Japan Party Leaders Face Off Over No-Confidence Motion; Opposition Hesitant Amid Tariff Negotiations With U.S.
Yomiuri Shimbun photos
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, right, and Constitutional Democratic Party leader Yoshihiko Noda participate in the party leader debate at the Diet in Tokyo on Wednesday.
A tense standoff took place during a debate between party leaders in the Diet on Wednesday as the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and the main opposition party grappled with a potential no-confidence motion against the Cabinet of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba.
Ishiba, who also serves as LDP president, and Yoshihiko Noda, president of the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, waged a war of nerves at the final party leader debate of the current Diet session.
Noda took a confrontational stance, despite appearing inclined to forgo the no-confidence motion, but he lacked vigor. This highlighted his struggle to keep the CDPJ at an appropriate distance from the government and the ruling bloc.
Arguments lacked depth
During the debate, Noda emphasized measures to combat rising prices. He asserted that the approach taken by Ishiba Cabinet's tended to 'understand the issues but either postpones [taking steps] or does nothing.'
However, Noda noticeably lacked depth in the pursuit of individual issues.
He pressed for the consumption tax rate on food to be reduced to 0%, which is one of the CDPJ's campaign pledges for the House of Councillors election.
However, Ishiba rejected a possible tax cut, saying: 'Mr. Noda understands the significance of the consumption tax better than anyone. I respect him as a politician.'
Noda questioned Ishiba about the Japan-U.S. tariff negotiations, asking, 'Is there a prospect of reaching an agreement on main points?' Ishiba remained unruffled and responded: 'We are making progress one step at a time. Ultimately, [U.S.] President [Donald Trump] will make the decision.'
Noda wavering
Noda failed to fully commit to a confrontational stance, as he hesitated about submitting a no-confidence motion.
The CDPJ has submitted no-confidence motions in ordinary Diet sessions every year since 2018, except in 2020, when priority was given to COVID-19 countermeasures.
Under a minority government, the opposition can pass such a motion if it is united. Normally, this would be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for the opposition to bring about a change of government.
Noda had hinted at submitting a motion but began to waver, questioning whether such a political decision was appropriate amid ongoing tariff negotiations with the United States, which is considered a national crisis.
If Japan-U.S. tariff negotiations continue even after their bilateral summit meeting — scheduled on the sideline of the Group of Seven summit from Sunday to Tuesday — the CDPJ could face public criticism if a political vacuum emerges from the passage of a no-confidence motion. Furthermore, if the tariff negotiations are successful, that would also make it difficult for the party to submit such a motion.
On the other hand, there are simmering voices within the CDPJ to demonstrate a more aggressive and confrontational stance by submitting the motion. Noda had even told aides before the party leader debate that he was genuinely struggling with the decision of whether to submit the motion.
Avoiding dissolution
If a no-confidence motion is submitted, some within the government and the LDP believe the House of Representatives should be dissolved without a vote on the motion. But junior coalition partner Komeito opposes holding simultaneous elections for both houses.
Nevertheless, if a no-confidence motion passes, Ishiba would have no choice but to either dissolve the lower house or see his Cabinet resign en masse. Many within the ruling party believe there would be no option but dissolution if it passed.
The prime minister wants to avoid the political vacuum caused by dissolution, and intends to courteously respond to talks between the ruling and opposition party leaders on tariff negotiations around the time of the G7 Summit. Ishiba is trying to save face for Noda while hoping the CDPJ will not submit the motion.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
35 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Ishiba, Trump likely to speak by phone Fri. night: source
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and U.S. President Donald Trump are expected to speak over the telephone on Friday night, a Japanese government source said. The phone call would come before Japan's top negotiator Ryosei Akazawa is slated to hold another round of tariff talks with U.S. officials in Washington. It would be the third telephone conversation between Ishiba and Trump in roughly a month, as both nations conduct rounds of ministerial-level tariff negotiations with an eye toward reaching a mutually beneficial deal at soon as possible. The two previously spoke over the phone on May 29. As Ishiba and Trump are expected to participate in the Group of Seven leaders' summit in Canada that will begin on Monday, both have been exploring an in-person meeting on the sidelines of the multilateral gathering. Japan has been urging the United States to rethink its tariff policy that targets imports, ranging from cars and auto parts to steel and aluminum.
Asahi Shimbun
39 minutes ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Japan to lock up, impose fines on profit-seeking resellers of rice
Farm minister Shinjiro Koizumi speaks to reporters in Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward on June 13. (Nobufumi Yamada) People caught reselling rice for a profit, including the government's emergency supplies, will face a fine or even imprisonment, farm minister Shinjiro Koizumi told reporters on June 13. Koizumi said a Cabinet ordinance will be amended to include rice under the Law on Emergency Measures for Stabilizing Living Conditions of the Public. The ban will be enforced starting on June 23. The ordinance will prohibit resales of rice to random buyers, including those online, for more than the original retail price. Those who violate the ordinance face a maximum prison term of one year or a fine of up to 1 million yen ($6,963). The government has been releasing rice from its emergency stockpiles in an effort to lower prices that have soared amid supply shortages. 'Reselling of rice would lead to further rice price hikes, which is not desirable,' Koizumi said. The rice subject to the resale ban includes government emergency supplies distributed through direct sales contracts with retailers. These supplies contain both polished and unpolished rice, and they are currently available in supermarkets and other stores for around 2,000 yen per 5 kilograms. 'We are taking maximum measures to prevent the potential risk of resales,' said Koizumi, asking for public understanding of the new regulation. 'This is a necessary government decision to ensure that government-stockpiled rice reaches as many people as possible.' The law was established in 1973 amid the oil crisis to regulate sales of daily necessities that are in short supply. In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, resales of masks and disinfectant alcohol were prohibited under the law. Online market operator Mercari and LineYahoo have already established self-regulatory standards against resales of government rice.
Japan Times
43 minutes ago
- Japan Times
A belligerent China hones its tools of intimidation
Amid turmoil elsewhere in the world, the steady expansion of China's military presence in waters surrounding Japan has been overlooked. Recent exercises underscore the ability of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) to project power ever farther from the country's shores. When combined with the increasing tempo, sophistication and intensity of drills around Taiwan, China's intent could not be clearer: Beijing is signaling its growing capability and readiness to press its will on regional governments. Japan must do more to prepare. Regional and global attention has been focused on the steady creep of the Chinese military presence in the South China Sea. Especially fraught is the rising tension with the Philippines, which is engaged in a bitter dispute with China over territory in those waters, but Beijing has also antagonized other countries with claims in those waters, such as Vietnam and Indonesia. At the same time, the PLA has held a growing number of military exercises in and around Taiwan. The Chinese leadership is angered by the continued success of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party on the island, which Beijing claims is 'a renegade province' and whose political leadership continues to defy its calls for reunification with the mainland. China has been especially active around the island since former U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi visited Taiwan in August 2022, with the Eastern Theater Command's exercise program expanding from regular quarterly exercises to almost monthly operations. Taiwan President Lai Ching-te is the focus of particular anger and has been denounced for making 'rampant provocations for 'independence.'' Especially troubling are three major encirclement military exercises that the PLA has conducted since Lai took office a little over a year ago. The most recent consisted of two days of Strait Thunder-2025A, conducted in early April. They were intended to serve as 'a stern warning' to 'Taiwan independence' forces, reported China's Taiwan Affairs Office. The drills occurred in the middle and southern parts of the Taiwan Strait and focused, said the Eastern Theater Command's spokesperson, on 'joint blockade and control' operations and 'precision strikes on key targets,' such as ports and energy facilities. The Taiwanese Defense Ministry detected 76 Chinese warplanes, 13 PLA vessels and four China Coast Guard ships near Taiwan in 24 hours. Reportedly, 68 Chinese aircraft crossed the median line of the Strait, an informal demarcation of the waterway, the most since the 2022 exercise that followed Pelosi's visit. For the first time, Chinese coast guard vessels entered the 24-nautical-mile contiguous zone around the main island of Taiwan. The Defense Ministry criticized the exercises as 'aggressive, provocative and irresponsible.' The United States agreed, calling them 'irresponsible threats and military pressure operations near Taiwan' that 'exacerbate tensions and undermine cross-Strait peace and stability.' Japan's response was more tepid. Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said the Japanese government was 'watching it (the drill) with serious interest,' and had conveyed its concern to Beijing about the exercises. Since the April exercises were Strait Thunder-2025A, at least one more — B — is expected later this year. Adm. Samuel Paparo, head of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, warned last month that these exercises are not drills but are 'rehearsals' for an invasion of the island. Other observers fear that they could be cover for an actual invasion. Japanese strategists are also worried about the growing capabilities of China's aircraft carriers. Three have been built, and the third, the Fujian, the most advanced in its fleet, has begun its sea trials and is set to be commissioned soon. As Jesse Johnson wrote in The Japan Times this week, the Beijing government has called it 'one of the most important' pieces of military hardware and central to the goal of ensuring that the PLA is a 'world-class military' by the middle of this century. The other two carriers, the Liaoning and the Shandong, this week conducted their first simultaneous operations in the Pacific. The 'routine exercises' were designed 'to test the forces' capabilities in far seas defense and joint operations.' The exercises represent a rapid expansion of Chinese capabilities — the two ships had their first dual-carrier drills in the South China Sea last October. And the Liaoning was observed off Minamitorishima, the first Chinese aircraft carrier to cross the so-called second island chain, a stretch of islands from Japan to Guam and the islands of Micronesia. That follows a string of other 'firsts' detailed by Johnson — the Liaoning's first operations in the East China Sea earlier this year and its first passage last September through a narrow waterway between Yonaguni and Iriomote islands in Okinawa Prefecture. While legal, that passage was denounced by a Japanese government spokesperson as 'totally unacceptable from the perspective of the security environment of Japan and the region.' When challenged, the Chinese response is invariably that its actions are consistent with international law and that the country only acts defensively, responding to the actions of other nations and never targeting any specific country. Defense Minister Gen Nakatani was right when he said that 'China is seeking to enhance the operational capabilities of its two aircraft carriers in distant maritime and airspace areas.' That characterization extends to the entire PLA and the various activities it has undertaken in recent years. Quite simply, China is honing its power projection capabilities. Beijing seeks to protect increasingly far-flung assets as well as shape regional geopolitical dynamics. The PLA is a tool to influence regional decision-making and the Chinese leadership is increasingly confident in its ability to do just that. Central to that ambition is both habituating the world, and regional governments in particular, to the exercise of Chinese power and then intimidating those governments into accommodating Chinese policy preferences whatever their national interests might be. While the world must accept Chinese actions — as long as they are in fact legal — it must not bend to the larger Chinese goal. This demands a more robust defense posture and doctrine that counters the PLA and deters Chinese aggression, whether conventional or through the use of 'hybrid' tactics that Beijing has used to rewrite the regional status quo. This requires money as well as a new strategy that adapts to the various dimensions of Chinese strategy and tactics. Japan must be prepared not only for deliberate acts, whether an attack or a quarantine, but also the inevitable accidents — collisions, misfires and other mistakes — that occur as China engages in exercises and accelerates its operational tempo. Ready and reliable communications channels with Beijing are a must. This also requires an aggressive diplomatic campaign that aligns and rallies like-minded countries to ensure the largest and most solid bulwark against Chinese revisionism. That will consist of both active and creative diplomacy as well as a readiness to use economic tools. It goes without saying that all this must be done in close cooperation and coordination with our ally, the United States. The Japan Times Editorial Board
