
Forget Scotland in Europe. It is the UK which deals with Brussels now
That has not forestalled SNP protests. In the Holyrood chamber, Angus Robertson noted that the EU deal had been reached 'without the explicit agreement' of the devolved Scottish Government. That was, he said, 'an affront to devolution'.
Responding, Labour's Neil Bibby said the External Affairs Minister was 'miserable, opportunistic and inconsistent.' For the Tories, Tim Eagle said the SNP would take Scotland back into the Common Fisheries Policy – an outcome he called a 'horror show'.
Read more by Brian Taylor
Mr Robertson's objection was that fisheries, as a topic, is devolved to Holyrood. Yet it had featured in the EU deal without any consultation with the Scottish Government. He listed the meetings, cancelled by Whitehall, when the topic could have been raised.
UK Government sources say this is limp nonsense. They say the Scottish Government was consulted in generic terms, including at a meeting just prior to the talks, while conceding that there was no specific involvement in the negotiations, not least because the fisheries issue was concluded around midnight on the eve of the London summit.
They say the Scottish Government has 'tied itself in knots' over the issue, contriving to end up on the same side as Nigel Farage. To examine this issue, we need to delve back into history – and catch the scent of that devolutionary fudge.
As I recall, the aroma first arose in the run-up to the creation of the Scottish Parliament. Importance was attached to a role for the devolved legislature in the European Union. (The UK was, of course, still a member at that point.)
The question was how to balance those devolved aspirations with the reality that it was the United Kingdom which was the EU member state. It was the UK which had an audience in Brussels.
The result? Fudge. The 1997 White Paper which led to devolution stated that relations with Europe were 'the responsibility of the United Kingdom Parliament and Government'.
There is no real role for the Scottish Government in Westminster's dealings with the EU (Image: free) However it added that 'the Scottish Parliament and Executive will have an important role' in areas where EU business affected devolved areas.
There were encouraging words about the involvement of Edinburgh. There was talk of the 'spirit of collaboration'. But there was also emphasis upon the need for a common UK position. Upon ultimate UK sovereignty.
In the early years of devolution, there was the Sewel Convention: that the UK would not normally legislate in devolved matters without Edinburgh consent. But that eroded over time – and the UK Supreme Court ruled in 2017 that the Convention was just that. A convention, potentially significant but with no justiciable force.
Post Brexit, EU laws were repatriated to the UK. Scottish Ministers complained that this was done without the agreement of the Scottish Parliament.
Which brings us to today. Fisheries are still devolved. But, arising from the 1998 Scotland Act, relations with the EU are reserved to the UK. (There was no room for fudge in statute.)
The 1997 White Paper vaunted UK clout as an EU member state. The UK later left the EU. Politically contentious – but irrelevant to power. It is sovereignty which counts.
You may say that EU access to UK (primarily Scottish) fishing waters was sensibly traded for other gains – including speedier market access for salmon and other seafood from our shores.
You may say that it was a treacherous sell-out. Either way, it is clear that the lingering Sewel concept is now utterly consigned to history. It is clear that continuing relations with the EU – from outwith the EU – are, in practice, a matter for the UK Government.
There will still be talk, as there was in that 1997 White Paper, of consulting and involving Holyrood. But, in the final analysis, little remains of the White Paper concept of collaborative endeavour.
Read more
Again, to be clear, that applies regardless of the content of the deal. For example, Angus Robertson only launched his attack on the UK Government – after welcoming aspects of the London agreement, other than fisheries.
If anything, there is a sharper dilemma for the devolved government in Wales. Led by Labour's Eluned Morgan. Critics there also seized upon the constitutional question, saying that she had allowed the Senedd to be entirely sidelined.
Of necessity, Baroness Morgan's response featured caveats. She welcomed the details of the deal, praising the efforts of her party colleague, the Prime Minister. She said it would bring Wales 'more opportunity for jobs and growth'.
But she noted, obliquely, that she would have 'liked more discussion' between the Welsh and UK governments over the issue of fishing.
Not going to happen, in practice. We are back to statute and sovereignty. Not White Paper fudge. External relations, including with the EU, rest with the UK.
Which, to repeat, offers clarity. John Swinney said this week that the only way to protect Scottish fishing now lay with independence. Critics say that rejoining the CFP would involve further concessions.
There is, then, a fundamental dispute. Independence versus the Union. Equally, though, there is practical co-operation within the devolved structure.
Only this week, the Scottish Secretary Ian Murray announced increasing borrowing powers for Holyrood. He published a report setting out the efforts of UK Departments, such as HMRC and the DWP, to ease devolved tax and benefits functions.
In return, the Scottish Government and other devolved administrations work closely and daily with Whitehall, in the common public interest.
A straightforward constitutional choice, then. Ian Murray says 'working collaboratively with the Scottish Government' is a key part of the Starmer plan for change.
John Swinney says he will govern sensibly and consensually within devolved powers – but invites us to consider how much more could be achieved under independence. All clear?
Brian Taylor is a former political editor for BBC Scotland and a columnist for The Herald. He cherishes his family, the theatre - and Dundee United FC
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
11 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Coalition push for ministers answers after energy project summit snub
It comes after both Scottish energy secretary Gillian Martin and UK energy minister and Rutherglen MP Michael Shanks 'snubbed' an invitation to attend a summit in Inverness on Tuesday attended by around 300 people. Ms Martin's office told the convention in a letter that "in terms of the ministerial code, it would not be appropriate to discuss matters pertaining to live applications or proposals which could come before a live application for consent". A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero source said Mr Shanks had turned the convention down as planning of development was devolved to the Scottish Government, although the convention wanted to talk about policy. The convention's 'unified statement' calls for a pause on all major applications, " given the impact upon our communities which may hasten depopulation in some areas until a clear national energy policy is in place and an economic impact assessment is undertaken given that tourism is currently the backbone of The Highland economy". It opposes "unjust and unnecessary industrialisation of the Highlands" and says the Scottish Government should undertake an inquiry to address the cumulative impact of all major renewable energy infrastructure developments. The group also called on elected members to urgent support and protect communities at national level "given that community consultation is inadequate and local democracy is being overridden..." The group of 11 MPs and MSPs have now signed off on an undertaking to move to secure parliamentary debates on the statement. There were estimated to be 700 live applications in the Highland Council area alone earlier this month ranging from wind and hydro projects to energy storage and transmission grid plans. The signed agreement (Image: Helen Crawford) Highland councillor Helen Crawford, who is chairman community council convention and is a former lawyer said parliamentary debates would force ministers to defend policies. "This is a way to get ministers to address the issues when they previously have not," said Ms Crawford. "Of course not everyone shares the same view, but this is a growing movement because people want this and need this conversation to happen. "The statement is not perfect. But it's a real attempt to address where the whole process has gone wrong and, let me be frank, this is not simply a local failure, it's a national failure to address what's going on.! She added: "This clearly needs to go to Westminster and it needs to go to Holyrood." Those signing off on the undertaking also included SNP MP Graham Leadbitter, Scottish Conservative MSPs Jamie Halcro Johnston, Edward Mountain, Tim Eagle and Douglas Ross as well as Liberal Democrat MPs Jamie Stone and Angus MacDonald and Independent MSP Fergus Ewing. Among the most controversial of the energy plans is a so-called 'super-pylon' proposal which was to run for over 100 miles across some of Highlands and Aberdeenshire's most picturesque areas to enable 'significant' growth of renewable energy and support transition away from fossil fuels. Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks Transmission, which owns, operates and develops the high voltage electricity transmission system in the north of Scotland and islands unveiled the strategy three years ago which it says was a 'critical project of national significance' as it has been identified as 'essential' to deliver government targets for offshore wind. The project at that point was to involve building a new 400kV overhead line connection - or energy motorway - between Beauly, Blackhillock, New Deer and Peterhead to enable the transmission of renewable power into the network for onward transmission to 'areas of demand further south'. Mr Eagle said: "It really is well past time that ministers and other decision-makers in Holyrood started listening to people here in the Highlands. We have been ignored for far too long."


Scotsman
37 minutes ago
- Scotsman
GERS figures: Scotland's public spending deficit rises to £26.5 billion
There was an estimated deficit of 11.7 per cent of GDP in 2024/25, compared to 5.1 per cent for the UK Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scotland's public spending deficit has risen to £26.5 billion amid falling North Sea revenue. The latest annual Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) report shows there was an estimated deficit of 11.7 per cent of GDP in 2024/25, compared to 5.1 per cent for the UK. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad An oil rig in the North Sea | PA In 2023/24, the estimated deficit stood at £22.7 billion. It was £15.1 billion, or 8.6 per cent of GDP, before Covid. The Scottish Government said falling North Sea revenue had contributed to a deterioration in Scotland's net fiscal balance. UK ministers said the figures showed Scotland benefits by £2,669 more per head of additional spending compared to the UK average. This is an increase of £358 on the previous year. SNP Finance Secretary Shona Robison said: 'The decisions we have taken here in Scotland are helping support sustainable public finances. For the fourth year in a row, devolved revenues have grown faster than devolved expenditure. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK, with the third highest revenue per person in the UK, behind only London and the South East. 'The GERS statistics reflect only the current constitutional arrangements – of Scotland as part of the UK – and not an independent Scotland with its own policy, decisions on defence spending and the economy. 'GERS allocates Scotland a population share of reserved UK spending rather than accounting for real expenditure. For example, UK defence expenditure is listed as £5.1 billion, but only £2.1 billion was actually spent with industry in Scotland in 2023-24. 'Being taken out of the EU, against the will of the people of Scotland, has also hit Scotland's revenues by £2.3 billion and the higher cost of UK government debt adds £500 million to the deficit. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Falling oil prices and a decrease in extraction present challenges going forward, but we are clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with our climate change commitments and energy security.' Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: 'These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom and how Scotland benefits from the redistribution of wealth inside the UK. 'By sharing resources with each other across the UK, Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head in public spending than the UK average. It also means that devolved Governments have the financial heft of the wider UK behind them when taking decisions. 'That means more money for schools, hospitals and policing, if the Scottish Parliament chooses to invest in those areas. People in Scotland will rightly expect to see better outcomes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'These figures also underline that the Scottish Government's policy of full fiscal autonomy would mean turbo-charged austerity and economic chaos for Scotland. That's why the UK Government will stand up for the pooling and sharing resources across the UK as part of our Plan for Change - to grow the economy and put more money in working people's pockets.'


Scotsman
37 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Highlands renewables debate set for Westminster and Holyrood after 11 politicians back 'urgent calls'
Momentum is building to put pressure on the UK and Scottish Governments to debate the future of renewable projects in the Highlands. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A convention calling for 'urgent debate' on renewable energy projects in the Highlands has won backing from eleven politicians. Some 57 community councils gathered in Inverness to encourage policy makers to take residents' concerns to Holyrood and Westminster. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The packed-out convention on Tuesday was the second of its kind. Hundreds from community councils across the Highlands gather with MPs and MSPs at a convention on renewable energy projects in the Highlands | Supplied The event's aim was to persuade policy makers to recognise the value of community councils and their role in local democracy and to push for 'urgent debates' on Net Zero-related projects in the Highlands in the debating chambers in both Edinburgh and London. Follow Hay's Way updates via Katharine's Instagram page and by signing up to her free Scotsman Rural newsletter here. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Eleven MSPs and MPs in attendance signed a statement backing the move, including Labour MP Torcuil Crichton, SNP MSPs Maree Todd Emma Roddick, Scottish Conservative MSPs Edward Mountain and Douglas Ross, Tim Eagle, Jamie Halcro Johnston, Scottish Lib Dems Angus MacDonald and Jamie Stone and Independent MSP Fergus Ewing. The signed document included calls for the Scottish Government to undertake a planning inquiry commission to address the cumulative impact of all major renewable energy infrastructure developments and a pause on all applications until a clear national energy policy is in place and an economic impact assessment undertaken. Conservative councillor Helen Crawford, who has led both conventions, said the community councils represented recognise the impact of climate change but 'oppose an unjust and unnecessary industrialisation of the Highlands.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Councillor Helen Crawford and the statement signed by eleven MSPs and MPs to secure "urgent debates" at both Holyrood and Westminster | Helen Crawford Speaking to The Scotsman after the event, Ms Crawford said: 'The convention was a step forward for local democracy. 'I'm delighted that this important communique, which I drafted after listening to community councils for many months, has been signed cross-party by 11 Highland MPs and MSPs. 'That's a significant cross-party commitment to respect local democracy and get the convention's unified statement debated urgently in both Holyrood and Westminster. 'It's now up to our MPs and MSPs to secure those debates. And to fully address the need for a pan Scotland Planning Inquiry Commission so that the full cumulative impact of all of these major energy applications can be assessed, rather than the current piece meal approach. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'And to pause while both Governments do their homework - and publish a standalone, holistic national energy policy.' It comes after John Swinney responded to a letter signed by 40 different community groups across Scotland calling for a moratorium on major renewable developments. The first minister rejected these calls, saying there is 'a pressing need to increase our renewable generation capacity', with electricity demand expected to increase. Last week, the UK Government announced those living near new pylons, including Scots, would receive £250 off energy bills each year for a decade under UK government plans. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Department of Energy Security and Net Zero is launching a consultation into proposals included in the Planning and Infrastructure Bill to provide payments to households affected by the new pylon developments. Households within 500m - a third of a mile - of new or upgraded electricity transmission infrastructure could receive a discount of up to £250 via their electricity bill every year for ten years, totalling £2,500. The discounts, which would be assigned to the home, and applied to the occupant, could be provided in instalments of £125 every six months.