Russia downplays nuclear risk after Trump's submarine deployment
President Vladimir Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the move as an emotional reaction rather than a significant shift in military dynamics between the rival powers.
"It's clear that US submarines are always on alert in any case," Peskov was quoted as saying by Russian state news agency TASS.
He cautioned all sides to exercise restraint when it comes to nuclear rhetoric.
Trump said on Friday he ordered the deployment in response to threats made by former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. Medvedev, now deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, has drawn attention for his hardline and provocative statements since the start of the war in Ukraine.
"In any country, members of its leadership have different working points of view on current events and have different attitudes. There are people who are very, very harshly minded both in the United States of America and in European countries," Peskov said, referring to Medvedev.
"In our country, foreign policy is formulated by the head of state: President Putin."
Peskov also acknowledged efforts by Trump and the US to help bring an end to the war in Ukraine. He said it was possible that Putin might meet Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, later this week.
Trump has given Moscow a deadline to end the conflict, initially 50 days, which he has since shortened. According to US officials, the revised deadline is set to expire on Friday. Trump has threatened sanctions if Russia does not comply.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Southeast Asia Looks for Clarity From U.S. on ‘Rules of Origin'
Southeast Asian officials spent the past few days praising President Trump's tariffs as a win, saying that they could now compete fairly with their neighbors and that their businesses could plan for the future. But though tariffs for Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam are set at around 20 percent, those countries still face a cloud of uncertainty as negotiations grind on. The biggest concern: details surrounding the 40 percent tariff on so-called transshipments of products from China, and especially what percentage of Chinese-made components would set it off. Although the countries have taken steps to crack down on the practice, they say the Trump administration has not defined clearly what it regards as a transshipped product. This has implications for Southeast Asia because Chinese manufacturers have long set up factories in the region, and many of the goods made in them use components that are made in China. Exactly how the United States plans to determine whether a product from Thailand, for example, would qualify for a 19 percent tariff or a 40 percent levy is not clear. Senior officials in Southeast Asia say the United States is setting its criteria for so-called rules of origin unilaterally to define what constitutes a locally made product, based on a calculation that involves raw materials, overhead productions and the cost of labor. 'We explained to them that, if they put a very high percentage, we will not qualify, because we don't have our upstream industry yet, so we need to improve and diversify our supply chains,' said Sun Chanthol, Cambodia's deputy prime minister and lead trade negotiator. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Trump may look like he's winning the trade war, but hurdles remain
By Andrea Shalal WASHINGTON (Reuters) -At a glance, U.S. President Donald Trump appears to be winning the trade war he unleashed after returning to the White House in January, bending major trading partners to his will, imposing double-digit tariff rates on nearly all imports, narrowing the trade deficit, and raking in tens of billions of dollars a month in much-needed cash for federal government coffers. Significant hurdles remain, however, including whether U.S. trading partners will make good on investment and goods-purchase commitments, how much tariffs will drive up inflation or stymie demand and growth, and whether the courts allow many of his ad-hoc levies to stand. On inauguration day, the effective U.S. tariff rate was about 2.5%. It has since jumped to somewhere between 17% and 19%, according to a range of estimates. The Atlantic Council estimates it will edge closer to 20%, the highest in a century, with higher duties taking effect on Thursday. Trading partners have largely refrained from retaliatory tariffs, sparing the global economy from a more painful tit-for-tat trade war. Data on Tuesday showed a 16% narrowing of the U.S. trade deficit in June, while the U.S. trade gap with China shrank to its smallest in more than 21 years. American consumers have shown themselves to be more resilient than expected, but some recent data indicate the tariffs are already affecting jobs, growth and inflation. "The question is, what does winning mean?" said Josh Lipsky, who heads economic studies at the Atlantic Council. "He's raising tariffs on the rest of the world and avoiding a retaliatory trade war far easier than even he anticipated, but the bigger question is what effect does that have on the U.S. economy." Michael Strain, head of economic policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said Trump's geopolitical victories could prove hollow. "In a geopolitical sense, Trump's obviously getting tons of concessions from other countries, but in an economic sense, he's not winning the trade war," he said. "What we're seeing is that he is more willing to inflict economic harm on Americans than other countries are willing to inflict on their nations. And I think of that as losing." Kelly Ann Shaw, a White House trade adviser during Trump's first term who is now a partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, said a still-strong economy and near-record-high stock prices "support a more aggressive tariff strategy." But Trump's tariffs, tax cuts, deregulation and policies to boost energy production would take time to play out. "I think history will judge these policies, but he is the first president in my lifetime to make major changes to the global trading system," she added. DEALS SO FAR Trump has concluded eight framework agreements with the European Union, Japan, Britain, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan and the Philippines that impose tariffs on their goods ranging from 10% to 20%. That's well short of the "90 deals in 90 days" administration officials had touted in April, but they account for some 40% of U.S. trade flows. Adding in China, currently saddled with a 30% levy on its goods but likely to win another reprieve from even higher tariffs before an August 12 deadline, would raise that to nearly 54%. Deals aside, many of Trump's tariff actions have been mercurial. On Wednesday he ratcheted up pressure on India, doubling new tariffs on goods from there to 50% from 25% because of its imports of oil from Russia. The same rate is in store for goods from Brazil, after Trump complained about its prosecution of former leader Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally. And Switzerland, which Trump had previously praised, is facing 39% tariffs after a conversation between its leader and Trump derailed a deal. Ryan Majerus, a trade lawyer who worked in both the first Trump administration and the Biden government, said what's been announced so far fails to address "longstanding, politically entrenched trade issues" that have bothered U.S. policymakers for decades, and getting there would likely take "months, if not years." He also noted they lack specific enforcement mechanisms for the big investments announced, including $550 billion for Japan and $600 billion for the EU. PROMISES AND RISKS Critics lit into European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen after she agreed to a 15% tariff during a surprise meeting with Trump during his trip to Scotland last month, while gaining little in return. The deal frustrated winemakers and farmers, who had sought a zero-for-zero tariff. Francois-Xavier Huard, head of France's FNIL national dairy sector federation, said 15% was better than the threatened 30%, but would still cost dairy farmers millions of euros. European experts say von der Leyen's move did avert higher tariffs, calmed tensions with Trump, averting potentially higher duties on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and cars, while making largely symbolic pledges to buy $750 billion of U.S. strategic goods and invest over $600 billion. Meeting those pledges will fall to individual EU members and companies, and cannot be mandated by Brussels, trade experts and analysts note. U.S. officials insist Trump can re-impose higher tariffs if he believes the EU, Japan or others are not honoring their commitments. But it remains unclear how that would be policed. And history offers a caution. China, with its state-run economy, never met its modest purchase agreements under Trump's Phase 1 U.S.-China trade deal. Holding it to account proved difficult for the subsequent Biden administration. "All of it is untested. The EU, Japan and South Korea are going to have to figure out how to operationalize this," Shaw said. "It's not just government purchases. It's getting the private sector motivated to either make investments or back loans, or to purchase certain commodities." And lastly, the main premise for the tariffs Trump has imposed unilaterally faces legal challenges. His legal team met with stiff questioning during appellate court oral arguments over his novel use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets, to justify his tariffs. A ruling could come any time and regardless of the outcome seems destined to be settled ultimately by the Supreme Court. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What we know about Trump and Putin's Ukraine ceasefire face-to-face meeting
The US and Russian presidents are set to discuss the ongoing war in Ukraine in a face-to-face meeting Donald Trump is set to meet with Vladimir Putin 'in the coming days' to discuss the ongoing war in Ukraine, officials in Russia have said. News of a possible face-to-face meeting between the US and Russian presidents was first touted by Trump and the White House on Wednesday. The New York Times reported that Trump told European leaders during a call on Wednesday that he intended to meet with Putin and then follow up with a further meeting that would include Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump told reporters: 'There's a good chance that there will be a meeting very soon.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also said: 'The Russians expressed their desire to meet with president Trump, and the president is open to meeting with both president Putin and president Zelensky.' On Thursday, the Kremlin confirmed the meeting is planned for the next few days, marking the first summit between leaders of the two countries since 2021. But he did not comment on the possibility of another meeting including Zelensky. According to the Interfax news agency, Moscow's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said: 'At the suggestion of the American side, an agreement was essentially reached to hold a bilateral meeting at the highest level in the coming days, that is, a meeting between president Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. 'We are now beginning concrete preparations together with our American colleagues.' No details have been given as to where the summit would take place but a possible venue could be the United Arab Emirates, where Putin is due to fly to on Thursday for a meeting with its president. News of the meeting comes days before the deadline set by Trump for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or face new sanctions runs out. Trump has been increasingly frustrated with Putin over the lack of progress towards peace and has threatened to impose heavy tariffs on countries that buy Russian exports, including oil.
