles" for more than two years in Canada and globally. Many in the legal community don't want to appear critical of AI, out of a "knee-jerk fear" of being branded as Luddites, she told CBC News. Legal frameworks are in place around intellectual property, but Sundara Rajan said it's hard to stretch existing laws to cover AI. "Because legal actions tend to be very precise for obvious reasons, you don't have catch-all legal provisions," she said. Sundara Rajan, who is also a classical pianist, tackles these topics in her recent book, The Moral Rights of Authors and Artists: From the Birth of Copyright to the Age of Artificial Intelligence. She said there's been debate in the world of intellectual property law about whether scraping artists' music for AI is "fair use," as it's called in the U.S., or "fair dealing" in Canada. She argues it falls short in both cases. Sundara Rajan said large technology companies, by way of lobbying, have a heavy sway in how their products are regulated — and whatever happens in the U.S. is often followed by Canada and other countries. She cites Canada's recent scrapping of the digital services tax as an example of that. "It's a total vicious-cycle situation," she said. "The sad thing for me is that two constituencies that I really care about end up losing out — one being the artist and the other being the public — because they're not in a position to do a lot, they don't have the lobby power."


CBC
3 hours ago
- CBC
Squamish Nation Youth Powwow celebrates Indigenous culture, music and language
Squamish Nation Youth Powwow celebrates Indigenous culture, music and language News Duration 1:51 A vibrant celebration of Indigenous culture, music and community is on display this weekend at the 3rd annual Squamish Nation Youth Powwow. Organizers say it's a chance for First Nations youth to stay connected to their roots. Take a look.