Newly discovered settlement could unlock secrets of Roman conquest
The excavation near a Cotswolds village was prompted by the find of two iron Roman cavalry swords, possibly still bearing traces of their scabbards, two years ago.
Metal detectorist Glenn Manning discovered the rare artefacts during a rally near Willersey. They were subsequently donated to the Corinium Museum in Cirencester, Gloucestershire.
'Finding two swords in the same spot was amazing,' Mr Manning said.
'The morning before the rally, I had a feeling I would find something special.
'This was only my second time metal detecting. I'm excited to find out more about them.'
Following this discovery, Historic England conducted geophysical surveys of the area where the swords were found, which revealed the possibility of extensive prehistoric and Romano-British remains.
Excavations earlier this year found evidence of settlements spanning several centuries.
These include three or four Iron Age ring ditches, a substantial rectangular enclosure, and remains of Roman limestone buildings, which could be a winged villa.
More archaeological work is required, and Historic England could then recommend to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) that the site be protected as a scheduled monument.
It is believed the long swords or 'spatha' were used by the Romans on horseback from early in the second century AD through to the third century AD.
They are contemporary with the villa, but it is not known how they came to be there.
Ian Barnes, senior archaeologist at Historic England, said: 'This excavation provides valuable insights into the nature of settlement patterns from the Early Iron Age through to the Roman period in Gloucestershire.
'This new evidence will help us to understand more about what happened around the period of the Roman Conquest, which must have been a tumultuous time.'
Peter Busby, from Cotswold Archaeology, said: 'I am very proud of how much our team of volunteers, professional archaeologists, and metal detectorists achieved in 15 days, despite the heavy January rain.
'We turned a ploughed field, the swords, and geophysical anomalies into the story of a settlement spanning hundreds of years – the first stage in telling the history of these fields and their cavalry swords.'
Emma Stuart, director of the Corinium Museum, added: 'It's a privilege to acquire such rare artefacts.
'This valuable addition of Roman weaponry at the museum broadens the story of life in the Cotswolds during the mid to late Roman period.
'Wiltshire Conservation has identified the scabbard remnants and this adds another dimension to this discovery.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Unburied treasure: Viking hoard found by Scottish detectorist comes to South Australia
In AD900, marauding Vikings buried a hoard of treasure – jewellery, gold, silver and more – in Scotland. It wasn't until 2014 that it was unearthed. Metal detectorist Derek McLennan was prospecting in a ploughed field near Dumfries and Galloway when he came across the hoard, which turned out to be the most significant Viking-age collection ever found in the UK or Ireland. Now the Galloway hoard is making its international debut in Adelaide, on exhibition at the SA Museum. By chance, the very detector McLennan used (a waterproof, all-terrain CTX 3030, for the cognoscenti) was made by an Australian company based in Adelaide, Minelab. Minelab's engineering general manager, Mark Lawrie, says it was a 'bizarre' and 'happy' coincidence, and the museum confirmed it had no relationship with the company. Minelab sells detectors for coins and treasures, for gold prospecting and for finding landmines in conflict zones. With names such as Excalibor, Equinox and Manticore, the machines have helped customers around the world find treasures such as a pirate knife, sterling silver with an ivory handle and a Bronze-age torc. There are coins and rings, and American civil war relics, arrowheads and, in one case, a 1906 dog registration tag. And then there was that amazing cache in Scotland. 'I unearthed the first piece; initially I didn't understand what I had found because I thought it was a silver spoon, and then I turned it over and wiped my thumb across it and I saw the saltire-type of design and knew instantly it was Viking. Then my senses exploded,' McLennan said at the time. In Scotland, treasure seekers are paid for their finds – in this case, National Museums Scotland paid Derek McLennan a reward of almost £2m (about A$4m) for the 5kg of gold, silver, textiles and other objects he found. When he discovered it, the hoard of treasure was topped with a layer of silver bullion with an Anglo-Saxon cross, thought to be a decoy. Under it was another layer – of gravel – under which was a much larger stash of silver bullion, then elaborate, silver arm-rings and a box of gold objects, including a gold bird-pin. Next was a silver-gilt vessel, packed with valuables and wrapped in fabric, and inscribed with a 'fire-altar' associated with Zoroastrianism, the state religion of the last Persian imperial dynasty, in modern-day Iran. The Vikings buried their loot as they fled danger, perhaps hoping to later recover it – or to see it in the afterlife. Content coordinator at the SA Museum, Stephen Zagala, says apart from the looted treasures in the hoard, there are other objects that are perhaps more interesting. 'It's these glass beads and curios and heirlooms which are really more like a time capsule than a treasure hoard,' he says. 'Heirlooms that have been passed down over several generations, and they intended to pass them on further, and it never happened. 'They were just left in the ground for a thousand years.' One of his favourite objects is the rattle-stone, also known as a charm-stone. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'The inside has been eroded by water and left some sort of little fossil or other bit of stone inside, so that it rattles when you shake it like a seed pod,' he says. Zagala explains that the rattle-stone was often used in Scandinavia to help 'loosen' a baby during childbirth. 'It speaks to magic and mysticism,' he says. 'It speaks to maternal care and memories and relationships in a community.' Mark Lawrie says Minelab started working with McLennan and his wife, Sharon – who is from Kalgoorlie – after their 2014 find. They are now field testers who help Minelab fine-tune its technology. They are testing, for example, technology to weed coke – which sends similar signals as metals do – from burned wood in Scotland, to be used for energy. While detectorists hunt for archaeological treasure and Viking hoards in Europe, in Australia it's more about looking for gold, old coins or lost objects. Australia's famous gold nuggets are one of the reasons Minelab is in Australia. Another is that an inventor in the 1990s worked out how to get detectors to work on the iron-heavy red dirt of the outback. Now, Lawrie says, they have a big market in Africa. There, people on the poverty line can make a living out of finding gold. Minelab also makes landmine detectors for humanitarian projects in Cambodia, Laos, Afghanistan and Ukraine, 'everywhere where there has been conflict,' he says. Lawrie is a detectorist himself and describes it as 'meditative'. 'If you like hunting, or fishing, anything to do with dreaming of the thing you're going to get, and then preparing all your equipment and then going and doing it and, by and large, not actually finding anything most of the time, but being OK with that … that's very similar,' he says. 'They sometimes call it 'dirt fishing'.' Researchers will be studying the Galloway hoard for years, if not decades to come, particularly the more exotic items: the surviving silk, those curios, a rock crystal jar. And there are two balls of compact earth containing flecks of gold, which might have been gathered from a religious shrine or sacred place. But for now they're calling these things, which McLennan fished out of the earth, 'dirt balls'.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Can you see circles or rectangles? And does the answer depend on where you grew up?
Do people from different cultures and environments see the world differently? Two recent studies have different takes on this decades-long controversy. The answer might be more complicated, and more interesting, than either study suggests. One study, led by Ivan Kroupin at the London School of Economics, asked how people from different cultures perceived a visual illusion known as the Coffer illusion. They discovered that people in the UK and US saw it mainly in one way, as comprising rectangles – while people from rural communities in Namibia typically saw it another way: as containing circles. To explain these differences, Kroupin and colleagues appeal to a hypothesis raised more than 60 years ago and argued about ever since. The idea is that people in western industrialised countries (these days known by the acronym 'weird' – for western, educated, industrialised, rich and democratic – a summary that is increasingly questionable) see things in a specific way because they are generally exposed to highly 'carpentered' environments, with lots of straight lines, right angles – visual features common in western architecture. By contrast, people from non-'weird' societies – like those in rural Namibia – inhabit environments with fewer sharp lines and angular geometric forms, so their visual abilities will be tuned differently. The study argues that the tendency of rural Namibians to see circles rather than rectangles in the Coffer illusion is due to their environments being dominated by structures such as round huts instead of angular environments. They back up this conclusion with similar results from several other visual illusions, all supposedly tapping into basic brain mechanisms involved in visual perception. So far, so good for the cross-cultural perceptual psychologists, and for the 'carpentered world' hypothesis. The second study, by Dorsa Amir and Chaz Firestone, takes a sledgehammer to this hypothesis, but for the much better-known illusion: the Müller-Lyer illusion. Two lines of equal length seem to be different lengths because of the context provided by inward-pointing, compared with outward-pointing, arrowheads. It's a very powerful illusion. I've seen it on thousands of occasions and it works every time for me. There are many explanations for why the Müller-Lyer illusion is so effective. One of the more popular is that the arrowheads are interpreted by the brain as cues about three-dimensional depth, so our brains implicitly interpret the illusion as representing an object of some kind, with right angles and straight lines. This explanation fits neatly with the 'carpentered world' hypothesis – and indeed a lot of early support for this hypothesis relied on apparent cultural variability in how the Müller-Lyer illusion is perceived. In their study, Amir and Firestone carefully and convincingly dismantle this explanation. They point out that non-human animals experience the illusion, as shown in a range of studies in which animals (including guppies, pigeons and bearded dragons) are trained to prefer the longer of two lines, and then presented with the Müller-Lyer image. They show that it works without straight lines, and for touch as well as vision. They note that it even works for people who until recently have been blind, referencing an astonishing experiment in which nine children, blind from birth because of dense cataracts, were shown the illusion immediately after the cataracts were surgically removed. Not only had these children not seen highly carpentered environments – they hadn't seen anything at all. After you absorb their analysis, it's pretty clear that the Müller-Lyer illusion is not due to culturally specific exposure to carpentry. Why the discrepancy? There are several possibilities. Perhaps there are reasons why cross-cultural variability should be expected for the Coffer but not the Müller-Lyer illusion (one possibility here is that the Coffer illusion is based on how people pay attention to things, rather than on some more basic aspect of perception). It could also be that there are systematic differences in perception between cultures, but that the 'carpentered world' hypothesis is not the correct explanation. It's also worth noting that the Kroupin study has some potential weaknesses. For example, the UK/US and Namibian participants were exposed to the illusions using very different methods. All in all, the jury remains out and – favourite scientist punt coming up – 'more research is needed'. The notion that people from different cultures vary in how they experience things is certainly plausible. There's a wealth of evidence that as we grow up our brains are shaped, at least to some extent, by features of our environments. And just as we all differ in our externally visible characteristics – height, body shape and so on – we will all differ on the inside too. As the author Anaïs Nin put it in quoting the Talmud: 'We do not see things as they are, we see them as we are.' For me, an important implication of this line of thought is that there are likely to be substantial differences in perception within 'groups' as well as between them. This will probably hold however these 'groups' are defined, whether as different cultures or as a contrast between 'neurotypical' and 'neurodivergent' people. I believe that paying more attention to within-group perceptual diversity will help us to better interpret the differences we do find between groups, and equip us with the tools needed to resist relying on simple cultural stereotypes as explanations. More research is needed here too. But it's on the way. In the Perception Census, a project led by my research group at the University of Sussex together with professor Fiona Macpherson at the University of Glasgow, we are studying how perception differs in a large sample of about 40,000 people from more than 100 countries. Our experiment includes not just one or two visual illusions but more than 50 different experiments probing many different aspects of perception. When we're done analysing the data, we hope to deliver a uniquely detailed picture of how people experience their world, both within and between cultures. We'll also make the data openly available for other researchers to explore new ideas in this important area. One critical insight lies behind all these questions. How things seem is not how they are. For each of us, it might seem as though we see the world exactly as it is; as if our senses are transparent windows through with the world pours itself directly into our mind. But how things are is very different. The objective world no doubt exists, but the world we experience is always an active construction, a kind of 'controlled hallucination' in which the brain uses sensory signals to update and calibrate its best interpretation of what's going on. What we experience is this interpretation, not a 'readout' of the sensory information. For me, this is the key insight that underlies any claim about perceptual diversity. When we take it fully on board, it encourages a much-needed humility about our own ways of seeing. We live in perceptual echo chambers, just as we do in those of social media, and the first step to escaping any echo chamber is to realise that you're in one. Anil Seth is a professor of cognitive and computational neuroscience at the University of Sussex, and author of the Sunday Times bestseller Being You: A New Science of Consciousness
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Lottery results and numbers: Lotto and Thunderball draw tonight, July 5, 2025
THE NATIONAL Lottery results are in and it's time to find out who has won a life-changing amount of money tonight (July 5, 2025). Could tonight's £15million jackpot see you handing in your notice, jetting off to the Bahamas or driving a new Porsche off a garage forecourt? 3 3 You can find out by checking your ticket against tonight's numbers below. Good luck! Tonight's National Lottery Lotto winning numbers are: 09, 12, 18, 37, 43, 45 and the Bonus Ball is 15. Tonight's National Lottery Thunderball winning numbers are: 06, 18, 21, 28, 29 and the Thunderball is 08. The first National Lottery draw was held on November 19 1994 when seven winners shared a jackpot of £5,874,778. The largest amount ever to be won by a single ticket holder was £42million, won in 1996. Gareth Bull, a 49-year-old builder, won £41million in November, 2020 and ended up knocking down his bungalow to make way for a luxury manor house with a pool. TOP 5 BIGGEST LOTTERY WINS ACROSS THE WORLD £1.308 billion (Powerball) on January 13 2016 in the US, for which three winning tickets were sold, remains history's biggest lottery prize £1.267 billion (Mega Million) a winner from South Carolina took their time to come forward to claim their prize in March 2019 not long before the April deadline £633.76 million (Powerball draw) from a winner from Wisconsin £625.76 million (Powerball) Mavis L. Wanczyk of Chicopee, Massachusetts claimed the jackpot in August 2017 £575.53 million (Powerball) A lucky pair of winners scooped the jackpot in Iowa and New York in October 2018 Sue Davies, 64, bought a lottery ticket to celebrate ending five months of shielding during the pandemic — and won £500,000. Sandra Devine, 36, accidentally won £300k - she intended to buy her usual £100 National Lottery Scratchcard, but came home with a much bigger prize. The biggest jackpot ever to be up for grabs was £66million in January last year, which was won by two lucky ticket holders. Another winner, Karl managed to bag £11million aged just 23 in 1996. The odds of winning the lottery are estimated to be about one in 14million - BUT you've got to be in it to win it. 3
