Bengaluru citizen activists, experts come down heavily on GBG Act
At a seminar hosted by CIVIC (Citizen Voluntary Initiative for the City) on Saturday, former IAS officer and decentralisation advocate T.R. Raghunandan condemned the Act for placing authority in the hands of the Chief Minister, instead of enabling elected urban local bodies to function independently. 'This Act flies in the face of the Nagarapalika framework, which explicitly advocates for local self-government,' he said.
Echoing his concerns, Kathyayini Chamaraj, civic activist, emphasised that the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) had already been stripped of substantial powers and that the GBG Act further reduces local officials to an advisory role, weakening accountability and grassroots governance.
Satyajit Arikutharam, former Chief Technical Advisor at DULT, warned that opaque infrastructure decisions—such as a car-only underground tunnel—highlight the risk of elite-centric planning under the new regime. 'Future generations will bear the financial burden of projects that serve a privileged few,' he said.
While Mr. Raghunandan advocated for the division of Bengaluru into smaller administrative units to aid decentralisation, Ms. Chamaraj warned this could lead to financial inequality between zones. 'Prosperous areas like Mahadevapura would retain their revenues, leaving others underfunded,' she cautioned.
CIVIC plans to legally challenge the Act to restore democratic and accountable governance to the city.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a few seconds ago
- The Hindu
Uttar Pradesh court orders FIR against Union MoS for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh, four others in land dispute case
A court in Uttar Pradesh's Gonda district has directed the police to register an FIR against Union Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh, his representative Rajesh Singh and three others in connection with an alleged land dispute case. According to officials, the order was issued on Monday (August 11, 2025) by Special Judge of the MP-MLA Court (Civil Judge, Senior Division) Apeksha Singh, who instructed Mankapur police station to lodge an FIR against Kirti Vardhan Singh, Rajesh Singh, Pinku Singh, Sahdev Yadav and Kanti Singh. The complainant, Ajay Singh, a resident of Bhitoura in the Mankapur area, had moved the court under Section 173(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking registration of a case against the accused. Ajay Singh has alleged that land registered in the name of his wife Manisha Singh was fraudulently transferred again by influencing and luring the original seller, Bittan Devi, to execute a backdated sale deed in favour of Mithlesh Rastogi and Kanti Singh using a three-year-old stamp paper. He claimed that when he complained, the Superintendent of Police ordered an inquiry, which confirmed the allegations. Based on the SP's directions, police registered a case in 2024 against the seller and the buyers under relevant sections, but later filed a final report closing the matter. Ajay Singh said he objected to the closure, and in March 2025, the court set aside the final report and ordered further investigation, which is still underway. In the meantime, Rajesh Singh allegedly lodged a false case against Ajay Singh and his wife at the local police station in 2024. After the court's order for further investigation, Rajesh Singh allegedly used his political influence to harass the couple, they said. Through his driver Rinku Singh, he purportedly got another case registered against the couple under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and other sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, with the aim of pressuring them to settle the dispute. Ajay Singh alleged that since then, the accused have been threatening him to stop pursuing cases related to the disputed land and agree to a settlement, warning that his family would be killed if he refused. He said that despite repeated complaints to the police, no action was taken, prompting him to approach the court. Reacting to the development, Rajesh Singh, the Union Minister's representative, said he had come to know about the matter through the media and would comment only after receiving a copy of the court order.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a few seconds ago
- Business Standard
UP court orders FIR against Union MoS, four others in land dispute case
A court in Uttar Pradesh's Gonda district has directed the police to register an FIR against Union Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh, his representative Rajesh Singh, and three others in connection with an alleged land dispute case. According to officials, the order was issued on Monday by Special Judge of the MP-MLA Court (Civil Judge, Senior Division) Apeksha Singh, who instructed Mankapur police station to lodge an FIR against Kirti Vardhan Singh, Rajesh Singh, Pinku Singh, Sahdev Yadav and Kanti Singh. The complainant, Ajay Singh, a resident of Bhitoura in the Mankapur area, had moved the court under Section 173(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking registration of a case against the accused. Ajay Singh has alleged that land registered in the name of his wife Manisha Singh was fraudulently transferred again by influencing and luring the original seller, Bittan Devi, to execute a backdated sale deed in favour of Mithlesh Rastogi and Kanti Singh using a three-year-old stamp paper. He claimed that when he complained, the superintendent of police ordered an inquiry, which confirmed the allegations. Based on the SP's directions, police registered a case in 2024 against the seller and the buyers under relevant sections, but later filed a final report closing the matter. Ajay Singh said he objected to the closure, and in March 2025, the court set aside the final report and ordered further investigation, which is still underway. In the meantime, Rajesh Singh allegedly lodged a false case against Ajay Singh and his wife at the local police station in 2024. After the court's order for further investigation, Rajesh Singh allegedly used his political influence to harass the couple, they said. Through his driver Rinku Singh, he purportedly got another case registered against the couple under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and other sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, with the aim of pressuring them to settle the dispute. Ajay Singh alleged that since then, the accused have been threatening him to stop pursuing cases related to the disputed land and agree to a settlement, warning that his family would be killed if he refused. He said that despite repeated complaints to the police, no action was taken, prompting him to approach the court. Reacting to the development, Rajesh Singh, the Union minister's representative, said he had come to know about the matter through the media and would comment only after receiving a copy of the court order.
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Day after doing away with land pooling policy, Punjab govt not ready with scrapping notification
Even as the Punjab government scrapped its controversial land pooling policy, it was not ready with a notification to scrap the policy a day later on Tuesday. Sources in the government said that the officials and top leadership of AAP were all putting their heads together to stitch up the notification amid Opposition and farmers unions demands that notification regarding scrapping of the policy should have been out. When asked, a government official said, 'It is being prepared.' All eyes are on the notification as it would throw light on what all projects would be shut down completely. For instance, the government had issued a notice for the land pooling policy for expansion of Aerotropolis residential scheme in IT City of Mohali. The government had identified land for blocks E,F,G,H,I and J of the project and offered land pooling to the landowners. 'If the entire land pooling policy is scrapped then this project would also not see expansion. The government had already frozen the Chang in Land Use (CLU) in the area since 2017. No private builder can construct any housing project in the area. It was frozen so as to allow GMADA to expand the Aerotropolis which is already facing delays due to guava orchard scam that took place in the area. Now, the Vigilance Bureau is handling the case and no development can take place in the area. Hence, the new blocks are of utmost importance forthe state. The government is now wary of the already paddled narrative against the land pooling. Now, it remains to be seen whether the notification would mean curtains on the expansion of Aerotropolis or they would fins a way out,' a source said. He added that in such circumstances, the notification is of utmost importance. 'The way it will be worded will matter. That would have a bearing on the future projects. That is why the delay.' An official said that the government will have to scrap the entire policy first. 'If it wants to acquire land for Aerotropolis, it can do so under the Land acquisition Act.' Sources said that the government is likely to summon a Cabinet meeting for scrapping the policy. 'We had not thought about it earlier. But this is a part of the narrative now. We will see what is to be done,' a Cabinet minister told The Indian Express.
