Iran threatens to move nuclear material to secret sites to thwart Israeli strike
Iran threatened on Thursday to move its nuclear material to undeclared sites to protect it from a potential Israeli military strike.
Why it matters: The threat, made in an official letter from Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to the UN secretary-general and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director-general, signal the risk of an unprecedented escalation in the Iranian nuclear crisis.
The IAEA is currently able to access and monitor Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles, which are stored in declared sites.
If that material is moved, it will be much harder to know whether Iran is building a nuclear weapon or not.
Driving the news: The threat comes after CNN and Axios reported that Israel has been making preparations to swiftly strike Iran's nuclear sites if U.S.-Iran nuclear talks break down in the coming weeks.
One source told Axios that Israel believes its operational window for a successful strike could close soon.
What they are saying:"Under conditions wherein threats made by the Zionist fanatics persist, the Islamic Republic of Iran shall be left with no recourse but to implement special measures for the protection of its nuclear facilities and materials, the relevant particulars of which shall thereafter be communicated to the IAEA," Araghchi wrote.
Driving the news: Araghchi and White House envoy Steve Witkoff will hold a fifth round of nuclear talks in Rome on Friday, with Oman's foreign minister mediating.
The negotiations have hit a roadblock over the fact that Iran says it will only sign a deal that allows a domestic enrichment capability, and the U.S. has said enrichment is its red line.
Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer and the director of Israel's Mossad spy agency David Barnea will meet Witkoff in Rome on Friday on the sidelines of the nuclear talks, two Israeli officials said.
The officials said Dermer and Barnea are traveling to Rome to coordinate positions with Witkoff and be briefed immediataely after the talks.
State of play: The Israeli intelligence community has shifted just in the past few days from believing a nuclear deal was close to thinking talks could soon break down, Israeli sources say.
Hence the urgency behind Israel's preparations to strike fast if President Trump gives a green light.
A U.S. official told Axios the Trump administration is concerned Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu might make his move even without approval from Trump.
Trump spoke to Netanyahu on Thursday and they "agreed on the need to ensure that Iran does not obtain nuclear weapons," per the Israeli readout.
The other side: Araghchi wrote in his letter that Iran "will take all necessary measures to protect and defend its citizens, interests, and facilities against any terrorist or sabotage actions."
"Iran strongly warns against any adventurism by the Israeli Zionist regime and will respond decisively to any threats or unlawful actions by this regime. We also believe that if any attack is carried out against the nuclear facilities of the Islamic Republic of Iran by the Israeli regime, the U.S. government will be complicit and bear legal responsibility," the Iranian foreign minister wrote.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
18 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
U.S. strikes crippled Iran's nuclear program, Israeli analysis finds
THE HAGUE — Israel's preliminary analysis of the damage caused by U.S. strikes on Iran's main nuclear facilities — based in part from on-the-ground assessments — shows the attacks inflicted widespread destruction, a senior Israeli official said. The official, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said that Tehran has been 'actively trying to hide the damage' from the attacks, which President Trump said in The Hague on Wednesday had all but eliminated Iran's enrichment program. Trump, who repeatedly defended the effectiveness of the strikes at the NATO Summit, made reference to individuals who had been on the ground to assess the damage, without providing details. 'I can't say it's a final assessment, because we're less than a week after. It's not like we can send officers openly. But that's the indication we have now,' the official said. A spokesperson for Iran's foreign ministry on Wednesday said the bombing raid 'badly damaged' the nuclear sites, but the Iranian government has said it will continue its nuclear efforts, which it insists are for peaceful purposes. A full review of the mission could take weeks, and experts have expressed skepticism of declarative statements by Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that the U.S. operation was a success within mere days of the attack. 'Battlefield damage assessment is an imprecise art, with initial estimates frequently being way off,' said Patrick Clawson, an expert on Iran and director for research at The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 'I would be very suspicious of any claims — by Iran, by Trump, by Israel — about what has happened to Iran's enriched uranium stocks or to its centrifuges.' Israel's preliminary findings come after an initial assessment from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency cast doubt on the effectiveness of the American strikes, stating with low confidence that Iran had retained the core elements of its nuclear program despite the attacks, one U.S. official familiar with the findings told The Times. The DIA assessment was first reported by CNN. The U.S. attack followed nine days of an Israeli military campaign that decimated Iran's air defenses, its military leadership and its ballistic missile stockpiles, while degrading its nuclear facilities. Israeli intelligence has also monitored the reaction to the campaign among Iranian leadership, which has struggled to comprehend the extent of the damage itself, the Israeli official said. 'We don't believe everyone in the leadership knows what really happened, because the whole program was compartmentalized — they weren't sharing a lot of information, and a lot of the officers who were highly involved on the ground level were eliminated,' the official continued. 'So a lot of the top leadership hasn't fully begun to understand what's happened.' The developing intelligence picture comes as Trump defended the U.S. mission, called Operation Midnight Hammer, during multiple appearances at the NATO Summit in The Hague on Wednesday. 'It's been obliterated, totally obliterated,' he said of Iran's nuclear facilities. Addressing the DIA report, he added, 'They did a report, but it was like, if you look at the dates, it's just a few days after.' The U.S. deployment of massive, 'bunker-buster' munitions targeting Iran's main nuclear sites — including six dropped on Fordo, a facility burrowed deep into the side of a mountain — was intended to bury its most advanced equipment and most highly enriched uranium, which can be used to build nuclear warheads. Initial assessments of the damage were unclear, but since then, Trump said, 'we've collected additional intelligence. We've also spoken to people that have seen the site, and the site is obliterated.'
Wall Street Journal
19 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
How ‘Daddy' Trump Learned to Love NATO
THE HAGUE—What a difference one night in a Dutch palace can make. President Trump departed Washington early Tuesday in a bad mood, swearing at Israel and Iran for endangering the cease-fire he had brokered and sweating from a heat wave blanketing the capital.
San Francisco Chronicle
19 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump voters cheer his move against Iran. MAGA leaders had warned the bombing could backfire
FRONT ROYAL, Va. (AP) — As President Donald Trump prepared to order the bombing of Iran's nuclear sites, many prominent leaders of his 'Make America Great Again' movement warned he was making a grave mistake. Tucker Carlson accused Trump of abandoning his pledge to keep the United States out of new wars. Charlie Kirk said an escalation would be too divisive. Steve Bannon, Trump's former chief strategist, said intervention would thwart the Republican's most important priority, mass deportations. But interviews with Trump voters across the country this week and early polling suggest Trump's decision has been welcomed by his political base. While some said they were weary of the U.S. becoming embroiled in a protracted war, most cheered the move and said they did not see it as running counter to Trump's 'America First' approach. Ken Slabaugh, a retired Air Force veteran from Warrensburg, Missouri, said he was '100% supportive' of the strikes. Speaking Sunday near Whiteman Air Force Base, home of the B-2 bombers used in the attack, Slabaugh said it was clear to him that negotiations and attempts to strike deals with Iran were futile, and Trump had to act. The Iranians, he said, 'can't be trusted and they certainly can't have a nuke.' The response was exactly what he expected from the president. 'What he said was he's not gonna start new wars. He doesn't start wars. He finishes them,' Slabaugh said. 'It's pretty obvious that when the situation requires it, he don't monkey around with it. He gets in it and gets it done." MAGA's enthusiastic response More than 1,000 miles away, at an American Legion post in Brunswick, Maryland, Denny Bayer said the attacks were 'awesome.' 'He wants global peace," the Army National Guard veteran said Tuesday. 'He gave them 60 days' to make a nuclear deal. Bayer, 72, is not concerned about possible retribution because he said Trump had made clear what would follow: 'If you hurt one hair on an American's head I'll rain hellfire down on you." In Front Royal, Virginia, about 70 miles (112 kilometers) from the nation's capital, retired drywaller Stacey Roles said Trump's decision was 'the right one." Roles, 77, described himself as part of Trump's 'MAGA" movement. 'Trump's got my support,' Roles said Tuesday. Targeting 'a bully' Pam Pollard, 65, a longtime GOP leader in Oklahoma, said her first thought upon hearing the U.S. had dropped bombs was that the action would be supported by 'the entire world, save a very small few.' Presidents going back multiple administrations have talked about Iran's nuclear buildup, Pollard said, calling Iran a bully in the region. 'President Trump isn't someone to be bullied,' she said. Pollard was not worried about a military escalation. She does worry about the possible activation of 'terrorist cells.' 'I am very fearful of that all over the world, not just in America,' she said. In La Grange, Kentucky, on the outskirts of Louisville, Donna Williamson, a Republican from nearby Carrollton, said she worries about the U.S. being drawn into a protracted war in the Mideast. 'I hope and I pray that Trump is doing the right thing, but I will reserve judgment,' she said Monday. What early polling shows Early polls suggest Republicans are far more supportive of the military action than are Democrats. A Quinnipiac University poll Wednesday found that about 80% of registered voters who are Republicans back the U.S. joining Israel in striking Iran's nuclear sites. Overall, however, about half of those polled say they disapprove of the strikes, and 75% of Democratic voters were opposed. The poll found that 80% of Republicans believe the strikes will make Americans safer, while nearly as many Democrats believe the strikes will make Americans less safe. Meanwhile, nearly 8 in 10 voters are either very concerned or somewhat concerned about the possibility the U.S. will get drawn into war with Iran. A Fox News poll conducted immediately after Israel attacked Iran, but before the U.S. became involved, found that about 8 in 10 registered voters were 'extremely' or 'very' concerned about Iran getting a nuclear bomb. Trump has a history of foreign intervention Trump won the presidency in 2016 in part due to anger over the 'forever wars' in Afghanistan and Iraq, but he has never been opposed to foreign intervention. In 2019, U.S. special forces killed Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the shadowy leader of the Islamic State group, during a raid in Syria, as part of a campaign that involved U.S. troops on the ground. A year later, Trump ordered the assassination of Gen. Qassem Soleimani, a top Iranian general, and some worried that strike would lead to full-blown war. In March, Trump ordered airstrikes against the Houthis in Yemen. He promised to use 'overwhelming lethal force' until the Iran-backed rebels ceased their attacks on shipping along a vital maritime corridor. Trump has brushed has off the suggestion that his base would be put off by the attacks on Iran, telling reporters, 'My supporters are more in love with me today.' 'He should finish the job' Bill Cantle, a Republican from Clearwater, Florida, said he thinks Trump is 'doing the right thing" on Iran. 'I just think he should finish the job. Not leave it half-done," Cantle said while he and his wife explored downtown La Grange, Kentucky, during a visit. Republican Peter Espinosa, a retired Army sergeant who was born in Cuba and lives in the Miami suburb of Doral, said he sees Iranian officials as 'the bad guys" and views Trump as 'disciplined.' 'I truly believe he's a peacekeeper," he said. "We just need to fight the hostility that's going on in the Middle East right now and take care of it, because if we don't, our country is going to be jeopardized.' At a GOP fundraiser Tuesday in Lima, Ohio, headlined by Vice President JD Vance, Clark Spieles said he has faith in the administration's actions. 'Nobody likes war, everybody wants peace,' said Spieles, a Shawnee Township, Ohio, trustee, adding "I have confidence that they're doing the right thing.' Gomez Licon reported from Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Schreiner from La Grange, Kentucky and Colvin from New York. Associated Press polling editor Amelia Thomson DeVeaux in Washington, and AP Writers Nicholas Ingram in Knob Noster, Missouri and Julie Smyth in Lima, Ohio, contributed to this report.
