Opinion - Could Trump's tariffs cause simmering tensions in South Korea to boil over?
South Korea is floundering in a time of uncertainty, in which its future as both a relatively new democracy and an old American ally is at stake. Unimaginable though it might seem, the conservative government is dealing simultaneously with the twin menaces of President Trump's tariffs and the rise of a leftist-led movement — one that has thrown out the country's conservative President Yoon Suk Yeol and is favored to take over in a 'snap election' on June 3, six months after Yoon's foolish attempt at imposing martial law on Dec. 3.
The front-runner, Lee Jae-myung, is almost certain to win the nomination of the left-leaning Democratic Party, or Minju, after engineering the demise of Yoon, who defeated him by less than 1 percent in the 2022 presidential election. The fact that Lee is a flawed figure, accused of sending money to North Korea when he was governor of the province surrounding Seoul and bordering the North, does not seem likely to cost him the upcoming election.
Rightists, highly divided as to whom to nominate against Lee, are smoldering with rage over his renaissance. Amid the turmoil, acting President Han Duck-soo, who has served as prime minister, economics minister and trade minister as well as ambassador to Washington, is keeping a steady hand on the tiller, even though the Minju-dominated National Assembly voted to impeach him shortly after impeaching Yoon. Thankfully Korea's constitutional court threw out Han's impeachment before agreeing unanimously to get rid of Yoon.
Meanwhile, the ministers Yoon appointed to his conservative government are battling Trump's tariffs and his misbegotten notion of linking them to the costs of keeping America's 28,500 troops in Korea. Having failed during his first term to get South Korea to pay $5 billion a year for U.S. forces, Trump is sure to demand far more than the $1.1 billion that former President Biden wound up agreeing on.
Headlined a 'nosedive,' a 'tailspin' and a 'bloodbath,' the precipitous drop in global stock markets after Trump said he was jacking up tariffs to unprecedented levels was far more than a one-day sensation. Trump's subsequent decision to suspend huge increases for all countries except China in the face of worldwide protests may postpone — but hardly halts — the chaos the world faces as he goes on trying to enforce tough bargains.
China, America's rival in the contest for regional power, is digging in for a long-term trade war, while America's northeast Asian allies, Japan and South Korea, along with the independent island province of Taiwan, look for a viable accommodation with Trump in his drive to wipe out enormous trade imbalances. Korea's quest for a new deal with Trump's America is complicated by the struggle that leaves the country without a leader entrusted with setting policy long-range.
Acting President Han would appear eminently qualified to talk over solutions, but he's not able to make a real deal while the leftist opposition salivates over the chance to take over. Trump has agreed to exempt smart phones and computers from reciprocal tariffs, but considering that Korea's trade surplus with the U.S. last year was $60.2 billion, he won't yield easily to pleas for mercy. U.S. troops and bases will be cards to play in the bargaining game.
Lost in the deluge of propaganda is any reference to China's stupendous surplus of $270.48 billion last year in trade with the U.S. Ironically, Taiwan, population 24 million, has profited far more per capita than the mainland, population 1.4 billion, in warding off tariffs that could undermine Washington's commitment to defend the island. President William Lai has said Taiwan won't retaliate against skyrocketing tariffs on exports that gave the island a surplus of $67.48 billion with the U.S. last year, and he promises to 'explore countermeasures' in a quest for a 'zero-for-zero' deal.
Uncertainty, however, prevails. For Korea, the danger of Trumpian tariffs deepens the gap between far right and far left. The rightists, still waving American and Korean flags at mass protests, are convinced that Trump will forever be on their side against the communist North. They can't believe that Trump, eager for a reunion with his old friend, North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, with whom he 'fell in love' at their first summit in Singapore in June 2018, might gladly cooperate with Lee, the South's likeliest next president, who also wants to renew talks with Kim.
Rightists and Trump are in complete accord, however, in their hostility toward China. Echoing Trump's charge of the 'stolen' 2020 presidential election, the rightists accuse China of rigging elections last year that gave the Minju its grip over the assembly, which Yoon accuses of blocking all he wanted to do as president. In this cauldron of conflict, Yoon, his former defense minister and about 20 others face trial for 'insurrection' for staging the abortive coup. The trial of Yoon opened on Monday, pouring fuel on the embers that could burst into an explosion long before Kim Jong Un makes good on his threats to nuke the South.
Donald Kirk has been a journalist for more than 60 years, focusing much of his career on conflict in Asia and the Middle East, including as a correspondent for the Washington Star and Chicago Tribune. He is currently a freelance correspondent covering North and South Korea, and is the author of several books about Asian affairs.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Daily Show' Makes X-Rated Example Out Of Republican's L.A. Protests Gaffe
'Daily Show' correspondent Desi Lydic roasted Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa) Tuesday after his not-safe-for-work gaffe while naming a law that experts warn may complicate Donald Trump's military deployment to Los Angeles protests. Lydic warned that Trump sending the military to demonstrations against his immigration policies could put him on the 'wrong side of the law' before flagging concerns tied to the Posse Comitatus Act — a law which, with some exceptions, bars troops from engaging in civilian law enforcement on U.S. soil. Lydic called for more details on the 'very serious legal principle' before turning to video of Nunn's wild on-air fumble during a CNN segment. 'Look, I believe strongly in pussy comitatus...,' Nunn appeared to say in the clip. The comedian, after pausing for laughter and applause from the 'Daily Show' crowd, pressed on. 'Indeed, Trump is truly in violation of 'pussy cum-in-tatas.' That's to say nothing of his violations of the Snatch Act,'' she joked. She went on to emphasize that Trump is taking an 'extreme measure' in Los Angeles. 'The last time 'pussy cum-in-tatas' was used it was on your mom last night,' quipped Lydic while the sound of an air horn went off. Watch more of Lydic's Tuesday monologue on '' below. Jon Stewart Busts Biggest Right-Wing Myth About 'F**king Pussies' Trump And Elon Musk 'Look At His Dumb Face!': Stephen Colbert Trolls Trump Over Truly Awkward Moment Seth Meyers Spots The Grandest Of Ironies In Trump's Latest Online Meltdown


Washington Post
16 minutes ago
- Washington Post
A federal appeals court is set to hear arguments in Trump's bid to erase his hush money conviction
NEW YORK — President Donald Trump's quest to erase his criminal conviction heads to a federal appeals court Wednesday. It's one way he's trying to get last year's hush money verdict overturned. A three-judge panel is set to hear arguments in Trump's long-running fight to get the New York case moved from state court to federal court, where he could then try to have the verdict thrown out on presidential immunity grounds. The Republican is asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene after a lower-court judge twice rejected the move. As part of the request, Trump wants the federal appeals court to seize control of the criminal case and then ultimately decide his appeal of the verdict, which is now pending in a state appellate court. The 2nd Circuit should 'determine once and for all that this unprecedented criminal prosecution of a former and current President of the United States belongs in federal court,' Trump's lawyers wrote in a court filing. The Manhattan district attorney's office, which prosecuted Trump's case, wants it to stay in state court. Trump's Justice Department — now partly run by his former criminal defense lawyers — backs his bid to move the case to federal court. If Trump loses, he could go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump was convicted in May 2024 of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal a hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels, whose affair allegations threatened to upend his 2016 presidential campaign. Trump denies her claim and said he did nothing wrong. It was the only one of his four criminal cases to go to trial. Trump's lawyers first sought to move the case to federal court following his March 2023 indictment, arguing that federal officers including former presidents have the right to be tried in federal court for charges arising from 'conduct performed while in office.' Part of the criminal case involved checks he wrote while he was president. They tried again after his conviction, arguing that Trump's historic prosecution violated his constitutional rights and ran afoul of the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling , which was decided about a month after the hush money trial ended. The ruling reins in prosecutions of ex-presidents for official acts and restricts prosecutors in pointing to official acts as evidence that a president's unofficial actions were illegal. U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein denied both requests, ruling in part that Trump's conviction involved his personal life, not his work as president. In a four-page ruling, Hellerstein wrote that nothing about the high court's ruling affected his prior conclusion that hush money payments at issue in Trump's case 'were private, unofficial acts, outside the bounds of executive authority.' Trump's lawyers argue that prosecutors rushed to trial instead of waiting for the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision, and that prosecutors erred by showing jurors evidence that should not have been allowed under the ruling, such as former White House staffers describing how Trump reacted to news coverage of the hush money deal and tweets he sent while president in 2018. Trump's former criminal defense lawyer Todd Blanche is now the deputy U.S. attorney general, the Justice Department's second-in-command. Another of his lawyers, Emil Bove, has a high-ranking Justice Department position. The trial judge, Juan M. Merchan, rejected Trump's requests to throw out the conviction on presidential immunity grounds and sentenced him on Jan. 10 to an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction intact but sparing him any punishment. Appearing by video at his sentencing, Trump called the case a 'political witch hunt,' 'a weaponization of government' and 'an embarrassment to New York.'
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs seen lifting underlying US consumer prices in May
By Lucia Mutikani WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. consumer prices likely increased moderately in May amid relatively cheaper gasoline, but the Trump administration's import tariffs probably started filtering through to other goods and potentially raising underlying inflation pressures. The Consumer Price Index report from the Labor Department on Wednesday could show the CPI less the volatile food and energy components rising by the most in four months. Economists said the increase in the so-called core CPI would be attributable to higher prices from President Donald Trump's sweeping import duties. May would mark the start of tariff-related high inflation readings that could last through year end, they said. Walmart last month said it would begin raising prices in late May and June. Economists said inflation has been slow to respond to tariffs as most retailers were selling merchandise accumulated before the duties took effect. "Retailers showed remarkable restraint in April," said Stephen Stanley, chief U.S. economist at Santander U.S. Capital Markets. "May should bring the leading edge of price increases, with the maximum impact coming in June and July." The CPI likely increased 0.2% last month after advancing by the same margin in April, a Reuters survey of economists showed. Gasoline prices were mostly lower in May as concerns over global economic growth curbed crude oil prices. In the 12-months through May, the CPI was forecast increasing 2.5% after rising 2.3% in April. Some of the rise in the year-on-year CPI would reflect last year's low readings dropping out of the calculation. Core CPI is forecast to have climbed 0.3%, which would be the biggest gain since January, after rising 0.2% in April. In the 12 months through May, core CPI inflation is estimated to have increased 2.9% after rising 2.8% in April. The Federal Reserve tracks different inflation measures for its 2% target. The U.S. central bank is expected to leave its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range next Wednesday while policymakers monitor the economic impact of the tariffs. STAFFING CRUNCH The CPI data will come under close scrutiny in the months ahead after the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Labor Department's agency that compiles the report and other economic releases including the closely watched employment report, announced last week the suspension of CPI data collection in three cities because of resource constraints. The BLS like all government agencies has been severely affected by mass firings, voluntary resignations, early retirements and hiring freezes, which are part of an unprecedented campaign by the White House to drastically reduce the size of government and remake it. The BLS has also announced that it would, effective with the release of the July Producer Price Index data in August, end the calculation and publication of about 350 indexes. That would include data from PPI industry, commodity, final demand-intermediate demand and special index classifications. Economists said that the BLS had with the CPI data reported a rise in the share of categories for which prices were calculated using a method called different cell imputation, which some viewed as less accurate. The BLS said on Tuesday its published data met rigorous standards, but did not address staffing issues. "Data quality is evaluated through measures of variance, bias studies, and assessments of survey methods," the agency said in a statement to Reuters. "BLS continues to evaluate data quality." A former BLS commissioner told Reuters that staff levels were considerably low at the agency. "I understand that BLS staffing is down by at least 15% now, that's not reflected in any official numbers yet, because many of them are still being paid," said Erica Groshen. "They are not at work and it is impinging on the agencies. Also the hiring freeze means that they can't be replaced." Groshen said the CPI report remained reliable, noting an increased shift towards electronic collection of data. "At a national level, the standard errors aren't really affected very much, and the reliability is still good, but it's really disaggregated at the granular level, where you're starting to see some real losses," she said. "It's just not aiding publication standards, and so they're not putting it out, but they can still use it as input to the national numbers." Other economists agreed, noting that the collection suspension only affected a small area. "I don't see that as being a deal breaker," said Brian Bethune, an economics professor at Boston College. "The problem would be, if they start to have to suppress more of them or drop them out of the survey, then that could be more problematic." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data