‘Essex Boys' triple killer Michael Steele released from prison
Michael Steele was jailed for life in 1998 for the killings of Tony Tucker, Pat Tate and Craig Rolfe, which he denied, alongside co-defendant Jack Whomes.
The three men were found shot dead in a Range Rover in Rettendon, near Chelmsford, Essex, in 1995.
Pat Tate, Tony Tucker and Craig Rolfe were shot dead in a 1995 triple gangland killing which came to be known as the 'Essex Boys' murders (Essex Police/PA)
A Parole Board panel decided in February to free Steele, now in his 80s, because his imprisonment was 'no longer necessary for the protection of the public' but Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood challenged the decision and asked for his case to be reviewed again on the grounds the decision was legally irrational.
Steele was released from prison in May, the MoJ confirmed.
A spokesperson for the government department said: 'Our thoughts remain with the family and friends of Craig Rolfe, Tony Tucker and Pat Tate.
'This decision was made by the independent Parole Board after a thorough risk assessment.
'Michael Steele will be on licence for the rest of his life, with strict conditions and intensive probation supervision. He faces an immediate return to prison if he breaks the rules.'
The killings took place after a row over a drug deal, prosecutors said, and the case later inspired the 2000 film Essex Boys, starring Sean Bean.
The decision in February to release Steele came in the second review by the Parole Board following the end of his initial minimum term of 23 years' imprisonment.
Police search a remote lane in Rettendon, Essex, in 1995 after the bodies of Tony Tucker, Pat Tate and Craig Rolfe were found inside a Range Rover (PA)
He had not been assessed as suitable for formal risk-reduction interventions while in prison, 'partly through lack of need and partly because he had maintained his innocence of involvement in the murders', the Parole Board's summary said.
It added that risk factors for Steele at the time of his offending included his 'criminal lifestyle, involvement with drugs and association with the wrong people'.
But the Parole Board also found that Steele's behaviour in prison had shown 'marked improvement' and none of the witnesses considered risks would be imminent if he was released into the community.
Strict licence conditions were set out for Steele, including to live at a designated address, be of good behaviour, provide financial and business details, give up his passport, and be subject to electronic tagging and a specified curfew.
There were additional restrictions relating to the use of electronic technology, contact with the media or other publications, and not to own a boat, plane or firearm.
The Parole Board decided Whomes, then aged 59, could be released in 2021.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Cardiff Council admits responsibility for data breach that led to parents' email addresses being leaked
Cardiff Council admits responsibility for data breach that led to parents' email addresses being leaked The data breach, which was caused by a human error, led to parents' email addresses being leaked Cardiff Council admitted responsibility for a data breach that led to email addresses being leaked (Image: PA ) Cardiff Council admitted responsibility for a data breach that led to the email addresses of parents being leaked. Parents in Cardiff who are eligible for Childcare Offer for Wales funding received an email from the council in May ahead of the summer half term. The local authority said that an error caused all recipients of the email to be copied into the 'to' field instead of the 'bcc' (blind carbon copy) field. Later that same day a follow-up email was sent to all the recipients to apologise for the error and to ask them to delete the original email. A Cardiff Council spokesman said: "Cardiff Council is aware that a data breach occurred on May 15 this year. "The breach resulted from human error and Cardiff Council's reporting procedures were followed promptly and appropriately in line with data protection protocols. "Cardiff Council remains committed to continuous improvement in data handling practices and staff awareness to prevent recurrence." The Childcare Offer for Wales aims to help parents with childcare costs and eligible parents can claim up to 30 hours of early education and childcare a week for up to 48 weeks a year. Article continues below Local authorities in Wales are responsible for implementing the scheme in their areas. For more Cardiff stories, sign up to our newsletters here. Cardiff Council's recall email to recipients following the data breach on May 15 was sent out at 4.33pm. It read: "You will have received an email... on 15/05/2025 at 10:05am titled 'Childcare Offer Funding: Holiday Periods | Cyllid Cynnig Gofal Plant: Cynodau Gwyliau'. "The content of this email, which includes information on setting up an online funding agreement, is provided below. "We kindly request that you delete the original email due to an error that caused all recipients to be copied into the TO field instead of the Bcc field. "We sincerely apologise for this mistake and have taken measures to prevent such breaches in the future." A separate data breach involving Cardiff Council, which saw the details of vulnerable children the local authority looks after being compromised, was reported on in March. Read more about that here. Members of the council's governance and audit committee were told about the data breach by a council official at a meeting on Tuesday, March 25. The Local Democracy Reporting Service understands that the information was taken in a breach that affected Data Cymru. Article continues below At the time Data Cymru was asked for the type of data that was compromised, when the breach occurred, and what was done to resolve the issue. Cardiff Council was also given an opportunity to respond.
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Parents are being warned about a new dangerous craze 'chroming' that is claiming the lives of children
Parents are being warned about a new dangerous craze 'chroming' that is claiming the lives of children It has already caused the death of a child in UK and parents are being warned of the dangers The dangerous trend has led to the loss off life of young people across the world (Image: PA ) A Welsh school has warned parents about the dangers of new online craze that has been targeting teens called Chroming. But what does it mean exactly? Safer Schools, a safeguarding initiative says that chroming refers to act where a person inhales chemicals like aerosols, nitrous oxide, solvents, and nitrites. While doing this might result in a temporary 'high', it can also lead to deadly consequences like heart and lung damage. These substances can also cause harm to a person's brain, and behavioural development. Although the abuse of these chemicals in such a way is not new, the way the trend is spreading among teens over social media is what raised concern. What has been the impact of this trend? The trend has already resulted in loss of life among teenagers across the world, including one in the UK when a 11-year-old-boy in Lancashire died after following the trend. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here On November 8, 2023, UK government had updated its laws classifying nitrous oxide as a Class C drug entailing criminal penalties for those abuse it. Still, as the chemicals that are misused in chroming are widely available is common household items like glue, permanent markers, and deodorant cans, it is harder to regulate. Article continues below Why are young people using it? Safer Schools states that children and young people might be enticed to engage in this craze due to its feeling (intoxication), thrill seeking, media influence, or peer pressure. How are young people using it? There are several ways in which people use to inhale the chemicals while chroming, which also makes it challenging to control dosage significantly increasing the risk. Spraying – This involves spraying the contents of an aerosol container directly into the mouth or nose. Bagging – This method entails spraying the contents of an aerosol container into a paper or plastic bag, which is then held over the person's mouth or nose for inhalation. Sniffing – This involves inhaling the fumes directly from the container. Huffing – This method involves soaking a rag with the inhalant and holding it to the face for inhalation What does the school's warning say? In a letter addressed to parents and carers, Coleg Cymunedol Y Dderwen, in Bridgend, has said: 'We are reaching out to raise urgent awareness about a disturbing trend currently circulating among teenagers on social media, particularly TikTok, known as 'chroming." 'This emerging craze has already led to serious health consequences for some young people and in some tragic cases, loss of life. We believe it's vital for parents and carers of secondary school students to be fully informed.' It adds: 'It is particularly dangerous because it can be done relatively quickly using products that are easily accessible in most homes. Article continues below 'Young people may not fully understand the severity of the risks, especially when they see others engaging in the activity online without apparent consequences.' The school also said that it strongly encourages cares to speak directly to their ward about the issue and help them make safe and informed decisions.
Wales Online
6 hours ago
- Wales Online
Four people injured at Liverpool parade named for first time
Four people injured at Liverpool parade named for first time A car was driven into crowds as Liverpool fans celebrated the club's Premier League title win An inflatable field tent at the scene in Water Street near the Liver Building in Liverpool (Image: Peter Byrne/PA ) Four people who were injured when a car was driven into crowds at Liverpool's Premier League victory parade can be named after reporting restrictions were lifted by a court. Paul Doyle, 53, is charged with seven offences in connection with the crash, which happened on Water Street in the city centre as thousands of fans were gathered for the football team celebrations just after 6pm on May 26. He is accused of the unlawful wounding with intent of Simon Nash, 52, causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) with intent to Susan Passey, 77, and Christine Seeckts, 66, and the attempted GBH of Ethan Gillard, 18. An order preventing publication of their identities was put in place when Doyle first appeared before magistrates in Liverpool on Friday. On Tuesday, Recorder of Liverpool Judge Andrew Menary KC lifted restrictions, which had been made under Section 46 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. Doyle is charged with another count of wounding with intent and a second count of attempted GBH, which both relate to children, for whom reporting restrictions remain in place. Article continues below Doyle is also charged with dangerous driving. He is alleged to have driven his Ford Galaxy Titanium dangerously on roads between his home address in Burghill Road and Water Street. He was not required to attend the court hearing on Tuesday. On Friday, Doyle appeared before magistrates in the morning, before a crown court appearance in the afternoon. Article continues below Judge Menary fixed a trial date for November 24 and remanded the defendant in custody ahead of a plea hearing on August 14. Earlier this week, Merseyside Police said the number of people reported injured after the incident had risen to 109. Four people remained in hospital on Monday.
