
Top energy group demands governor take swift action against radical 'extremists' crippling power grid
"Left-wing extremists tried to muscle the Green New Deal through Congress during your tenure as Puerto Rico's Resident Commissioner," American Energy Institute CEO Jason Isaac wrote in a letter to Puerto Rico Gov. Jenniffer González-Colón.
"They failed. Now they have turned to the courts to impose their agenda on our country – and Puerto Rico is participating."
The letter outlines "three active tracks of litigation" that Isaac labels a "coordinated lawfare attack on our quality" of life, including a lawsuit filed by dozens of Puerto Rico cities and towns blaming energy companies for climate change and seeking damages.
"Their goal is to bankrupt energy companies or to leverage the threat of tort damages to force outcomes that would be disastrous for Puerto Rico and the rest of the nation," Isaac wrote.
Isaac told Fox News Digital that groups like the Environmental Law Institute (ELI) have been instrumental in the green energy push in Puerto Rico and throughout the United States.
The Washington, D.C.-based ELI created the Climate Judiciary Project (CJP) in 2018, establishing a first-of-its-kind resource to provide "reliable, up-to-date information" about climate change litigation, according to the group. The project's reach has extended to various state and federal courts, including powerful appellate courts, and comes as various cities and states pursue high-profile litigation against the oil industry.
Fox News Digital has previously reported on the group, funded by left-wing nonprofits, and how critics say it continues to work with judges and experts involved in climate change litigation despite publicly downplaying the extent of those connections.
"They're going out and really kind of rigging the game before cases have even been brought to the courts," Isaac said. "They've tainted over 2,000 American judges at the federal and state level using climate education, these so-called climate education modules, modules that had even been debunked by left-leaning organizations like Snopes."
In a statement to Fox News Digital, ELI communications director Nick Collin said, "ELI has decades of experience providing highly respected judicial education programs. The Climate Judiciary Project offers evidence-based information about climate science and trends in the law so that judges can make informed decisions. It does not participate in litigation, support or coordinate with parties in litigation, and it does not tell judges how to rule in any case or on any issue."
Gonzalez, a Republican, has signaled that she is open to embracing fossil fuels and Isaac's letter calls on her to take three key steps to push back on climate activists on the island.
First, Isaac asks Gonzales to "Direct the Secretary of Justice to withdraw Puerto Rico's complaint in the Puerto Rico v. Exxon Mobil case filed in the Superior Court of San Juan."
Second, the letter asks the governor to "file amicus briefs in the San Juan and Puerto Rican municipalities litigation in favor of dismissal with prejudice."
The letter also asks for judges to be appointed to the Puerto Rican judiciary who "will respect the separation of powers and leave political issues to the democratically elected branches" and for the government to "discourage state contracts with outside counsel, such as Milberg or Smouse & Mason, who are using public legal engagements to advance far-left political objectives."
Puerto Rico's power grid is considered to be barely functional as blackouts have become a part of everyday life, including the most recent grid failure during Holy Week that left more than 1.4 million residents without power for days.
It has been estimated that power failures cost the island $230 million in lost revenue every day.
Ultimately, it's the Puerto Rican people who suffer the most when climate litigation hampers the island's grid, Isaac told Fox News Digital, explaining that residents are living in "energy poverty" with constant rolling blackouts and an unreliable grid.
"They're kind of experiencing what the energy transition does, it transitions people from affordable and reliable energy to less reliable energy, economic despair," Isaac said.
Fox News Digital reached out to Gonzalez's office for comment.
"Climate lawfare threatens to derail your administration's common-sense approach," Isaac wrote. "The climate plaintiffs are advancing a fundamentally neocolonial agenda. They are steering Puerto Rico toward a 'green' energy future it did not choose – one that ignores the basic needs of its people, who simply require cheap and reliable electricity."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
27 minutes ago
- New York Post
JD Vance: ‘You are going to see a lot of people get indicted' over Russiagate
Vice President JD Vance said in an interview Sunday that 'a lot of people' are about to get indicted over the Obama administration's machinations on so-called Russiagate. Without divulging specific names of who will get charged, Vance pointed to recent disclosures from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard as ironclad evidence that there had been 'an aggressive violation of the law' revolving around Russiagate. 'I absolutely want to see indictments,' Vance told Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' in a pre-taped interview. 'Of course, you've got to have the law follow the facts here.' Advertisement 'You don't just indict people to indict people. You indict people because they broke the law,' he went on. 'If you look at what Tulsi and Kash Patel have revealed in the last couple of weeks, I don't know how anybody can look at that and say there was an aggressive violation of the law.' 4 Vice President JD Vance called for people to get indicted over Russiagate. Getty Images 'I absolutely think they broke the law. And you're going to see a lot of people get indicted for that,' he later added. Advertisement Last month, Gabbard began unveiling a tranche of documents about the Obama administration's investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 election. Among the disclosures was the declassification of a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report crafted by Republicans that found there was insufficient evidence that Russia favored President Trump in 2016. Gabbard also divulged material showcasing that top intelligence bosses had evidence that Russia did not hack 2016 voting systems in a way that allowed them to change the election outcome. 'What they basically did is they defrauded the American people in order to take Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign talking points and turn them into intelligence,' Vance said, accusing the Obama-era intelligence apparatus of 'lying about what the intel said.' Advertisement 4 Vice President JD Vance accused the Obama-era intelligence community of helping the Clinton campaign. James Messerschmidt 'They would take something that supported a Hillary Clinton campaign talking point, and they would overemphasize it and exaggerate it,' the vice president continued. 'They took anything that actually contradicted that narrative, and they buried it deep.' Following the revelations from Gabbard, the Justice Department formed a 'strike force' to begin assessing whether there were any criminal violations in what had been uncovered. Last week, US Attorney General Pam Bondi moved to open a grand jury to probe Obama administration officials. Grand juries are used to determine whether or not to hand down indictments. Advertisement 4 The vice president said the Russiagate debacle bogged President Trump down during his first term. NATHAN HOWARD/POOL/EPA/Shutterstock Vance broadly argued that 'they actually laundered Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign talking points through the American intelligence services.' He did not specify names. Former CIA director John Brennan and former DNI James Clapper have hit back at Gabbard, pointing to a 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, which noted the panel 'heard consistently that analysts were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions.' Clapper and Brennan also inked an op-ed insisting that the 2017 Intelligence Community report that was at the center of Gabbard's ire never described 'collusion' between Trump. They also stood by their claims that the Kremlin preferred him in the 2016 election. 4 President Trump is set to meet with Russian tyrant Vladimir Putin next week. Getty Images A spokesperson for former President Barack Obama issued a rare statement rebuffing Gabbard. 'The bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,' spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush said last month. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes.'


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Cornyn leans into Texas redistricting fight amid uphill reelection bid
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) is leaning into the Texas redistricting battle as he seeks to fend off a conservative primary challenge from Attorney General Ken Paxton (R). On Tuesday, Cornyn publicly called for FBI Director Kash Patel to assist in tracking down Democrats who fled the state in protest. Two days later, the senator and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) separately confirmed that the FBI was assisting in the effort. The move to get out in front of the redistricting battle allows Cornyn to ingratiate himself with the state's deeply conservative base, who have distanced themselves from the incumbent senator in his uphill primary battle against Paxton. 'I think this is a good opportunity for Cornyn to show that he's a fighter and that's willing to take on an issue that's a red meat issue that resonates with the base. When you see those opportunities, you have to take them,' said Brendan Steinhauser, Cornyn's former campaign manager and a Texas-based GOP strategist. 'In campaigns like this, you don't get to control events. You can only control how you react and respond to them,' he continued. 'This is exactly the kind of thing he needs.' Cornyn's allies have touted the senator's move. The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) rolled out a digital ad titled 'Cornyn Fights–Paxton Folds.' The incumbent senator and his allies have also taken a number of swipes at Paxton in the process, pointing out that the state attorney general was in Europe as the redistricting battle erupted. Paxton had previously traveled to Scotland at the end of July and met with Trump during the president's trip to his Turnberry golf course. 'Memo to @kenpaxtontx:Hey, Ken. Are you in the office today? It's kind of important. Let me know if you need the off the golf course in Scotland and do your job. President Trump and Governor Abbott need a focused AG. For once,' Cornyn said in a post on X earlier this week. An unnamed Republican strategist called Paxton's decision to stay in Europe 'a missed opportunity,' but added it was not 'necessarily a vulnerability.' 'Texas Democrats doing this wasn't a surprise,' said an unnamed GOP strategist.'I'm really surprised that Paxton didn't plan better and go 'You know what, I should probably do my visit with Trump and at least come back to Austin for a day and half.'' The same strategist argued that Cornyn's role as a federally elected official has forced him to 'cheer from the stands,' while it is easier for Paxton to get involved as a state elected official. 'It's such a state-centric issue,' the strategist said. 'If anybody, it would traditionally advantage Paxton over Cornyn just given his role in being able to use the Texas judicial system to chase these folks down.' And Paxton has emerged as a prominent voice in the fight. He initially criticized Cornyn's call for the FBI to intervene on Steve Bannon's 'War Room' podcast on Tuesday, saying it was 'purely a state issue.' But Paxton later reversed in a statement to The Hill, saying he was open to the FBI getting involved. 'I'm in full support of using every possible method to secure a quorum and hold lawless Democrat legislators accountable for abandoning Texans, including involving federal authorities and the FBI,' Paxton said. And as state attorney general, Paxton has used his office to take action against Texas Democrats. Paxton announced this week he would seek judicial orders 'declaring that runaway Democrats who fail to appear by the Speaker's deadline have vacated their office.' Additionally, Paxton said he is investigating whether former Rep. Beto O'Rourke's (D-Texas) political group is breaking laws by allegedly 'bankrolling' the state Democratic lawmakers out-of-state travel. 'It's more about the actions he takes, it's more about the statements, it's more about having a voice in this, and you don't necessarily have to be in the state to accomplish that,' Steinhauser said. The pro-Paxton Lone Star Liberty PAC compiled mainstream media coverage of the state's redistricting saga and Paxton's response, along with conservative media figures praising the state attorney general, into a digital spot released on Friday. The redistricting battle comes as Cornyn faces the biggest fight of his political life in his bid to hold onto his seat. Outside groups backing Cornyn have spent swaths of money boosting Cornyn in recent weeks. According to the Texas Tribune, the Senate GOP leadership-affiliated One Nation has spent over $4 million in advertising, while Texans for a Conservative Majority, another pro-Cornyn group, has spent $3.2 million. The pro-Cornyn Conservative Majority Project has spent roughly $500,000. 'They're just throwing everything at the wall possible to try to capture one poll that shows him with momentum and really gaining on Paxton,' the unnamed strategist said. 'They're doing it to get the president's attention.' Most polls have shown Cornyn consistently trailing Paxton in the polls, in many cases by double digits. Cornyn's team has maintained that there is plenty of time to close the gap by next year. There is also the hope that an endorsement from Trump, who has given no indication he will wade into the primary, would boost Cornyn. 'These skirmishes on redistricting and otherwise are just bigger parts of the play for Cornyn in a mad dash to try to do anything he can to take the lead in polling,' the strategist said.


Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
What Russia and Ukraine Are Demanding Ahead of Putin-Trump Alaska Meeting
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. With President Donald Trump's face-to-face meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin looming, there are still unanswered questions about how Ukraine will be involved, and whether the Republican can find a way to bridge the still-substantial distance between Kyiv and Moscow on a ceasefire deal. Trump said he would meet Putin in Alaska on August 15 for a "highly anticipated" summit. It will be the first time the Republican has met the Kremlin chief in person of his second term in office. Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov confirmed the meeting, saying on Saturday that the White House and the Kremlin would be "working vigorously hard" on the summit's agenda in the next few days. "The presidents will undoubtedly focus on discussing ways to reach a sustainable settlement to the Ukraine crisis," Ushakov said. The Trump administration is considering inviting Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky, U.S. media reported on Saturday. Many months of talks on a ceasefire deal for Ukraine have failed to yield an agreement inked by both Kyiv and Moscow. Ukraine agreed to a U.S. proposal in March, and Trump—historically reluctant to overly criticize Putin—has grown increasingly frustrated with the Kremlin chief. U.S. President Donald Trump, right, meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany, on July 7, 2017. U.S. President Donald Trump, right, meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany, on July 7, 2017. AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File What Does Trump Want? Trump, often known for to-and-froing, has been consistent in his calls for an end to the largest conflict on European soil since World War II. A substantial part of his foreign policy has been shaped by his desire to be known as both a dealmaker and a peacemaker. As Moscow increased its aerial assaults on Ukraine in recent months, Trump became more critical of the Kremlin, saying Putin was giving the White House "a lot of b*******." Trump has warmed to Ukraine since the infamous White House meeting with Zelensky in February, during which the president, along with several senior administration officials, berated the Kyiv leader in front of the world's cameras. But as Russia's reluctance to sign a deal continued, Trump greenlet more aid for Ukraine, including air defense supplies to defend the country from Russian attacks, and imposed a deadline of "10 or 12 days" for Russia to agree to a ceasefire deal in early August. This window closed on Friday, but the White House did not appear to institute new economic sanctions on Russia as threatened. "Putin is not interested in a true ceasefire," said Oleksandr Merezhko, the chair of Ukraine's parliamentary foreign affairs committee and a member of Zelensky's party. "He is using negotiations with Trump for only one purpose—to avoid serious sanctions, including secondary sanctions against those countries which buy Russian oil and gas," he told Newsweek. Russia's oil and gas industry is crucial to the country's economy, and Moscow was slapped with sanctions by Ukraine's backers after it launched its full-scale invasion of its neighbor in early 2022. Kyiv has also targeted Russian oil and gas facilities with long-range drone strikes in an attempt to curb the Kremlin's access to the resources propping up its military. Secondary sanctions target third-party buyers of Russian exports, like India and China. Trump became embroiled in a war of words with Russia's former President, Dmitry Medvedev, and deployed two U.S. Navy nuclear submarines after "highly provocative" statements from Medvedev. The former president is currently the deputy chair of Russia's Security Council and well-known for his inflammatory social media commentary. Where Does Ukraine stand? Ukrainian officials frequently say they are seeking an end to the war, but one that does not reward Russia or open the door for Moscow to restart attempts to seize territory from Kyiv. Ukraine has repeatedly said that ceding Ukrainian territory to Russia is off the table. It goes against the country's constitution, Zelensky said again over the weekend. "No one will deviate from this—and no one will be able to," Zelensky said in a post to messaging app Telegram on Saturday. "Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier." Ukraine has consistently said it needs security guarantees, and not to be bound by any limits on the size of its military. Kyiv also does not want to be labeled a neutral state, but one firmly on the path to NATO and European Union membership. Ukraine's memorandum, presented by Kyiv officials during rounds of direct talks with a Russian delegation in Turkey earlier this summer, also said it sought a "full and unconditional ceasefire in the sky, on land and at sea." Furthermore, Kyiv has said an agreement needs to look at humanitarian issues, such as an exchange of all prisoners and the return of children taken from Russian-controlled areas of Ukraine. And Russia's Perspective? Russia's demands have remained far away from what Ukraine appears willing to accept. During direct talks in Istanbul in June, Russia offered up two proposals for a 30-day ceasefire. "The first one is about how to reach a truly lasting peace," Vladimir Medinsky, Russia's chief negotiator, said at the time. "The second part highlights the steps to be taken toward a real ceasefire." One option would have Kyiv withdraw from the eastern regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, collectively known as the Donbas, as well as the southern Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions of Ukraine. Russia declared it had annexed these four mainland Ukrainian regions in fall 2022. It does not fully control these regions, although it has captured much of Luhansk and Donetsk. Moscow annexed Crimea, to the south of the mainland, from Kyiv in 2014. The alternative, Russia said, would be for Ukraine to stop building up its military and halt military aid deliveries, while lifting martial law and opening up to elections. Elections are banned in Ukraine while martial law is in place. A more comprehensive peace agreement would come later, Moscow said, adding no foreign military personnel should be allowed in Ukraine. Russia has pushed for the recognition of its control over the annexed regions, and for Ukraine to abandon its hopes of joining NATO in favor of neutrality. Moscow has also said it wants Kyiv to limit the size of its military and put the Russian language on equal footing with Ukrainian. How Does Europe Fit In? The U.K., France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen issued a joint statement on Sunday, reiterating their support for the "principle that international borders must not be changed by force." "We share the conviction that a diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests," the governments said. European leaders have offered a "counterproposal" following a meeting between Putin and Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, The Wall Street Journal reported. This European plan rejected the idea Ukraine would cede territory it still holds in Donetsk and was presented to the U.S. on Saturday, according to the report.