US labor unions fight to contain AI disruption
As artificial intelligence threatens to upend entire sectors of the economy, American labor unions are scrambling to protect workers, demand corporate transparency, and rally political support—an uphill battle in a rapidly changing world.
"As laborers, the ability to withhold our labor is one of our only tools to improve our lives," explained Aaron Novik, a key organizer with Amazon's ALU union.
"What happens when that disappears (to AI)? It's a real existential issue," he added.
Automation has already transformed most industries since the 1960s, typically reducing workforce numbers in the process.
But the emergence of advanced "physical AI" promises a new generation of intelligent robots that won't be limited to repetitive tasks -- potentially displacing far more blue-collar workers than ever before.
The threat extends beyond manufacturing.
The CEO of Anthropic, which created Claude as a competitor to ChatGPT, warned last week that generative AI could eliminate half of all low-skilled white-collar jobs, potentially driving unemployment rates up to 10-20 percent.
"The potential displacement of workers and elimination of jobs is a significant concern not just for our members, but for the public in general," said Peter Finn of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, America's largest union.
- Vetoes -
The Teamsters have focused their efforts on passing legislation limiting the spread of automation, but face significant political obstacles.
California's governor has twice vetoed bills that would ban autonomous trucks from public roads, despite intense lobbying from the state's hundreds of thousands of union members.
Colorado's governor followed suit last week, and similar battles are playing out in Indiana, Maryland, and other states.
At the federal level, the landscape shifted dramatically with the change in the White House.
Under former president Joe Biden, the Department of Labor issued guidelines encouraging companies to be transparent about AI use, involve workers in strategic decisions, and support employees whose jobs face elimination.
But US President Donald Trump canceled the protections within hours of taking office in January.
"Now it's clear. They want to fully open up AI without the safeguards that are necessary to ensure workers' rights and protections at work," said HeeWon Brindle-Khym of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (RWDSU), which represents workers in the retail sector.
- Rush to AI -
Meanwhile, companies are racing to implement AI technologies, often with poor results.
"By fear of missing out on innovations, there's been a real push (to release AI products)," observed Dan Reynolds of the Communications Workers of America (CWA).
The CWA has taken a proactive approach, publishing a comprehensive guide for members that urges negotiators to include AI provisions in all collective bargaining agreements.
The union is also developing educational toolkits to help workers understand and negotiate around AI implementation.
A handful of unions have successfully negotiated AI protections into their contracts.
Notable examples include agreements with media company Ziff Davis (which owns Mashable) and video game publisher ZeniMax Studios, a Microsoft subsidiary.
The most significant victories belong to two powerful unions: the International Longshoremen's Association, representing dock workers, secured a moratorium on full automation of certain port operations, while the Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA) won guarantees that actors must be consulted and compensated whenever their AI likeness is created.
These successes remain exceptional, however.
The American labor movement, as a whole, lacks the bargaining power enjoyed by those highly strategic or publicly visible sectors, said Brindle-Khym.
"Smaller contract-by-contract improvements are a long, slow process," she added.
Despite frequent accusations by corporate interests, the unions' goal isn't to halt technological progress entirely.
"Workers are usually not seeking to stop the march of technology," noted Virginia Doellgast, a Cornell University professor specializing in labor relations.
"They just want to have some control."
As AI continues its rapid advance, the question remains whether unions can adapt quickly enough to protect workers in an economy increasingly dominated by artificial intelligence.
tu/arp/sla/tc
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Adviser Urges Immigration Investigation Into Elon Musk's Past as "Illegal Alien"
As Elon Musk and Donald Trump's bromance experiences a rapid but totally predictable disassembly, Musk's archnemesis Steve Bannon is calling on the president to investigate the world's richest man's dubious immigration history. "They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status, because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately," Bannon told the New York Times on Thursday. He also declared that Musk should be investigated for his alleged drug habit. Bannon was a former chief strategist to Trump. He no longer holds the role in an official capacity, but remains an informal adviser and an influential voice on the American far right. Musk and Trump traded blows on their respective personal social media playgrounds this week, not long after Musk suddenly announced that his time as a "special government employee" was over. Once out of the White House, it didn't take long for things to escalate from Musk blasting the president's newly proposed spending bill, to Trump threatening to cancel Elon's billions of dollars worth of government contracts, to Musk clapping back by saying he'd cut off NASA's invaluable access to his spacecraft. Musk also really went off the rails by shouting from the rooftops of X that Trump is in the unreleased Epstein files, and then agreeing that the president should be impeached. We can only imagine the pure schadenfreude bliss that Bannon must be experiencing right now. He's made no secret of his contempt for Musk, who he's previously called a "toddler," and "not tough enough," and a "parasitic illegal alien." Some of that is probably his jealousy speaking: Musk had replaced Bannon as the president's golden boy, a role he lost when Trump kicked Bannon kicked to the curb for stealing the limelight during his first term in office. Bannon, an alleged white supremacist, has always been skeptical of Musk's sudden realignment with the MAGA movement, and has constantly chided the Silicon-Valley-liberal turned Texas-based-technocrat for not being conservative — or racist — enough. So you can bet he's making the most of Musk's downfall, capitalizing on his dubious personal immigration history. Despite his constant slandering of immigrants, the South Africa-born businessman was likely at one point an "illegal" immigrant too, overstaying on a student visa even though he'd dropped out of school to work on his startup. His brother, Kimbal, has admitted to both of them working illegally. Bannon, on top of calling for Musk's deportation, has recommended nationalizing Musk's businesses, too. "President Trump tonight should sign an executive order calling for the Defense Production Act to be called and seize SpaceX tonight before midnight," Bannon said Thursday on an episode of his War Room podcast, as quoted by the Daily Beast. But he faces a fearsome keyboard warrior in Musk, who retaliated in a slur-bedazzled tweet: "Bannon is peak r*tard." Then he doubled down, clarifying that Bannon was, in fact, a "communist r*tard." There's clearly no love being lost between the two. Trump, for his part, is doing his best Don Draper impression. "I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem," he said Friday, per CNN. More on Elon Musk: Elon Musk Declares That He's "Immediately" Cutting Off NASA's Access to Space
Hamilton Spectator
28 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
U.S. ambassador Pete Hoekstra says Canada's economic hopes align with Trump's goals
OTTAWA - The American ambassador to Canada says U.S. President Donald Trump's goal of enhancing American power aligns with Ottawa's aim of becoming the fastest-growing G7 economy. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra also says frequent talks between Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney show how much Washington is invested in boosting both countries' economic growth — even though he isn't sure how often the two leaders speak. Hoekstra tells The Canadian Press the important thing is that the exchanges between Carney and Trump happen frequently and aren't leaked to media. Hoekstra says Canada and the U.S. can partner more on producing cars and challenging China's growing share of the global auto market — despite Trump's repeated claim that America doesn't need Canadian lumber or energy and doesn't want Canadian-built cars. The ambassador insists there is 'absolutely no discrepancy' between his focus on win-win partnerships and Trump's tariffs and rhetoric. Hoekstra isn't offering a timeline for trade talks as discussions continue between Ottawa and Washington on tariffs and a possible early start to a review of the North American trade deal this fall. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 6, 2025.
CNBC
35 minutes ago
- CNBC
The May jobs report wasn't nearly as good as it looked on the surface
Markets applauded the upside surprise Friday from the May jobs count, but traders will want to keep their eyes and ears open in coming months for significant signs of weakness that also appeared in the report. From a headline view, the 139,000 gain in nonfarm payrolls provided a nice bit of relief for a market on edge over the direction of the economy and the impact that President Donald Trump's tariffs might bring. However, several factors in the report bear watching, if not as a signal of impending doom than at least yellow flags that the labor market is a bit more fragile than what appears on the surface. Consider the following: While the monthly number looked good, it was in keeping with a year that has seen job growth slow considerably. Through five months, the average gain is just 124,000, compared to 180,000 for the same period a year ago — a 31% slide. What appeared to be solid growth in previous months isn't as good as it looked. Revisions took down the March and April estimates by a combined 95,000, or 26% below the prior counts. Hiring breadth was terrible. Combined, health care, leisure and hospitality and social assistance — essentially a subcategory of health care that the Bureau of Labor Statistics nonetheless parses out — accounted for 126,000 of the jobs, or nearly all of the hiring for May. Health care benefits greatly from government assistance, which may or may not be drying up depending on how Trump's "big beautiful" spending bill ends up. So if you worked in a medical facility, restaurant or bar, jobs were plentiful. Otherwise, you were out of luck. Wages rose more than expected. While that's a good thing if you're employed, it could work against hopes for lower interest rates if Federal Reserve officials change their thinking and consider the labor market could, in fact, be a source of inflation. Government jobs, a prior significant source of employment gains, fell by 22,000 at the federal level. With cuts from the Department of Government Efficiency approaching 300,000, per Challenger, Gray & Christmas, this will be a space to watch closely as unemployment benefits and severance pay run out. "The May jobs report was mediocre. The headlines were decent, but the details were considerably worse," wrote Bill Adams, chief economist at Comerica Bank. "Tariffs were a headwind to private job growth, with losses in manufacturing, retail, and professional services. Job gains in other cyclical private industries were anemic, reflecting the drag from policy uncertainty." Still, markets liked the report , even if they bet more heavily against significant Fed easing this year. Traders now see zero chance of a rate cut when the central bank meets again in less than two weeks, with odds diminishing of further reductions, according to CME Group data . Instead, investors were relieved that despite an array of headwinds and uncertainty, the labor market is still standing. "It is a good thing that the American economy is so resilient and dynamic because it has been able to endure the headwinds caused by an ever-changing trade policy and higher tariffs," wrote Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist at tax consultancy RSM. "That resilience, though, has its limits, as the May employment report started to show on Friday."
