Ranges on Fort Benning aren't long enough for Army's new sniper rifle
The MK22 Precision Sniper Rifle is a multi-caliber bolt-action sniper rifle that was designed to replace the Army's M2010, M110 and M107 rifles, according to the Army's Program Executive Office Soldier, which is in charge of new weapon development.
The Army's current generation of sniper rifles have 'an effective range' of nearly 1,000 meters, but the new MK22 can reach targets between 1,500 to 1,800 meters away, said Shane Duncanson, Fort Benning range planner, in an Army release. As a result, he said, the sniper rifle 'requires a whole different range design.'
Will Brugge, a spokesperson for Fort Benning, said that the range upgrades will allow soldiers to use the MK22 to the fullest extent, which helps them train specific sniper skills like calculating ballistics, estimating distances and actually hitting targets.
'Firing at targets with the weapon system's maximum effective range requires snipers to be absolutely precise with their ballistic calculations to accommodate for atmospheric conditions, primarily wind speed and temperature. It also requires snipers to be absolute with their range estimation skills. Further engagements also challenge the sniper's ability to detect targets and apply target recognition skills,' Brugge said. 'Snipers who do this successfully gain experience and confidence in using the weapon system.'
The MK22 rifle can swap between three different barrels to use three types of ammunition: the typical 7.62mm, and two new calibers, .300 and .338 Norma Magnum rounds, which can be switched out depending on the type of mission.
With the shortest barrel, the rifle can use standard 7.62 rounds for targets as far as 1000 meters. Two longer barrels accommodate the .300NM's regular ball round and the .338NM's armor-piercing round for shots up to 1,500 meters, according to an Army fact sheet on the system.
An Army marksmanship instructor at one of the largest bases told Task & Purpose that some soldiers with the new MK22 have not yet received the .300NM and .338NM ammunition. Unlike 7.62 rounds, which the Army has used for decades in other weapons, both of the new sniper rounds have been developed specifically for the rifle. The Army signed a $157 million contract with Sig Sauer to produce .300NM and .338NM ammunition in June 2022. Sig Sauer told Task & Purpose that all of the ammunition ordered by the Army had been delivered.
The Army fielded the MK22 to special operations soldiers in 2021. According to PEO Soldier officials, the sniper rifles are still being distributed to conventional units that have sniper-trained soldiers assigned to them, such as infantry battalions. Officials declined to give additional details on what units have so far received the MK22 or which might soon.
The sniper rifle is also being adopted by the Marine Corps, which announced in November 2024 that it had been fielded to all of its infantry and reconnaissance units and training schools. The new rifles arrive amid a Marine Corps-wide overhaul of its marksmanship training, which includes building new ranges at major training centers.
Fort Benning's largest firing range, the Burroughs Range, was completed in 1976 and was originally designed for heavy sniper training with armored targets and a moving target rail system 800 meters from shooters.
To make room for the MK22, the range will now initially be upgraded for soldiers to practice with targets at distances between 800 and 1,100 meters. Further work will extend that distance to 1,200 meters away in the coming years.
However, as part of the range upgrades, the Army is removing a 225-meter berm and tracks, which will give soldiers an additional line of sight to distant targets and an area to install new trackless moving targets.
A Marine Corps reply-all email apocalypse has an incredible real-life ending
Army shuts down its sole active-duty information operations command
Army plans to close more than 20 base museums in major reduction
Former Green Beret nominated to top Pentagon position to oversee special ops
The Navy's new recruiting commercial puts the 'dirt wars' in the past
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Will BigBear.ai be Able to Offset Army Contract Losses With New Wins?
Holdings, Inc. BBAI witnessed notable declines in demand volume on certain Army contracts in its recently reported second quarter of 2025 results. These losses had severe blow on the company's revenues and margins. However, this does not seem to be a woe for BBAI as it is actively engaging into other contracts and partnerships to offset this core capabilities, including offering AI-driven mission solutions across national security, defense autonomy, border technology, transportation and logistics, are boding well in the current scenario. The company highlighted the deployment of biometric solutions for traveler processing on more than 2,000 devices at more than 500 gates and 25 airports. Besides, the prospects seem promising for its technology solutions supporting defense autonomy, which includes ConductorOS for the Department of Defense's drone forming development efforts, alongside supply-chain management solutions (including Shipyard AI) for enhancing the industrial base for America and its these new projects, the One Big Beautiful Bill (OB3) is proving to be profitable for BBAI in the long term, given its diversified array of service portfolios. The OB3 allocates $170 billion in supplemental funding to the Department of Homeland Security and $150 billion to the Department of Defense for disruptive defense technology, accompanied by a few more billions for shipbuilding and other critical national security missions. Being engaged in offering AI-driven critical solutions, is expected to scale from this new legislative investment strategy and witness incremental revenue visibility and its partnerships with an international holding company in the United Arab Emirates and Narval Holdings in Panama, for deploying AI solutions across security and logistics, are also expected to fuel its growth, despite weaknesses across certain Army contracts. BBAI Stock's Price Performance vs. Other Market Players Shares of this Virginia-based AI-powered decision intelligence solutions provider have gained 48.9% in the past three months, significantly outperforming the Zacks Computers - IT Services industry, the Zacks Computer and Technology sector and the S&P 500 index. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Moreover, firms like Palantir Technologies Inc. PLTR and Inc. AI offer substantial competition to in the market space of offering AI-based products and services to government clients. Although the market trends are favoring these companies, they are falling behind in realizing the benefits from the robust fundamentals compared with BBAI. In the past three months, shares of Palantir have gained 43.3% while those of have tumbled 26%. Valuation Trend stock is currently trading at a discount compared with the industry peers, with a forward 12-month price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 9.67, as evidenced by the chart below. The discounted valuation of the stock, compared with its peers, advocates for an attractive entry point for investors. That said, in the long term, the valuation could move toward a premium, given the favorable market fundamentals backing the company's revenue visibility. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Notably, Palantir and are currently trading at a forward 12-month P/S ratio of 88.04 and 4.58, respectively. EPS Trend of BBAI BBAI's bottom-line estimates for 2025 and 2026 have remained unchanged over the past 60 days at a loss per share of 41 cents and 21 cents, respectively. However, the estimated figures for 2025 and 2026 imply year-over-year growth of 62.7% and 49.2%, respectively. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research BBAI stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Inc. (AI) : Free Stock Analysis Report Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Why the US military refuses to adopt bullpup rifles
For decades, the U.S. military has flirted with bullpup rifles — compact, futuristic-looking designs that put the action and magazine behind the trigger instead of in front of it. From the Austrian Steyr AUG to the Israeli Tavor, the sci-fi-looking FN F2000, and most recently the RM277 from the Army's Next Generation Squad Weapon program, the Pentagon has tested them all. And every time, the verdict has been the same: No thanks. So why does the military keep rejecting a rifle style that's seen service from Australia to Israel? What is a bullpup rifle? In a bullpup, the working parts, the chamber, bolt, and magazine, are located in the buttstock, behind the trigger group. This means you can run a full-length barrel in a much shorter overall package. For example, the M4 carbine is just under 30 inches long with a 14.5-inch barrel. The Israeli Tavor X95 is 26 inches with a 16.5-inch barrel. The French FAMAS is roughly the same size as the M4, but has a 19.2-inch barrel. That extra barrel length matters. Longer barrels usually mean higher muzzle velocity, better energy retention, and more reliable terminal effects from rounds like 5.56mm or 6.8mm. And in tight spaces like vehicles, helicopters, and urban combat, shaving a few inches off the gun's overall length makes a real difference. The advantages of a bullpup On paper, bullpups tick a lot of boxes for modern combat. Compactness without losing barrel length: Ideal for close quarters and vehicle crews. Better weight distribution: With the bulk of the rifle close to the shoulder, they can feel lighter and easier to hold at the ready. Suppressed use: Starting with a shorter rifle means a suppressor won't make it unwieldy. So if they look good on a spec sheet, why won't the U.S. use them? The dealbreakers The first problem is ergonomics. Bullpups require a different manual of arms. The magazine sits behind the pistol grip, often under the shooter's armpit or mixed up in body armor. Speed reloads and malfunction drills are harder, especially for troops who've spent years training on the M4/M16 family. Next is trigger feel. With the trigger up front and the firing mechanism in the rear, bullpups rely on a long mechanical linkage to connect the two. That linkage adds friction and flex, resulting in heavier, spongier pulls that aren't ideal for precision shooting. Left-handed shooting is another hurdle. Many bullpups eject to the right by default, which means lefties risk brass in the face unless the rifle is reconfigured, something you can't do mid-fight. Then there's modularity. The M4 has plenty of rail space for optics, lasers, lights, and grips. Bullpups have a shorter fore-end, which means less real estate for accessories without crowding the muzzle or ejection port. Top Stories This Week News Airman arrested for death that prompted Air Force-wide safety review of Sig M18 Airman arrested for death that prompted Air Force-wide safety review of Sig M18 By Jeff Schogol News Soldiers who stopped Fort Stewart gunman recognized as 'the best among us in the Army' Soldiers who stopped Fort Stewart gunman recognized as 'the best among us in the Army' By Patty Nieberg Culture Laura Loomer unites vets from both sides of aisle after Medal of Honor rant Laura Loomer unites vets from both sides of aisle after Medal of Honor rant By Matt White Finally, logistics and doctrine. Adopting bullpups would mean rewriting training manuals, changing qualification standards, redesigning load carriage systems, and retraining hundreds of thousands of troops across every service branch. Unless a bullpup offers overwhelming advantages, that level of disruption just isn't likely to be seen as being worth it. The U.S. has tried In 1985, the Pentagon put the Steyr AUG through its paces. What they found were all of the above shortcomings and decided not to purchase them, but that didn't stop U.S. Customs and Border Protection from adopting the rifle from 1988 to 2007 before replacing them with AR-style rifles. The Belgian FN F2000, tested by U.S. special operations, offered fully ambidextrous, forward-ejecting operation in a compact package. But its spongy trigger, bulky profile, and incompatibility with existing accessories killed its chances. Most recently, the General Dynamics RM277 was proposed as part of the Army's Next Generation Squad Weapon program. It is a suppressed, polymer-cased 6.8mm bullpup that, despite impressive ballistics, lost to SIG Sauer's then-XM7, an AR-style rifle that felt more familiar to soldiers and fit better into existing logistics. Other countries made it work… sort of Israel fields the Tavor for infantry and urban ops, but many troops still carry M4s depending on the mission. The country is currently looking to replace the Tavor with a home-built AR-style weapon. France ditched the FAMAS for the HK416. The UK stuck with the SA80 but spent decades and millions fixing its flaws. They're also currently looking for a replacement, and none of the candidates are bullpups. Austria and Australia have stuck with the Steyr AUG, but they operate on a smaller scale and with different mission profiles than the U.S. The bottom line Bullpups aren't bad rifles. In some environments, they're excellent. But they don't offer enough benefit to make the U.S. military scrap its entire small arms ecosystem. They're harder to reload, have less modularity, and often deliver a worse trigger feel. And in a force this large, familiarity and interoperability matter as much as performance. For now, the Army's next standard rifle, the M7, sticks with the AR-style layout. Bullpups will keep showing up in gun shop display cases and in the hands of foreign forces, but for the U.S. military writ large, they remain too weird to issue. We dive into this in more depth in this week's YouTube video, which you can check out here.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
BigBear.ai Stock Plummets on Uncertainty About Government Contracts
Key Takeaways lowered its revenue guidance and withdrew its adjusted EBITDA outlook on government contract uncertainty. The artificial intelligence data analytics company said it would be affected by changes in the Army's data architecture. posted a bigger loss and lower revenue than expected in the second (BBAI) shares lost a quarter of their value Tuesday, a day after the artificial intelligence data analytics firm slashed its revenue outlook and withdrew its profit forecast on uncertainty about government contracts. The company now anticipates full-year revenue in the range of $125 million to $140 million, down from its earlier estimate of $160 million to $180 million. Its previous guidance for adjusted EBITDA had been "in the negative single digit millions." CEO Kevin McAleenan said while is optimistic about future investments and growth opportunities, "we have also seen disruptions in federal contracts from efficiency efforts this quarter, most notably in programs that support the U.S. Army, as they seek to consolidate and modernize their data architecture." Along with questions about Army contracts, the company expects increased spending in the second half of the year. In the second quarter, posted a loss of $0.71 per share, about 12 times more than analysts from Visible Alpha were looking for. Revenue slumped 18% year-over-year to $32.5 million, also well short of forecasts. Shares of had entered Tuesday up nearly 60% this year. Read the original article on Investopedia
