German Cabinet approves stricter asylum measures – DW – 06/04/2025
The German Cabinet on Wednesday approved several measures to tighten Germany's asylum laws, including a plan to make it easier to determine "safe countries of origin" and thus to deport rejected asylum-seekers.
This comes after another policy put in place by Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt — allowing police to send back asylum-seekers at the border without assessment of their cases according to the Dublin procedure — was deemed unlawful by the Administrative Court in Berlin.
What did the Cabinet decide?
Dobrindt, a conservative politician from the Bavarian Christian Social Union (CSU), would like to see the government made solely responsible in the future for deciding which countries should be categorized as "safe countries of origin."
Under his plan, no approval from Germany's upper house of parliament, or Bundesrat, which represents the 16 federal states, would be required anymore to decide whether there is persecution in a country that would justify granting asylum to people from there.
This would reduce the number of people eligible for asylum and make it easier to deport rejected asylum-seekers to their home countries if these were put in the "safe" category.
The Cabinet also approved the abolition of a rule calling for people in pre-deportation custody to be automatically be assigned a lawyer by the state.
This rule was adopted under the previous Social Democrat-led coalition government at the behest of the Green Party.
Speaking to reporters in Berlin, Dobrindt said, "These are essential steps that are part of a whole raft of measures to bring about the asylum transformation."
The reforms approved by the Cabinet, which are all contained in the government's coalition agreement, still need approval by the lower house of parliament, the Bundestag.
Tougher migration policy faces legal challenges
Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who leads the current German coalition government of his conservative CDU/CSU bloc with the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), has vowed to crack down on irregular migration — a policy seen by many as a bid to reduce support for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which has been gaining in popularity.
His efforts suffered a setback on Monday with the court ruling on border pushbacks but has vowed to continue with the policy "within the framework of existing European law."
Criticism from legal experts, human rights groups
Further criticism has also come from legal experts and from human rights groups.
The German Bar Association (DAV) argued on Wednesday that the proposed reform of rules governing the definition of "safe countries" would unnecessarily complicate asylum regulations.
Christoph Tometten, the DVA's expert for migration law, said that because the planned reform applied to EU law and not the right to asylum enshrined in the German constitution, there would be "unnecessarily complex differentiations" that needed to be made by administrations and courts.
This would mean that asylum proceedings could become longer rather than shorter, he said.
He was referring to the fact that the German constitution requires the Bundesrat to be involved in categorizing "safe countries," while an EU guideline allows member states to define them by decree — a guideline the German government is taking to argue its case.
German refugee advocacy group Pro Asyl called the actions of the government "undemocratic and constitutionally questionable."
The organization's spokeswoman on legal policy, Wiebke Judith, said, "The determination of allegedly safe countries of origin and third countries makes it more difficult for endangered people to receive the protection they are really entitled to."
Edited by: Wesley Rahn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
7 hours ago
- DW
Trump, Putin summit on Ukraine underway in Alaska – DW – 08/15/2025
Trump described Putin as a "smart guy" while teasing the meeting as "high stakes!" Ukrainian President Zelenskyy said a trilateral meeting with Kyiv's involvement must follow. Follow DW for more. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are meeting at a military base in Alaska Trump greeted Putin with a handshake on a red carpet laid out on the tarmac Zelenskyy says summit should "open up a real path toward a just peace" Yulia Navalnaya calls for the release of political prisoners from Russia and UkraineDonald Trump and Vladimir Putin sat together in a room at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson after their arrival in Alaska. Against a backdrop bearing the slogan "Pursuing Peace," the US and Russian presidents sat with members of their respective delegations without taking any questions from reporters or making any statements. Donald Trump has greeted Vladimir Putin with a handshake on the red carpet in Alaska. The two leaders met on the tarmac before briefly posing for photos standing side-by-side. After not taking any questions from reporters, they left the stage and got into a waiting car together, and could be seen smiling and chatting to each other in the backseat as the vehicle drove off. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has said the previously planned one-on-one meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will now be a three-on-three session. The US president is to be joined by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who arrived in Alaska earlier, is likely to be one of the team alongside Putin. According to the Kremlin, the meeting will be followed by talks between the full delegations and continue over lunch. The two leaders are expected to hold a joint press conference. Donald Trump has landed in Alaska for the highly anticipated summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump and Putin are expected to discuss Russia's invasion of Ukraine and US-Russia on Friday, several hundred people had gathered in Anchorage, the state capital, to show their support for Ukraine. A rally outside Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, where the Trump-Putin summit is being held, however, was much smaller. Only a handful of protesters turned out to denounce Russia's invasion of its neighbor. As US and Russian leaders meet to discuss peace in Ukraine, key voices are missing — Ukraine and Europe. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz warns that any deal must include Kyiv and begin with a ceasefire. Though Europe's influence is limited, Merz could emerge as a key figure, urging President Trump to protect European and Ukrainian interests. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 videoA Russian government aircraft has landed in Alaska ahead of the talks between the Russian and US presidents, according to flight tracking site Flightradar24. It was unclear whether Kremlin leader Vladimir Putin was on board. The plane departed from Magadan in Russia's Far East, where the Russian president had been earlier on Friday. The Kremlin said the summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska is expected to last six to seven hours. Spokesman Dmitry Peskov told Russian state television the meeting will begin with a personal conversation involving advisers, followed by delegation-level talks that could take place over a working lunch. He said the two leaders would later meet privately again before holding a joint press conference. Putin left for Alaska from Russia's Magadan region in the Far East. Peskov said the Russian leader was expected to arrive on time at 11 a.m. local time (1900 GMT/UTC) in Anchorage, where the meeting will take place at a US military base. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Friday that Moscow was continuing to kill people and showing no intention of ending the war, just hours before the Russian and US presidents meet in Alaska "There is no order, nor any signals from Moscow that it is preparing to end this war... they are also killing on the day of the negotiations," Zelenskyy said in a video address posted on social media. Separately, in his nightly video address, the Ukrainian leader reiterated his call for a trilateral meeting with himself, US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "It is precisely in this format that real solutions are possible," Zelenskyy said. A Friday night in mid-August is usually the peak of the European Union's sleepy summer political recess. But tonight, officials are glued to their phones, waiting for any clue on whether their bid to influence US President Donald Trump ahead of his talks with Putin has worked. European leaders said their virtual meeting with the US president and his Ukrainian counterpart earlier this week went well — and there's no doubt the trans-Atlantic mood music is better now than back in February when President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was booted out the White House, and Europe was left looking powerless. A European Commission spokesperson told reporters on Thursday their "understanding" is that Trump will "debrief" Zelenskyy and European leaders following his tete-a-tete with Putin. "We don't have a timeframe on this," she added. Until then, it's a case of putting on a brave face and watching from afar. You can read all about Europe's hopes and fears in this analysis by my colleague Anchal Vohra. On his way to the summit with US President Donald Trump in Alaska, Russian President Vladimir Putin visited the Magadan region of his country, some 6,000 kilometers (about 3,750 miles) east of Moscow. According to state media, Putin's scheduled included a visit a fish oil capsule factory and cultural centers in the Russian Far East region's capital, also called Magadan. The city was a major transit centre for political prisoners during the Stalin era and was the administrative centre of a forced labor gold mining operation. The sparsely populated wider Magadan region, on the Sea of Okhotsk, today relies on mining and fishing. After his visit, Putin was expected to review materials on Ukraine, bilateral tensions, and economic cooperation on his 3,000-kilometer journey to the summit in Donald Trump is rolling out the red carpet for Vladimir Putin, not everyone is pleased with the visit. Several hundred people have expressed their protests by waving yellow and blue flags in support of Ukraine. Their main concern is that Zelenskyy is not participating in the meeting. Many of the protesters have voiced their opposition to having an alleged war criminal on American soil. The International Criminal Court in The Hague has issued a warrant for Putin's arrest. Conversely, some Alaskans we met at a golf course expressed pride in having the president here, stating that they would prefer him to meet his Russian counterpart on American soil rather than in Russia. US President Trump is expected to greet Russian President Putin on the plane upon his arrival in Anchorage, Alaska, the Kremlin has said. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Russian state TV that the Russian president was due to arrive at 11:00 am local time (1900 GMT). The meeting between US President Trump and Russian President Putin in a few hours in Alaska should " open up a real path toward a just peace and a substantive discussion between leaders in a trilateral format," Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said. In a Friday post on X, Zelenskyy said he expected an intelligence report on Russia's intentions and preparations for the meeting. "It is time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia," Zelenskyy wrote. "We are counting on America. We are ready, as always, to work as productively as possible."
DW
11 hours ago
- DW
Can the war in Ukraine be 'frozen?' – DW – 08/15/2025
European leaders say one option to at least temporarily bring an end to the conflict in Ukraine is to freeze it. Fighting between Russia and Ukraine would stop immediately while negotiations on reaching a more lasting peace would continue. DW looks at what a "frozen" conflict could mean for Ukraine.
Int'l Business Times
11 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Taliban Mark Fourth Year In Power In Afghanistan
Afghanistan's Taliban authorities marked the fourth anniversary of their takeover on Friday buoyed by Russia's first official recognition of their government, a step they hope other countries will follow. Helicopters circled above Kabul, dropping flower petals over the city to mark the Taliban seizure of the capital on August 15, 2021. Taliban members and supporters leaned out of trucks and rickshaws on the streets below waving the black-and-white "Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan" flags. They also carried yellow jerry cans -- a common receptacle for homemade bombs during the 20-year war against US-led forces. Celebrations were organised across the country, although a military parade like the one held with much fanfare last year at the Bagram airbase, once the linchpin for US-led operations, was cancelled without public explanation. A gathering was held instead at the enormous Loya Jirga Hall in Kabul, where hundreds of men listened to ministers praise the government's achievements. Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada, who remains largely secluded in the southern Taliban heartland of Kandahar, did not attend but, in a statement read by a spokesman, hailed the return of security to Afghanistan. "Our people were saved from corruption, oppression, usurpation, narcotics, theft, plunder and looting in the light of Islamic laws," the statement said. "A positive environment was created for the rebuilding and reconstruction of Afghanistan." The speeches did not mention the steep challenges facing a country gripped by one of the world's worst humanitarian crises, according to the United Nations. In Jalalabad in the east, farmer Zabihullah -- who like many Afghans only uses one name -- celebrated the Taliban takeover but also hoped authorities would address poverty and unemployment. "They should address the bad situation in the country, because of unemployment poor Afghans are going from one country to another, some die, some are detained, it is a chaotic situation," the 45-year-old told AFP. The Taliban government remains largely isolated on the global stage over restrictions imposed under their severe interpretation of Islamic law, with women facing restrictions the UN has deemed "gender apartheid". The International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants in July for two senior Taliban leaders, accusing them of crimes against humanity over the persecution of women and girls who are banned from most education and work. Women and girls are also barred from parks and gyms, and from travelling without a male guardian. The Taliban authorities scored a victory in July when Russia became the first country to officially recognise their administration. Kabul also enjoys close ties with China, Qatar and several Central Asian states. The Taliban government has reported talks in Kabul with officials from Western states, including Norway, Britain and the United States. International Crisis Group analyst Ibraheem Bahiss said women's rights are still important to the international community but other issues, particularly security, take precedence. "Even Europe -- because it has a core interest with migration -- has continued to pursue engagement," he told AFP, although discussions with Taliban authorities on women's rights were "a complete non-starter". The Taliban authorities have almost no internal opposition but struggle with economic fragility, international aid cuts and the influx of four million Afghans expelled from neighbouring countries. The Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA) condemned any engagement with the Taliban authorities in a statement. Contrary to its claims, RAWA said, the Taliban government "is not dedicated to ensuring peace and human dignity but is bent on destroying the last vestiges of our people's most basic rights". Independent experts appointed by the UN Human Rights Council called on the international community on Thursday not to normalise relations with the Taliban authorities and to reject their "violent and authoritarian rule". "Operating without legitimacy, the Taliban enforces an institutionalised system of gender oppression, crushes dissent, exacts reprisals, and muzzles independent media," they said in a statement. The Taliban government in Afghanistan has remained largely isolated on the world stage over restrictions it has imposed under its strict interpretation of Islamic law, particularly on women and girls AFP
