COTA board approves study regarding making bus system free
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – The Central Ohio Transit Authority has commissioned a study to examine making the bus system free to use.
The COTA Board of Trustees voted at an April 14 meeting to approve a contract with the California-based consulting company Four Nines Technologies to conduct a 'No Fare Feasibility Study' for a cost not exceeding $319,946.
York Steak House in Columbus hailed as having the nation's best steaks
The study will examine the potential impacts of making the transit system completely free to use, or making rides free for certain groups, according to a resolution passed by the board. A standard bus ride costs $2, but fares may be cheaper or free for certain riders, such as children and students.
'COTA continues to receive questions from the community about the feasibility of moving from a transit system that charges customers fares to a system that charges zero fares or creates zero fare opportunities for identified groups,' the resolution reads. 'To provide meaningful, well-researched data to support answers to community questions, COTA must perform a deeper analysis of the long-term sustainability of a substantial change to the fare system.'
Fares make up about 17% of COTA's operating funds, according to the agency's 2023-2027 Short Range Transit Plan.
The study will begin on May 1 and conclude on Dec. 31. It will be paid for through the External Relations Division's operating budget for 2025, specifically with local funds, which includes income from sales tax revenue and fares.
Fast food chain Culver's plans new location in central Ohio
The study will analyze six specific areas, including the financial implications of transitioning to a no-fare or partial-fare system, potential needed changes to current operations, how underserved communities would be impacted, what technology would be needed for the transition, feedback from key stakeholders, and laws that may impact the change.
The completion of the study will not guarantee COTA will go fare free. The transit system has considered the idea before, when it commissioned a similar study from the law firm IceMiller in 2020.
That study was conducted amidst the COVID-19 pandemic and before voters approved LinkUs, a plan to modernize and expand COTA's current system through rapid transit lines, extended walkways and more. The 2020 analysis noted other cities that switched to a fare-free system – including Denver and Olympia, Washington — saw increased ridership.
Jeff Pullin, COTA's director of public and media relations, said he does not have any further information about the study to share at this time.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
More than 125,000 residents have fled NYC for Florida since 2020 — but don't count the Big Apple out just yet
Like Kurt Russell in his 1981 classic, a notable number of city dwellers have been trying to Escape from New York in recent years. Citizens Budget Commission (CBC) data gathered by New York Post suggests that over 125,000 residents have left the Big Apple for Florida since 2020. These expats took an estimated $13.8 billion aggregate income along with them. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) But Florida isn't the only state attracting New Yorkers in recent years. City residents have also moved to nearby states like New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and distant states like California and Texas. This level of out-migration could have a significant impact on the city's economy. Here's why the CBC report believes New York City is at an 'inflection point' and the trend could reverse. A city that loses residents also loses tax revenue. This problem is particularly acute in New York, which taxes its residents higher than most other parts of the country. On a per capita basis, the state of New York collected $12,751 in 2022, 79% higher than the national average and the highest among all 50 states, according to the CBC report. Out-migration in recent years could create a shortfall in tax revenue in the years ahead. The city's budget could see a gap ranging from $7.8 billion to $10.1 billion, according to the CBC's estimates. Faced with a gap in its coffers, city officials might have to make difficult decisions about how much they borrow or spend to manage city services. However, there are signs that the city's population and aggregate income is growing, which could mitigate some of this gap. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it New York City Mayor Eric Adams recently announced that the city's population decline was over and that the number of residents was on an upswing. The city's population grew in 2023 and 2024 and stands at 8,478,000 people as of March. International migration is a key reason for this reversal. While the city is losing some residents to other states, it's gaining residents from other countries in recent years, according to the CBC report. The growth in job opportunities has helped too. Since 2020, the number of healthcare and social assistance jobs in the city has increased by 27%, while jobs in financial activities, securities and transportation and warehousing also saw modest growth. The pushback on remote work in recent years could have pulled more employees back to the city as well. If these trends continue, New York's future may not be as gloomy as it once seemed. "The numbers do not lie. Our city's best days still lie ahead of us," Mayor Adams said in the press release. "Jobs are at their highest levels in city history, crime is down across the five boroughs and people are coming back to the greatest city on the globe. New York City has emerged from the darkest days of the pandemic and continues to take leaps towards a brighter future. Believe the hype: New York City is back." Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jobs at the Port of Los Angeles are down by half, executive director says
Job opportunities at the Port of Los Angeles are dwindling as President Trump's steep tariffs take a hit on global trade and a major economic engine for the regional economy. Nearly half of the longshoremen who support operations at the port went without work over the last two weeks, Gene Seroka, executive director of the Port of Los Angeles, said in an interview. The port processed 25% less cargo than forecast for the month of May, he said. Trump's tariffs have drastically stemmed the flow of goods into the U.S., driving down activity at the neighboring ports of L.A. and Long Beach, which collectively processed more than 20 million 20-foot-long cargo units last year. The two ports are the largest in the country and provide jobs for thousands of dockworkers, heavy equipment operators and truck drivers. But work has fallen off sharply in recent weeks. Over the last 25 work shifts, only 733 jobs were available for 1,575 longshoremen looking for work. Read more: Tariffs bring shipping slowdown, threatening trucking jobs at L.A. ports 'They haven't been laid off, but they're not working nearly as much as they did previously,' Seroka told The Times. 'Since the tariffs went into place, and in May specifically, we've really seen the work go off on the downside.' Marine terminal operators post available work opportunities, known as job orders, on a digital board at the port three times a day. Longshoremen can review the job orders at each shift and bid on the jobs they want to take. If there are more longshoremen than job orders, a portion of workers will go without pay. The average of 733 job orders posted over the past 25 shifts, which is equal to roughly two weeks, is unusually low. Ordinarily, between 1,700 and 2,000 job orders are posted during a typical day shift, and between 1,100 and 1,400 are posted during a standard night shift. Seroka attributed the decrease in job opportunities to lower cargo volume moving through the port. In May, 17 cargo ships canceled their planned trips to Los Angeles amid uncertainty over duties the Trump administration imposed worldwide. Although May is typically a busier month than April, this past May saw 18% less cargo processed than the month prior, according to port data. The falloff comes during a critical time in advance of the Christmas shopping season, orders for which are usually placed before July 1. Read more: U.S. representatives sound alarm over slowing port activity Conditions are not expected to significantly improve anytime soon. "The June numbers that we're projecting right now are nowhere near where they traditionally should be," Seroka said. An average of five ships have entered the port each day over the last week. This time of year, there would typically be between 10 and 12 ships in the port each day. 'The drop in cargo volume caused by Trump's tariffs will mean empty shelves when products don't reach our stores, rising prices on everything from groceries to clothes to cars, and undoubtedly, more Americans out of work,' U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla of California said in a news conference last month. The decline in shipping has broader ripple effects on L.A.'s logistics economy. A 2023 report found that the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach contributed $21.8 billion in direct revenue to local service providers, generating $2.7 billion in state and local taxes and creating 165,462 jobs, directly and indirectly. A decline of just 1% in cargo to the ports would wipe away 2,769 jobs and endanger as many as 4,000 others, the study found. Read more: 'It's going to hurt a lot.' How L.A.'s importers are navigating Trump's shifting tariffs Union officials could not be reached for comment on Friday but had previously predicted job losses for their members. 'Some of the workforce will not be getting their full 40 hours a week based on the loss of cargo,' Gary Herrera, president of the longshoremen union ILWU Local 13, warned last month. 'That is going to have an effect on the work opportunities for not just us, but for truck drivers, warehouse workers and logistics teams,' he said. The slowdown in activity at the ports of L.A. and Long Beach has also spread into surrounding communities. Businesses in the area rely on a robust community of port workers to frequent their establishments. "We're starting to hear from small businesses and restaurants in the harbor area that their customer patronage is trending downward," Seroka said. "Outside of COVID, this is the biggest drop I've seen in my career." Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge approves landmark college sports settlement
The corrupt system of denying payment to college athletes has officially ended. On Friday, Judge Claudia Wilken approved the settlement of multiple antitrust class-action lawsuits that challenged the longstanding refusal of the NCAA and its members to compensate athletes. Advertisement The deal includes $2.8 billion in payments to players over the past 10 years along with payments to players moving forward. This hardly ends the chaos currently consuming college sports. The major conferences have launched the College Sports Commission (which is different from the presidential commission that was under consideration for like a week) to regulate NIL collectives that have in many instances become pay-for-play programs. Here's the problem. Any collective action by independent businesses that restrict the earning capacity of the athletes potentially creates a fresh antitrust problem. Friday's settlement resolves (in theory) the manner in which the schools will directly compensate players. The NIL issue is separate. Advertisement And it should be open season, thanks to the American system of free enterprise. That's why the colleges want the federal government to throw them a lifeline with legislation that would include an antitrust exemption. The only truly effective solution would come from creating a nationwide union and negotiating rules regarding key issues like compensation limits and transfer rights. With that, however, the players would have the ability to secure protections against, for instance, unlimited padded practices and a year-round schedule of intense workouts that leave the players with very little time to themselves — especially relative to pro athletes. So the settlemen isn't the end. It's more like the end of the beginning, with plenty more work to be done.
