
US authorities name California health clinic blast suspect – DW – 05/18/2025
A bomb exploded near a reproductive health facility in Palm Springs, California, killing one person. The FBI characterized the explosion as an "act of terrorism," later identifying a 25-year-old as the suspect.
Police investigating a bombing at a fertility clinic in the US city of Palm Springs, California have identified a 25-year-old male as the suspect and the only fatality in Saturday's explosion.
Authorities told a press conference on Sunday that they were "fairly confident" that the suspect was the man who died in the explosion.
Four others were injured in the bombing, which the FBI has said was a terrorist act.
The suspect was a resident of Twentynine Palms, a town about 35 miles (57 kilometers) from Palm Springs, a popular desert resort city near Los Angeles.
Palm Springs' mayor said the bomb was either in or near a car next to the IVF clinic Image: picture alliance/dpa/ABC7 Los Angeles via AP
What do we know about the investigation?
Akil Davis, the assistant director in charge of the FBI's Los Angeles field office, told reporters that "all of the embryos" at the fertility clinic were saved.
"The subject had nihilistic ideations, and this was a targeted attack" against the facility that provides In vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment, Davis said.
"Good guys one, bad guys zero," he added.
The FBI agent said police had searched the suspect's home in Twentynine Palms and had evacuated some residents as a precaution.
The suspect reportedly posted a manifesto online and tried to record the explosion, but officials said the video had failed to upload.
Speaking to reporters on Saturday evening, Davis had said, "make no mistake — this is an intentional act of terrorism."
Authorities said that the blast outside a Palm Springs fertility clinic was caused by a bomb Image: ABC AFFILIATE KABC via REUTERS
No ongoing threat to the public
"We do not believe that there's an ongoing threat to the public in the Twentynine Palms area," Davis added.
Local police chief Andy Mills said Palm Springs would be "stronger and more resilient as a result" of the attack, which he said had failed.
"Our determination to continue life as we know it here in Palm Springs continues unabated," Mills said.
What did the clinic say?
Dr. Maher Abdallah, the director of the American Reproductive Centers fertility clinic, confirmed that his clinic was damaged.
In a phone interview with The Associated Press, he said that all of his staff were safe and accounted for.
"I really have no clue what happened," Abdallah said. "Thank God today happened to be a day that we have no patients."
The explosion damaged the office space where consultations with patients are conducted, but the IVF lab and all of the stored embryos were unharmed, Abdallah said.
*Editor's note: DW follows the German press code, which stresses the importance of protecting the privacy of suspected criminals or victims and obliges us to refrain from revealing full names in such cases.
Edited by: Rana Taha

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
25 minutes ago
- DW
Germany: Cologne evacuation lifted after WWII bombs defused – DW – 06/04/2025
Buildings across the center of the western city of Cologne were evacuated after the discovery of three WWII bombs. Some 20,000 people had been under evacuation orders. Large areas of the city center of Cologne were closed off on Wednesday as experts defused three bombs left over from World War II, which ended 80 years ago. The evacuation operation in Cologne, which has seen plenty of them over the years, was one of the largest to ever be carried out in the city since World War II, with some 20,000 people ordered to leave the affected area. What do we know about the evacuation? The process of defusing the bombs had to be delayed at one point because of a resident refusing to evacuate, according to a city spokesperson. An individual living in the old town resisted orders to leave their apartment, with public order officials, police, and the fire department enforcing removal measures. Kai Kulschewski, head of explosive ordnance disposal in the nearby city of Düsseldorf, who is coordinating the disposal, had earlier said everything was going to plan. He had added that the defusing operation had yet to begin as of the afternoon because not everyone had been evacuated yet. "We can only start when the last person is out," he said. Several roads have been closed off ahead of the operation Image: Thomas Banneyer/dpa/picture alliance Hotels, care homes evacuated The evacuated area included the entire old part of the city, 58 hotels, three Rhine bridges, the town hall, the railway station in the district of Deutz, which lies across the Rhine from the city center, museums, a hospital and two care homes. The city's major landmark, the Cologne Cathedral, was, however, situated just outside the danger area. Germany's national rail operator, Deutsche Bahn, had warned that many trains will be diverted or even canceled, and road traffic has was severely disrupted. The weapons — two 200-pound (90-kilogram) bombs and one 100-pound bomb, all manufactured in the US — were discovered in Deutz on Monday. Security personnel are out in force for the operation Image: Thomas Banneyer/dpa/picture alliance In a statement on its website, the City of Cologne said, "The evacuation is the largest such measure since the end of World War II. Everyone involved hopes that the defusal can be completed in the course of Wednesday." Bomb defusals are nothing new in Cologne, as it was one of the major bombing targets for Allied forces during the Second World War. Among other attacks, the British Royal Air Force targeted Cologne with its first "thousand-bomber raid" on a German city overnight to May 31, 1942, dropping 1,455 tons of bombs and destroying or damaging thousands of buildings. Edited by: Elizabeth Schumacher, Wesley Rahn


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Germany updates: Merz set for inaugural trip to US – DW – 06/04/2025
06/04/2025 June 4, 2025 Germany seeking easier process to declare countries safe in asylum curbs The German government is looking at a simpler process when it comes to declaring countries of origin as safe, under a push by the new conservative-led coalition to reduce the number of asylum seekers. Chancellor Merz's Cabinet approved a draft policy in which a country can be declared safe with a simple statutory order and where the consent of the Bundesrat (Germany's upper house of parliament) is no longer needed. Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said the move was part of a whole package of "national measures (...) to implement the asylum turnaround." Under German asylum law, "safe countries of origin" are seen as those where people are not subject to political persecution or inhuman punishment. Migrants seeking asylum from these countries are likely to have asylum applications rejected, apart from exceptional cases. Deportations back to safe countries will also face fewer legal obstacles. Opposition lawmakers from the Green party have criticized the draft as contrary to German law, as have asylum and immigration NGOs. The reform still needs to be approved by the lower house of parliament, the Bundestag. The announcement comes just days after a court declared the government's tightened border security, including the turning back of asylum seekers, to be illegal under German law.


DW
4 hours ago
- DW
German Cabinet approves stricter asylum measures – DW – 06/04/2025
The German government has proposed several new measures as it pushes on with plans to further curb irregular migration. This comes despite a legal setback this week when a court ruled pushbacks at the border unlawful. The German Cabinet on Wednesday approved several measures to tighten Germany's asylum laws, including a plan to make it easier to determine "safe countries of origin" and thus to deport rejected asylum-seekers. This comes after another policy put in place by Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt — allowing police to send back asylum-seekers at the border without assessment of their cases according to the Dublin procedure — was deemed unlawful by the Administrative Court in Berlin. What did the Cabinet decide? Dobrindt, a conservative politician from the Bavarian Christian Social Union (CSU), would like to see the government made solely responsible in the future for deciding which countries should be categorized as "safe countries of origin." Under his plan, no approval from Germany's upper house of parliament, or Bundesrat, which represents the 16 federal states, would be required anymore to decide whether there is persecution in a country that would justify granting asylum to people from there. This would reduce the number of people eligible for asylum and make it easier to deport rejected asylum-seekers to their home countries if these were put in the "safe" category. The Cabinet also approved the abolition of a rule calling for people in pre-deportation custody to be automatically be assigned a lawyer by the state. This rule was adopted under the previous Social Democrat-led coalition government at the behest of the Green Party. Speaking to reporters in Berlin, Dobrindt said, "These are essential steps that are part of a whole raft of measures to bring about the asylum transformation." The reforms approved by the Cabinet, which are all contained in the government's coalition agreement, still need approval by the lower house of parliament, the Bundestag. Tougher migration policy faces legal challenges Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who leads the current German coalition government of his conservative CDU/CSU bloc with the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), has vowed to crack down on irregular migration — a policy seen by many as a bid to reduce support for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which has been gaining in popularity. His efforts suffered a setback on Monday with the court ruling on border pushbacks but has vowed to continue with the policy "within the framework of existing European law." Criticism from legal experts, human rights groups Further criticism has also come from legal experts and from human rights groups. The German Bar Association (DAV) argued on Wednesday that the proposed reform of rules governing the definition of "safe countries" would unnecessarily complicate asylum regulations. Christoph Tometten, the DVA's expert for migration law, said that because the planned reform applied to EU law and not the right to asylum enshrined in the German constitution, there would be "unnecessarily complex differentiations" that needed to be made by administrations and courts. This would mean that asylum proceedings could become longer rather than shorter, he said. He was referring to the fact that the German constitution requires the Bundesrat to be involved in categorizing "safe countries," while an EU guideline allows member states to define them by decree — a guideline the German government is taking to argue its case. German refugee advocacy group Pro Asyl called the actions of the government "undemocratic and constitutionally questionable." The organization's spokeswoman on legal policy, Wiebke Judith, said, "The determination of allegedly safe countries of origin and third countries makes it more difficult for endangered people to receive the protection they are really entitled to." Edited by: Wesley Rahn