logo
Najib still considering contempt action against Terrirudin despite AG's advice, says lawyer

Najib still considering contempt action against Terrirudin despite AG's advice, says lawyer

by FARAH SOLHI
FORMER Prime Minister (PM) Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Razak's (picture) defence team is still considering filing a contempt application against former Attorney General (AG) Tan Sri Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh over royal addendum issue, despite advice to the contrary from the current AG.
Najib's lead defence counsel, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, said this is in spite of a recent letter from current Attorney General Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar advising them to reconsider.
'The AG ( Mohd Dusuki) sent us a letter about three weeks ago, asking us to reconsider filing the contempt (against Terrirudin).
'We are taking the request seriously — we cannot simply ignore such a letter. However, we still believe we should proceed with the application. So, after considering the matter, we may file it within a week or two… we'll see,' he said during a press conference today.
In February, Muhammad Shafee announced at a separate press conference that Najib had instructed his team to file the contempt application against Terrirudin. This was over Terrirudin's alleged failure to enforce a royal addendum order, said to have been signed by the 16th Yang di-Pertuan Agong, allowing the former Pekan MP to serve the remainder of his jail term under house arrest.
This followed the submission of the alleged royal letter during a Court of Appeal hearing, which subsequently ruled that the High Court should hear the matter, finding sufficient merit for it to be considered by the lower court.
Muhammad Shafee also revealed that his legal team had issued a show-cause letter to Terrirudin, who responded by denying any wrongdoing. Terrirudin maintained that he had no obligation to disclose the existence of the addendum at the time, as the case was still at the leave stage in the High Court.
Separately, Shafee confirmed today that former Goldman Sachs banker Roger Ng Chong Hwa is expected to testify as a defence witness in Najib's ongoing 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) trial.
'Ng is being brought to court so we can call him as a witness and question him in detail regarding what he knows about the real actors behind the 1MDB scandal.
'Perhaps he may even state that, to his knowledge, Najib was not involved,' Mohd Shafee said.
On April 17, Deputy Public Prosecutor Kamal Baharin Omar informed the court that Ng would be brought to testify in the 1MDB proceedings.
Ng was convicted in March 2023 by a US federal court and sentenced to 10 years in prison for his role in helping to embezzle funds from 1MDB. In October 2023, IGP Tan Sri Razarudin Husain confirmed that Ng had been repatriated to Malaysia to assist in ongoing 1MDB investigations.
Najib is currently serving his sentence in Kajang Prison, Selangor, after the Federal Court upheld the Kuala Lumpur High Court's conviction for corruption involving RM42 million in funds from SRC International Sdn Bhd, a former subsidiary of 1MDB.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal Court ruling on SIS forum fatwa appeal set for June 19
Federal Court ruling on SIS forum fatwa appeal set for June 19

The Sun

time39 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Federal Court ruling on SIS forum fatwa appeal set for June 19

KUALA LUMPUR: The Federal Court will deliver its ruling on June 19 in the appeal filed by SIS Forum (Malaysia) against a fatwa issued by the Selangor religious authorities, which declared the organisation deviant and contrary to Islamic teachings. The matter was confirmed by Datuk Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar, counsel for the Selangor Fatwa Committee, when contacted today. 'The court informed the parties of the decision date via email on May 20,' he said. In addition to the Selangor Fatwa Committee, the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (MAIS) and the Selangor government are also named as respondents in the appeal. On Aug 21, 2023, the Federal Court granted leave to SIS Forum and its founder, Zainah Mahfoozah Anwar, to appeal against the Court of Appeal's earlier decision dismissing their bid to annul the fatwa. In a 2-1 majority decision, the Court of Appeal held that the fatwa issued by the Selangor Fatwa Committee did not constitute a final decision and, therefore, could not be challenged by way of judicial review. SIS Forum and Zainah had appealed to the Court of Appeal after the High Court dismissed their application for a judicial review on Aug 27, 2019. The fatwa, gazetted by the Selangor State Government on July 31, 2014, declared SIS Forum, as well as any individual or group subscribing to liberalism and pluralism, as deviant and contrary to Islamic teachings. The fatwa further directed that any publication espousing liberal or pluralist views be banned and seized, and urged the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission to censor social media content deemed contrary to Islamic teachings and syariah law.

Plantation worker escapes the gallows
Plantation worker escapes the gallows

The Sun

time39 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Plantation worker escapes the gallows

TAIPING: An oil palm plantation worker escaped the death penalty after the High Court here today sentenced him to seven years in prison on an amended charge of manslaughter of a detainee at Taiping Prison, six years ago. Judge Noor Ruwena Md. Nurdin sentenced Mohd Nizam Shah Shahruddin, 40, to seven years in prison without a fine after the accused pleaded guilty to the amended charge from Section 302 of the Penal Code to Section 304b of the same code, which is manslaughter. The prison sentence on the accused was set to start from the date of his arrest, which was on August 29, 2019, after he was suspected of causing the death of Chua Teng Wooi, 41, at the Taiping Prison Remand Cell, here, at 9.30 pm the same day. Noor Ruwena said the sentence was handed down after examining the facts of the case and the arguments of the prosecution and defence as well as the statements of the accused and witnesses called in relation to the case. He said the court found that Mohd Nizam had succeeded in raising a reasonable doubt that he did not intend to kill the victim but was angry with the victim's actions and only wanted to teach a lesson. According to Noor Ruwena, from the testimony of the accused and several other witnesses, the victim was beaten up by a mob while in the remand cell because he often defecated everywhere due to diarrhoea. He said the doubts raised included whether the actions of the accused and other detainees caused injuries to the victim's lungs, which was the cause of death. This was because there was witness testimony that the injuries may have occurred when the victim fell in the prison toilet due to the dark conditions of the detention cell. 'The accused's statement was not challenged that he woke up other inmates to help the deceased who fell in the toilet and also lifted the deceased, the affidavit that there were (other) people who also beat the deceased was not challenged,' he said. The prosecution was conducted by deputy public prosecutor Sally Chay Mei Ling, while counsel Rajit Singh Tara Singh represented the accused.

Federal Court to rule June 19 on SIS fatwa appeal
Federal Court to rule June 19 on SIS fatwa appeal

The Sun

time39 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Federal Court to rule June 19 on SIS fatwa appeal

KUALA LUMPUR: The Federal Court will deliver its ruling on June 19 in the appeal filed by SIS Forum (Malaysia) against a fatwa issued by the Selangor religious authorities, which declared the organisation deviant and contrary to Islamic teachings. The matter was confirmed by Datuk Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar, counsel for the Selangor Fatwa Committee, when contacted today. 'The court informed the parties of the decision date via email on May 20,' he said. In addition to the Selangor Fatwa Committee, the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (MAIS) and the Selangor government are also named as respondents in the appeal. On Aug 21, 2023, the Federal Court granted leave to SIS Forum and its founder, Zainah Mahfoozah Anwar, to appeal against the Court of Appeal's earlier decision dismissing their bid to annul the fatwa. In a 2-1 majority decision, the Court of Appeal held that the fatwa issued by the Selangor Fatwa Committee did not constitute a final decision and, therefore, could not be challenged by way of judicial review. SIS Forum and Zainah had appealed to the Court of Appeal after the High Court dismissed their application for a judicial review on Aug 27, 2019. The fatwa, gazetted by the Selangor State Government on July 31, 2014, declared SIS Forum, as well as any individual or group subscribing to liberalism and pluralism, as deviant and contrary to Islamic teachings. The fatwa further directed that any publication espousing liberal or pluralist views be banned and seized, and urged the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission to censor social media content deemed contrary to Islamic teachings and syariah law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store