
The May jobs report wasn't nearly as good as it looked on the surface
Markets applauded the upside surprise Friday from the May jobs count, but traders will want to keep their eyes and ears open in coming months for significant signs of weakness that also appeared in the report. From a headline view, the 139,000 gain in nonfarm payrolls provided a nice bit of relief for a market on edge over the direction of the economy and the impact that President Donald Trump's tariffs might bring. However, several factors in the report bear watching, if not as a signal of impending doom than at least yellow flags that the labor market is a bit more fragile than what appears on the surface. Consider the following: While the monthly number looked good, it was in keeping with a year that has seen job growth slow considerably. Through five months, the average gain is just 124,000, compared to 180,000 for the same period a year ago — a 31% slide. What appeared to be solid growth in previous months isn't as good as it looked. Revisions took down the March and April estimates by a combined 95,000, or 26% below the prior counts. Hiring breadth was terrible. Combined, health care, leisure and hospitality and social assistance — essentially a subcategory of health care that the Bureau of Labor Statistics nonetheless parses out — accounted for 126,000 of the jobs, or nearly all of the hiring for May. Health care benefits greatly from government assistance, which may or may not be drying up depending on how Trump's "big beautiful" spending bill ends up. So if you worked in a medical facility, restaurant or bar, jobs were plentiful. Otherwise, you were out of luck. Wages rose more than expected. While that's a good thing if you're employed, it could work against hopes for lower interest rates if Federal Reserve officials change their thinking and consider the labor market could, in fact, be a source of inflation. Government jobs, a prior significant source of employment gains, fell by 22,000 at the federal level. With cuts from the Department of Government Efficiency approaching 300,000, per Challenger, Gray & Christmas, this will be a space to watch closely as unemployment benefits and severance pay run out. "The May jobs report was mediocre. The headlines were decent, but the details were considerably worse," wrote Bill Adams, chief economist at Comerica Bank. "Tariffs were a headwind to private job growth, with losses in manufacturing, retail, and professional services. Job gains in other cyclical private industries were anemic, reflecting the drag from policy uncertainty." Still, markets liked the report , even if they bet more heavily against significant Fed easing this year. Traders now see zero chance of a rate cut when the central bank meets again in less than two weeks, with odds diminishing of further reductions, according to CME Group data . Instead, investors were relieved that despite an array of headwinds and uncertainty, the labor market is still standing. "It is a good thing that the American economy is so resilient and dynamic because it has been able to endure the headwinds caused by an ever-changing trade policy and higher tariffs," wrote Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist at tax consultancy RSM. "That resilience, though, has its limits, as the May employment report started to show on Friday."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prediction: in 12 months the dirt-cheap Shell share price could turn £10,000 into…
The Shell (LSE SHEL) share price looks cheap right now, with a price-to-earnings ratio of just 8.95. That's well below the average FTSE 100 P/E of 15 times. There's a reason for that, of course. Shell shares have fallen with the oil price, slumping almost 10% in 12 months. They're still up 67% over five years though. That's less than half the drop suffered by FTSE 100 rival BP. Shell seems to have a better idea how to navigate the push to net zero, but with the oil price hovering around $65 a barrel, it's still struggling. It's far from a done deal that Shell can bounce back from today's lows and make investors rich all over again. There is little sign the oil price is about to recover. With OPEC+ increasing production, it could fall further, especially as China struggles and Donald Trump brings volatility. Then there's the push towards net zero, which could go either way. Theoretically, building a new line of renewable energy will threaten fossil fuel behemoths, but we need them to help us push through the transition. This is particularly true given exponentially rising energy demand, thanks to AI and the rest. Shell's first-quarter results, published on 2 May, showed adjusted earnings of $5.6bn. That's a big drop from $7.73bn a year earlier but ahead of analyst expectations of $4.96bn. The company also announced another $3.5bn quarterly share buyback programme, marking the 14th consecutive quarter of at least $3bn in buybacks. Cash flow from operations came in at $9.3bn, slightly below consensus expectations of $9.6bn. So what about that dividend? A trailing yield of 4.4% is okay, but not exactly to die for. It's expected to creep up in 2026, but only to 4.49%. Shell isn't the dividend superstar it once was. Over the last 15 years, I would have expected shareholder payouts to compound at a decent clip. Instead, it's fallen by an average of 2.88% a year. The board didn't just slash its full-year dividend from 188 US cents in 2019 to 65.3 cents during the 2020 pandemic. It rebased it. While payouts have climbed at a decent clip since, they started from that lower level. In 2024, the total dividend was 139 US cents. That's at levels last seen in 2007. The 19 analysts serving up one-year share price forecasts have produced a median target of around 3,027p. If correct, that's a handsome increase of around 21.5% from today. Combined with that yield, this would give investors a total return of 26%. Based on that, if somebody invested £10,000 in the stock today, it would grow to £12,600 in a year. Obviously, nobody can predict the future like that. I use it only as a guide to market thinking. Here's another. Of the 32 analysts giving one-year stock ratings, an impressive 23 name Shell a Strong Buy. Four say Hold and five say Sell. Shell continues to face risks, as the oil price slows, net zero spreads confusion, and the global economy struggles. It may look cheap, but there's no guarantee its shares will suddenly close the valuation gap. But for those wanting exposure to energy, today's low valuation does make Shell worth considering. More so than BP, in my book. The post Prediction: in 12 months the dirt-cheap Shell share price could turn £10,000 into… appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Harvey Jones has positions in Bp P.l.c. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025

Business Insider
41 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Who will be Trump's new Silicon Valley bestie?
Mark Zuckerberg, Meta Platforms founder and CEO Zuckerberg was something of a MAGA stan earlier this year. Meta, his company, dropped $1 million on Trump's inauguration, and Zuck even co-hosted a black-tie soirée that night to honor the second-time president. Now, with Meta in the throes of a federal antitrust lawsuit, Zuckerberg may not be on Trump's good side. But the Meta CEO could be playing the long game here: He snapped up a $23 million, 15,000 square-foot DC mega mansion, establishing more of a presence in the capital. Zuck has also been on a bit of a rebrand journey, from a hoodie-wearing founder to a gold chain-wearing CEO with unapologetic swagger. Part of this transformation has included podcast appearances, like an episode with Trump-endorsing Joe Rogan in which Zuck talked about his "masculine energy" and his proclivity for bowhunting. Sam Altman, OpenAI cofounder and CEO Altman has also been circling the throne. First came Stargate: the $100 billion AI infrastructure plan between OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank, announced the day after Trump's inauguration. Then, in May, the OpenAI CEO joined Trump on a trip to Saudi Arabia while Altman was working on a massive deal to build one of the world's largest AI data centers in Abu Dhabi. This reportedly rattled Musk enough to tag along at the last minute, according to the Wall Street Journal. OpenAI was ultimately selected for the deal, which Musk allegedly attempted to derail, the Wall Street Journal reported. Jeff Bezos, Amazon founder and executive chairman, Washington Post owner, and Blue Origin founder Back in 2015, Bezos wanted to launch Trump into orbit after the at-the-time presidential candidate fired shots at Bezos on what was Twitter, now X, calling the Washington Post, which Bezos owns, a "tax shelter," Bezos responded that he'd use Blue Origin, a space company Bezos founded, to "#sendDonaldtospace." Times have certainly changed. In January, Bezos said he is "very optimistic" about the administration's space agenda. Behind the scenes, he has reportedly given Trump political advice, allegedly as early as the summer of 2024, according to Axios. There was a brief flare-up in April, though, after Amazon reportedly considered listing Trump's tariffs next to products' prices on the site, according to Punchbowl News. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt called the plan a "hostile and political action." The idea, which was never implemented, was scrapped, and an Amazon spokesperson insisted it was only ever meant for its low-cost Haul store. If Trump does cancel Musk's SpaceX government contracts as he threatened to do, Bezos' Blue Origin, and rival to SpaceX, could stand to benefit. Blue Origin already has a $3 billion contract with NASA. Jensen Huang, Nvidia cofounder and CEO While Huang was notably missing from Trump's second inauguration in January, he did attend the Middle East trip in May. Nvidia is partnering with Oracle, SoftBank, and G42 on the OpenAI data center plans in the UAE. But Nvidia hasn't gotten off too easy: In April, Trump banned the chip maker from selling its most advanced chips, the H20, to China, a move that Nvidia says cost it $5.5 billion and reportedly prompted the company to modify the chip for China to circumvent US export controls. Sundar Pichai, Google CEO In April, a federal judge ruled that Google holds an illegal monopoly in some advertising technology markets. This is one of two major legal blows to Google in the past year: Back in August 2024, a federal judge ruled that Google violated antitrust law with its online search. If Google has to sell Chrome, Barclays told clients on Monday, Alphabet stock could fall 25%. This flurry of litigation — and potential divestment of the Chrome business — puts Pichai between a rock and a hard place. While the CEO was spotted with the rest of the technorati at Trump's inauguration, it's hard to say how he might cozy up to Trump, and whether friendly relations would do anything to remedy these rulings.

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Here are the winners and losers in today's job market
The winners and losers of the workforce are coming into sharper focus. If you're looking for roles in healthcare or service work, you may have a very different experience than the white-collar workforce or new grads. Overall, the latest jobs data shows that the labor market isn't looking too shabby; the number of payrolls added in the Bureau of Labor Statistics' May report exceeded economists' expectations, and the unemployment rate held steady. But that doesn't mean all workers are navigating the labor market with ease. Instead, some are faring better than others. Cory Stahle, an economist at the Indeed Hiring Lab, said the new jobs report reflects that divide. "The headline number says the train keeps chugging along," Stahle said, "but at the same time, not everybody is experiencing that same thing." Here's who's winning in the job market right now A few industries stood out in the most recent jobs report. Employment in the private education and health services sector and the leisure and hospitality sector swelled. They alone accounted for over 100,000 new payrolls in May, and over the last three months have added around 374,000 jobs. In short, if you're trying to find a job in food service or home healthcare, the job market is in your favor. Other sectors that added roles in May include construction and retail trade, although not at the same clip. Daniel Zhao, lead economist at Glassdoor, said those service sectors have powered job growth, but "all of them have slowed in the first half of 2025 compared to the back half of 2024." There were also some winners in the white-collar world. Job-stayers — whether they still want to be there or not — are at least reaping some financial rewards. Average hourly earnings for workers in the information sector, which includes many aspects of tech, shot up from a year ago, as well as pay for those in professional and business services. For the white-collar workers who are waiting out the Big Stay, that's a win. Indeed, job stayers have a bit of a financial edge right now: Their raises are now slightly outpacing those of job switchers, per the Atlanta Federal Reserve, a big change from the days of the Great Resignation. Who's losing in the job market right now White-collar workers who are actively seeking a new role probably aren't feeling too hot; neither are new grads. Employment growth in the information sector has been nonexistent since February, while employment fell by 19,000 in professional and business services during that time. The job switching pay premium has evaporated, and companies are taking longer to fill available roles. One subsection of white-collar workers has reason to be especially nervous: Middle managers are getting flattened out of corporate structures in the name of efficiency. Then, of course, there's the bottom rung of the labor market: New graduates trying to land a full-time role. The share of recent college graduates with jobs that don't require a degree ticked up in March, according to the New York Federal Reserve's analysis. Similarly, that data shows recent college graduates ages 22 to 27 had higher unemployment rates compared to the larger 16- to 65-year-old workforce, a reversal from longer-term historical trends. "There's fewer people coming in, fewer people heading out," Guy Berger, the director of economic research at The Burning Glass Institute, said. "That mix tends to favor established workers who tend to be older and tends to hurt younger people trying to get their foot in the door." Stahle said college and high school graduates are entering a frozen labor market where the quits rate is low, people are staying put, and employers aren't really looking for new folks. "We're seeing unemployment rates rise most notably for those younger workers, college graduate-age workers — which is very different than what we've seen in the past, where those workers tend to do pretty well," Stahle said. Are you a job seeker, middle manager, or new grad with a story to share? Contact these reporters at jkaplan@ and .