Second J&K arrest through facial recognition tech; terror suspect held at Anantnag checkpoint
SRINAGAR: J&K police announced Sunday their second arrest through Facial Recognition System (FRS) since the AI-based technology was installed two months ago in some areas, picking up the terror suspect as he passed a checkpoint in Anantnag.
The previous such breakthrough came last month.
Muneeb Mushtaq Sheikh of Pulwama's Pampore was booked in cases under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and Explosive Substances Act. He was spotted at Ganishbal in Anantnag, part of south Kashmir where FRS is being used along with some pockets in central Kashmir. Upon detection, Muneeb was immediately taken into custody and shifted to Pahalgam police station for further verification, the police said in a statement.
J&K police underlined the significance of FRS, vowing to continue leveraging modern tools to combat terror and ensure public safety. 'The swift identification and apprehension of the suspect highlights the effectiveness of advanced surveillance technologies, including FRS, in enhancing security and maintaining law and order,' the police said.
On June 19, an alleged 'overground worker (OGW)' was held in Anantnag district, the first using FRS. The system flagged the suspect as he passed a checkpoint in the district's Langanbal area. OGWs are those who provide shelter and logistical support to terrorists.
J&K authorities have rolled out FRS as part of a wider security overhaul. The system is equipped with real-time alert capabilities for security forces once a suspect appears within the surveillance camera's range.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
WWICS chief's conviction upheld in Forest Act case
Mohali: A local court on Monday upheld the 2009 conviction of Col Baljit Singh Sandhu (retd), owner of WorldWide Immigration Consultancy Services (WWICS), in a case under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, but granted him probation instead of jail time. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The order was pronounced by additional sessions judge Prashant Verma. Under the probation terms, Sandhu will now serve his sentence under the supervision of a probation officer, allowing him to remain in the community rather than face incarceration. The decision effectively offers the convict a chance to rehabilitate under legal scrutiny, in accordance with provisions of criminal law. Advocate Amit Mandkan, counsel for Sandhu, said they plan to challenge the sentencing further. "We will file for revision of the sentence in a higher court," he said. The case pertains to a violation of Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, for which Sandhu was convicted by the chief judicial magistrate, Rupnagar, on Sept 17, 2009. The conviction was made under Section 3(A) of the Act, which deals with penalties for unauthorised use or diversion of forest land. Sandhu filed an application seeking compounding of the offence under Section 359(5), corresponding to Section 320 of the CrPC, 1973. He argued that the offence should be compoundable under Section 68 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, which permits certain forest-related offences to be settled out of court. However, the application was rejected by the Divisional Forest Officer, Mohali, and subsequently contested by the State. The prosecution maintained that the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 does not contain any provision to compound offences, and Section 68 of the 1927 Act applies only to specific offences listed under that statute. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The court concurred with the State's argument but granted probation considering the long-pending nature of the case and other mitigating factors. The court's decision highlights the legal complexity in cases involving overlapping provisions of environmental laws and underscores the distinction between compoundable and non-compoundable offences under different forest legislations. While the probation order spares Sandhu from immediate jail time, the legal battle appears far from over as the defence prepares to pursue further relief through appellate forums.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Mumbai Police bust MD manufacturing unit in Mysore, seize drugs worth Rs 381 crore, four arrested
The Mumbai Police have busted a mephedrone (MD) manufacturing racket in Mysore, Karnataka, and seized the drug worth Rs 381 crore. Police also arrested four members of the MD manufacturing and supplying racket. At a press conference on Monday, Mumbai Police said that the Sakinaka police in April this year had arrested three people and seized over four kilograms of MD and other raw materials totally worth Rs 8.04 crore from a place in Vasai, Palghar. One of the key accused of the racket, Salim Imtiyaz Shaikh, alias Salim Langda, has since been on the run. After constantly following leads on Shaikh, a Bandra (West) resident, the Sakinaka police team arrested him on July 25. During interrogation, Shaikh revealed that he had brought MD drugs from Mysore, Karnataka. A police team, with the help of other technical probes, discovered that an MD manufacturing unit was being operated from Mysore, Karnataka. A watch was kept on the factory and the information was verified. Mumbai police DCP Dutta Nalawade of Zone-10 said, 'A team of Sakinaka police along with the local police on Sunday raided the said factory situated behind a garage on the service road of the Ring Road of Mysore city and seized MD drugs, raw material (chemicals), equipment and machines, etc., totally worth nearly Rs 382 crore. This included 187.97 kilograms of MD worth Rs 381 crore as per the estimated international price of MD.' Police also arrested four members of the racket linked to manufacturing of MD at the unit. The arrested accused have been charged under relevant sections of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act. DCP Nalawde's team included senior inspector Pramod Tawde, inspector Sanjay Shirsagar, API Dayanand Wanve, PSI Pankaj Pardeshi, and staff Shashikant Patil, Chandrakant Pawar, Nitin Khairmode, and Anil Kharade. Police probe has also revealed that among the four arrested, one is from Mumbai, two are from Gujarat and one is from Mysore. Another police officer said that the arrested accused have sound knowledge in chemistry and cooking mephedrone using raw material available in the pharmaceutical industry. Police officials have also found that the arrested eight accused have a history of NDPS (drugs) cases. Further investigation is underway.
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
Social Media Used For Academic Interaction Falls In Ambit Of Workplace Under POSH Law: Delhi HC
A DU professor accused of sexual harassment had challenged the university's disciplinary action, claiming social media conversations should not be treated as workplace harassment The Delhi High Court has upheld the compulsory retirement of a Delhi University assistant professor after an internal complaints committee found him guilty of sexually harassing four students and an alumna via WhatsApp and Facebook messages. The court ruled that social media platforms used in the context of academic interactions are within the ambit of a workplace under the POSH law. The professor had challenged the findings of the internal complaints committee (ICC) and the university's disciplinary action, claiming procedural irregularities and arguing that private social media conversations should not be treated as workplace harassment. The court rejected all grounds of challenge. The complaints, filed in 2018, alleged that the professor had sent sexually charged, inappropriate, and unsolicited messages through Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp. Screenshots submitted by the complainants revealed late-night texts with sexual innuendos and repeated digital contact despite objections. The ICC found the complaints credible and concluded that the conduct constituted sexual harassment under Section 2(n) of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. The inquiry established that the accused used his position to exploit academic and personal boundaries over digital platforms. The professor was issued a show-cause notice in July 2018. After considering his written response and oral submissions before the governing body, the university accepted the ICC's recommendation and imposed the penalty of compulsory retirement in October 2018, which was subsequently ratified by the vice-chancellor. In his petition before the Delhi High Court, the professor argued that the ICC was not properly constituted and that the inquiry process violated Rule 7(7) of the POSH Rules. He claimed the committee had failed to offer him sufficient opportunity to cross-examine the complainants and that no detailed 'speaking order" was issued by the university in the final disciplinary decision. Justice Subramonium Prasad, however, dismissed the petition. The court held that the ICC was validly constituted and the inquiry was conducted as per law. The professor's non-cooperation during evidence collection and cross-examination was noted on record, and the court found no procedural irregularity that could vitiate the process. Significantly, the HC held that digital platforms like WhatsApp and Facebook, when used in the context of academic or hierarchical relationships, fall within the scope of 'workplace" under the POSH Act. The power dynamic between the professor and the students was relevant in establishing the workplace context, despite the online medium. The court observed that the 'WhatsApp and Facebook messages sent by the petitioner are so profane that this court refrains from reproducing the same in the order". It also remarked that 'teachers shape the careers of young aspiring students", and misconduct by educators has a 'deleterious effect on the psyche" of the victims. The court clarified that the absence of a speaking order from the university did not cause prejudice to the petitioner, since the disciplinary process followed ICC findings and provided both notice and hearing. The ruling reaffirms the legal validity of ICC inquiries under the POSH Act and reinforces the interpretation that harassment through digital channels by a person in authority, even outside institutional premises, can constitute workplace sexual harassment. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
