Virginia Giuffre's family expresses shock over Trump saying Epstein 'stole' her
Giuffre, who had accused Britain's Prince Andrew and other influential men of sexually exploiting her as a teenager trafficked by Epstein, has been a central figure in conspiracy theories tied to the case. She died by suicide this year.
Her family's statement is the latest development involving Epstein, who took his own life in a New York jail in 2019 while facing federal sex trafficking charges, and the Republican president, who was his one-time friend. Trump denied prior knowledge of Epstein's crimes and said he cut off their relationship years ago, but he still faces questions about the case.
Trump, responding to a reporter's question on Tuesday, said that he got upset with Epstein over his poaching of workers and that Epstein had stolen Giuffre from his Palm Beach, Florida, club.
'It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been 'stolen' from Mar-a-Lago,' the family's statement said.
'We and the public are asking for answers; survivors deserve this,' it continued.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt noted the president was responding to a reporter's question and didn't bring up Giuffre himself.
'The fact remains that President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club for being a creep to his female employees,' she said.
The family's statement comes shortly after the Justice Department interviewed Maxwell, who was convicted in 2021 on sex trafficking and other charges and is serving a 20-year sentence in Tallahassee, Florida. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche interviewed Maxwell in a Florida courthouse, though details about what she said haven't become public.
Maxwell's lawyers have said she testified truthfully and answered questions 'about 100 different people.' They have said she's willing to answer more questions from Congress if she is granted immunity from future prosecution for her testimony and if lawmakers agree to satisfy other conditions.
A message seeking comment about the Giuffre family's statement was sent to Maxwell's attorney Thursday.
A Trump administration official said the president is not considering clemency action for Maxwell.
Giuffre said she was approached by Maxwell in 2000 and eventually was hired by her as a masseuse for Epstein. But the couple effectively made her a sexual servant, she said, pressuring her into gratifying not only Epstein but his friends and associates.
Giuffre said she was flown around the world for appointments with men including Prince Andrew while she was 17 and 18 years old.
The men, including Andrew, denied it and assailed Giuffre's credibility. She acknowledged changing some key details of her account.
The prince settled with Giuffre in 2022 for an undisclosed sum, agreeing to make a 'substantial donation' to her survivors' organization.
The American-born Giuffre lived in Australia for years and became an advocate for sex trafficking survivors after emerging as a central figure in Epstein's prolonged downfall.
Her family's statement said she endured death threats and financial ruin over her cooperation with authorities against Epstein and Maxwell.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Judges Press for Answers on Federal Involvement in Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
An immigration detention center built in the Florida Everglades threatens protected lands and wildlife, and violated federal laws when the government failed to study potential harms before construction, environmentalists argued in federal court in Miami on Wednesday. Witnesses testified that they worried that the detention center known as 'Alligator Alcatraz' would pollute environmentally sensitive wetlands, hurt endangered species and undo decades of Everglades restoration. 'We are very concerned about potential impacts of runoff,' said Eve Samples, the executive director of Friends of the Everglades, a nonprofit group and one of the plaintiffs. The suit is one of two federal cases filed against the remote detention center, which Florida erected last month to house federal immigration detainees. The environmental suit argues that the federal and state governments failed to conduct a review process required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, which would have allowed for some public input before any construction. Environmentalists are seeking a preliminary injunction to stop operations and any additional construction while their lawsuit moves forward. State officials have tried to portray the environmental impact as minimal. They have said the detention center was necessary to assist the Trump administration with illegal immigration enforcement, because federal authorities did not have enough capacity in existing facilities to hold detainees. Florida has taken an especially aggressive stance in assisting with the illegal immigration crackdown, and is considering erecting a second detention center in North Florida. In legal filings, Florida has also suggested that the detention center is not subject to federal environmental regulations because it is state-run. But what was perhaps most striking during the daylong hearing was how many significant questions remained unanswered about the Everglades detention center, more than a month after the first detainees began to arrive there. Among those questions was the relationship of authority between the Florida Division of Emergency Management, which is in charge of the detention center, and the Department of Homeland Security, which is in charge of immigration detainees. The judge presiding over the environmental case, Kathleen M. Williams of the Federal District Court in Miami, asked the state and federal defendants last week to provide any legal agreement related to the detention center's operations. No such document was provided during Wednesday's hearing or in the days leading up to it. One of the witnesses for the environmental groups, State Representative Anna V. Eskamani, an Orlando Democrat, testified on Wednesday that she had requested a copy of any agreement between the state and federal government but had not been provided with one. Agreements known as 287(g) typically authorize state or municipal authorities to help with immigration enforcement. State officials have also not responded to repeated requests from The New York Times requesting such an agreement, if one exists. The judge presiding over the second federal case, which relates to immigration lawyers' access to their clients inside the detention center, has ordered the state and federal governments to clarify their relationships to the facility by Thursday. 'We need to get to the bottom of the interplay between the federal and state authorities on who's running this thing,' Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz II of the Federal District Court in Miami said last week. The Everglades detention center has come under much criticism since state and federal officials announced in June that Florida would become the first state to erect such a facility for immigration detainees. In addition to environmental and legal concerns, detainees, their relatives and their lawyers have denounced troubling conditions, many related to the center's unusual location. State officials built the detention center on an old airfield with little existing infrastructure. Most services — potable water, sewage, electricity — have to be trucked in or out, or provided by temporary facilities, such as power generators. Detainees have complained about flooding, mosquitoes, lack of showers and floodlights around the clock. In recent weeks, several relatives have said that some detainees have resorted to going on a hunger strike in protest. A spokeswoman for the Division of Emergency Management did not respond to a request for comment on Wednesday. During Wednesday's hearing in the environmental case, lawyers for Homeland Security tried to distance federal authorities' involvement in selecting the Everglades site. Dr. Eskamani testified that Kevin Guthrie, the executive director of the Division of Emergency Management, told elected officials last month that the state had received an email from Homeland Security requesting the construction of the facility. A lawyer for Homeland Security suggested in court that federal authorities might have asked for 'a' facility, without saying where it should be. Judge Williams interjected that she knew how the government could clear things up: 'Get the email for all of us.' Ms. Samples, of Friends of the Everglades, testified that the detention center was initially envisioned as a large and busy jetport in 1969. Opposition to the project led the famed environmentalist Marjory Stoneman Douglas to found Friends of the Everglades that same year — and led to the strengthening of environmental laws. Only one runway was built for the jetport before activists successfully shut it down. That runway now serves the detention center. 'Victories are sometimes imperfect,' Ms. Samples said.
Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
Apple Adds $100 Billion U.S. Investment, Trump Says
President Donald Trump on Wednesday announced another $100 billion investment by Apple to expand manufacturing in the U.S., adding to a $500 billion commitment announced earlier this year by Tim Cook featuring plans for a new factory in the country and tens of thousands of new jobs. AFP via Getty Images Trump's announced a new 'American Manufacturing Program' that will bring more of Apple's supply chain into the U.S., with plans to manufacture critical components domestically. The president also said the U.S. will place 'approximately 100%' tariff rates on chips and semiconductors, adding if companies are building in the U.S., 'there will be no charge' on the tech supplies. Cook announced plans in February for Apple's $500 billion investment that included a doubling of its 'Advanced Manufacturing Fund' to $10 billion, building a factory in Houston and a training facility in Michigan while adding 20,000 new jobs. Cook said under the new manufacturing plans, all iPhones and Apple Watches sold across the world will contain coverglass made in Kentucky. Shares of Apple closed up 5% to $213.25 after the company's latest U.S. investment was first reported by Bloomberg. Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 'Today's announcement with Apple is another win for our manufacturing industry that will simultaneously help reshore the production of critical components to protect America's economic and national security,' White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers told Forbes in a statement. Tangent Trump on Wednesday said he would double the U.S. tariff rate on India to 50% because the country continues to purchase Russian oil. In a call last week with analysts, Cook said a 'vast majority' of iPhones sold in the U.S. come from India, noting Apple would 'obviously try to optimize our supply chain' and 'ultimately, we will do more in the United States.' In May, Trump wrote on Truth Social that he 'long ago' told Cook he expected Apple's iPhones to be manufactured in the U.S., 'not India, or anyplace else.' Trump warned Apple would pay a 25% tariff unless the company shifted its production domestically. Trump has pressured companies to increase production in the U.S. in the wake of his wide-reaching tariffs in recent months. He announced a $100 billion investment in AI data centers from Oracle, SoftBank and OpenAI earlier this year, with plans to up the total to at least $500 billion, as they boost American innovation in AI. Both Oracle and OpenAI later revealed expanded plans to upgrade data center capabilities. Trump also targeted Walmart after the retailer warned its prices would increase to absorb the cost of his tariffs. Trump said the company should 'EAT THE TARIFFS' and 'not charge valued customers ANYTHING.' Further Reading Forbes Apple Promises $500 Billion U.S. Investment And 20,000 Jobs By Siladitya Ray Forbes Apple Shares Drop As Trump Threatens 25% Tariff—Sparking Market Selloff By Ty Roush
Politico
a few seconds ago
- Politico
Trump tells European leaders he'll continue Russia talks through in-person meetings with Putin
The New York Times previously reported on the plan for the meeting, which the Times said will occur as soon as next week. The German official did not provide any details on the timing of the planned meetings. The White House has not confirmed such a proposal was outlined with the European leaders. Earlier Wednesday, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said Trump remained open to the prospect of meeting with Putin, but declined to say whether such a proposal was outlined in the phone call. Putin met with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow earlier Wednesday and Trump described that three-hour meeting at the Kremlin as 'highly productive.' It's unclear what the planned meeting with Putin means for Trump's Friday deadline for imposing sanctions against countries who purchase Russian energy – which he has said he will do to punish Moscow if it doesn't make more progress towards a peaceful end to the war in Ukraine. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the European leaders' call. Trump pledged to end the war in Ukraine 'on day one' of his second presidency. But Russia has stymied peace talks, infuriating both Ukrainian and American negotiators by continuing to conduct airstrikes on civilian targets in Ukraine. Trump threatened in July to impose hefty new sanctions and secondary measures to punish the Russian economy, targeting oil sales that have allowed it to stay economically afloat despite becoming a global economic pariah since the invasion.
